What's better? Yokohama 1987 or Bucharest 1992?

[simon89]

I started this thread on MJNO, and thought I would revive it on here.

So what do you prefer?

[MJFAN90TN]

If you ask me, I'd say Bucharest 1992. It's much more powerful and the dance moves are better in my opinion.

[daphnieas]

Bucharest all the way!

[Memia]

No doubt whatsoever BAD TOUR owns everything.

[Cinnamon234]

I prefer the Bad Tour over The Dangerous overall, but in this case I have to say "Bucharest" was the better show. The dancing was better, more creative sets, better lighting, better energy from the crowd-just pretty much everything except for the "Human Nature" performance was better at the "Bucharest" show.

[simon89]

...pretty much everything except for the "Human Nature" performance was better at the "Bucharest" show.

It's amazing too see how many rate and comment a concert, performance (or whatever) based on the Human Nature performance and in general. But it's also nice, as HN is the first thing I watch on a concert, too see the different moves each time.

I do it myself!

[mo_rizwan]

Yokohama - 100% Live Singing :wub:

[Girlygirl]

yokohama!! http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/3908/girlhappyqh3.gif

[Chaos]

yokohama!! http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/3908/girlhappyqh3.gif
thats one freaky emo :ermm:



I have to go for 92 just because its a better show http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/3908/girlhappyqh3.gif

[Foxy..]

Yokohama because his form is flawless.

[Girlygirl]

thats one freaky emo :ermm:

I have to go for 92 just because its a better show http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/3908/girlhappyqh3.gif

^http://img503.imageshack.us/img503/6193/thsmileyangrygirlwm1.gif



want a hug chaos? http://img187.imageshack.us/img187/4504/thdrmarioredap5.gif

:wub:






yokohama all the way!!

http://img182.imageshack.us/img182/3204/girlhappyfn8.gif http://img182.imageshack.us/img182/3204/girlhappyfn8.gif http://img182.imageshack.us/img182/3204/girlhappyfn8.gif http://img182.imageshack.us/img182/3204/girlhappyfn8.gif http://img182.imageshack.us/img182/3204/girlhappyfn8.gif

[WritergirlAD]

definitely Bad tour =D

[mjfan 1]

The UNEDITED Sat 1 version of Bucharest

[GAV001]

I love the Bucharest concert, it's just a perfect show. The stage, the costumes, the dance moves, the setlist is all perfect. I watch the Bucharest show alot more than the Yokohama one.

All this talk of Bucharest is making me want to watch the concert now: 'goes to get Bucharest dvd'

[lilseanb]

Bucharest 92 because of thw whole show...had bucharest been competeing with a Bad tour concert from the 88 leg then the BAd tour would have won hands down!

[Bob George]

Yokohama. Better dancing, more live vocals, better setlist, better outfit (anything better than the gold leotard).

[Marilyn Monroe]

bad rules.

[daphnieas]

Yokohama. Better dancing, more live vocals, better setlist, better outfit (anything better than the gold leotard).

The gold leotard was awful, I'll give you that.
I just watched both, Yokohama is def better in the sense that it's a LIVE show, he's actually singing, but performance and energy conerned Bucharest wins for me.

[RockWithLou]

Bucharest. :D
TEH BEST. :wub:

[NinaB]

I'd say Yokohama

[the floacist]

I prefer the Bad Tour over The Dangerous overall, but in this case I have to say "Bucharest" was the better show. The dancing was better, more creative sets, better lighting, better energy from the crowd-just pretty much everything except for the "Human Nature" performance was better at the "Bucharest" show.

If I recall, wasn't the girl he picked for 'Shes Out Of My Life' in the Bad tour here not interesting at all? I mean, she seemed excited but it was like, I'm-winning-a-free-prize-at-a-game-show excited. I was like HELLO.:huh: :lol:

This is a tough one, I think I'm going with Yokohama. Bucharest is great too.

[michaelsson]

Yokohoma is boring compared 2 bucharest/ Bucharest was lighter brighter bangin and the crowd was rockin and the japan crowd was kind jus lookin like omg its mj lol but not really groovin like bucharest

[Bio]

Both are great, but I voted Bucharest.

[MJsPYT1]

LOVE both, but Yokohama!

[je57]

for me Bucharest is better than yokohama

[ScreamX]

Yokohama for the vocals and Bucharest for the dancing

[Dervla]

Yokohama is better from a "live show" point of view and Bucharest is better from a performance point of view...... actually Bucharest!

[eunice]

I LIKE WHOLE BAD TOUR SHOW
THE CUSTUMES-silver, red and black
AND MJ'S MOVE AND GESTURE ON STAGE SO SEXY
EVERYTHING IS AUESOME!

[kingofpopSonia]

Bucharest. i love that much

[FinalEyes]

The Bad Tour, most definitely. :yes:

[wendijane]

1992 i voted

[ForeverBeInPeaceMichael]

Bucharest 1992 :wild:


but i love HIStory tour, the most :wub:

[TialovesMJ]

Bucharest 1992 ...:punk: loved it!!

[michaelsson]

i know we all love the bad tour but i mean seriously yokohama was boring in comparison to bucharest. just because bucharest wasnt all live that makes the yokohama show better? lol. wrong! the better show all around from staging,lighting,performance wise,and crowd interacton is def bucharest. it runs circles around yokohoma. i mean compare the entrances of each show lol. yes yokohoma was all live, and a great show. but bucharest has the better setlist, better tricks and better costumes and a better crowd and michaels energy was on fire! and his performing was just breath-taking and that moonwalk on billie jean was sumthin vicious!

[Frankyboy5]

BUCHAREST DANGEROUS TOUR 1992 FTW!!! :)

Bad Tour 1987 concerts weren't very good when compared to second leg. I tend to look at Billie Jean performances especially, and he often improves performances as it goes from one leg to another. He only started the hopping move (backup yells "Hoo! Hoo!") in the second leg.

But I actually like the HIStory Tour Second Leg most of all, because even though it was lipsynched, his dancing was so amazing during the second leg. In the first leg he had the flu and was too aggressive with moves and often ended up doing "sticky" moonwalks. Best HIStory Tour would be Gothenburg!!!

[wojciszek]

Yokohama = 100% amazing live vocals, and Mike was BAD :]
Bucharest= His vocals weren't in great shape as in for example London or Munich, but compared to Yokohama the dancing were bettr. I voted for Yokohama.

[DStephan]

Yokohama...it was totally live...

[elusive moonwalker]

never seen the full footage but the audio of yokahama is excellent. always playing it in my car. the facts its live and sounds great beats anything else

[Mamaca]

Yokohama 87! The energy is great and Michael sings 100% live. That's what I love most.

[Dri]

Bucharest!YAY!!!:party:

[Themidwestcowboy]

I actully like the Bad Tour over the Dangerous tour, But if i had to chosse between yokohama and bucharest i would have to say bucharest definitley. I mean comeone the set list, the dancing, the lights! man bucharest is really a great concert overall..

[mj_brainiac]

Bad Yokohama.

[MJFanSuus]

Yokohama, 1987
Because he sings everything live!

[Spice]

bucharest for me, mj at his peak and the show was unbelievable from start to finish but yokohama is a very plain one compared but for rawness its amazing

[Snow White luvs Peter Pan]

Go Bucharest!! :dance:

[michaelsson]

bucharest for the win ;)

[Hess]

BAD tour 4ever!

[helena22]

As much as I dig Bad tour as a whole including the Yokohama show, I gotta go with the Bucharest show. IMO, he was fantastic in both, but Bucharest had the crowd reaction. Crowd is a big part of any show. Plus, I feel like the Man In The Mirror finale...alone could make me choose Bucharest over Yokohama, easily.

[iboz75]

That's a tough choice for me, but in the end I'd have to say Yokohama 1987. All of the performances from the Bad Tour was top notch.:)

[michaelsson]

I think pple are missing the whole point of the thread. its not about the bad tour vs the dangerous tour. its about 2 particular shows from each tour. Yokohoma was a great show but bucharest is better. IT had the better setlist, the crowd was booming, the lighting was better, the dancing was better. the entrance killed it. i mean seriously just cuz yokohoma was apart of the tour that shook the earth doesnt mean it was a better show lol, but to each its own

[Agent Nr.47]

Bucharest. Because the Energy is great. Also more Dance...

[RockWithLou]

Yay GO DANGEROUS!!

[big DB]

Bucharest had a better lineup in terms of songs, dancers, band members, everything was in order, the lighting, the videos, everything was just perfect, it was the perfect concert!

[Misuzu]

Yokohama FTW!

[michaelsson]

Yokohama FTW!

But dangerous is slaying bad lol

[ds8989]

Bucharest, 1992

[Mjkop4ever]

Dangerous Tour :punk:

[Cinnamon234]

I think pple are missing the whole point of the thread. its not about the bad tour vs the dangerous tour. its about 2 particular shows from each tour. Yokohoma was a great show but bucharest is better. IT had the better setlist, the crowd was booming, the lighting was better, the dancing was better. the entrance killed it. i mean seriously just cuz yokohoma was apart of the tour that shook the earth doesnt mean it was a better show lol, but to each its own

I agree. It's not about Dangerous vs Bad Tour 'cause in that case i'd say "Bad" all the way, but when you compare these two particular shows, there's just no competition as far as i'm concerned. The Bucharest show absolutely blows Yokohama away. Yokohama was pretty boring compared to the Bucharest show actually. Bucharest was just a much more entertaining show and held my attention the entire time. I never felt bored, not even once like I did during a few times when I was watching Yokohama. The crowd was dead as hell too lol, which didn't help. Yeah i'm all for live singing, but all things considered, it was just not better than the Dangerous performance. No way. I'm glad it's winning!

Bucharest for the win! lol

[Ashtanga]

It is so difficult to answer. lol! I love all tours. Each has a different style and Michael was a state of mind different and special in each one. But the Bad Tour will always be my favorite tour that was then that I became a fan and started to know who was Michael Jackson. Will always be my favorite. :)

[Superstition]

Bad Tour for me. More live singing and more energy.

With that said, I think "This Is It" will best all three of the past world tours. That's my hope and prediction.

[Steve001]

Yoko '87 for sure!!! The RWY and BJ performances alone blow away anything on the sh*tty, heavily edited Bucharest show...

:yes:

[the floacist]

Wow, Yokohama is losing? :mello:

[K.O.S.]

Michael made such an improvement in the Dangerous era.

He has always in my opinion become better with age.

Bad Tour I think is like the prototype of Dangerous Tour, and History Tour is the perfection of Dangerous Tour.

[moonwalker80]

I really dont understand how people can choose Bucharest over Yokohama...Yokohama is 10000% better show. Music, singing, dancing, improvisation...everything is better.

[Mizz Mina]

Yokohama

[Mizz Mina]

Yokohama 1987

[Butterflylady]

Bucharest '92. The concert was mind-blowing, everything was perfect and the public energy awesome! If the public is great, you do your best!! That's what he did!

[Khim]

Both! Yokohama because - 100 % live. Bucharest, dancing is much better.

[pauline]

Bucharest, 1992 of course=]
i like it more~~

[parli123]

I have only seen Bucharest not Yokohama. Would like to see yokohama th judge. But I feel the energy in Romania. However, they could of shown less of the fans and more of Michael..

[kes1984]

I love Yoko cos he sang every song live! And look freakin sexy!!

[littlesparrow]

Hands down Yokohama.
Raw energy, raw talent, all live.

[reggty]

Bucharest of course!

[badtourgirl]

yokohama all the way..
hot yummy delicious...
oh and and he sounds good too... :)
intro to RWY (his confidence is contagious!)
WDAN night glitter suit

hmmm - sorry honey, no movie tonight! I think I wanna ROCK!

[andyroser]

Bucharest man! Dangerous Era is my thinggggg! :)

[Dianelesley]

Yokohama for pure "liveness" but Dangerous for the polished editing.... quality of Yoko is a bit grainy but love it for it's look and feel...

[Michael Jackson Moonwalk]

No doubt whatsoever BAD TOUR owns everything.

I'll testify to that statement!! :bounce: :bounce:

[Word Smith Sr]

I couldn't tell. I like both equally. Both of these have epic moments.

[Tin Angel]

For me it has to be Bucharest. :yes:

[Alyssa]

honestly cant pick between the two, they are both great. but i purely picked 1992 cus i was 1year old!! :P

[BunnyHead]

I never saw the full Yokohama show but his adrenaline was through the roof from what I was able to watch and I want to see the whole thing so bad
, I own the bucharest dvd and he delivered, that is his best Billie Jean performance ever and at the end of human nature when he did the miming it was perfection.

I can't make a choice.

[LoveMJackson]

I love both but I chose bad tour like always.. <3

[Buttercup]

I couldn't tell. I like both equally. Both of these have epic moments.

Amen.

[MJfan10]

I couldn't tell. I like both equally. Both of these have epic moments.

I agree :)

[White Swan]

Bad tour!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://img706.imageshack.us/img706/4418/139wm.th.jpg (http://img706.imageshack.us/i/139wm.jpg/)

[BunnyHead]

How can I see the full yokohama concert???

I am aching to see it now

[analogue]

I think pple are missing the whole point of the thread. its not about the bad tour vs the dangerous tour. its about 2 particular shows from each tour. Yokohoma was a great show but bucharest is better. IT had the better setlist, the crowd was booming, the lighting was better, the dancing was better. the entrance killed it. i mean seriously just cuz yokohoma was apart of the tour that shook the earth doesnt mean it was a better show lol, but to each its own


Damn right!

[AnnieRUOkay89]

Nothing gets better than Yokohama and that epic Billie Jean performance, and Michaels voice was just spectacular.

[Kane]

Yokohoma, simply because it's the Bad tour. And Bad tour basically dominates everything :giggle:

[analogue]

In my opinion the Dangerous tour beats the first leg of the Bad Tour hands down

[DJ Spins the sounds]

Are you all mad! BAD Tour was Michael's tour of tours, live vocals, fast paced dancing, I saw
both tours at Wembley. Michael was on top of his game during BAD tour. Bucharest was good, but does not come close to Yokohama.

[eStyle]

No doubt whatsoever BAD TOUR owns everything.

I agree here!
The Victory and BAD tours are the very bests for me! There's no other concert like them with such power and great performance and all! I know, his performance for the Dangerous tour in bucharest is also very nice and incredible but for me nothing can top the BAD tour, especially the one in Yokohama we are talkin' about!

[Dirty]

yokohama banzai

[QSMJ]

Love both!

But I voted Yokohama.
Because he sings everything live!

[azza]

Bad tour.Yokohama is 100% live.I don't really like the stage for the 87 leg though.The vocals are great.

[eStyle]

Bad tour.Yokohama is 100% live.I don't really like the stage for the 87 leg though.The vocals are great.

Yepp, that's true!
The stage is very boring!...
Just compare it with the one from THIS IS IT, how it should be! :D (just kiddin')

[bowen9999]

Bad Tour for me. I went to Bad & Dangerous concerts - Bad knocked spots off Dangerous!

[Dublinproud]

Bucharest for me!

[BunnyHead]

I finally watched Yokohama, I really can't make a choice because it was two different types of MJ's.

Both concerts were incredible.

[meena]

I love Yokohama !!

Because he sang all songs live ♪

[RockWithYou28]

Are you all mad! BAD Tour was Michael's tour of tours, live vocals, fast paced dancing, I saw
both tours at Wembley. Michael was on top of his game during BAD tour. Bucharest was good, but does not come close to Yokohama.

This!!!

[MJsBollywoodGirl7]

I love and have both concerts. But I voted for Yokohama because one of my most favorite performances of Michael's is on that concert. Which is the Shake Your Body performance. I so love that performance especially the whole thats nasty scene. I so love the look on Michael's face as he was watching that guy. Doing I don't know what.

[mjnana]

Yokohama,for me! Live vocals !!!

[Moonwalker91]

In terms of live singing and dancing I prefer Yokohama but Bucharest is the overall better show so I go for that :)

[anko]

Yokohama ;)

[DeDeviL]

Meaningless topic. Without a doubt, thinking or what so ever - YOKOHAMA ALL THE WAY!!!

[Hope]

I dream about Yokohama. :lol:

[Arklove]

I really love Yokohama...Live vocals, stunning, electrifying dancing....But Bucharest is all around a better show, much more exciting, the crowd is more responsive, I find. Therefore, its get me much more pumped!

[Helen28]

Bucharest, 1992. It was the first concert which I have looked, and I will not have not enough words to transfer all those emotions which have overflowed me when I have seen representation Billie Jean. Michael has amazed me with the beauty, force, artistry at this concert . This representation is filled by the biggest power, boldness.

[_rckwitu]

I found this actually quite hard.
To me, Yokohama because he's singing like, 99% of the time. But Bucharest was were his dancing was at it's best.
But I chose Yokohama because um, that's pure sexiness right there ;)

[00383]

I Vote For Bucharest 1992 They Edit to Perfect concert
that concert Not Bucharest in All they use munich Wembley and Other dangerous tour to combine it.

Bad tour 1987 weren't very good When compare 1988-89

I actually like Bad Tour Second Leg most of all!!

[analogue]

1. Bad Tour 1988/1989
2. Dangerous Tour
3. Bad Tour 1987

[afgtnk]

Yokohama. Was probably at his physical peak at that concert IMO

[MJxEagle]

Yokohama without a doubt.

[N4ty]

Yokohama :dancing:

[mjfan1990]

bucharest 92 better concert my friend dancings better the whole show was amazing

[*Little Suzie*]

Bucharest, 1992!! :D.

[CaptainEoLove85]

I voted Yokohama. I love both concerts, but the thing that bugs me about Bucharest is cutting to the audience too much, and not all of it is concert footage from Bucharest either.

[souldreamer7]

It's so not a fair comparison. That leg of the BAD Tour was not 'up to par' yet. The leg of The Dangerous Tour was. So I can't vote.

:wub:
souldreamer7

[Thrillerbaby82]

This is tough because they are both great shows! Just wish Yokohama had actually more songs from the Bad album but that's because it was in the beginning of the tour. But man I don't know...I love them BOTH hehehe! : )

[Glance]

I love Yokohama too but I'm in love with
!!!Bucharest '92!!!

[hrp102]

The Bad tour by a lot! I hadn't seen any of that until it started showing up on youtube around 2006/2007. Honestly, it took a little while to get past the weird backup dancers, but really it was so good it was hard to believe it was real. The live singing combined with the energy of the whole performance - never seen anything like it.

[MASSDAGOD]

yokohama was MUCH better vocally.

bucharest was MUCH better dancing wise.


If I had to go w/ one, I'd go w/ the yokohama, because I love the singing, but only by a tad; plus he looked a lot more "normal" during the bad tour... IMO

[4u_n_4me]

hmm. Never seen Yokohama, but I voted Bucharest, Co's that's the show that cemented, stamped, sealed, permanetly my love for Michael as a youngster. And now I heard the Bucharest crowd on "Behind The Mask" and saw most of the clips from Bucharest in the "Hold My Hand" video. Bucharest is legend.

[Themidwestcowboy]

yokohama was MUCH better vocally.

bucharest was MUCH better dancing wise.


If I had to go w/ one, I'd go w/ the yokohama, because I love the singing, but only by a tad; plus he looked a lot more "normal" during the bad tour... IMO

Whats wrong with his looks in dangerous?

[claudiadoina]

If I must ...I say YOKOHAMA.
Raw vocals, dance, sexiness.:naughty:

Bucharest was also GREAT but the show was more meant for general audience, meaning under 12 too.

[Rhilo]

I love Bucharest. That said, I voted Yokohama for the raw talent, energy and live singing sans the dazzling sets and special effects.

[wanyllo]

The Dangerous Tour was more amazing than any other show seen before, and probably better than HIStory Tour.

[nicu_mjj]

Yokohama 1987 is 100% live! :)

[8701girl]

I havent seen the yokohama bad concer in full yet, so im gonna vote for bucharest 92!

[L.T.D]

Bucharest by a mile.

Yokohama may be 100% live and his vocals are tons better, but Bucharest is just overall a better show. The set list is better, the dancing is better, the lighting is better, the costumes are better.

The only way in which Yokohama is better is the vocals, and to me...all that I listed above more than makes up for the lack of quality in the vocals, or the lack of live singing.

[if.it.aint.broke.break.it]

Definitely Yokohama. The simpler stage set-up, not too many gimmicks and as far as I know, sang completely live.

[powernoize]

Yokohama 1987, love the beginning leg of the Bad tour....he was in top form!

[mjdong]

This bad comparison

[whosbad]

I think that Bad is the better concert - cause Michael was in a great shape. He didn´t even needed more than 5 or 6 seconds to change another costume and go back on stage. The first time I´ve seen Bad in Yokohama on DVD, I was like: wft????? How can he be so quickly??? :)

[methodman]

Yokohama-He is so energy

[Moon__Walk]

Bucharest, Dangerous Tour is epic...

[MJCHIRS]

I'd like to see MJ in 80s'

[Galactus123]

I say Bucharest. DVD version is great but the unedited version is better. Yokohama concert is a great show but I wanna see the second leg concert. Wembey 1988 would be nice.

[chrissychristina]

what about munich 1997? what are people's opinions on that?

[analogue]

what about munich 1997? what are people's opinions on that?

It's good but Michael did much better performances on different concerts on the HIStory Tour. The Brunei concert had so much energy

[MJBT]

I like them both however I prefer the Second Leg of both the Bad Tour & Dangerous Tour, When the Bad Tour Second Leg gets and official release it will own

[startinsomethin87]

Yokohama. Better vocals ... live vocals ...

[Gregershansen]

Well Yokohama was best when it came to singing, but Bucharest was the best dancing, he kicked serious ass! Plus it was a bigger and greater show in Bucharest

[BenBigBoy]

Bucharest is better but i love you more, Yokohama :D

[MJkana]

Bucharest ;)
but I love Yokohama too :D

[liliyyy]

Yokohama. He's blowing everyone away. So energetic... That's what I call live show.

[Speechlessgirl27]

Definitely Yokohama for me. I wish it was released on dvd

[karom]

I'm Romanian so...I'll go with Bucharest :wild: :lol:

[SimplyMagic]

Bucharest hands down.

[777]

Yokohama... live vocals and more energy

[Leopard]

Bucharest 1992, for sure! Great setlist and a lot of energy.

[ASIS]

The obsession of live vocals is strange to me.

I mean, yes they are important, but they don't make the show for me. Especially when it comes to Michael Jackson.

1992 gets my vote.

[dam2040]

Bucharest. Hands down. Michael's most perfect, energetic performance ever.

[Rudolf]

Bucharest all the way. I became fan after watching Billie Jean in Bucharest DVD version. I agree about Yokohama live singing, but Bucharest overall WAY better show and dancing. Pure power and magic of Michael Jackson. I think History tour would be at bottom of my list of favourite tours. Almost all show playback. Some shows Michael was sick and tired. Lack of energy compared to Dangerous tour.

[analogue]

Look at it this way. Bucherest has Smooth Criminal. Yokohama does not

Bucharest wins lol

[Themidwestcowboy]

^^ MITM also :D

[Rudolf]

^^ MITM also :D

Of course :) Billie Jean and MITM in Bucharest made the whole concert for me :D:D Especially live ad-libs in MITM of Bucharest :)

[analogue]

To be honest i never really considered the 1987 leg of the Bad tour to be true Bad tour concerts. I look at it as more of a warm up to the true Bad tour shows in 88/89

[Galactus123]

Yokohama. Michael's singing was better and he had more energy. I want to see Bad Tour 88 concert too because they are even better.

[roomdownstairs]

Personally Bucharest in 1992, but only because I'm terribly biased in favour of the Dangerous era (first one I remember properly) and watched that more times than Yokohama 87. Bucharest has a certain familiarity from the Dangerous songs - the concert has a totally different feel than the Bad Tour because of those tracks, which I love.

[Go Flying]

Wembley 1988 of course!

[TehHolySpir1t]

Yokohama all the way! The performance is electrifying, the audio is great(!) and the setlist is amazing once you learn to appreciate the older stuff. I think it's safe to say that a Bad Tour '88 show would've won this poll if such a concert was available to us, but - unfortunately - that's not the case.

Bucharest '92 is a fantastic show, but I really hate the audio mix on that concert. Whoever edited the audio for the DVD should go kill themselves. I know it's a bit harsh, but come on! A Michael Jackson concert release deserves more than this low-res, noisy sound mix.

[Rudolf]

Bucharest '92 is a fantastic show, but I really hate the audio mix on that concert. Whoever edited the audio for the DVD should go kill themselves. I know it's a bit harsh, but come on! A Michael Jackson concert release deserves more than this low-res, noisy sound mix.

We have BBC verson as well :)

[TehHolySpir1t]

We have BBC verson as well :)

The BBC version doesn't suffer from the same over-editing as the DVD version, but the audio is still terrible in my opinion. Up until WDAN, the instrumentation drowns in a mix of crowd noise and Michael's distant-sounding voice. It's as far from clean as it gets, at least for a pro recording.

[Rudolf]

The BBC version doesn't suffer from the same over-editing as the DVD version, but the audio is still terrible in my opinion. Up until WDAN, the instrumentation drowns in a mix of crowd noise and in Michael's distant voice. It's as far from clean as it gets, at least for a pro recording.

IMWhizzle remastered BBC audio till BOW. It's on 2000watts ;)

[TehHolySpir1t]

IMWhizzle remastered BBC audio till BOW. It's on 2000watts ;)

Is it any better than those FLAC-files from the Bucharest show?

[Rudolf]

Is it any better than those FLAC-files from the Bucharest show?

http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/threads/89376-Dangerous-Tour-Bucharest-REAL-REMASTERED.?highlight=imwhizzle

[paisleyCUTtop]

I prefer Bucharest 92 but that's because it was my first concert experience watching it on HBO as a kid :)

[SmoothC21]

Bucharest! The performance was so powerful and we can watch it in great quality :)

[msdeweydiva]

Bucharest, baby! I also remember being spellbound in front of the television watching him. :wub:

[GlovedPimp]

Yokohama ofcourse!! The BAD tour was the best!

[MJelboo]

That's a really tough one. The dancing's best in 1991, the singing in 1987. It sort of evens each other out.

[HIStory88]

i prefer Yokohoma, Michaels ''Bad'' Tour was the best! :clapping:

[Galactus123]

I watched Yokohama again yesterday and it was amazing! I think it is better than Bucharest because all singing is live.

[lom kit]

It's like asking, what tastes better coca cola or pepsi.
Dangerous = coke