Latest on MJJC

Can I ask If anyone know bout Michael's thoughts on something?

Well, he was all about L.O.V.E. and all that stuff, but then again he was a religious man. So who knows?
 
I'm not sure to be honest. I think he might have had the "each to their own, I can't judge" attitude You know, knowing MJ, he didn't like to judge.

And yeah, he was religious.
 
I think it is something he would avoid mentioning or talking about. I don't think he would say anything if he saw a homosexual couple somewhere, and directly asked I think he would answer something that wouldn't hurt anybody. Deeply inside I think homosexuality is something he didn't really understand. he was in my opinion an old fashioned gentleman believing in old fashioned deeds, and I believe he thought marriage should be between a man and a woman. I do not believe he would ever express such a view as he wouldn't want to hurt anyone, but deep inside I think he found same sex relationships confusing. I don't think he condemned the relationships in any way, but I think he prefered to pretend they didn't exist
 
JamesDean said:
I think it is something he would avoid mentioning or talking about. I don't think he would say anything if he saw a homosexual couple somewhere, and directly asked I think he would answer something that wouldn't hurt anybody. Deeply inside I think homosexuality is something he didn't really understand. he was in my opinion an old fashioned gentleman believing in old fashioned deeds, and I believe he thought marriage should be between a man and a woman. I do not believe he would ever express such a view as he wouldn't want to hurt anyone, but deep inside I think he found same sex relationships confusing. I don't think he condemned the relationships in any way, but I think he prefered to pretend they didn't exist
Click to expand...

and you base this on what, exactly? your own views?
 
chrissychristina said:
and you base this on what, exactly? your own views?
Click to expand...

I am very sorry Chrissychristina, I do feel that you often aswer to threads, without carefully reading them, and it annoys me. I feel if you had read my post decently, you would not be confused about this being my wiev and my assumptions as I do write "I think..." several times through the post.
I am aware that the reason for my irritation might be based on cultural differences or language skills, but please could you show somehow that you post out of interest in the debate, conversation or the subject as I do feel that you are posting, just to post, and I do feel a little hunted by you.
 
JamesDean said:
I think it is something he would avoid mentioning or talking about. I don't think he would say anything if he saw a homosexual couple somewhere, and directly asked I think he would answer something that wouldn't hurt anybody. Deeply inside I think homosexuality is something he didn't really understand. he was in my opinion an old fashioned gentleman believing in old fashioned deeds, and I believe he thought marriage should be between a man and a woman. I do not believe he would ever express such a view as he wouldn't want to hurt anyone, but deep inside I think he found same sex relationships confusing. I don't think he condemned the relationships in any way, but I think he prefered to pretend they didn't exist
Click to expand...

I actually think you're very right. Michael has hinted over the years that he doesn't really understand homosexual views, but as you said, he would never go as far as to condemn or cause another human being hurt. I think he's just a product of his time, the way people thought back when he was a kid is a lot different to how children are taught not to see gender or race these days.
 
JamesDean said:
I am very sorry Chrissychristina, I do feel that you often aswer to threads, without carefully reading them, and it annoys me. I feel if you had read my post decently, you would not be confused about this being my wiev and my assumptions as I do write "I think..." several times through the post.
I am aware that the reason for my irritation might be based on cultural differences or language skills, but please could you show somehow that you post out of interest in the debate, conversation or the subject as I do feel that you are posting, just to post, and I do feel a little hunted by you.
Click to expand...

hunted?? i'm sorry but i don't even look at your username, so if i have replied to you twice then that must be by total accident. don't flatter yourself, please.

i would appreciate it if you tried to understand, too, what i wanted to say with my post. what gives you such an insight into michael jackson's head, that we others do not have? could it be, quite possibly, that it is wishful thinking on your part since those are the views that you have, and in turn, would prefer michael jackson to have? there, was that enough of an elaboration and clarification for you?

P.S. don't take other people for idiots, assuming that they either haven't read the thread or don't know what they're talking about, it just shows your own arrogance and stupidity. and i don't know which language skills you are referring to, must be your own.
 
^No, she's actually based her view on what Michael has said - and others have said about him - over the years. And I think she's right.
 
King of disco: Thank you for reading my post and sharing your consideration. You fully do understand what I tried to say. Thank you!

Chrissychristina: yes I do diffinately project my views on homosexuality onto Michael in my post. Living in a homosexual relationship for 10 years have made me confident, that same sex relationships is difinately something i am.... against ??? [hint: this is a joke in my world]
but yes chances are that we most likely are not from the same country so refering to cultural differenses and language skills did also apply to me (funily enough)
 
Last edited:
JamesDean said:
King of disco: Thank you for reading my post and sharing your consideration. You fully do understand what I tried to say. Thank you!
Click to expand...

I share too your thoughts on this matter, of course we could not possible know what Michael really felt on this subject (or anyother subject) but we can sure make our own opinion based on what we've read and what we've heard directly from him.And probably everyone's opinion is influenced by everyone's personal beliefs.
 
Last edited:
it doesn't matter whether you were in a homosexual relationship or not, i was simply asking how you would know michael's thoughts on the matter, since unless you had unlimited access to his brain, that would be as hard for you to know as it would for me. that said, i understand your post was an opinion, and it would be pointless for us both to argue over this.
 
JamesDean said:
I think it is something he would avoid mentioning or talking about. I don't think he would say anything if he saw a homosexual couple somewhere, and directly asked I think he would answer something that wouldn't hurt anybody. Deeply inside I think homosexuality is something he didn't really understand. he was in my opinion an old fashioned gentleman believing in old fashioned deeds, and I believe he thought marriage should be between a man and a woman. I do not believe he would ever express such a view as he wouldn't want to hurt anyone, but deep inside I think he found same sex relationships confusing. I don't think he condemned the relationships in any way, but I think he prefered to pretend they didn't exist
Click to expand...

I agree with you.
And this kind of proves your point when you say he was an old fashioned gentleman.
He said "there's a reason why I was created male" in Jet interview here is the link
http://floacist.wordpress.com/2007/10/20/jet-interview-august-16-1979/
But of course, he wouldn't judge anyone.
 
lucilla;3336505 said:
I agree with you.
And this kind of proves your point when you say he was an old fashioned gentleman.
He said "there's a reason why I was created male" in Jet interview here is the link
http://floacist.wordpress.com/2007/10/20/jet-interview-august-16-1979/
But of course, he wouldn't judge anyone.
Click to expand...

Thank you, I knew he said that but I didn't know exactly when and where.
And he said that at 21 years old.....yes he truly was a veteran before being a teenager.

“I don’t like to break hearts,”oh Michael, you broke millions.....:sad:
 
Last edited:
I appreciate this question !! :wub::clapping::cheers:

“I know it’s not true, so it doesn’t bother me. I’m sure we must have plenty of fans who are gay. That doesn’t bother me in the slightest, but I’m not gay.”
– Michael Jackson in an interview with Steven Ivory, 1978


In my opinion and what I think Michael's thoughts on same sex marriage is that he L.O.V.E.D ALL people as they are !! Michael did NOT care about where they found L.O.V.E as long as they DID and that he gave his example of SHOWING it to Fans !! Michael loved all HIS fans the same way UNCONDITONALLY !!
Yes he had to be so careful on what he said about certain factions of society that discriminate about other factions less desired or understood !! He knew in a way how they felt too and he was there for them !! He had so much empathy for the HUMAN RACE and so many times it was twisted and abused by the media at large !! The Fans always knew Michael didn't discriminate against anyones lifestyle, race creed or colour ! He just wasen't GAY hisself, but he knew he had a loyal and loving GAY Fanbase !! He would never ever hurt anyone PERIOD !!

Thanks for listening , I Michael you all !! Even if we don't agree all the time we L.O.V.E each other regardless !! Like Michael would have wanted Us to be as a MJ Family !!

always
MJ TinkerBell:angel::wub::agree::clapping:
 
I think when he was younger he was more conservative about this. I remember he also said once back in the early 80s that homosexuality was a sin according to the Bible, so he thought it was wrong. However I think his views probably changed over the years. He left Jehova's Witnesses in 1987 and I think he started to see some things differently. Also remember, when you are in Hollywood and in the world of arts you are surrounded by lots of, lots of gay people all the time. So when you see them in person and see that they are human just like you and that it's not your sexuality that makes you a good or a bad person, he might have changed his mind on gay people. I think he did. He didn't like to be called gay (he always seemed hurt at such suggestions when asked about it in interviews), but I don't think he judged gay people or that he cared if someone he worked with was gay or not. As for gay marriage, I don't think he cared too much about the issue, to be honest.

Wasn't he asked in an interview if he was gay and he said he won't answer that question on camera? And when they switched off the camera (but it was recorded by his personal cameraman) he said he wasn't gay but he had a lot of gay fans as well and didn't want to hurt their feelings?
 
Well in reality there is no way we could know his personal thoughts on "Same sex marriage"
He never really discussed the topic publically or the topic of homosexuality really except to say he wasnt

He did state once when being questioned by an attorney about the Gay porn Marc Shefield once produced
that he was against the porn as it didnt look righ for his image to be assicated with it. But he didnt have
anything against homosexuals Just the porn .. Michael loved all people and dindt judge them based on their
sexual preference religious belifs or nationaliy race etc etc

So just know MJ was very excepting of people. but he was very against Hate, racisim or predudice
 
Oh, this is a tuff one. I really don't know but knowing Michael and how he was all about love, peace and understanding I'm sure he would be okay with it. Maybe he would have a hard time understanding it, it's probably hard for anyone who hasn't been in that situation...
Even if he wouldn't, I'm sure he would never say or do anything to hurt anyone.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top