Michael Jackson's Sony/ATV Sale Gives Him Largest Celeb Payday Ever

ILoveHIStory

Proud Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2013
Messages
778
Points
0
Michael Jackson’s “Thriller” famously depicts grisly ghouls from various tombs closing in to seal the doom of the song’s protagonists. Similarly, the real-life King of Pop has risen from the grave, this time to clock a record $825 million payday.

The figure places Jackson atop this year’s Highest-Paid Dead Celebrities list—and also gives him the largest single-year payday by any entertainer, living or dead, ever recorded by FORBES. Most of that cash came from this year’s sale of Jackson’s half of the Sony/ATV music publishing catalogue, home to valuable copyrights of the Beatles, Taylor Swift, Eminem and others. The sale was announced in March and closed late last month.

“This transaction further allows us to continue our efforts of maximizing the value of Michael’s Estate for the benefit of his children,” said estate co-executors John Branca and John McClain in a statement. Added Sony Entertainment chief Michael Lynton: “This acquisition will enable Sony to more quickly adapt to changes in the music publishing business.”

Those in charge of Jackson’s estate and Sony weren’t the only ones who felt the move was a landmark agreement.

“It was certainly a deal that will go down in history,” says Jeff Jampol, who manages the estates of Jim Morrison, Janis Joplin and others. “I think to take a big payday like that … and divest their holdings, and be able to spread it out across other investments, is smart.”

The acquisition wouldn’t have happened if it weren’t for Jackson’s own underrated business savvy. He purchased the original ATV catalogue for $47.5 million in 1985, a move questioned at the time by some of Jackson’s most trusted advisers—including music executives Walter Yetnikoff and David Geffen—and initially lambasted by many observers.

But ATV’s value burgeoned rapidly, strengthened by the enduring value of the catalogue’s Beatles copyrights, and a decade later Sony paid Jackson $115 million to become partners on Sony/ATV. In the years that followed, the publisher turned into a multibillion-dollar behemoth, accumulating north of 2 million copyrights in total.

“Turns out that it was a very lucrative investment,” Yetnikoff told me in an interview for my book, Michael Jackson, Inc. “So I would have to say that his business acumen is better than mine.”

Even after the Sony/ATV sale, Jackson will continue to be a publishing mogul from beyond the mortal realm: his estate retains control of Mijac Music, the entity that contains his own copyrights. That catalogue also includes some of his favorite songs by other artists, acquired over the years separately from Sony/ATV.

“He had a kid’s heart, but a mind of a genius,” Motown founder Berry Gordy once explained to me. “He wanted to do everything, and he was capable. You can only do so much in a lifetime.”

Fortunately for the King of Pop, he’s found a way to keep setting new records, even in the afterlife.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/zackoma...s-him-largest-celeb-payday-ever/#2a220ac72600

_91888620_top_earning_dead_celebs_inf.jpg
 
Last edited:
While the Pearly Gates seemed to welcome an unusual amount of celebrities in the past year (David Bowie, Prince and Arnold Palmer, to name just three), the long-departed King of Pop had the time of his afterlife.

The March sale of Michael Jackson’s half of the Sony/ATV music publishing catalog, famous for its library of Beatles tunes, for $750 million puts him at the top of our annual ranking of the top-earning dead celebrities, an ironic finish given that many critics and even advisors once derided the catalog as a badly overpriced investment. Jackson’s total pretax payday of $825 million ranks as the biggest annual haul by any celeb dead or alive.

“He was always doing stuff that was the best, the greatest, the biggest,” says Jeff Jampol, who manages the estates of Janis Joplin, Jim Morrison and others. “That was a big fight when he wanted to buy that catalog … it turned out to be one of the greatest investments ever.”

In 1985, Jackson paid $47.5 million ($140 million in 2016 dollars) to buy the Beatles-packed ATV publishing catalog. Ten years later, Sony paid him $115 million to form a 50/50 joint venture, then purchased his remaining half in March. In all, the sales (and accompanying distributions) gave Jackson’s estate, which is overseen by lawyer John Branca and music exec John McClain, a 30% annualized return on investment.

Peanuts creator Charles Schulz claims the second spot with $48 million. The cartoonist died of colon cancer 16 years ago, but lives on through the franchise—and its licensing revenue, boosted by last year’s well-received 3-D Peanuts movie. Golf legend Arnold Palmer rounds out the top three with earnings of $40 million, most of which was accumulated in the mortal realm, as he passed away just days before our cutoff.

Our set of 13 Halloween-spooky estimates are for pretax income from October 1, 2015, through October 1, 2016, before deducting expenses for agents, managers and lawyers. Sources include Nielsen SoundScan, Nielsen BookScan, PollstarPro, IMDB and interviews with estate experts.

Recently deceased superstars Prince and David Bowie also rank high on the list. The Purple One passed away while still at the top of his touring game (grossing nearly $2 million per show) and sold more than 2.5 million albums over the past year, more than any other dead musician. Bowie, meanwhile, released his final album, Blackstar, just two days before his death; the ensuing sales spike helped him outsell Jackson and Elvis Presley (No. 4, $27 million) in the last year.

Presley’s total represents a 50% drop from last year’s figure (a change in how we accounted for Graceland ticket sales, not plummeting demand, accounts for the change). The King of Rock n’ Roll still moved more than 1 million albums on the year—most of them physical, not digital—remarkable for someone who’s been gone for nearly 40 years.

As for Jackson, the Sony/ATV payday gives him the last laugh over doubters. But a decade ago, he already knew what a good deal he’d made, as detailed in my book Michael Jackson, Inc. On a 2007 conference call, the King of Pop reminded Sony/ATV chief Marty Bandier of the acumen that had earned him a nine-figure return on paper by that point.

“See,” he told Bandier. “I told you I knew the music publishing business.”

Full List: The Top-Earning Dead Celebs Of 2016

1. Michael Jackson (d. 2009) -- $825 million
2. Charles Schulz (d. 2000) -- $48 million
3. Arnold Palmer (d. 2016) -- $40 million
4. Elvis Presley (d. 1977) -- $27 million
5. Prince (d. 2016) -- $25 million
6. Bob Marley (d. 1981) -- $21 million
7. Theodor "Dr. Seuss" Geisel (d. 1991) -- $20 million
8. John Lennon (d. 1980) -- $12 million
9. Albert Einstein (d. 1955) -- $11.5 million
10. Bettie Page (d. 2008) -- $11 million
11. David Bowie (d. 2016) -- $10.5 million
12. Steve McQueen (d. 1980) -- $9 million
13. Elizabeth Taylor (d. 2011) -- $8 million

http://www.forbes.com/sites/zackoma...t-paid-dead-celebrities-of-2016/#99817ce8d2e1
 
Last edited:
I wish MJ was here to spend his own money that he worked hard for and invested.
 
I wish MJ was here to spend his own money that he worked hard for and invested.

... but he mostly spent his money for leeches and opportunists, so.called advisers and lawyers..., rent and hotels and bodyguards, absolutely mindlessly....
 
I appreciate the way Zack O'Malley writes about Michael. Not enough people know about this side of Michael, the serious businessman who made smart investments, the capable adult with the mind of a genius, as Berry Gordy puts it. That "Peter Pan" image doesn't do him justice.
 
Even deducting the $750 million from the ATV sale MJ would still be #1 with around $75 million earning.
 
And it cost him his life and will soon end up in the IRS pocket.
 
You all realize that the general public will probably never know about this. They were dictated by the mainstream media over a decade ago that Michael had lost his rights to Sony/ATV which was never true. Otherwise he would not be able to sell them now.
 
AlexRox;4170382 said:
You all realize that the general public will probably never know about this. They were dictated by the mainstream media over a decade ago that Michael had lost his rights to Sony/ATV which was never true. Otherwise he would not be able to sell them now.

Don't you just hate it how not a single mainstream media company has reported this :(

The Guardian: "That came mostly from the Jackson estate’s $750m sale of the late singer’s remaining stake in the Sony/ATV music publishing catalog – which includes the rights to many Beatles songs – to Sony Corporation."

Daily Mail: "Sale of singer's remaining half share of Beatles music catalogue to Sony earned him $750 million" (literally first big bulletpoint in that article)

Billboard: "Sony paid the singer $115 million for a 50/50 partnership for Sony/ATV Publishing after Jackson initially bought the Sony/ATV publishing company for $47 million back in 1985 (the equivalent to $160 million today). Earlier this year, Sony bought Jackson's half for $750 million, giving the pop legend his highest payout to date."

Sky News: "The growth in his fortune was largely due to the $750m (£616m) sale of his half in the Sony-ATV Music Publishing catalogue."

The Mirror: "The Don’t Stop ‘Til You Get Enough star earned a record-breaking income of £677million this year - largely thanks to the £615million sale of his half of the Sony/ATV publishing catalogue, including a library of Beatles tracks."

ABC News: "In 1995, Jackson earned $115 million from Sony for half of the Fab Four's catalog that he owned in a 50/50 partnership deal. In March of 2016, Jackson's estate sold his remaining half to the company."

NME: "This massive figure includes a $750 million (£615 million) payout that Jackson's estate received for the sale of his half of the Sony/ATV music publishing catalogue, which includes a substantial library of Beatles songs."
 
HIStoric;4170391 said:
Don't you just hate it how not a single mainstream media company has reported this :(

The Guardian: "That came mostly from the Jackson estate’s $750m sale of the late singer’s remaining stake in the Sony/ATV music publishing catalog – which includes the rights to many Beatles songs – to Sony Corporation."

Daily Mail: "Sale of singer's remaining half share of Beatles music catalogue to Sony earned him $750 million" (literally first big bulletpoint in that article)

Billboard: "Sony paid the singer $115 million for a 50/50 partnership for Sony/ATV Publishing after Jackson initially bought the Sony/ATV publishing company for $47 million back in 1985 (the equivalent to $160 million today). Earlier this year, Sony bought Jackson's half for $750 million, giving the pop legend his highest payout to date."

Sky News: "The growth in his fortune was largely due to the $750m (£616m) sale of his half in the Sony-ATV Music Publishing catalogue."

The Mirror: "The Don’t Stop ‘Til You Get Enough star earned a record-breaking income of £677million this year - largely thanks to the £615million sale of his half of the Sony/ATV publishing catalogue, including a library of Beatles tracks."

ABC News: "In 1995, Jackson earned $115 million from Sony for half of the Fab Four's catalog that he owned in a 50/50 partnership deal. In March of 2016, Jackson's estate sold his remaining half to the company."

NME: "This massive figure includes a $750 million (£615 million) payout that Jackson's estate received for the sale of his half of the Sony/ATV music publishing catalogue, which includes a substantial library of Beatles songs."

Ha ha! Was gonna do the same but couldn't be arsed. Nice one :)
 
Yup. Haven't seen a mainstream media outlet NOT report it last night. Take away that Sony deal and Michael still made twice as much as the next in line.

I love the way Forbes wrote their article too. Especially mentioning Yetnikoff, Geffen and Gordy. Powerful money making music moguls. Yetnikoff and Geffen are probably gnashing their teeth.
 
I wish MJ was here to spend his own money that he worked hard for and invested.

I don't think he'd have sold it. But then we'll never know.

But it would appear in the latter years of his life Michael was spending money before he had earned it...in a way.
 
don't think he'd have sold it. But then we'll never know.
----------------

He wouldnt have had any choice if they inacted the clause.
 
Even deducting the $750 million from the ATV sale MJ would still be #1 with around $75 million earning.

I was thinking about that too. I would like to know how that money was made
since Immortal is no longer a factor.


I'm afraid the fact that MJ has been at the top since his death is just more reason why
the media is doing everything to tear him down. They HATE it that despite all their efforts
there are still people all over the world who don't despise him. They just hate it.

And Robson, Safechuck and their leech lawyers look at those numbers and salivate.
The American government want most of that money too.
After doing their best to destroy him and his reputation.

And it cost him his life and will soon end up in the IRS pocket.

Why are you so sure they will win? Their case is BS. They way overstate the value of MJ's image at the time of his death.
If a jury or judge (will it be a jury trial?) give the IRS the 700 million they want that will be due to bias not facts.
 
Last edited:
Im not sure. I have no idea. No doubt they will get something though. This is mj and the state we are talking about. When was mj not screwed over in some shape of form.the irony if you want to call it that of them wanting vertually the same amount as they got for the cat sums it up.you couldnt write a script like it.
 
So enough money made to create an full out exclusive "Dangerous" 25 box set and live shows on bluray.


Verzonden vanaf mijn iPad met Tapatalk
 
Im not sure. I have no idea. No doubt they will get something though.

This is mj and the state we are talking about. When was mj not screwed over in some shape of form.

Yes they will get something which is ridiculous if you think about that America, including a certain federal agency, did their best
to devalue MJ's image. First the American media makes hundreds of millions branding him as a child molester
then their government wants to make hundreds of millions arguing that the value of the child molester's image
was much more than 5000 bucks. It's just infuriating how screwing MJ has always been good business.
 
When it suits their agenda hes broke and when it suits their agenda hes a billionaire. They need to make their minds up?
 
If this is true then MJ earned no more than 10 million from album and single sales last year
where did the remaining 65 million come from?
Other than Off the Wall and MJ ONE I don't know about any MJ projects in the last 12 months.
He still got his share from the ATV revenue before the sale was finalized, didn't he?


Presley's total was down 50% from last year’s figure, due to a change in how Forbes accounts for Graceland ticket sales, but he still sold over a million albums (most of them physical) in the year.

While David Bowie, who succumbed to cancer in January, has outsold both Jackson and Elvis in terms of albums and singles in many major markets in 2016, his estimated earnings were a comparatively low $10.5m.

http://www.newstalk.com/Michael-Jackson-outperforms-Prince--Bowie-on-topearning-dead-celebs-list
 
Last edited:
Mijac earnings can be added.obviously not 65 mill

Yes and his share of EMI publishing is also there.

In any case this is the first year since he died that he earned less than 100 million
40 million less than last year (115 million) even though there was no Off the Wall doc/reissue last year
just MJ ONE, Mijac, album sales.

This is no doubt partly due to the smear campaign which has been going on since June and which the Estate totally failed
to counter. But they just don't care. Not even if their passivity hurts their business.
 
Last edited:
Greenburg's book "Michael Jackson Inc." is actually a worthy read for any fan. I suggest picking it up at your local library.

I'm still conflicted about the sale of the catalog. Yes, Michael's estate has earned a buttload of money once again, but Michael himself would have NEVER sold that catalog back to Sony if he were still alive. I'm not sure how to feel about the sale in general.:bored2:
 
Michael Jackson Earned More Money than Any Other Celebrity, Dead or Alive, in 2016

[FONT=&amp]<time pubdate="" datetime="2016-10-12T14:02:10-04:00" class="pub-date" style="box-sizing: inherit; font-size: 1.4rem; line-height: 1.71429;">Wednesday, October 12, 2016 2:02 p.m. EDT</time>[/FONT]
<figure class="article-main-media-container" style="box-sizing: inherit; font-family: &quot;Whitney SSm A&quot;, &quot;Whitney SSm B&quot;, &quot;Lucida Grande&quot;, &quot;Lucida Sans&quot;, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 1.4rem; line-height: 1.71429; margin: 0px 0px 1.71429em; color: rgb(69, 69, 69); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">
019523a8285e0cfc8b11acf6e9fdef9b.jpg

<figcaption id="main-article-caption" class="single" style="box-sizing: inherit; font-size: 1.4rem; line-height: 1.71429;">Image courtesy of Kevin Mazur/WireImage (via ABC News Radio)

More than seven years after his death, Michael Jackson is still raking in big bucks, and this past year the King of Pop actually earned more money than any other celebrity, living or dead. According to Forbes , Jackson's estate earned a whopping $825 million between October 2015 and October 2016, thanks mainly to the sale of his 50-percent share of the Sony/ATV music publishing catalog, which accounted for $750 million alone.</figcaption></figure>[FONT=&amp]
Sony/ATV was a joint venture Jackson and Sony entered into in 1995 that includes the rights to hundreds of Beatles songs. Sony purchased the remaining half of Jackson's stake in the company in March 2016. This marks the fourth straight year, and the sixth time in the last seven years, that MJ has topped the Forbes list of top-earning dead celebrities.
Second among dead music artists who appear on the latest Forbes tally, and fourth overall, is Elvis Presley , whose estate earned $27 million over the last year. The King of Rock 'n' Roll's earnings came in large part from music sales and from his Memphis mansion Graceland, which is a popular tourist attraction. Elvis' earnings were about 50-percent less this year than last, mainly due to a change in the way Forbes accounted for Graceland ticket sales.

Other deceased music artists who landed on the Forbes list include Prince at #5 with $25 million; Bob Marley at #6 with 21 million; John Lennon at #8 with $12 million; and David Bowie at #11 with $10.5 million.

Here are the top 11 deceased celebrities on Forbes ' 2016 list, and their estimated earnings:
1. Michael Jackson, $825 million 2. Charles M. Schulz, $48 million (Peanuts creator) 3. Arnold Palmer, $40 million (golfer) 4. Elvis Presley, $27 million 5. Prince, $25 million 6. Bob Marley, $21 million 7. Theodore "Dr. Seuss" Geisel, $20 million (children's book author) 8. John Lennon, $12 million 9. Albert Einstein, $11.5 million (physicist) 10. Bettie Page, $11 million (model & pinup star) 11. David Bowie, $10.5 million[/FONT]
[FONT=&amp]

Copyright © 2016, ABC Radio. All rights reserved.
http://929wlmi.com/news/articles/20...an-any-other-celebrity-dead-or-alive-in-2016/
[FONT=&amp]<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" viewBox="0 0 32 32" class="at-icon at-icon-facebook" style="width: 32px; height: 32px;"><g></g></svg>
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" viewBox="0 0 32 32" class="at-icon at-icon-twitter" style="width: 32px; height: 32px;"><g></g></svg>
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" viewBox="0 0 32 32" class="at-icon at-icon-pinterest_share" style="width: 32px; height: 32px;"><g></g></svg>

[/FONT]


[/FONT]
 
Yup. Haven't seen a mainstream media outlet NOT report it last night. Take away that Sony deal and Michael still made twice as much as the next in line.

I love the way Forbes wrote their article too. Especially mentioning Yetnikoff, Geffen and Gordy. Powerful money making music moguls. Yetnikoff and Geffen are probably gnashing their teeth.

Why didn't Gordy sell Motown to MJ?
 
Greenburg's book "Michael Jackson Inc." is actually a worthy read for any fan. I suggest picking it up at your local library.

I'm still conflicted about the sale of the catalog. Yes, Michael's estate has earned a buttload of money once again, but Michael himself would have NEVER sold that catalog back to Sony if he were still alive. I'm not sure how to feel about the sale in general.:bored2:

Minus raising $750,000,000 to buy out Sony's half of the catalogue, Michael wouldn't have a choice if Sony triggered their shotgun clause, which is exactly what they did with the Estate.
 
HIStoric;4170569 said:
Minus raising $750,000,000 to buy out Sony's half of the catalogue, Michael wouldn't have a choice if Sony triggered their shotgun clause, which is exactly what they did with the Estate.

The estate wasn't looking for raising that amount of money, they were looking for partner who had money to buy Sony's share. Then there was the other problem the estate faced, which people seems to have forgotten. Sony not only triggered B&S clause, but they also refused to renew loan that MJ had against the catalogue.
"In 2012: A substantial business loan ($280 million, by FORBES&#8217; estimate) remains on Jackson&#8217;s 50% stake in the Sony/ATV publishing catalog."

I understood that the Estate would have needed to find parter to buy 50% (Sony's share of catalogue) and they had to find someone to loan them around 280 million to pay MJ's loan back to Sony, but they couldn't.

If the estate wanted to buy Sony out and pay MJ's loan against his share of catalogue, the amount would have been eye watering over 1 billion.

I find is useless when people say MJ never would have sold the catalogue. We do not know what he would have done if he was here and faced the same situation as his estate faces now. Somehow he would have had to make up all the money to pay his people, lawsuits, his and family living paying back loans against his own catalogue as well as ATV catalogue etc. Michael would have worked himself to grave trying to keep himself afloat without selling the catalogue.
 
Presley&#8217;s total represents a 50% drop from last year&#8217;s figure (a change in how we accounted for Graceland ticket sales, not plummeting demand, accounts for the change). The King of Rock n&#8217; Roll still moved more than 1 million albums on the year&#8212;most of them physical, not digital&#8212;remarkable for someone who&#8217;s been gone for nearly 40 years.


Isn`t this strange? Forbes changed his roule how to account Graceland ticket-sales and now he dropped 50% in income.
 
It's strange and sad to me that MJ no longer owns half of Sony/ATV (IDK why it matters to me) but I hope some great investments are made with the money and are MJ related.....
 
Why are you so sure they will win? Their case is BS. They way overstate the value of MJ's image at the time of his death.
If a jury or judge (will it be a jury trial?) give the IRS the 700 million they want that will be due to bias not facts.

The Estate did understate the value of Michael's image and they should be made to pay their fair share in taxes. Would you really be defending tax evasion by a multi-million dollar estate if it wasn't MJ's? Now I don't think the Estate owes 700 million but the IRS is probably hoping for a settlement. I'm glad they sued though. I'm not going to automatically side with the Estate in every case when they are clearly in the wrong. And scheming to avoid taxes (which will have to be compensated for by ordinary citizens) when you're raking in millions of dollars is wrong.
 
Back
Top