Michael Jackson Hologram Conjures Billionaire Alki David's Patent Lawsuit (Exclusive)

Bubs

Proud Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2012
Messages
7,856
Points
0
Alki David says an Amy Winehouse concert is coming, but first comes a patent lawsuit over a popular Cirque du Soleil show in Las Vegas.

Two years ago, a hologram of Tupac Shakur at the Coachella Music Festival sparked the imagination about what might be next in concert possibilities. Now, the technology that created the spectacle has landed in the hands of a noteworthy billionaire -- Alki David, the eccentric one who attempted to transform the television business with streaming technology before Aereo stole his thunder and TV broadcasters unleashed their legal guns on him.

Now, David finds himself on the flip side of the intellectual property coin. His FilmOn as well as hologram-maker Musion are the plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed on Monday against Cirque du Soleil and MGM Resorts for allegedly infringing patents to create a hologram used in the final scene of Michael Jackson: One, the resident acrobatic production at Mandaley Bay Theatre in Las Vegas.

The complaint filed in California federal court begins with some history.
"In 1862, John Pepper and Henry Dircks invented 'Pepper's Ghost,' an illusion technique, which, over the last 150 years, has appeared in movies, concerts, magic shows and amusement park rides," says the lawsuit. "Today a new incarnation of Pepper's Ghost exists -- Musion Eyeliner technology. Musion Eyeliner uses a patented system to project three-dimensional images virtually indistinguishable from real life bodies."

David was apparently impressed upon seeing the technology being used to create the deceased rapper Tupac appearing on stage with Dr. Dre and Snoop Dogg. He says he recently bought the exclusive license to Musion's patent and has started up a company called Hologram USA with a showroom at the FilmOn Studios on Canon Drive in Beverly Hills.

Why? He's got plans. "We already agreed on hologram performances with Flo Rida and the late Amy Winehouse," he says. "Many other shows are coming."

But first comes some score-settling about who owns rights to hologram technology. David says he's about to file a slew of lawsuits. This Michael Jackson one is the first.

The new lawsuit mentions two patents at issue: One for a device for displaying moving images in the background of a stage and one for a projection apparatus and method for pepper's ghost illusion.

"Although it has been widely acknowledged that Defendants employ the technology to create a three-dimensional hologram of Michael Jackson in Cirque du Soleil's Michael Jackson: One, Defendants do not possess a valid license to practice that technology."

The show has been enormously successful and has helped the Michael Jackson estate reap almost a billion dollars in revenue since the King of Pop's passing in 2009. The lawsuit claims that since the technology behind the Tupac hologram got so much press attention, the defendants knew or should have known the system was patented. The plaintiffs demand an injunction and maximum damages for willful infringement.

The hologram is the climax of the 26-scene show, which never has a performer portraying Jackson onstage. Instead, the show strategically uses video and audio footage of the singer throughout the plot's peaks and valleys.

"His presence, even on video, is so powerful, that it can be very tricky to use him," Welby Altidor, One’s director of creation, told The Hollywood Reporter just before the show's opening in May 2013. "What we wanted to do in this show is build Michael’s presence through his voice and feeling his shadow, to feeling him progressively becoming more and more present throughout the show, until we can create the longing. And then the apex, the moment where we'll really feel that he's there and he's still with us."


THR has reached out to Cirque du Soleil and will update with any response.
Meanwhile, the hologram technology has landed in the hands of a Hollywood bad boy with a taste for the outrageous. David tells THR, "This is by far the most exciting business opportunity I have ever seen. Imagine running 100 meters against Usain Bolt or resurrecting Richard Prior!"

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/hologram-lawsuit-alki-david-michael-jackson-690899
 
Re: Michael Jackson Hologram Conjures Billionaire's Patent Lawsuit (Exclusive)

Hmm. There he is again ...
 
Re: Michael Jackson Hologram Conjures Billionaire's Patent Lawsuit (Exclusive)

Same person who pushed the whole B. Howard crap...
 
Re: Michael Jackson Hologram Conjures Billionaire's Patent Lawsuit (Exclusive)

I will go bonkers if there is even a hint of chance that sleaze ball will start using MJ hologram in his ventures :angry:

Is it just coincidence that he came up with this crap with B Howard? Is there some sort of plan that they claim B Howard is MJ's son, so he can use MJ image and likeness?
Too far fetching?


Ivyyyyyyyyy help!!!!
Am I right to says that Alki might owns the technology, but he still cannot use anyones image and likeness without permission from the estate?
 
Last edited:
Re: Michael Jackson Hologram Conjures Billionaire's Patent Lawsuit (Exclusive)

This guy's name is cropping up all too often now and nothing he is involved in sits easy with me.
 
Re: Michael Jackson Hologram Conjures Billionaire's Patent Lawsuit (Exclusive)

** so he wants the estate/cirque to pay for using the technology??
 
I'm guessing that 'wiki' is out of date on this...it implies that the patent has only been 'applied for'

Aspects of the technology are currently the subject of a US patent application.[4]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musion_Eyeliner

http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph...&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=20070201004&OS=20070201004


Musion's own website says that the Tupac Hologram appeared at Coachella in 2012, which appears to pre-date the granting of the patent?

http://www.eyeliner3d.com/musion_eyeliner_showreels.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It seems that the patent may have been granted in 2013....there is a response to another 'patent infringment' discussion with 'Arena 3D' here:

Having discovered the methods and processes required for the manufacturing of flame retardant foil, Musion filed for patents at the end of 2008. These are expected to be granted in Europe and the US during the course of 2013.
The assertion by Arena 3D that Musion did not invent its foil is completely false and designed to mislead the market into believing its own material is the same as Musion’s.

To the uninitiated, the materials may seem identical, but the differences could be fatal. Tests conducted by independent organisations and Musion on foils supplied by Arena 3D have found the materials to be highly flammable, especially when used in close proximity to powerful heat sources like high powered projectors and stage lighting. This presents a significant safety risk to the public.
Musion intends to continue its active campaign of informing the public of the potential dangers of using polymers originally destined for food packaging, especially in areas prone to fire hazards.

It is worth noting in this response that Musion is currently in litigation with Mr Augusiak in Germany for alleged patent and trademark infringement, as well as web domain misappropriation.
Furthermore, Mr Augusiak has attempted to discount Musion’s patents in legal affairs, but in two years, failed to provide any credible evidence for his supposed afflictions.

In general, Musion’s remarkable development of the Pepper’s Ghost effect has moved far beyond the initial excellent work of Henry Dircks and John Pepper, and since then, Uwe Maass’ initial creation. This has been achieved by Musion’s introduction of its flame retardant foil, ultra-bright projection, lighting effects and production techniques.

Musion has pioneered Pepper’s Ghost into the realms of real-time immersive holographic telepresence, music concerts and most recently, political electioneering. This has resulted in the rebranding of a theatrical effect into one of the most compelling visual forms known to man.
This effect has even usurped Walt Disney’s Haunted Mansion theme park attraction with the award winning ride, Disaster!, at Universal Studios in Orlando Florida featuring Christopher Walken.

The End of an Argument
So, to conclude. It is with great aggravation and sadness that Musion must endure the regular misdirection of Arena 3D. Musion prides itself on the research and development it has driven for the market’s benefit.


http://www.digitalsignagenews.eu/in...-to-arena-3d&catid=41:industry-news&Itemid=71
 
Last edited:
Re: Michael Jackson Hologram Conjures Billionaire's Patent Lawsuit (Exclusive)

This guy must be fascinated with the aspect of Michael Jackson, first the B. Howard stunt. Now this, he's doing everything to make sure his name is synonymous with Michael Jackson. It ain't gonna happen, buddy.
 
Re: Michael Jackson Hologram Conjures Billionaire's Patent Lawsuit (Exclusive)

OK I need to get some clarity on this, because we are dealing with David here. I guess we have to wait for some response from some ethical and intelligent person?

-I am not clear on who owns the patterns the One use.
-I am not clear if the technology One uses is the same as what David says he owns.
-I am not clear when David got a pattern for his technology.
-I am not clear if the illusion can be done with different technologies and One is using one of them.

Who is next to sue something or someone connected to the estate?
 
Re: Michael Jackson Hologram Conjures Billionaire's Patent Lawsuit (Exclusive)

I will go bonkers if there is even a hint of chance that sleaze ball will start using MJ hologram in his ventures :angry:

Is it just coincidence that he came up with this crap with B Howard? Is there some sort of plan that they claim B Howard is MJ's son, so he can use MJ image and likeness?
Too far fetching?


Ivyyyyyyyyy help!!!!
Am I right to says that Alki might owns the technology, but he still cannot use anyones image and likeness without permission from the estate?

He cannot use MJ's image without permission and it doesn't look like he wants to do that. This lawsuit is about the device used to project the hologram to the stage. He says that device is patented and they should have asked him for permission and paid him for using it.
 
Re: Michael Jackson Hologram Conjures Billionaire's Patent Lawsuit (Exclusive)

According to the lawsuit, David and his co-complainants are seeking an injunction which will stop Cirque du Soleil and other entities to use hologram technology. The plaintiffs are also seeking unspecified maximum damages as well for alleged willful infringement.

"Although it has been widely acknowledged that Defendants employ the technology to create a three-dimensional hologram of Michael Jackson in Cirque du Soleil's Michael Jackson: One, Defendants do not possess a valid license to practice that technology," the lawsuit read.


Read more at http://www.lawyerherald.com/article...ogram-michael-jackson.htm#Qg3KJLvzfVcdX16i.99
 
Re: Michael Jackson Hologram Conjures Billionaire's Patent Lawsuit (Exclusive)

First and foremost,this dude was NOT the first person to use hologram technology at a concert.
LaToya and Janet did hologram work long before Tupac's Coachella revival ever took place,so this dude can have several seats.
 
Re: Michael Jackson Hologram Conjures Billionaire's Patent Lawsuit (Exclusive)

^^I think he is saying that the particular technology One uses has a patent and the patent belongs to him. Therefore, Cirque should have asked permission and since they did not they are to stop and pay him. What I want to know is whether the actual technology One uses is the one he has a patent for. Is there only one way to do this illusion? I hope the other side answers soon, so we can see the issues more clearly.


The filing states that MGM is a partner. Now isn't the estate and Cirque partners as well, so is one of the Does 1-10 the estate?

Is the illusion on for tonight in the show or for the rest of the week? Does anyone know someone who has tickets for this week?
 
Last edited:
Re: Michael Jackson Hologram Conjures Billionaire's Patent Lawsuit (Exclusive)

I hope this doesn't cause a lot of trouble now.
 
Re: Michael Jackson Hologram Conjures Billionaire's Patent Lawsuit (Exclusive)

It seems once you knock off one lawsuit a new one takes its place.

Why did this guy take so long to sue? The illusion has been out for some time now. Did he just get his patent finalized?
 
Uwe Maass’, who is part of this lawsuit suing Cirque gave an interview to CNN in January:
"Resurrecting performers of the past comes with a complex of legal, technical and ethical questions, but has nevertheless been proving popular with audiences around the world. Maass says that his company's next main project is to help Cirque du Soleil bring the work of Michael Jackson back to life in the 'Immortal World Tour'."
http://edition.cnn.com/2014/01/08/tech/innovation/optical-technology-tupac-back-to-life/


Musion's press release from June 27 2013
http://online.wsj.com/article/PR-CO-20130627-909643.html
"The current collaboration between Cirque du Soleil and Michael Jackson's estate is another example of how the Eyeliner(TM) technology created and driven by Musion is transforming the way we view the potential of technology."

What is going on?
Is there hologram of Michael in IMMortal, does anyone remember?
Could it be that hologram that they use in MJ1 was meant to be used in IMmortal, but they decided to use it in MJ1?
 
Last edited:
Re: Michael Jackson Hologram Conjures Billionaire's Patent Lawsuit (Exclusive)

It seems once you knock off one lawsuit a new one takes its place.

Why did this guy take so long to sue? The illusion has been out for some time now. Did he just get his patent finalized?

From Ivy's patent links, the latest date (at the bottom of patent US7883212 B2) is 26 Sept 13. It looks as though both current patents incorporate elements of previously-patented technology. I'm guessing that the 'whole system' is described in the two latest patents (in Ivy's post) which build on and add to these previous technologies. The main thing about the 'foil' used and patented ? by Musion, is that it is non-flammable. It seems that there are several other foils out there which can be used to work the same way (ie to project images on to) but Musion say they are not flame proof. I think the foil itself is made by a specialist company, and I thought that Musion had an exclusive licence to purchase it. (Musion worked with Mitsubishi to develop the foil.....and I think they worked out ways of 'setting it up' eg with correct angles and tension, and correct use of projectors).

The YT video below shows the President of Cirque talking about acquiring 3d technology to bring Michael on to the stage with the dancers, and he mentions talking to technology companies. This video seems to be dated April 12

Patent US 7883212 B2
Nov 11, 2013 AS Assignment
Owner name: MUSION DAS HOLOGRAM LIMITED, UNITED KINGDOM
Effective date: 20130926
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MUSION SYSTEMS LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:031615/0800





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eo588zbf2-Y

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cirque du Soleil plans Michael Jackson show with 3-D and holograms
April 20th 2010

You don't see The Beatles in "Love," but Michael Jackson might be part of his own tribute show when Cirque du Soleil brings it to the Strip in late 2012.
Cirque officials say holograms or 3-D effects might have you ducking when the late superstar goes into that moonwalk or lets his gloved hand fly in the joint production announced Tuesday by Cirque and Jackson's estate.

"Technology is evolving at a very rapid pace. We hope that between now and 2012, when we open the show, technology will be even more sophisticated, that people will have the feeling Michael is onstage," said Cirque President Daniel Lamarre.
"We've been talking a lot ... about the fact that Michael Jackson was always ahead of his time. It's important with this show that we're going to be ahead of our time," Lamarre said. "We are talking to a lot of people that can bring new technologies to the table."
"We're looking at two or three different (venue) possibilities that are going to be dictated by which one will suit better the technology that we're looking for and obviously the availability," he said. "We will have to do some major changes wherever we end up."

http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/cirque-du-soleil-plans-michael-jackson-show-3-d-and-holograms
 
Last edited:
Re: Michael Jackson Hologram Conjures Billionaire's Patent Lawsuit (Exclusive)

Bubs OK so I am still confused. If this guy talked to the Cirque people in that January 2014 interview, how come the parties did not know that someone was using the technology without permission? I wish I had some more technical information and someone to tell me exactly how the One illusion is done. Why would Cirque actually talk to the people who owned the technology and not ask for permission? Is this something like the Anka situation?

Does anyone know if the illusion was in the show this week?
 
Re: Michael Jackson Hologram Conjures Billionaire's Patent Lawsuit (Exclusive)

Isn't the so called "Hologram" of Michael in the Cirque shows the impersonator from the MJ Experience video game? Can they really sue if it's not even Michael in the image?


Then again, I see this lawsuit isn't about the image itself, but the tech used to create it.
 
Re: Michael Jackson Hologram Conjures Billionaire's Patent Lawsuit (Exclusive)

Isn't the so called "Hologram" of Michael in the Cirque shows the impersonator from the MJ Experience video game? Can they really sue if it's not even Michael in the image?


Then again, I see this lawsuit isn't about the image itself, but the tech used to create it.

They are not suing over what image is being used. They are suing over the technology used to show the image. Even if they showed a cat doesn't matter. It is what they are using to create the hologram. not what image they use. I hope that helps .
 
Re: Michael Jackson Hologram Conjures Billionaire's Patent Lawsuit (Exclusive)

I don't think they will stop the illusion until they get a court order, if they win the case against them. To remove it could be used against them as admitting guilt. maybe they are not using the same technology or used it before it was copyrighted. Lets wait and see what the Estate defense is first.

Much can happen.
They might offer a settlement to get permission to continue using it if they are using that same technology. Stating they will pay so much for the use. It may be worth their while to take that offer if they want to make gauranteed money off the copyright, because the estate's MJOne show is ongoing and can benefit them. Other wise the Estate can say if they don't settle they will take it to court and if they lose they will use some other technology to create the illusion. Its not over and not proven ..
 
Re: Michael Jackson Hologram Conjures Billionaire's Patent Lawsuit (Exclusive)

^^Yeah that is why I want to know how they knew Cirque is using their technology. Is it that there is only one type of technology that produce this illusion? Then, if they found out Cirque was using their technology, wouldn't the first step be to send them notice and see what resolutions can be made before their do the filing? Why did this guy file first?
 
Re: Michael Jackson Hologram Conjures Billionaire's Patent Lawsuit (Exclusive)

^^Yeah that is why I want to know how they knew Cirque is using their technology. Is it that there is only one type of technology that produce this illusion? Then, if they found out Cirque was using their technology, wouldn't the first step be to send them notice and see what resolutions can be made before their do the filing? Why did this guy file first?

There seem to be similar companies using other types of 'foil' as a screen for the projection. Musion say theirs is the safest. I guess the reason for the suit (in place of a letter) is to gain maximum international publicity for his company....
 
Re: Michael Jackson Hologram Conjures Billionaire's Patent Lawsuit (Exclusive)

^^I agree with you with that publicity thing.
 
The Cirque case is referred to at the end of this article...response is expected on 23 May....

Billboard Awards defend Michael Jackson hologram

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Tech companies have filed an emergency lawsuit to prevent the Billboard Music Awards from using their patents to project a Michael Jackson hologram at this weekend's show.

Hologram USA Inc. and Musion Das Hologram Ltd. sued Jackson's estate and dick clark productions in federal court over technology known for digitally resurrecting deceased rapper Tupac Shakur at the 2012 Coachella music festival.

A lawyer representing the show's producers and Jackson's estate responded to the suit Friday by stating that if the virtual performance from the King of Pop were blocked, they would be irreparably harmed.

Judge Kent Dawson held a brief hearing Friday afternoon in a Nevada federal court and said he would rule on the case by the end of the day.

Plans to use the hologram during the show Sunday emerged with the lawsuit. Show producers still haven't confirmed that they plan to feature a 3-D image of Jackson, but they had been promoting a "history-making performance" at Las Vegas' MGM Grand Garden Arena that would promote the singer's latest posthumous album, "Xscape."

Attorney Michael Feder, representing the show and Jackson estate, said in his filed response that the holographic performance has been planned for months and had been discussed with Alki David, who owns the rights to the technology that creates and projects lifelike images to appear alongside live performers through Hologram USA and Musion.

Howard Weitzman, an attorney for Jackson's estate, called the lawsuit in a statement "ludicrous" and said it had "no merit."

Hologram USA and Musion say one of their products is being used without authorization by a competitor to create a segment that depicts Jackson performing a new song, "Slave to the Rhythm."

Hologram USA obtained the rights to the patents after the bankruptcy of Florida effects house Digital Domain, which created the Shakur performance to wide acclaim two years ago.

The lawsuit also names John C. Textor, the chairman of Florida-based Pulse Entertainment Corp. who was the former head of Digital Domain. Pulse is accused of using the hologram techniques without a proper license. A phone message left for Textor was not immediately returned.

The lawsuit names Atlanta-based Pulse Entertainment Inc. as a defendant. Ken S. Johnson said the company was listed incorrectly because it had no connection the Billboard Music Awards.

In March, Hologram USA sued Cirque du Soleil and MGM Resorts International over its show, "Michael Jackson ONE" at Mandalay Bay Hotel & Casino. The show features a performance by a digital rendition of Jackson, which the company also contends is an unlicensed use of its technology.

The case is being handled in a Los Angeles federal court and Cirque du Soleil and MGM Resorts have been granted an extension until May 23 to respond to the lawsuit.

https://music.yahoo.com/news/billbo...hael-jackson-hologram-225904282--finance.html
 
Re: Michael Jackson Hologram Conjures Billionaire's Patent Lawsuit (Exclusive)

Didn't know they tried to stop the Billboard performance too. I wonder what the response will be? They have up to this week anyway, so I guess we will find out soon.
 
Michael Jackson 'Hologram' Show Sparks New Legal Crossfire (Exclusive)

It's now been a month since a Michael Jackson recreation at the Billboard Music Awards earned heavy buzz. In the days leading up to the spectacle, Hologram USA, owned by firebrand entrepreneur Alki David, attempted to stop it by claiming it infringed patented hologram technology that he had exclusively licensed. The Billboard Awards performance was allowed to happen, but the dispute is hardly over.

On Thursday, a new $10 million lawsuit was filed by Pulse Evolution, whose animators and technicians spent many months preparing the Billboard Awards show. In a complaint filed in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles, Pulse is attacking David as a "charlatan who had no involvement whatsoever in the development of the Michael Jackson animation."

The move follows David's own lawsuit, which originally named Prometheus Global Media, parent of Billboard Music Awards producer Dick Clark Productions (PGM also is THR's owner), among the defendants. But now the case has been amended mostly to focus on Pulse and its chairman John Textor. The executors of the Michael Jackson estate are among the other defendants.

Both sides present their own tale of what has happened.

According to Pulse's complaint, David "falsely claimed credit for creating and developing the visual effects spectacle in a nationally-televised interview on CNN, in press releases and on his various websites operated by his company, FilmOn."

The lawsuit paints David as being famous for his outrageous antics and being a "notorious infringer of intellectual property rights," specifically referring to his well-publicized battles with TV broadcasters. The plaintiff is upset with David's alleged efforts to "divert public and industry attention away from Pulse Entertainment just as the company was being launched," asserting that it rises to unfair business competition practices and trade libel.

What's more, Pulse says that in the days leading up to the Billboard Music Awards, David attempted a "shakedown" by demanding credit — all on the basis of patent licensing from "a defunct company with no assets that had nothing to license in the first place."

That "defunct" company is Musion Das Hologram Limited, said by David to be connected to Europeans named Giovanni Palma and Uwe Maas. Where things get confusing is that Pulse has been dong with business with a company called Musion Systems Limited, apparently connected to two more Europeans named Ian O'Connell and William James Rock.

How hologram-like technology was created, who owns proper rights and what exactly is going on with these Musion companies is something that will have to be addressed in this case or elsewhere soon.

For now, what's important is that David's company claims a hold on technology said to be a new version of a 19th century stage trick called "Pepper's Ghost," involving the projection of two-dimensional images into a three-dimensional stage set. According to Hologram USA, the technology was famously used to create the late Tupac Shakur performing at the 2012 Coachella Music Festival.

David says he outbid Textor's Digital Domain unit to acquire rights to the technology last February, and that Textor's Pulse "elected to ignore the rights they previously sought to obtain" in the creation of a posthumous performance by Michael Jackson.

David's amended complaint (read it here ) goes onto assert that it "rejected a proposal made by Textor and Pulse for a joint marketing agreement over the technology in April and May 2014 – days before Textor and Pulse used that technology without authorization to create the Jackson hologram."

Back to Pulse's new lawsuit: The fact that David insists upon calling it a "hologram" in media interviews is noted. According to its complaint (read it here), "This mischaracterization of the [Michael Jackson] animation as a hologram highlights David's complete lack of technical expertise and involvement in the creation and development of the Michael Jackson Animation, insofar as the virtual Michael Jackson appearing at the Billboard Award Show was not a hologram at all, rather, it was an animation projected onto a screen. This distinction is lost on David, because he is nothing more than a fraud claiming credit for Pulse Entertainment's animation."

Is the distinction important?

David's lawsuit points to a USA Today story (with comments given by Textor and Pulse CEO Frank Patterson) that says Pulse refined the magician's technique called Pepper's Ghost, and that the technology was used to recreate Tupac.

"After Plaintiffs moved for a temporary restraining order in these court proceedings to enjoin Defendants from using the Patented Technology to create the Jackson hologram at the Billboard Music Awards, Defendants argued to this Court that they would not use the patented technology to create the Michael Jackson hologram," states David's amended complaint. "That argument is belied by the actual evidence. Initially, Textor attempted to obtain rights to the Patented Technology in the months and days leading up to the Billboard Awards because he knew those rights were required."

David's company, represented by lawyers Craig Newby and Ryan Baker, says that his legal adversaries "have created significant confusion in the marketplace" and "diluted the value of the Hologram USA brand," getting in the way of its discussions to do recreations of Elvis Presley and Bob Marley.

Pulse, represented by Marty Singer and Todd Eagan, responds that David has hijacked the launch of the company and has similarly caused "immeasurable harm" to its "public relations, its reputation and brand."

Bottom line: The business of dead stars has a very live fight.


http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/michael-jackson-hologram-show-sparks-713109
 
Re: Michael Jackson Hologram Conjures Billionaire's Patent Lawsuit (Exclusive)

It'll be interesting to see how this ends, I guess.
 
Back
Top