Medical questions and answers

LindavG

Proud Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2010
Messages
2,226
Points
63
Location
The Netherlands
Hey guys, I usually don't post in this section but I recently had a discussion with two fellow fans on YouTube and it left me confused, so I thought maybe some of you know what's true and what not. I did read the autopsy report several months ago and this (following quotes) is how I remember it, but now I'm doubting if I understood it correctly. Anyway, these are the conversations:

One fan (this got 40 thumbs-up :mello:)

Him getting burned during that commercial was the beginning of his use of prescription? drugs, poor michael, maybe if that never happened he may have never developed a habit and would probably still be alive.

My response:

Michael Jackson did not die from prescription drugs! There were no drugs found in his system whatsoever except for the anesthetics (Propofol and Lorazepam) his doctor administered to him just before he died, read the autopsy report! Michael suffered from a severe case of amnesia as a result? of the auto-immune disease Lupus. Even though the media tries hard to lable him a druggie, don't believe it! He was murdered, plain and simple.

Other fan:

Michael admitted himself that he was addicted to pain meds and went into rehab for it in the 80's after Chandler's accusations. His family tried a number of interventions. His nurse said Michael begged her for propofal. That's a drug. It was injected into his body & killed him. He had large amounts of prescription meds in his system when he died. No one? ever saw him TAKE the meds, but they saw the after effect

My response:

You couldn't be more wrong. Some family members CLAIM that they did interventions, but they mention no specific time so this could've been 10 years ago. MJ was addicted in? 1993 yes, that's 17(!!) years ago. His past addiction has absolutely no relation to his death. He had no prescription drugs at all in his system, just the anesthetic his doctor administered to him right before he died. And since when are comments of some nurse who claims she once worked for him considered reliable? The reason no one ever saw him take meds is because he didn't, the autopsy report proved that Michael was in excellent physical shape when he died, if? he really had been addicted this would have come up in the report somehow. What people saw were the side effects of the medication he had to take to treat his very REAL health problems such as Lupus.

His/her response to this:

I don't know what autopsy reports you have read but there is a list of medications that were found in Michael's system when he died. Lorazepam isn't an anesthetic it's an antidepressant. I'm a huge Michael Jackson? supporter & am in contact with the family. I am not talking against Michael I'm saying how tragic it was that he became addicted to prescription meds. Due to the 2005 trial, Michael became more dependent on them to numb the pain. I'm being realistic. Acknowledging that Michael? had a problem with prescription meds does not mean that he was a "druggie" and in no way diminishes the wonderful man, father, son, performer & humanitarian that he was. Michael should not die in vain. His death should be a lesson to those with money & power to be careful of the leeches like those who enabled MJ because they wanted his money, the Dr. Feelgoods.

So who is right here? Was Michael addicted or not? I don't know anymore! :unsure:
 
Re: Please help me out - I'm confused!

You are right.

And tell that person that lorazepam is not an antidepressant. On the contrary, it shouldn't be used during the depression http://www.depression-doctor.com/antidepressants/lorazepam-ativan.html

But why is it then on the website of depression-doctor and listed under "antidepressants"? I'm still confused.. The problem is that I don't know anything about medicine, I just rely on what I've been told about the autopsy report by other people with more medical knowledge than I have. From what I understood the Lorazepam was used in combination with the Propofol or something (so not in the function of antidepressant) but can somebody please explain this once again?

Also, I just discovered that I wrote "amnesia" instead of "insomnia" in my previous post, how stupid am I :doh:
 
Re: Please help me out - I'm confused!

bottom line mj had an an addiction in the 90s to pain killers. he went in rehab. that hss nothing to do with what happened in 09. there were no painkillers found in his system and i believe even in his house. murray gave Loz to mj as it is one of the benzos given b4 you admin diprivan. murray was giving him Loz in order to help him get to sleep. diprivan is not physically addictive mj was not addicted to anything when he died.the dip and benzos were only being used from may 09 at the earliest as thats when they were bought. his organs also showed no damage which would occur with any long term addiction. in otehr words there is no evidence at all that mj was addicted to anything in the month and even several years upto his death. tell the fans on utuve to educate themselve and stop believing the crap randy pushes

these fans on utube had obviously been brainwashed by the stupid family members/presley who throw the druggie story down everyones throats.and this is what we are having todeal with. with even fans buying this crap.
 
Re: Please help me out - I'm confused!

bottom line mj had an an addiction in the 90s to pain killers. he went in rehab. that hss nothing to do with what happened in 09. there were no painkillers found in his system and i believe even in his house. murray gave Loz to mj as it is one of the benzos given b4 you admin diprivan. murray was giving him Loz in order to help him get to sleep. diprivan is not physically addictive mj was not addicted to anything when he died.the dip and benzos were only being used from may 09 at the earliest as thats when they were bought. his organs also showed no damage which would occur with any long term addiction. in otehr words there is no evidence at all that mj was addicted to anything in the month and even several years upto his death. tell the fans on utuve to educate themselve and stop believing the crap randy pushes

these fans on utube had obviously been brainwashed by the stupid family members/presley who throw the druggie story down everyones throats.and this is what we are having todeal with. with even fans buying this crap.

Thank you, this is what I thought as well. Is Diprivan the same as Propofol by the way (sorry if this is a stupid question, like I said I'm completely ignorant when it comes to medicine)?
 
Re: Please help me out - I'm confused!

yes diprivan is the same just another name for it. i can never spell propofol without having to look so use diprivan

I'm a huge Michael Jackson? supporter & am in contact with the family.
thats why that fan is so clueless then lol
 
Re: Please help me out - I'm confused!

yes diprivan is the same just another name for it. i can never spell propofol without having to look so use diprivan

Ah OK, thanks. Btw you said Propofol is not physically addictive but Wikipedia says: "Long-term use has been reported to result in addiction" and it references academic sources for this.. then again, there is no evidence to believe that MJ was using Propofol for a long term (to the contrary). It's just all so confusing, everyone is saying different things :( I just listened to an interview Timor Steffens (TII dancer) did for Dutch TV and he said those claims about MJ being frail/sick/unhealthy are all BS rumours and that he was very fit and enthusiastic to do the shows.. and then you have other people like Randy, Janet and Karen Faye saying he was very ill and addicted etc. Who to believe?? :(

I think I'm just gonna read the autopsy report again, see if I understand it better this time. It's already difficult to understand these medical terms when you don't know anything about medicine, but it's even harder when English is not your native tongue :(
 
Re: Please help me out - I'm confused!

Wikipedia is not a reliable source for anything, LindavG. Anyone can add info to and/or edit info on Wiki. But aside from that, I haven't seen anything that says propofol is physically addictive. Could Michael have been psychologically addicted to it? Possibly. We don't know. But it is much more likely, IF there was an addiction, that it was psychological rather than physical.

And while I do believe Michael was a bit too thin, I don't believe he was frail or sickly as some rumors suggest. This is my opinion. Though I will also add that even if the dancers and those around him at that time are saying he was very fit etc, I don't tend to blindly accept their opinions either. They no doubt signed confidentiality agreements and are likely very limited as to what they can say about Michael from their experience. I think it's very likely that they have all been told "you can say XYZ and that's it" in a nutshell. So I just don't put a lot of stock in their answers either. But I do have a hard time believing that he was as frail and sickly as some would suggest. Again, just my opinion.
 
Re: Please help me out - I'm confused!

Wikipedia is not a reliable source for anything, LindavG. Anyone can add info to and/or edit info on Wiki. But aside from that, I haven't seen anything that says propofol is physically addictive. Could Michael have been psychologically addicted to it? Possibly. We don't know. But it is much more likely, IF there was an addiction, that it was psychological rather than physical.

I know that Wikipedia is not always reliable of course, that's why I also mentioned that the article referenced two academic sources to back up this claim.. anyway I was more asking a general question as it speaks of "long-term use" and there's no reason to believe MJ used Propofol on the long term, to the contrary actually.

And while I do believe Michael was a bit too thin, I don't believe he was frail or sickly as some rumors suggest. This is my opinion. Though I will also add that even if the dancers and those around him at that time are saying he was very fit etc, I don't tend to blindly accept their opinions either. They no doubt signed confidentiality agreements and are likely very limited as to what they can say about Michael from their experience. I think it's very likely that they have all been told "you can say XYZ and that's it" in a nutshell. So I just don't put a lot of stock in their answers either. But I do have a hard time believing that he was as frail and sickly as some would suggest. Again, just my opinion.

I know, but this guy was so persistant about this that I do tend to believe him. It's just so confusing that some people who saw him a lot said he was very healthy and fit, while others that were also close to him claim the complete opposite. And the media chooses to focus on the latter. :mello:
 
Re: Please help me out - I'm confused!

But why is it then on the website of depression-doctor and listed under "antidepressants"? I'm still confused.. The problem is that I don't know anything about medicine, I just rely on what I've been told about the autopsy report by other people with more medical knowledge than I have. From what I understood the Lorazepam was used in combination with the Propofol or something (so not in the function of antidepressant) but can somebody please explain this once again?

Also, I just discovered that I wrote "amnesia" instead of "insomnia" in my previous post, how stupid am I :doh:

Lorazepam is a very typical antidepressant used to treat insomnia, anxiety and other disorders which are part of depression. Lorazepam is a similar drug as phenozepam, from the same group of drugs but stronger.
Phenozepam I used to take myself. It is not a very strong drug one but without control it can give you some problems.

Here is the link about phenozepam: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenazepam

About Lorazepam:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorazepam

They are both benzos to treat insomnia.
 
Re: Please help me out - I'm confused!

the only evidence of ppl being mentally addicted to diprivan is some cases of drs who enjoyed the feeling that comes with the waking up after taking it. articles stated that these ejected litterally 100 times in a day. so they would wake up after only a minute or 2 and then re inject. this obviously has no connectioon to mj. also there is nothing in diprivan that makes it addictive. its not a narcotic etc

did for Dutch TV and he said those claims about MJ being frail/sick/unhealthy are all BS rumours and that he was very fit and enthusiastic to do the shows.. and then you have other people like Randy, Janet and Karen Faye saying he was very ill and addicted etc. Who to believe?? :sad:
the best way to look at this is who do u believe? ppl that were physically around mj in the rehearsals or ppl who hadnt seen him in years and the only time they saw him b4 june was the family get together in may. randy janet/rebbie etc are as thick as theives yet janet admitted she hadnt seen mj in years. karen is buddies with randy and b4 everything happened she said how wonderful mj was looking etc etc. that all changed after june. so in short. do u believe ppl who were around him everyday or ppl who hadnt seen him in years and have a history of spreading shit to the media
 
Re: Please help me out - I'm confused!

Lorazepam is a very typical antidepressant used to treat insomnia, anxiety and other disorders which are part of depression. Lorazepam is a similar drug as phenozepam, from the same group of drugs but stronger.
Phenozepam I used to take myself. It is not a very strong drug one but without control it can give you some problems.

Here is the link about phenozepam: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenazepam

About Lorazepam:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorazepam

They are both benzos to treat insomnia.

Lorazepam (and other benzodiazepines) are not classed as anti-depressants - they are anxiolytics, in other words anti-anxiety drugs. They also have sedative properties, hence their use in treating insomnia (but they should only be prescribed if absolutely necessary and as a short-term measure due to the risks of dependence).

Lorazepam is not recommended for the treatment of depression however patients can often present with depression and anxiety together therefore in addition to prescribing an anti-depressant (eg prozac) for the longer term to treat the depression, benzodiazepines are sometimes prescribed initially as well on a short-term basis to treat the symptoms of anxiety until the anti-depressant drug takes effect (usually, but not always, within a few weeks).

the only evidence of ppl being mentally addicted to diprivan is some cases of drs who enjoyed the feeling that comes with the waking up after taking it. articles stated that these ejected litterally 100 times in a day. so they would wake up after only a minute or 2 and then re inject. this obviously has no connectioon to mj. also there is nothing in diprivan that makes it addictive. its not a narcotic etc

I agree with you, there is no evidence to suggest Michael was addicted to propofol as described in the literature.

As an aside, and for information, a review article published this year, based on the findings of 45 articles relating to this topic, suggests that propofol does have the potential to cause tolerance (where more and more of the drug is required for the same effect), psychological dependence and withdrawal symptoms when it is discontinued. In other words, it does have addictive properties, a finding which has been reported in prior animal studies as well.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20397799
 
Re: Please help me out - I'm confused!

yeah i agree there can be a psychological dependency especially if u are using it to sleep. obviously if u take something and it works then u are going to want to take it more.and may think if i dont take it i wont get sleep.its like finding a cure in the sense of why stop taking something that works. but interms of mj theres no evidence to support any kind of dependency and certainly nothing to suggest that fans and family can accuse him of being an addict of anything except KFC
 
Re: Please help me out - I'm confused!

Lorazepam (and other benzodiazepines) are not classed as anti-depressants - they are anxiolytics, in other words anti-anxiety drugs. They also have sedative properties, hence their use in treating insomnia (but they should only be prescribed if absolutely necessary and as a short-term measure due to the risks of dependence).

Lorazepam is not recommended for the treatment of depression however patients can often present with depression and anxiety together therefore in addition to prescribing an anti-depressant (eg prozac) for the longer term to treat the depression, benzodiazepines are sometimes prescribed initially as well on a short-term basis to treat the symptoms of anxiety until the anti-depressant drug takes effect (usually, but not always, within a few weeks).

I do not think it is very important how it has been classified in some medical books. This is a question of terminology only. I know from fact that specialists prescribe benzos to treat multiple depression symptoms such as insomnia, anxiety and others. Depression is not one symptom disorder. To say that it is antidepressant is not a big mistake imo.

The drug description I used to take even says as far as I remember: to treat multiple depression symptoms etc.
Maybe it changed now and they use a different classification. I do not think that this is THAT important.
The most important thing how it is being used and for what.
 
Last edited:
Re: Please help me out - I'm confused!

I do not think it is very important how it has been classified in some medical books. This is a question of terminology only. I know from fact that specialists prescribe benzos to treat multiple depression symptoms such as insomnia, anxiety and others. Depression is not one symptom disorder. To say that it is antidepressant is not a big mistake imo.

The drug description I used to take even says as far as I remember: to treat multiple depression symptoms etc.
Maybe it changed now and they use a different classification. I do not think that this is THAT important.
The most important thing how it is being used and for what.

Thanks for your reply. It is generally accepted that Michael was being treated with benzodiazepines to help him sleep and possibly to treat anxiety. I took issue with your statement that "lorazepam is a very typical anti-depressant" which, with respect, is not correct and if you have had experience of such (ie benzo use only to treat depression as defined by the ICD-10 classification, then this is poor clinical practice imo). In the absence of a diagnosis of coexistent depression, benzodiazepines on their own can be used to treat anxiety and insomnia.

[I can only speak as to UK medical practice where, as a physician, I prescribe both anti-depressants and benzodiazepines but I would be surprised if US prescribing practices and the classification of these drugs deviate substantially from what I have described in my previous post].
 
Last edited:
Re: Please help me out - I'm confused!

I've never heard of Lorazepam being used as an anti-depressant (but often is used to treat it as a symptom along with anxiety and other psychological disorders)...As someone else mentioned it's a benzodiazapine used for anxiety and has sedative properties, so is often used for insomnia...

I believe the autopsy says Michael had propofol as well as 4 different benzos:

Lorazepam: used for anxiety WITH depression
Diazepam: used for anxiety and panic attacks
Temazepam: insomnia, anxiety
Clonazepam: seizures, bipolar disorder, panic attacks....
 
Last edited:
Re: Please help me out - I'm confused!

linda all the info for the numpties on youtube is available from the autopsey report and also the the police documents. no wonder they are friends with the family as they are pandering the druggie label. its clearly documented how many bottles and how many tablets were found in each bottle for example.and that information clearly shows there was no addiction to Lorazepam.all it shows is that murray overdosed mj with Lorazepam on the 25th june giving him 2 and half times what should have been given and then ontop of that gives him enough diprivan for major surgery. please post the below on the utube comments and see what B.S they come up with next.

According to the coroner's report 21 tabs of Lorazepam had been taken from the box of 30 since 28th April when they were prescribed.. the prescription was to take one a day. so that shows that mj had hardly been taking the tablets at all. that info totally ridicules any claims by these "fans" that mj was addcited to the Lorazepam

also it is the same with the diazepam and temazepam bottles thats were found A bottle of 60 diazepam 10mg tablets were prescribed by Murray on 20th June, the dose was half to one tablet every 6 hours. 57 were still in the bottle. so mj was hardly touching them.the reports shows he could have taken 2 or 3 at the most b4 the 25th. well below what was prescribed. temazepam had been prescibed in december 08 out of 30 tablets 3 remained. and this drug was not found in mj so he had not been taken b4 the 25th.
 
Re: Please help me out - I'm confused!

its clearly documented how many bottles and how many tablets were found in each bottle for example.

and that information clearly shows there was no addiction to Lorazepam.all it shows is that murray overdosed mj with Lorazepam on the 25th june giving him 2 and half times what should have been given and then ontop of that gives him enough diprivan for major surgery.

According to the coroner's report 21 tabs of Lorazepam had been taken from the box of 30 since 28th April when they were prescribed..

the prescription was to take one a day.
so that shows that mj had hardly been taking the tablets at all. that info totally ridicules any claims by these "fans" that mj was addcited to the Lorazepam

also it is the same with the diazepam and temazepam bottles thats were found
A bottle of 60 diazepam 10mg tablets were prescribed by Murray on 20th June,

the dose was half to one tablet every 6 hours. 57 were still in the bottle. so mj was hardly touching them.

the reports shows he could have taken 2 or 3 at the most b4 the 25th.
well below what was prescribed.


temazepam had been prescibed in december 08 out of 30 tablets 3 remained. and this drug was not found in mj so he had not been taken b4 the 25th.

It's important the fans know this info. Thanks for the summary.
 
Re: Please help me out - I'm confused!

linda all the info for the numpties on youtube is available from the autopsey report and also the the police documents. no wonder they are friends with the family as they are pandering the druggie label. its clearly documented how many bottles and how many tablets were found in each bottle for example.and that information clearly shows there was no addiction to Lorazepam.all it shows is that murray overdosed mj with Lorazepam on the 25th june giving him 2 and half times what should have been given and then ontop of that gives him enough diprivan for major surgery. please post the below on the utube comments and see what B.S they come up with next.

According to the coroner's report 21 tabs of Lorazepam had been taken from the box of 30 since 28th April when they were prescribed.. the prescription was to take one a day. so that shows that mj had hardly been taking the tablets at all. that info totally ridicules any claims by these "fans" that mj was addcited to the Lorazepam

also it is the same with the diazepam and temazepam bottles thats were found A bottle of 60 diazepam 10mg tablets were prescribed by Murray on 20th June, the dose was half to one tablet every 6 hours. 57 were still in the bottle. so mj was hardly touching them.the reports shows he could have taken 2 or 3 at the most b4 the 25th. well below what was prescribed. temazepam had been prescibed in december 08 out of 30 tablets 3 remained. and this drug was not found in mj so he had not been taken b4 the 25th.

Thanks for summarizing it, next time I get into an argument about MJ's supposed drug addiction with a fellow "fan" I'll just copy your post ;)
 
Re: Please help me out - I'm confused!

'Lorazepam is sometimes used for individuals receiving mechanical ventilation. However, in critically ill patients, propofol has been found to be superior to lorazepam both in effectiveness and overall cost; as a result, the use of propofol for this indication is now encouraged, whereas the use of lorazepam for this indication is discouraged'

SOURCE: WIKIPEDIA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorazepam
 
Re: Please help me out - I'm confused!

your welcome.
 
Re: Please help me out - I'm confused!

bottom line mj had an an addiction in the 90s to pain killers. he went in rehab. that hss nothing to do with what happened in 09. there were no painkillers found in his system and i believe even in his house. murray gave Loz to mj as it is one of the benzos given b4 you admin diprivan. murray was giving him Loz in order to help him get to sleep. diprivan is not physically addictive mj was not addicted to anything when he died.the dip and benzos were only being used from may 09 at the earliest as thats when they were bought. his organs also showed no damage which would occur with any long term addiction. in otehr words there is no evidence at all that mj was addicted to anything in the month and even several years upto his death. tell the fans on utuve to educate themselve and stop believing the crap randy pushes

these fans on utube had obviously been brainwashed by the stupid family members/presley who throw the druggie story down everyones throats.and this is what we are having todeal with. with even fans buying this crap.
i couldn,t agree more,
 
Re: Please help me out - I'm confused!

Thanks for your reply. It is generally accepted that Michael was being treated with benzodiazepines to help him sleep and possibly to treat anxiety. I took issue with your statement that "lorazepam is a very typical anti-depressant" which, with respect, is not correct and if you have had experience of such (ie benzo use only to treat depression as defined by the ICD-10 classification, then this is poor clinical practice imo). In the absence of a diagnosis of coexistent depression, benzodiazepines on their own can be used to treat anxiety and insomnia.

[I can only speak as to UK medical practice where, as a physician, I prescribe both anti-depressants and benzodiazepines but I would be surprised if US prescribing practices and the classification of these drugs deviate substantially from what I have described in my previous post].

Thank you honysucklejasmine. I would be surprised too as I am in the US been perscribed anti-depressant and an anti-anxiety med for a while now. NO one would even notice any difference in my behavior due to my very close monitoring by my physician here in the states.

I am not a doctor but by the why it looks, each drug listed below treats the same symptoms which to me seem like over-kill with the exception of the clonazepam. Seems like wayyyyyyyy to many benzos.
Lorazepam: used for anxiety WITH depression
Diazepam: used for anxiety and panic attacks
Temazepam: insomnia, anxiety
Clonazepam: seizures, bipolar disorder, panic attacks....
__________________
 
Last edited:
Re: Please help me out - I'm confused!

I'm going to believe the Dr. Treacy whose stayed out of the majority of the crazy media and admitted to being offered big $$$ to try and sell Michael out, say bad things about him.

He first answer to that was, "First of all, they don't exsist.."

"Michael REFUSED to use propofol without an anesthsiologist. I never saw drugs in Michael's home and he was always in his full mental state and never sluggish. Murray did this on purpose. I can not believe Michael would do this to himeslf knowing that he refused propfol without proper care in the past, and I don't thin...k in two years, all of a sudden, he would change his opinion on that." - Dr. Patrick Treacy

This is a doctor who was ACTUALLY with Michael and admits to being offered $$$. He is the first and ONLY person so far that has admitted something like that. He's someone I would trust right now.
 
Last edited:
Re: Please help me out - I'm confused!

Thank you honysucklejasmine. I would be surprised too as I am in the US been perscribed anti-depressant and an anti-anxiety med for a while now. NO one would even notice any difference in my behavior due to my very close monitoring by my physician here in the states.

I am not a doctor but by the why it looks, each drug listed below treats the same symptoms which to me seem like over-kill with the exception of the clonazepam. Seems like wayyyyyyyy to many benzos.
Lorazepam: used for anxiety WITH depression
Diazepam: used for anxiety and panic attacks
Temazepam: insomnia, anxiety
Clonazepam: seizures, bipolar disorder, panic attacks....
__________________

You're right....it is WAY too many benzo's...I've seen almost NO patients being prescribed these all at the same time...maybe 1 or 2...but not FOUR
 
Re: Please help me out - I'm confused!

You're right....it is WAY too many benzo's...I've seen almost NO patients being prescribed these all at the same time...maybe 1 or 2...but not FOUR

yeah, i spoke to a med student about that, and that's exactly what he told me. TOO many benzons for just a short period of time, and not only that, mixed with propofol too.

he was determined to bring michael down.

This blog is very interesting:

http://xscapemj.blogspot.com/2010/05/anatomization-of-living-dead-part-2.html

Another interesting point is that the investigators confiscated most of the above listed medications & supplies on visits made few days after the alleged date of death. Anybody with access to that house could have tampered with the evidence, took items out & have left items inside the house! How are we to rely on these finding knowing that the house was not sealed as crime scene & many people had access to it?

BUT, security tapes would show who went in and out the house, and who stayed and for how long. And possibly, even what items people were holding, putting in bags, whatever.

Those tapes are so vital.
 
Re: Please help me out - I'm confused!

im sorry to say this but i ask my doctors about the propofol, its an iv only and you cannot provide it to yourself they say, and there is this it has to give in drops every sec, cant explain it otherwise my english isnt that good, not in one time. so if he did that him self he would be one sec out and then awake again etc etc..

and somebody here is right, lorezepam is a benzodapine and no antidepressive.
 
Back
Top