Page 1180 of 1180 FirstFirst ... 180680108011301170117811791180
Results 17,686 to 17,698 of 17698

Thread: [Discussion] Sexual abuse claims against MJ Estate (Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe)

   
  1. #17686
    Points: 28,548, Level: 99
    Level completed: 12%, Points required for next Level: 1,452
    Overall activity: 74.0%
    Achievements:
    Created Blog entryThree FriendsVeteran25000 Experience Points
    PoP's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Northern Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    4,968
    Points
    28,548
    Level
    99
    Blog Entries
    22
    Thanks
    512
    Thanked 1,092 Times in 693 Posts

    Default Re: [Discussion] Sexual abuse claims against MJ Estate (Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe)

    Quote Originally Posted by Goddess4Real View Post
    I see another opportunist coming out for attention and $$$$$ man of honor my ass!

    COMING CLEAN
    Anthony Pellicano Slams Michael Jackson In Shocking Prison Interview Ahead Of Release

    Famed private investigator Anthony Pellicano has spoken out about his controversial client, Michael Jackson, revealing that he let him go after finding the dark truth behind his actions.

    In a shocking interview with The Hollywood Reporter, the jailed investigator came clean about everything he’s learned in the past few years, and how maintaining his loyalty to clients and friends remains his biggest motto.
    As RadarOnline.com readers know, Pellicano, 73, was arraigned in 2002 facing allegations of computer hacking, illegal wiretapping, threats and harassment, among other crimes. He was given 15 years in prison in 2008 but was resentenced in 2017. He is set to be released in one year.

    Speaking of his notorious 1993 client, Michael Jackson, Pellicano claimed he “fired” the singer because he was disgusted by the dark truths than that were never exposed in Jackson’s child molestation scandal.

    “I was offered $500,000 to tell the whole story by a tabloid, and I declined, even though, while incarcerated, I needed the money,” admitted Pellicano, adding that loyalty has always been essential to him, even though it let him to where he is now (in jail).

    When asked about Jackson’s alleged dirty secrets, Pellicano told THR: “All of that would get too close to the truth, so, regretfully, I have to decline.”

    Speaking of the time he got caught (in 2002) with “a C-4 and two grenades that were locked in one of my evidence safes,” he said they belonged to one of his clients, but he refused to disclose the name, even though withholding that information landed him in prison.

    “I got convicted of committing crimes I did not commit. I had to listen to testimony of those who got up on the stand and lied. I changed a lot of lives for the better, helped a whole lot of people who were all grateful at the time. That’s what I kept in mind as I took all the heat — alone. As things got troublesome for me, they all took off for the hills,” Pellicano said in his interview.

    When asked if he has any regrets, he answered “no,” although he does “wish that I had been more careful at the end,” and much less loyal to some people.

    “My honor and word meant, and still mean, everything to me. Without that, I cannot, and could never, consider myself a man — especially a man of his word. One who does what he says he’s going to do.”
    Why that backstabbing FER!!! Well you know what? He deserves to stay in jail then. I'm getting sick and tired of the those fing backstabbers, not only their adding fuel to the fire, but they're putting themselves into my h8t list! F them all to hell!
    SUPPORTER/FAN of MICHAEL JACKSON & NARUHINA

  2. #17687
    Points: 3,083, Level: 34
    Level completed: 22%, Points required for next Level: 117
    Overall activity: 99.7%
    Achievements:
    Overdrive1000 Experience Points1 year registered
    Goddess4Real's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    821
    Points
    3,083
    Level
    34
    Thanks
    65
    Thanked 526 Times in 247 Posts

    Default Re: [Discussion] Sexual abuse claims against MJ Estate (Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe)

    And u know by doing these interviews he is shopping for future interviews book deals etc (because he said he was broke). He looks the type and in this climate where a mere allegation can destroy a career....I bet he is rubbing his hands right now. Also unfortunately with MJ still being a tabloid punching bag he is gonna use him to line his pockets. Especially next year being the 10th anniversary of MJ's death.
    Last edited by Goddess4Real; 14-02-2018 at 11:11 PM.

  3. #17688
    Points: 74,659, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 15.0%
    Achievements:
    Three FriendsVeteranOverdrive50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    41,210
    Points
    74,659
    Level
    100
    Thanks
    118
    Thanked 8,813 Times in 2,940 Posts

    Default Re: [Discussion] Sexual abuse claims against MJ Estate (Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe)

    Is he still at it. *yawn* talk about old hat. Next!

  4. #17689
    Points: 12,067, Level: 72
    Level completed: 5%, Points required for next Level: 383
    Overall activity: 62.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience PointsThree Friends

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    7,365
    Points
    12,067
    Level
    72
    Thanks
    485
    Thanked 1,597 Times in 598 Posts

    Default Re: [Discussion] Sexual abuse claims against MJ Estate (Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe)

    Quote Originally Posted by Goddess4Real View Post
    And u know by doing these interviews he is shopping for future interviews book deals etc (because he said he was broke). He looks the type and in this climate where a mere allegation can destroy a career....I bet he is rubbing his hands right now. Also unfortunately with MJ still being a tabloid punching bag he is gonna use him to line his pockets. Especially next year being the 10th anniversary of MJ's death.
    No one cares about this fool. The more these types of clowns talk, the more innocent MJ look and gets proven. At that time even after 1993, MJ was still under investigation. Why did he give what is he 'claiming" to Tom Sneddon? MJ had a trial, why didn't anything he have that he claim was "dirt" to come out in that trial in 2005 or given the grand juries 1993 and 2005 he had nothing and he was a con artist (you can just see it. If he had any creditable dirt on MJ, you can believe he would have used it in the 90's during the investigation. All these jerks including Wade, tabloids, etc use the same wordings such as "bombshell", "dirt", "explosive", blah, blah to talk about MJ and this nonsense, and in the end, as usual, It is BS and clearly lies or nothing. Funny, Quincy came out with his trash and in the same period, this is being shown in all else TALOID Press. MJ had a trial even with the 1993 case coming into the trial in 2005 and MJ was investigated as I keep saying worst than a serial killer. Fool, sit you azz down jail bird. No one with a brain listen to Wade and Jimmy and saw through their lies let alone a slick so called investigator who sits in prison. And at this point, the overall public is getting tired of "claims" on people which is now falling on deaf ears with the exception of a few people. Even with Quincy, the majority of people trashed him for what he did.
    Last edited by terrell; 16-02-2018 at 03:23 AM.
    Mike's PYT

  5. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to terrell For This Useful Post:


  6. #17690
    Points: 4,393, Level: 42
    Level completed: 22%, Points required for next Level: 157
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    1000 Experience Points1 year registered

    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    963
    Points
    4,393
    Level
    42
    Thanks
    153
    Thanked 771 Times in 332 Posts

    Default Re: [Discussion] Sexual abuse claims against MJ Estate (Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe)

    Of course the media once again doesn't fact check and doesn't apply common sense when someone trashes MJ with unproven innuendo.

    Assuming that the media didn't put words in Pellicano's mouth just to trash MJ once again
    what Pellicano says makes absolutely no sense.

    1. He now says he was fired but in 1993 and in 2011 he said he quit on his own. So which one?

    "I swear on my children this decision was not Michael Jackson's," Pellicano said in an interview Tuesday. "It was my sole decision. If I wanted to, I could be working on this case today."
    http://articles.latimes.com/1993-12-...ichael-jackson
    2. In reality he left the case after his long time mentor and employer Bert Fields also quit.

    Private investigator Anthony Pellicano and lawyer Bertram Fields, one of Jackson's team of legal advisers, resigned privately in recent weeks--Pellicano quit last Wednesday and Fields quit Dec. 3--sources close to the entertainer said.

    In a statement released by his office, Fields said he had resigned Nov. 23 and had put the resignation in writing Dec. 3.

    http://articles.latimes.com/1993-12-...ichael-jackson
    3. Even after Pellicano quit and no longer worked for MJ he kept insisting that he was innocent. So contrary to what he said in 2011 he didn't **** him over at all.

    Later in the interview, Pellicano reveals that when he agreed to work for Jackson during the star’s 1993 child-molestation case, he warned Jackson that he’d better not be guilty. “I said, ‘You don’t have to worry about cops or lawyers. If I find out anything, I will f--k you over.’ ” The detective took the assignment, but says, “I quit because I found out some truths…He did something far worse to young boys than molest them.” But he refuses to say anything more about it.

    http://www.newsweek.com/anthony-pell...-silence-67115

    vs.

    December 22, 1993, more than two weeks after he resigned or was fired
    "In no way, shape or form does (my resignation) indicate that Michael Jackson is guilty," Pellicano said. "Michael Jackson is not guilty, and all the things I said in the past I reaffirm."

    http://articles.latimes.com/1993-12-...ichael-jackson
    January 25, 1994
    Pellicano--who no longer works for Jackson but who still fiercely proclaims the entertainer's innocence and opposes any effort to settle the civil case--scoffed at that and suggested that prosecutors and lawyers in the civil case are orchestrating an effort to dismiss all the cases.

    "If you believe that," he said of Montagna's comments, "I'll sell you some bayou land."
    http://articles.latimes.com/1994-01-...1_civil-case/2

    4. He worked for MJ for years. In 1993 after the Chandlers accused him he described MJ as one of the kindest most decent people he knew.

    "People are always trying to extort him for all kinds of reasons because he's a superstar," Pellicano said. "I have worked for Michael Jackson for many years and have gone through many of these.

    "This one just happened to have gone too far. Michael is probably one of the most kind and decent men I've ever met, and this is horrible.

    http://articles.latimes.com/1993-08-...ichael-jackson
    So through all those years he didn't find any evidence that he molested anyone let alone did worse than that but we are supposed to believe that in Dec 1993 all of sudden he found the smoking gun and his reaction to that was not give it to the police so could "**** MJ" as he supposedly promised he would do but just to resign and keep defending MJ in the media. And this all happened coincidentally right after his friend and employer Bert Fields was fired for incompetence.

    5. Pellicano kept defending MJ privatety too. He talked to Jim Mitteager , a tabloid broker who had a tendency to record his conversations with everyone
    he recorded this conversation with Pellicano in Sept 1994. The transcript was published in Aphrodite Jones old website.

    September 1994

    PELLICANO: You have to understand something. I have nine kids. Michael [Jackson] plays with my baby. They crawl all over him. They pull his hair. They pull his nose. Sometimes he wears a bandage across his face. If I let my own kids (unintelligible) do you think there’s a chance?

    MITTEAGER: Well, all things being equal, I would say, no.

    PELLICANO: Not only that. If you sat this kid [Jordie Chandler] down like I did, as a matter of fact, he couldn’t wait to get up and go play video games. I said, “you don’t understand how serious this is. Your dad [Evan Chandler] is going to accuse Michael of sexual molestation. He going to say all kinds of stuff.” He [Jordie] says, “Yeah, my dad’s trying to get money.” As a matter of fact, I (unintelligible) for 45 minutes. Then I tried tricking him. I mean, I want you to know, I’m a vegetarian. I picked this kid with a fine tooth comb. So we’re there (unintelligible) with this kid... and If you sat down and talked to this kid, there wouldn’t be any doubt in your mind either. And I said Michael is all upset. We went over and over. I tried to get him to sit down and he wants to play video games while I’m sitting there. I’m sitting there with the kid’s mother [June Chandler] and David Swartrz walks in and (unintelligible) what’s this all about? And [Barry] Rothman (unintelligible) asking questions. There is no question that Rothman (unintelligible) what this is all about.”

    https://web.archive.org/web/20120317...kson_Trial.htm

    6. Another Mitteager Pellicano phone transcript which Paul Barresi gave to the Sunday People for that bogus FBI files story also
    shows that Pellicano believed MJ was innocent AFTER he resigned. Dec 10 1993

    "There is no other kid. They keep looking and looking and calling and caliing. There is no other kid."

    And Pellicano didn't have any incriminating info regarding Wade Robson either.



    7. Bert Fields employed Pellicano. Bert Fields represented MJ's nephews in the case against Radar Online. He again defended MJ against
    molestation claims. If he had believed that MJ was a molester or worse as Pellicano now insinuates would he have took up a case
    where he had to argue that MJ was not a molester? Bert Fields opposed any settlement and tried to get the criminal case go first. Would he have
    done that if he had info that MJ was worse than a molester?


    8. Pellicano testified to the Santa Barbara Grand Jury and if he had revealed any incriminating info about MJ Sneddon obviously would have used it. So Pellicano now wants to say that he lied under oath to protect MJ who was no longer his client even though he supposedly told him he will **** him if he finds out he was guilty?

    9. The FBI investigated both Pellicano and MJ. There is nothing in MJ's FBI files that came from Pellicano and there is nothing Sneddon ever tried to use against MJ
    that came from Pellicano.

    10. Pellicano wants us to believe that all these years he was sitting on evidence that MJ did worse to those boys than molest them
    but now that he needs money, by his own admission, he is willing to reveal it? If he had evidence that would have proven MJ's guilt
    and kept it to himself he would be guilty of obstruction of justice and does he wants us to believe that he protected a child molester
    and worse all through the years?

    11. He says he was not willing to reveal that supposed evidence not even for $500 000 but he freely admits that he needs money.
    So let's put this together: he told MJ he will **** him if he founds out he is guilty. He found evidence that he did worse than molest those boys
    so in Dec 1993 he quit or was fired which ever version he prefers. Then instead of ****ing him he testified under oath and said nothing bad about MJ
    and kept defending him in the media. He was interviewed for PBS's Tabloid Truth and there he didn't say anything bad about MJ either.
    http://<a href="https://www.youtube....WoX4gd4JW0</a>

    12. If Robson and Safechuck's lawyers took this fool seriously they would have tried to depose him for their lawsuit. The fact that they didn't even bother proves that they know Pellicano has nothing. In fact Robson's lawyer keeps talking about Pellicano as someone who was on MJ's side and who came in and somehow forced Robson to defend MJ even thought the Robsons defended MJ before they had any contact with Pellicano.

    13. What on earth can be worse than molestation? Rape? No kid even accused him of that , Robson accuses him of attempted rape in 1997 after Pellicano was long out of the picture. Chandler, Francia, Safechuck accused him of molestation.

    14. It makes no sense at all that Pellicano would tell MJ if you are guilty and I find out I will **** you and then MJ would keep him if he is guilty. Why would he want such a guy to interview Chandler and other boys? Why would he want him to work for him at all? And we are supposed to believe that MJ risked having such a guy uncover his dirty business then when he found out that Pellicano found out his dirty business he didn't try to keep him silent by paying him rather he fired him? Which would have guaranteed that he would have revealed the smoking gun he found. Again, this just makes no sense because it never happened.

    Pellicano may try to fabricate some evidence , some tape which then the media will use to "prove" MJ was guilty. He may fabricate transcripts and sell them to tabloids and the media won't fact check. He may just support Safechuck and Robson
    and say that Robson told him certain things during their interview but asked him not to attack MJ out of loyalty.


    What would be really great to know whether Pellicano indeed talked to Gutierrez or not. Gutierrez says in his book that he did and Pellicano threatened his life, which is most likely bullshit but even if it happened Pellicano is a scum and Gutierrez is a scum so it doesn't prove MJ wanted Pellicano to threaten Gutierrez let alone because Gutierrez was getting the truth about him being a pedophile.

    Would be great to know what exactly happened after Gutierrez approached Joy Robson in 1992 and told her that he was investigating MJ for being a pedophile. According to Jermaine's book Joy took Gutierrez's business card and reported him to MJ's people. But which people? Who knew about Gutierrez? Pellicano? Jermaine should have investigated this further.
    Last edited by redfrog; 16-02-2018 at 04:17 AM.

  7. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to redfrog For This Useful Post:


  8. #17691
    Points: 2,133, Level: 27
    Level completed: 89%, Points required for next Level: 17
    Overall activity: 59.0%
    Achievements:
    1000 Experience Points1 year registered

    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    366
    Points
    2,133
    Level
    27
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 218 Times in 111 Posts

    Default Re: [Discussion] Sexual abuse claims against MJ Estate (Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe)

    Thanks for the info redfrog, I don't really expect tabloids to research their reports these days - I've seen far too many MJ reports to know it just doesn't happen. I guess in reality they don't have hours to trawl through old transcripts, court documents etc. They just spew their crap all over the page and move on to the next story. In fact I wish somebody WOULD do their research AND be allowed to publish it in a mainstream news outlet. We know people have researched in the past and been actively blocked from expressing their views publicly. This happens with TV producers, tabloid print media, websites, book publishers. It's disgusting really, but after decades of reporting that MJ is a criminal I guess they're now afraid that the public who now 'know' this man to be a criminal will criticise them for defending a monster. It's not the done thing you see. In fact I wouldn't mind betting that half the people in charge at these places believe the stories themselves as some of them would have grown up reading about the 'crimes'. Sadly the narrative has been allowed to play out for far too long and it's been written into the consciousness of too many people. the only way this will EVER change is if key players come forward in a very public way and admit it was all false, hopefully in relation to the Chandler case as that was the catalyst for all this, but also for other cases.

    Of course, if Pellicano actually said what is being reported then he is aiming for a big book deal to line his pockets when he leaves. I guess he could of couse use his vast insider knowledge to write an 'explosive' tell-all book about how the MJ case was a set up, but perhaps the pay day is bigger if you write the opposite!

  9. #17692
    Points: 12,067, Level: 72
    Level completed: 5%, Points required for next Level: 383
    Overall activity: 62.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience PointsThree Friends

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    7,365
    Points
    12,067
    Level
    72
    Thanks
    485
    Thanked 1,597 Times in 598 Posts

    Default Re: [Discussion] Sexual abuse claims against MJ Estate (Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe)

    Even the overall media is not following this guy. ONLY the same old tabloid junkies See Redfog how you broke everything down that can be TRACED (I remember seeing him quit during the time you said. And remember, I knew one of the officer who searched MJ home in 1993 and even he said that is a witch hunt). Once again, when you have this much lyin, changing stories, etc with the type of investigation MJ went through, it means one thing. BULL@#$
    Last edited by terrell; 17-02-2018 at 12:55 AM.
    Mike's PYT

  10. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to terrell For This Useful Post:


  11. #17693
    Points: 3,083, Level: 34
    Level completed: 22%, Points required for next Level: 117
    Overall activity: 99.7%
    Achievements:
    Overdrive1000 Experience Points1 year registered
    Goddess4Real's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    821
    Points
    3,083
    Level
    34
    Thanks
    65
    Thanked 526 Times in 247 Posts

    Default Re: [Discussion] Sexual abuse claims against MJ Estate (Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe)

    Quote Originally Posted by terrell View Post
    Even the overall media is not following this guy. ONLY the same old tabloid junkies See Redfog how you broke everything down that can be TRACED (I remember seeing him quit during the time you said. And remember, I knew one of the officer who searched MJ home in 1993 and even he said that is a witch hunt). Once again, when you have this much lyin, changing stories, etc with the type of investigation MJ went through, it means one thing. BULL@#$
    Thanks for all the receipts......it will become handy when he crawls from under his rock next year
    Keep Calm & Listen to MJ

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Goddess4Real For This Useful Post:


  13. #17694
    Points: 7,626, Level: 58
    Level completed: 38%, Points required for next Level: 124
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Three FriendsVeteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Neverland
    Posts
    687
    Points
    7,626
    Level
    58
    Thanks
    25
    Thanked 69 Times in 25 Posts

    Default Re: [Discussion] Sexual abuse claims against MJ Estate (Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe)

    So now another snake awaiting to jump on the Vicious & Slanderous Bandwagon.Seriously Celebrities are target's But Michael Jackson is on another Level.
    It has now passed beyond laughable been a fan for over 3 decades to witness all the opportunist appear from no where with these crazy claims,It has become the norm.I am not gonna go too deep but lets just say people really close to Michael have tried to screw the man out of his hard earned $$$$ so Pellicano is just another name in a Looooong list of vultures.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Kingofthedancefloor For This Useful Post:


  15. #17695
    Points: 8,607, Level: 62
    Level completed: 53%, Points required for next Level: 143
    Overall activity: 55.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    ILoveHIStory's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    419
    Points
    8,607
    Level
    62
    Thanks
    503
    Thanked 673 Times in 193 Posts

    Default Re: [Discussion] Sexual abuse claims against MJ Estate (Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe)

    maybe some of you remember covering the cases by Roger Fried.man, and he in his articles literally wrote around 2003-2005 that he had some tapes and evidence from his then deceased friend and investigative journalist (I dont know his name now) who left him all his files and records (died on cancer), and RF wrote that he knew that MJ had been innocent in the 1993 case and that there had been the conspiracy against MJ!!!!!

    I had a copy of the article, but lost it in my old pc, but I do remember it!!!

  16. #17696
    Points: 74,659, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 15.0%
    Achievements:
    Three FriendsVeteranOverdrive50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    41,210
    Points
    74,659
    Level
    100
    Thanks
    118
    Thanked 8,813 Times in 2,940 Posts

    Default Re: [Discussion] Sexual abuse claims against MJ Estate (Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe)

    Was it mitiger?

  17. #17697
    Points: 8,607, Level: 62
    Level completed: 53%, Points required for next Level: 143
    Overall activity: 55.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    ILoveHIStory's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    419
    Points
    8,607
    Level
    62
    Thanks
    503
    Thanked 673 Times in 193 Posts

    Default Re: [Discussion] Sexual abuse claims against MJ Estate (Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe)

    I just dont remember his name

  18. #17698
    Points: 5,918, Level: 49
    Level completed: 84%, Points required for next Level: 32
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    369
    Points
    5,918
    Level
    49
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Re: [Discussion] Sexual abuse claims against MJ Estate (Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe)

    If Pelicano had anything 'serious' against MJ he would have bargained it with Sneddon during the 05 case when prosecutors were desparate for any real incriminating evidence from the past. He could have tried to reduce his jail time -and they probably would have given him anything he has asked for in return for any reliable 'dirt' from the past. the fact he didn't try back then, shows he's got nothing

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •