Latest on MJJC
- Latest Michael Jackson News
- Click Here to Join Our Community
- Follow us on Twitter
- Wanna talk Michael? Come join the chat rooms
- The Michael Jackson Chart Watch
- Become an MJJC Patron
- Join the Premium Member Group and Get Lot's of Extra's
- Major Love Prayer - Worldwide Monthly Prayer Every 25th
- MJJC Exclusive Q&A - We talk to the family and those in and around Michael
- Join us in the Chat Rooms
- Find us on Facebook
Michael Jackson - She Was Lovin' Me [Demo] (Remastered)
- Thread starter Zakk
- Start date
Zakk
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2012
- Messages
- 7,379
- Points
- 63
Your words are kind, i just played it on my stereo.. heard it didn't sound right so i decided to change a few thing's in Audacity
it sounds a little more fresh than it previously did, although i can't compare the two Zakk
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2012
- Messages
- 7,379
- Points
- 63
Thanks for posting Zakk
I didnt hear any differences ;D but that is me
Love the fact this song has a new thread again ...this is def my favorite song of the Xscape album
The Rock version I love the most.
Maybe i should have played 30 seconds of how it sounded before.. their are certainly differences their! in the remastered version you can hear everything more clearly.. not sure if we hear thing's differently but it just has more life, thanks for the feedback anyway
Zakk
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2012
- Messages
- 7,379
- Points
- 63
Zakk
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2012
- Messages
- 7,379
- Points
- 63
Thanks again Zakk
I listened to it 3 times to hear any differences ...lol..blame it on me
seems like there is less bass in it..am I right?
dont know exactly what have changed but it is very subtile
Yeah, their's a little less bass and a little more treble! i listened to it on my speakers, but i didn't want it to sound too different! i just wanted it to be cleaner, and to have a more genuine sound
Treasure
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2013
- Messages
- 2,062
- Points
- 48
Yeah, their's a little less bass and a little more treble! i listened to it on my speakers, but i didn't want it to sound too different! i just wanted it to be cleaner, and to have a more genuine sound
Thats a good thing, as I still like the song very much!
I hate it when people change songs (any songs) into a total disaster
Zakk
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2012
- Messages
- 7,379
- Points
- 63
Yeah, i'm not really good at all.. it's just a shame that they included a mono source on the CD instead of the original slave reel
Treasure
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2013
- Messages
- 2,062
- Points
- 48
Yeah, i'm not really good at all.. it's just a shame that they included a mono source on the CD instead of the original slave reel
Not good at all? you did great!
and it is obvious you have much more knowledge of music than me.
I didn't even know they included the Mono in stead of the original ...phew ...so many different versions h
Zakk
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2012
- Messages
- 7,379
- Points
- 63
That means a lot! thank you so much, and maybe they lost the original reel? and they only had access to the vocal tracks? it's hard to know, but i'm sure they stored the track on a higher quality source! hehe
SmoothGangsta
Proud Member
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2013
- Messages
- 5,490
- Points
- 113
Awesome man. Definitely sounds slightly different. Really wish we had stereo version of this.
Last edited:
Zakk
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2012
- Messages
- 7,379
- Points
- 63
Thanks man, just tryna let people have an easy listen of this wonderful song! and me too, perhaps it will come on a future new technology anthology multi audio channel release? hehe
SmoothGangsta
Proud Member
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2013
- Messages
- 5,490
- Points
- 113
Hopefully haha. Yeah the one on the album sounds really harsh compared.