Page 1209 of 1213 FirstFirst ... 20970911091159119912071208120912101211 ... LastLast
Results 18,121 to 18,135 of 18190

Thread: [Discussion] Sexual Abuse Claims Against MJ Estate - Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe

   
  1. #18121
    Points: 29,226, Level: 99
    Level completed: 54%, Points required for next Level: 774
    Overall activity: 17.0%
    Achievements:
    Tagger First ClassVeteranOverdrive25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    4,040
    Points
    29,226
    Level
    99
    Thanks
    4,868
    Thanked 4,643 Times in 1,725 Posts

    Default Re: [Discussion] Sexual Abuse Claims Against MJ Estate - Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe

    Quote Originally Posted by MOR316 View Post
    Hi all

    I was wondering could anyone shed some light on this article for me?
    https://www.theatlantavoice.com/arti...kson-behavior/

    This is the first I've heard about this. Never heard of Stacy Brown or anything about arguments at someone's wedding. I also know Joy Robson never said anything about MJ "crying like a baby"

    Thanks in advance
    1. 'While Safechuck declined to testify for Michael' - Safechuck did no such thing. He was never ASKED to testify in 2005 as the judge ruled his testimony would be irrelevant to the case. Judge Melville ruled Safechuck out, before the trial ever started.

    2. MJ was so 'keen' to see Wade, that Joy testified as follows in court in 2005:

    My memory is, in the entire time we've lived here since 1991, we've only been at the ranch with Michael on four occasions in 14 years. Every other time we've been here without him.
    Would that be the same for your son?
    Yes.
    Similarly in 2017, Joy testified at her deposition (on film) as follows:

    In '92, Michael had promised Wade the 'Jam' video, and then I wasn't hearing from him. and I kept calling Norma and saying, you know, What's going on? He's supposed to be doing the 'Jam' video. Michael promised him this.
    And she said 'let me find out'
    And I just didn't hear, and I didn't hear, and then he (Wade) was actually up for another job, so I was calling her saying 'Are we doing the 'Jam' video or not?'
    Stacy Brown can write as much fiction (for money) as he likes, it doesn't change the truth as told in court under oath. He is very careful not to name so-called 'sources' , who he keeps deliberately vague ('a gf of Jermaine's / 'a teenage family member') and he knows that none of the Jacksons will come forward to complain about his lies because that only draws more attention to him.

    He's writing for money and to an agenda. His words are worthless.
    Last edited by myosotis; 12-05-2020 at 02:44 PM.
    'We may not change the world in one day but we still can change some things today, in our small way.'[/SIZE][/SIZE]

  2. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to myosotis For This Useful Post:


  3. #18122
    Points: 15,232, Level: 79
    Level completed: 77%, Points required for next Level: 118
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience PointsOverdrive

    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    26,552
    Points
    15,232
    Level
    79
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1,474 Times in 636 Posts

    Default Re: [Discussion] Sexual Abuse Claims Against MJ Estate - Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe

    Well said as always

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to elusive moonwalker For This Useful Post:


  5. #18123
    Points: 18,628, Level: 86
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 222
    Overall activity: 15.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience PointsThree FriendsOverdrive

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    9,433
    Points
    18,628
    Level
    86
    Thanks
    1,268
    Thanked 3,473 Times in 1,577 Posts

    Default Re: [Discussion] Sexual Abuse Claims Against MJ Estate - Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe

    Quote Originally Posted by myosotis View Post
    1. 'While Safechuck declined to testify for Michael' - Safechuck did no such thing. He was never ASKED to testify in 2005 as the judge ruled his testimony would be irrelevant to the case. Judge Melville ruled Safechuck out, before the trial ever started.

    2. MJ was so 'keen' to see Wade, that Joy testified as follows in court in 2005:



    Similarly in 2017, Joy testified at her deposition (on film) as follows:



    Stacy Brown can write as much fiction (for money) as he likes, it doesn't change the truth as told in court under oath. He is very careful not to name so-called 'sources' , who he keeps deliberately vague ('a gf of Jermaine's / 'a teenage family member') and he knows that none of the Jacksons will come forward to complain about his lies because that only draws more attention to him.

    He's writing for money and to an agenda. His words are worthless.
    That fool does not know nothing about Michael.
    Mike's PYT

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to terrell For This Useful Post:


  7. #18124
    Points: 2,964, Level: 33
    Level completed: 43%, Points required for next Level: 86
    Overall activity: 12.0%
    Achievements:
    1000 Experience Points1 year registered
    Elton-Cetera's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    Fort Lauderdale / Ottawa
    Posts
    329
    Points
    2,964
    Level
    33
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 141 Times in 82 Posts

    Default Re: [TMZ] New child molestation claim by Wade Robson

    Is there a thread specifically for the Arvizo trial?

  8. #18125
    Points: 29,226, Level: 99
    Level completed: 54%, Points required for next Level: 774
    Overall activity: 17.0%
    Achievements:
    Tagger First ClassVeteranOverdrive25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    4,040
    Points
    29,226
    Level
    99
    Thanks
    4,868
    Thanked 4,643 Times in 1,725 Posts

    Default Re: [TMZ] New child molestation claim by Wade Robson

    Quote Originally Posted by Elton-Cetera View Post
    Is there a thread specifically for the Arvizo trial?
    There doesn't seem to be much - mainly videos (if you do an 'Advanced' search for '2005' in the title.

    There's this short thread:

    https://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/t...ght=2005+trial

    and there's also background info links here (MJ legal cases):

    https://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/t...bson-Safechuck
    'We may not change the world in one day but we still can change some things today, in our small way.'[/SIZE][/SIZE]

  9. #18126
    Points: 4,927, Level: 44
    Level completed: 89%, Points required for next Level: 23
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    473
    Points
    4,927
    Level
    44
    Thanks
    480
    Thanked 462 Times in 203 Posts

    Default Re: [Discussion] Sexual Abuse Claims Against MJ Estate - Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe

    Just on this...

    Latoya claimed that she and her mother had seen checks written out for “lots of money” to the families of her brother’s alleged child victims. Her mother, Katherine, “was so disgusted that she wrote a letter in which she used (a homophobic slur) to describe Michael,” Latoya alleged.

    Katherine vehemently denied “every word Latoya had to say.”

    She’d been brainwashed, the Jacksons said.

    For this reporter and one-time close family friend, their denials were shattered years later when the Jackson family forfeited possession of a storage unit upon being sued in 2002.

    That storage unit, Jermaine and Katherine would admit to me, contained “those checks and that letter” Latoya had spoken of.
    This 'cheque' myth is so stupid. It's truly ridiculous how this is so often mentioned. Cheques would have protected MJ against absolutely nothing. If MJ had written a cheque to a family to 'keep quiet', that family would have been free to sell their story to the media or even sue MJ to get more money.

    It also makes absolutely no sense for MJ to have been dishing out cheques left right and centre, then when Evan Chandler comes along refuse to pay him to go away. Not paying Evan would have opened a can of worms for all these supposed families that received cheques to come out of the woodwork.

    Also, where are these families that received cheques? Not a single one decided to go to either the media or police. Sneddon also was unable to track any of them down. The prosecution even had access to MJ's financial records.

    I've even seen haters still grasp on to LaToya's claim of a cheque being written out to one boy's family who's Father had a garbage disposal company... a.k.a Safechuck. Haters, with their usual terrific logic, fail to see how the Safechucks receiving a cheque totally contradicts James's entire story.

    Another aspect is why on earth would Katherine and LaToya have seen any cheques? We're to believe that MJ was writing these cheques out and just leaving them lying around before they were sent to families?

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Bad7 For This Useful Post:


  11. #18127
    Points: 29,226, Level: 99
    Level completed: 54%, Points required for next Level: 774
    Overall activity: 17.0%
    Achievements:
    Tagger First ClassVeteranOverdrive25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    4,040
    Points
    29,226
    Level
    99
    Thanks
    4,868
    Thanked 4,643 Times in 1,725 Posts

    Default Re: [Discussion] Sexual Abuse Claims Against MJ Estate - Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe

    ^ From 'themichaeljacksonallegations':

    Is LaToya’s claim supported by James Safechuck’s allegations?
    You might have noticed in the above linked interview that LaToya said she saw these supposed checks in 1984. In an interview with Gerlando Rivera on February 21, 1994 she further specified the story and said that the checks she saw were written to a boy whose father was a “garbage collector”.

    From this information Michael Jackson’s detractors (among them journalist Diane Dimond) concluded that the boy in question was James Safechuck, since it is his father who had a waste collection company. Jackson detractors then use the current Safechuck allegations as evidence of LaToya’s 1993 claims being true (or LaToya’s claims as support for Safechuck’s allegations).

    In reality, nothing in this story adds up. James Safechuck’s current allegations do not confirm LaToya’s “hush money” suggestion at all, nor do LaToya’s 1993 claims confirm the Safechuck allegations. On the contrary! Even now, the Safechucks do not claim that at any time they received hush money from Jackson. James Safechuck’s allegation is that he never told his parents about his alleged abuse until he was an adult, so of course his parents could not have received “hush money” to be silenced in the 1980s.

    Moreover, the Safechucks have not befriended Michael until 1987 and LaToya claimed in her interview above that she saw the checks in 1984.

    The closest story that comes to this from the Safechuck allegations is the story of a loan the Safechucks got from Jackson to buy their house. They mentioned it in the documentary Leaving Neverland. However, that story does not align with LaToya’s. First of all, the Safechucks did not claim it to be hush money. This is what James’s mother, Stephanie Safechuck said in Leaving Neverland about the loan:

    “We wanted to buy another house, and Michael gave us a loan at a very low percentage rate. My husband had already had a deposition. We were on Michael’s camp. My son also for Michael. And after that was all said and done is when Michael forgave the debt. Michael said, “No, I don’t want you to pay me anymore,” um, “It’s a gift.” So, he did buy us a house. It’s just coincidental, he wasn’t buying us off, but the timing’s right there. Just sounds bad. Yeah.” [2]

    According to the loan documents recovered since, the loan was given to the Safechucks by Michael Jackson on May 11, 1992 and it was in the sum of $305,000 (not $1 million, like the sum in LaToya’s story). It is a proper loan, that the Safechucks should have returned. (The John Branca, named as the Trustee of the NL Trust named in the document was a lawyer representing Michael Jackson, and is currently one of the executors of his Estate.)

    ...it was given much later than the time LaToya could have seen such checks. LaToya left her family’s home in Encino/Hayvenhurst in May 1988. She was then completely estranged and isolated from her family by her abusive husband-manager, Jack Gordon. [3] [4] She could not have seen and discussed checks in the family home after May 1988. But James Safechuck’s alleged abuse did not even start until June 1988, according to his own story, so obviously no check before that could have been hush money for his alleged abuse.
    https://themichaeljacksonallegations...-said-in-1993/
    'We may not change the world in one day but we still can change some things today, in our small way.'[/SIZE][/SIZE]

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to myosotis For This Useful Post:


  13. #18128
    Points: 7,353, Level: 57
    Level completed: 2%, Points required for next Level: 197
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    800
    Points
    7,353
    Level
    57
    Thanks
    382
    Thanked 1,110 Times in 424 Posts

    Default Re: [Discussion] Sexual Abuse Claims Against MJ Estate - Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe

    COMMON SENSE ALERT!!! Does anyone actually believe that Michael would just have a “million dollar” check just lying around where LaToya or even his mother could see it? I don’t even leave $50 checks lying around. Some things are just obviously a lie and a person doesn’t have to be a genius to know that LaToya’s bogus claim is pure bull@#$&.

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to somewhereinthedark For This Useful Post:


  15. #18129
    Points: 7,353, Level: 57
    Level completed: 2%, Points required for next Level: 197
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    800
    Points
    7,353
    Level
    57
    Thanks
    382
    Thanked 1,110 Times in 424 Posts

    Default Re: [Discussion] Sexual Abuse Claims Against MJ Estate - Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe

    COMMON SENSE ALERT!!! Does anyone actually believe that Michael would just have a “million dollar” check just lying around where LaToya or even his mother could see it? I don’t even leave $50 checks lying around. Some things are just obviously a lie and a person doesn’t have to be a genius to know that LaToya’s bogus claim is pure bull@#$&.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to somewhereinthedark For This Useful Post:


  17. #18130
    Points: 18,628, Level: 86
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 222
    Overall activity: 15.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience PointsThree FriendsOverdrive

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    9,433
    Points
    18,628
    Level
    86
    Thanks
    1,268
    Thanked 3,473 Times in 1,577 Posts

    Default Re: [Discussion] Sexual Abuse Claims Against MJ Estate - Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe

    Quote Originally Posted by somewhereinthedark View Post
    COMMON SENSE ALERT!!! Does anyone actually believe that Michael would just have a “million dollar” check just lying around where LaToya or even his mother could see it? I don’t even leave $50 checks lying around. Some things are just obviously a lie and a person doesn’t have to be a genius to know that LaToya’s bogus claim is pure bull@#$&.
    Exactly. And you can believe MJ was rarely around her because he was busy in the studio, on the road, etc. Also, as jealous as Latoya was towards MJ success, Latoya would have put that in her book "Growing Up Jackson" in 1989. She was telling lies in that book according to some; so you think if something like that was true, Latoya would not had it in that book? I think not. She & Jack was using MJ's name to help sell her "playbook" books and everything else for her.
    Mike's PYT

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to terrell For This Useful Post:


  19. #18131
    Points: 17,319, Level: 83
    Level completed: 94%, Points required for next Level: 31
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    Created Blog entryTagger First ClassOverdrive10000 Experience Points1 year registered
    Awards:
    Activity Award
    NatureCriminal7896's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    5,324
    Points
    17,319
    Level
    83
    Thanks
    2,166
    Thanked 1,076 Times in 788 Posts

    Default Re: [Discussion] Sexual Abuse Claims Against MJ Estate - Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe

    Latoya always been jealous of mike. that why I don't trust her with somethings neither did mike. through i'm glad at the end she did stick up for her brother and got out of that bad relationship.



    a female with major depression,generalized anxiety,behavioral and emotional disorder,ocd mild retardation, and learning disability. i'm not contagious but my smile is.

  20. #18132
    Points: 8,184, Level: 61
    Level completed: 12%, Points required for next Level: 266
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    Three FriendsVeteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    542
    Points
    8,184
    Level
    61
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 106 Times in 44 Posts

    Default Re: [Discussion] Sexual Abuse Claims Against MJ Estate - Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe

    At which court hearing stage will the Estates lawyers demonstrate to the court about the train station fallacy? That it was non-existent during Safechucks claimed abuse period 1988-1992? That Safechuck has perjured himself and must be penalized if the claimed abuse continued well into 1994-95 when the train station existed? It still mind-boggles me that he and Robson choose to appeal and still go forward with their lawsuits if they have not made any amendments in their lawsuits. Because Safechuck still claimes to be abused between 1988-1992?
    MJDRUMS - V DANCE SONGS

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZf0F76K61w

    Dance by me, john13th

  21. #18133
    Points: 29,226, Level: 99
    Level completed: 54%, Points required for next Level: 774
    Overall activity: 17.0%
    Achievements:
    Tagger First ClassVeteranOverdrive25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    4,040
    Points
    29,226
    Level
    99
    Thanks
    4,868
    Thanked 4,643 Times in 1,725 Posts

    Default Re: [Discussion] Sexual Abuse Claims Against MJ Estate - Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe

    Quote Originally Posted by john13th View Post
    At which court hearing stage will the Estates lawyers demonstrate to the court about the train station fallacy? That it was non-existent during Safechucks claimed abuse period 1988-1992? That Safechuck has perjured himself and must be penalized if the claimed abuse continued well into 1994-95 when the train station existed? It still mind-boggles me that he and Robson choose to appeal and still go forward with their lawsuits if they have not made any amendments in their lawsuits. Because Safechuck still claimes to be abused between 1988-1992?
    As in the earlier hearings (this case is only going on because of the extended statute of limitations) the new judge will decide if the case meets the criteria to go to trial. The criteria are based on the offences claimed, and the fact that the MJJ Companies (and unnamed 'does' - MJJ employees at the time) are being sued. (Each case is a separate complaint, so their law firm wants to combine them to try to 'cloud the issue' on evidence like this.)

    The Estate has already shown that the MJJ Companies were not 'in control of' Michael ie he was the overall 'controller', so suing the MJJ companies looks pointless anyway. I think they are still trying to claim 'negligence by employees'....

    If there are reasons for the judge to decide that either case should not continue (there are lots of legal considerations here) then the case can be thrown out again before it goes to trial. The result of that is that the full evidence will not be heard in court and 'guilters' will be able to say 'the case was only thrown out because....'

    There is a looooong way to go yet, because the Estate and complainants are both doing new 'discovery' about each other first- eg the complainants are pursuing the 'tour' aspects and no doubt wanting to interview those employees. So maybe another 12-18 months before any decisions are made about trial or no trial.

    (I'm sure the MJ Estate lawyers will pursue 'the railway station issue' when they question Safechuck in his deposition).

    Edited to add Safechucks 'negligence' claims, as an example:
    Complaint for damages for:
    Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
    Negligence
    Negligent Supervision
    Negligent Retention/ Hiring
    Negligent Failure to Warn, Train or Educate
    Breach of Fiduciary Duty

    and a screen cap. of the legal claims about the MJJ Companies and employees as a single 'CSA procurement and facilitation organisation'.:

    Last edited by myosotis; 09-06-2020 at 10:59 AM.
    'We may not change the world in one day but we still can change some things today, in our small way.'[/SIZE][/SIZE]

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to myosotis For This Useful Post:


  23. #18134
    Points: 8,184, Level: 61
    Level completed: 12%, Points required for next Level: 266
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    Three FriendsVeteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    542
    Points
    8,184
    Level
    61
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 106 Times in 44 Posts

    Default Re: [Discussion] Sexual Abuse Claims Against MJ Estate - Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe

    Quote Originally Posted by myosotis View Post
    As in the earlier hearings (this case is only going on because of the extended statute of limitations) the new judge will decide if the case meets the criteria to go to trial. The criteria are based on the offences claimed, and the fact that the MJJ Companies (and unnamed 'does' - MJJ employees at the time) are being sued. (Each case is a separate complaint, so their law firm wants to combine them to try to 'cloud the issue' on evidence like this.)

    The Estate has already shown that the MJJ Companies were not 'in control of' Michael ie he was the overall 'controller', so suing the MJJ companies looks pointless anyway. I think they are still trying to claim 'negligence by employees'....

    If there are reasons for the judge to decide that either case should not continue (there are lots of legal considerations here) then the case can be thrown out again before it goes to trial. The result of that is that the full evidence will not be heard in court and 'guilters' will be able to say 'the case was only thrown out because....'

    There is a looooong way to go yet, because the Estate and complainants are both doing new 'discovery' about each other first- eg the complainants are pursuing the 'tour' aspects and no doubt wanting to interview those employees. So maybe another 12-18 months before any decisions are made about trial or no trial.

    (I'm sure the MJ Estate lawyers will pursue 'the railway station issue' when they question Safechuck in his deposition).

    Edited to add Safechucks 'negligence' claims, as an example:
    Complaint for damages for:
    Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
    Negligence
    Negligent Supervision
    Negligent Retention/ Hiring
    Negligent Failure to Warn, Train or Educate
    Breach of Fiduciary Duty

    and a screen cap. of the legal claims about the MJJ Companies and employees as a single 'CSA procurement and facilitation organisation'.:

    I think Safechuck is waaay out on thin ice and he is taking extremely big risk on pursuing this lawsuit when it will come a point in time where he is going to be deposed by the Estate - just like they did with Wade and Joy on camera - and be asked about the train station. What makes he think that that it won't be mentioned by the lawyers? Isn't he afraid of being exposed of committing perjury and therefore be penalized for lying about the end date of abuse, if he is going to be maintaining of being abused in the train station which could not happen until 1994-95? The Estate could take the video deposition of him and make a new documentary just like with 'Lies of Leaving Neverland'. I would be very surprised if he even read through his whole lawsuit and the information about the penalty of committing perjury when he signed the lawsuit. It seems like he doesn't have a clue about it.
    MJDRUMS - V DANCE SONGS

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZf0F76K61w

    Dance by me, john13th

  24. #18135
    Points: 15,232, Level: 79
    Level completed: 77%, Points required for next Level: 118
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience PointsOverdrive

    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    26,552
    Points
    15,232
    Level
    79
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1,474 Times in 636 Posts

    Default Re: [Discussion] Sexual Abuse Claims Against MJ Estate - Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe

    He case will get thrown out as he never worked for the companies. Will it even get to a depo stage? Yes id love to see him deposed and love to see it leaked.😈

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •