Katherine Jackson: Statement About Attorney

[blueocean]

There is no legal mother of record for Blanket. His birth certificate says "Unknown" for the mother. Therefore, his legal next of kin are his siblings Prince & Paris. If the 2002 will is invalidated, the 1997 will would be probated. Unfortunately for Katherine and the Jackson Family, the terms of the 1997 will so happens to be identical to the 2002 will. The only exception is that Paris and Blanket were not in that will. The courts will then abide by the 40% 40% 20% split and add Paris and Blanket to the terms as they are Michael's children. John Branca and John McClain would still be Executors as they are named executors in the 1997 will.

If the 1997 will for whatever reason is invalidated, the courts would give 100% of Michael's estate to the children. The children would then be appointed another Guardian Ad Litem (most likely an attorney) who will oversee the estate until the children are of legal age to administer it themselves. Then the situation becomes dicey because if the wills are invalidated, that means guardianship (Michael's wishes) are invalidated as well. Which mean the State of California would seek their next of kin, which happens to be Debbie Rowe, NOT Katherine Jackson.

Debbie Rowe, much like Larry Birkhead could become very powerful if the wills are invalidated. She could get custody of her children, get custody of Blanket, and legally administer Michael Jackson's estate until the children are of age.

I pray for Katherine because she is being led astray on this one.

Debbie rowe did not want custody of the kids, i believe she is a good person, i dont believe she will ask for custody of the kids when the kids love there grandmother and want to be with her. no body really know what all there evidence is, and katherine was with michael in 2005 about the estate trustee. katherine has been on the inside of michael business with the estate.

[qbee]

Regardles the children belong with their grandmother NOt Debbie
Michael didnt want Debbie to have those children.

she was left completly out of the will by Michael
becuase she was already being compensated ..
she didnt want to be a mother - she wanted MJ to have children
she doesnt want the publicity that goes alaong with it either,

Dont make MONEY the prioroty here .
there is more to be concerned about then how the money is managed
those children are not going to be hurting for money ..

Those children have NO relationship with Debbie
it would be devastating for them_ Liker giving the
to strangers to raise _ They love thier grandma
and their cousins _ Thats where they belong

Thats where Michael wanted them PERIOD
regardless of what anyone else here thinks or says against Michael wishes

[back]

I shall be brief but to the point.

These veiled slights and the utter disrespect towards Mr. Jackson's family members, particularly Ms. Katherine Jackson, should seriously be addressed and furthermore, not tolerated here in this prestigious forum. Regardless of opinions about certain issues, either way, there are surely details that few are privvy to that may help to broaden each of your perspectives accordingly. I can personally say that reading certain responses levelled at Mr. Jackson's Mother has left me baffled, for it is no secret that he would be trully devastated to witness any fan/supporter/confidant besmirching his Mother in ANY circumstance. I've even seen some disgraceful utterances about Ms. Jackson's "intent" throughout this very trying ordeal. Though I choose not to broadcast the emotions and passions I have in this regard, I will say that "enraged" puts it lightly. Deference should be entertained where it is most definitely lacking.

To conclude, I'd say-----> put yourself in the shoes of another and try your best to walk their path while adjusting to the hand they're dealt before you assume and assume and assume and assume and assume and ASSume yourself into an oblivious state; unwilling to see things you saw before. Words can be very hurtful and I'm sure you're aware of this!

As Bono would say, "I knew more THEN than I know NOW"---in this CIrcumsTanc-E of many blinding lights.

Keep WATCHIN'.......

[blueocean]

right now , the jacksons have no chance in hell in getting near the decision table . their actions speak desperation on their part .

Notice it is no longer MJ was under "undue influence" becaue they probably figured out it was not gonna work out , now it is MJ did not sign the will . well, what about the 1997 will .

notice that they don't even have the 1997 will . because under law Branca is only obligated to hand the newest one . How do they will explain the one from 1997 ?


all they want is for Branca to allow Randy as an executor , that's it , and Branca is saying NO WAY . they will make his life a living hell , but they will not succeed in appointing Randy as a third executor .

you will have to wait and see they way this plays out, and god willing maybe this will uncover the conspiracy that i believe envolve branco and the gang. that was behind michael murder. and about the will of 1997 being the same and updated to ad blanket, the will singnature could be forgery michael was in new york and the will say he was in los angeles on july 7 2002, there were rumors of another will dont know if they have evidence of this or not, but londell say the have evidence and he seem confident of what they have.

[back]

We should always let the light shine.....

For it illuminates

Keep WATCHIN'.......

[Trish]

Regardles the children belong with their grandmother NOt Debbie
Michael didnt want Debbie to have those children.

she was left completly out of the will by Michael
becuase she was already being compensated ..
she didnt want to be a mother - she wanted MJ to have children
she doesnt want the publicity that goes alaong with it either,

Dont make MONEY the prioroty here .
there is more to be concerned about then how the money is managed
those children are not going to be hurting for money ..

Those children have NO relationship with Debbie
it would be devastating for them_ Liker giving the
to strangers to raise _ They love thier grandma
and their cousins _ Thats where they belong

Thats where Michael wanted them PERIOD
regardless of what anyone else here thinks or says against Michael wishes

I agree with you completely and I hope and pray for Katherine - that she is not being led astray. It was wonderful to see her smile the other night after Dancing With The Stars. I want her to be happy with her beautiful grandkids whom she adores. I just don't want her to make a mistake in haste, that could potentially cost her everything.

If there is something wrong with Branca, then it will all be revealed. As it stands, Michael wanted Branca involved and he never once changed that. From 1997 to his death, his will remained unchanged. I just hope that the family can accept that and leave it be, unless they TRULY have evidence to show that Branca is unfit to be executor. Otherwise, they are wasting Katherine's time and money.

I'm afraid that if this tug of war keeps up, that the victim in all of this will not only be Katherine, but Michael's children. I hope it all ends amicably.

[Trish]

Debbie rowe did not want custody of the kids, i believe she is a good person, i dont believe she will ask for custody of the kids when the kids love there grandmother and want to be with her. no body really know what all there evidence is, and katherine was with michael in 2005 about the estate trustee. katherine has been on the inside of michael business with the estate.

It doesn't matter. The law is the law and Debbie Rowe never once gave up her parental rights. If those wills are invalidated, Katherine will lose everything and the estate will be 100% the children. Their next of kin is Debbie Rowe, not Katie. Katherine could lose everything. That is why she must be very careful and not be led astray by family and/or outside forces.

[#1MJstan]

Regardles the children belong with their grandmother NOt Debbie
Michael didnt want Debbie to have those children.

she was left completly out of the will by Michael
becuase she was already being compensated ..
she didnt want to be a mother - she wanted MJ to have children
she doesnt want the publicity that goes alaong with it either,

Dont make MONEY the prioroty here .
there is more to be concerned about then how the money is managed
those children are not going to be hurting for money ..

Those children have NO relationship with Debbie
it would be devastating for them_ Liker giving the
to strangers to raise _ They love thier grandma
and their cousins _ Thats where they belong

Thats where Michael wanted them PERIOD
regardless of what anyone else here thinks or says against Michael wishes

good post Qbee

[back]

Ms. Brown

You can take solace in the fact that Ms Jackson and those three Angelics will be just fine...when all the smoke clears.

Light is very much needed in these times of "darkness"

Keep WATCHIN'.......

[Autumn II]

It seems that thus far, every indication is that Debbie wants what's best for Michael's children. Unless there is strife in Hayvenhurst that is harming them emotionally (and we don't have that information), I'd expect that Debbie would leave the children with Katherine, regardless of which will, or both, or none, is invalidated.

[MsMo]

I shall be brief but to the point.

These veiled slights and the utter disrespect towards Mr. Jackson's family members, particularly Ms. Katherine Jackson, should seriously be addressed and furthermore, not tolerated here in this prestigious forum. Regardless of opinions about certain issues, either way, there are surely details that few are privvy to that may help to broaden each of your perspectives accordingly. I can personally say that reading certain responses levelled at Mr. Jackson's Mother has left me baffled, for it is no secret that he would be trully devastated to witness any fan/supporter/confidant besmirching his Mother in ANY circumstance. I've even seen some disgraceful utterances about Ms. Jackson's "intent" throughout this very trying ordeal. Though I choose not to broadcast the emotions and passions I have in this regard, I will say that "enraged" puts it lightly. Deference should be entertained where it is most definitely lacking.

To conclude, I'd say-----> put yourself in the shoes of another and try your best to walk their path while adjusting to the hand they're dealt before you assume and assume and assume and assume and assume and ASSume yourself into an oblivious state; unwilling to see things you saw before. Words can be very hurtful and I'm sure you're aware of this!

As Bono would say, "I knew more THEN than I know NOW"---in this CIrcumsTanc-E of many blinding lights.

Keep WATCHIN'.......

[williamorange1]

Unless there is strife in Hayvenhurst that is harming them emotionally (and we don't have that information),

well, Oxman , Lester ( both on behalf of Randy ) and Latoya come to mind .

[Asedora]

debbie need to get them chillun NOW. lol sorry but this is a mess. she made sure joe was out of the picture but i bet she had no idea she had to keep jermaine and randy out, as well. and can she? since their children live at the house and are close to the kids now? this is one big damn mess. rndy need to go and sit down.

Debbie has to shut up forever. She is not their mother she sold those kids.This is it. The question with Debbie has to be closed by now. Kids are big enough to make their own decision where they want to be.
Read Rabbi's book and you will see WHAT MJ said about Debbie. He didn't want her to be around those kids because the nature of their relationships was NOT appropriate for kids to have her beside them.

[Thetruthbetold]

debbie need to get them chillun NOW. lol sorry but this is a mess. she made sure joe was out of the picture but i bet she had no idea she had to keep jermaine and randy out, as well. and can she? since their children live at the house and are close to the kids now? this is one big damn mess. rndy need to go and sit down.

Yes every body has their own opinions of debbie thanks to the ****ing media when the truth gets out like i said before every body will look down. She loves her kids but sadly I don't see her getting close to them as of right now the Jackson are focus on Justice for Michael. At the end of the day YES she can snatch her kids any time but off the strength Michael and the way things went down she has respect for Mrs.Jackson so it is what it is people are watching and talking I wish they could handle their business behind close doors cause the media having a field day. Katherine only doing what she feels is right for her son that's understandable but her kids needs to fall back and let their mother handle it. The truth is so serious that's all i'm saying for now u all will see

[elusive moonwalker]

Debbie has to shut up forever. She is not their mother

in the eyes of the law she is which is all that matters not your obviously biased opinion. and yes she sold the kids to mj that was the deal she was a surrogate. millions of woman do it and thank god she did cause its those kids that prob kept mj here aslong as he was