bouee
Proud Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2009
- Messages
- 2,369
- Points
- 0
Is this Flanagan's idea? It's obvious his negative and hateful personal feelings towards Michael (as evidenced in that Murray mocumentary) are making him want to keep desperately pursuing this case. I don't think he cares about defending Murray. He wants to convict Michael.
Pastor makes a great comment in the article thread about the defence fishing
Yes, it's all about saying that Michael self injected.... Still that's not going to change the amount of propofol they found in his urine and the concentration levels that Dr Shafer used to show there was a drip. Murray was convicted because of his negligence, not because there was a drip.
So yes, that's the way I see it, fishing and trying again to blame Michael.