REPORT this article !!!!

http://www.examiner.com/x-15033-Mem...-right-for-not-speaking-about-Michael-Jackson

Oprah Winfrey is right for not speaking about Michael Jackson

Let’s face the facts folks: There is a good chance that Michael Jackson was a pedophile. His first accuser, Jordan Chandler, was able to identify different marks on Michael’s “body.”
The self-titled "King of Pop" paid off his accuser millions of dollars so the case would not go to court. When Michael Jackson was forced to go to court ten years later, his accuser was put on trial, not Michael Jackson. He might have been declared “not guilty,” but so was O.J. Simpson.
Oprah Winfrey is a smart woman who knows what it’s like when kids are exploited. She is one of the rare celebrities who hasn’t tried to turn Michael Jackson into a saint. Some people are insulting Oprah for not saying anything. Like Bill O’Reilly, Oprah Winfrey should be honored for her stance against someone who likely victimized children.

Other articles of interest:

Michael Jackson: 750 million album sales figure is greatly inflated
Michael Jackson: Gay and good in bed?
Michael Jackson: Will Janet use his death to salvage her career?
Michael Jackson: His daughter Paris will be a big star

it make me SO ANGRYYY

http://www.examiner.com/x-15033-Mem...2009m7d14-Michael-Jackson-Gay-and-good-in-bed

Michael Jackson: Gay and good in bed?


http://www.examiner.com/x-15033-Memphis-Celebrity-Examiner
July 14, 3:05 PM



.iconpanel a { text-decoration:none; color:#006699};.iconpanel a:hover { text-decoration:none; color:#006699}.emailshowing { display:none}

22 comments
ShareThis

RSS

Email
Print




Now that Michael Jackson is dead, one can expect many people to come out of the woodwork with many “secrets.” However, I don’t think the revelation that Michael Jackson is gay really is a surprise. I thought it was obvious. As Jerry Seinfeld would say, “Not that there is anything wrong with it.”
However, it is wrong if Michael was gay and having sex with underaged kids. Michael paid off Jordan Chandler’s family millions of dollars to put that child molestation case under the rug. Ten years later, Michael Jackson was accused of engaging in sexual activities with teenager Gavin Arvizo, but a jury decided he wasn’t guilty.

WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :angry: :banghead:

This defnately needs to be reported!

THERES MORE!!!!


http://www.examiner.com/x-15033-Mem...hael-Jackson-Bruce-Springsteen-remains-silent

You have to hand it to the Boss for not being a follower despite playing the very commercial Superbowl earlier this year. He has joined Oprah Winfrey in not saying a word about Michael Jackson's death.
Bruce Springsteen has always defended liberal causes and many call him a hypocrite. However, liberals always say "What about the children?" and in this case, the Boss is thinking about the children that were likely victimized by Michael Jackson.
Michael Jackson was - at one time - a great entertainer. However, a man who pays off his victims so they won't go to court and states that it is okay to sleep with boys in his bed does not deserve to be turned into a saint. You have to wonder what this world has come to when alleged criminals such as Jackson are treated like heroes just because they had money. It's a cliche, but it needs to be said again: What about the children?

Other articles of interest:
Michael Jackson: Breitbart.com reporter claims Nambla gets messiah
Oprah Winfrey is right for not speaking about Michael Jackson
Michael Jackson: 750 million album sales figure is greatly inflated

he keeps calling him a paedo

First of all this should probably be in the Enough is Enough section yeah?

Secondly what is the examiner? is it a free for all blog? or is it a news group like NYtimes etc?

Cause we have another person from the examiner fishing for our responses here: http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=70515


Thirdly I wonder if Bruce Springsteen and Oprah know this guy is putting words in their mouths? Just cause the Boss hasn't made a statement on MJ doesn't mean he's doing so because he believes in what this banana is posting about.

L.J said:

First of all this should probably be in the Enough is Enough section yeah?

Click to expand...

Yes it should. Not everyone wants to read this garbage.

Gwyneira said:

Yes it should. Not everyone wants to read this garbage.

Click to expand...

so youre going to let the slanderish articles remain for more people to google 2 words "michael" and "jackson" and then those news articles pop up ?? we NEED to report them and get as many people as possible to shut them down!

L.J said:

First of all this should probably be in the Enough is Enough section yeah?

Secondly what is the examiner? is it a free for all blog? or is it a news group like NYtimes etc?

Cause we have another person from the examiner fishing for our responses here: http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=70515


Thirdly I wonder if Bruce Springsteen and Oprah know this guy is putting words in their mouths? Just cause the Boss hasn't made a statement on MJ doesn't mean he's doing so because he believes in what this banana is posting about.

Click to expand...

its a news group. as soon as you type in MJ on google news their ridiculous articles appear

we're fired by a lot of media with this shit only because they want our reactions!

Please don't make yourself a tool of such!

I'll report this thread for that it will be moved... oh I see smooth in here... maybe it will be moved already.

Well I moved the thread to the Enough Is Enough section
And dont know why i feel that it should be deleted from here

why should the thread be deleted?

Dont they know that all the marks the boy alledgedly said mj had was NOT confirmed to be right. He has not, nor would he ever have thought of a child that way... I get so fucking pissed offwhen people BAD-mouth Michael.... I could just BITCH-SLAP-THEM ALL....

Aw...go to hell!