Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 21 of 21

Thread: Could The Jacksons Still Have Been Successful Without Michael?

   
  1. #16
    Points: 6,061, Level: 50
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 89
    Overall activity: 63.0%
    Achievements:
    Overdrive5000 Experience Points3 months registered

    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    1,642
    Points
    6,061
    Level
    50
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 609 Times in 333 Posts

    Default Re: Could The Jacksons Still Have Been Successful Without Michael?

    I mean.... look at the Motown Audition Video... then you who brought them the contract. Without Michael in this Audition/Video - No contract!

  2. #17
    Achievements:
    Overdrive7 days registered500 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    224
    Thanks
    30
    Thanked 55 Times in 34 Posts

    Default Re: Could The Jacksons Still Have Been Successful Without Michael?

    The answer to this question was given in 1989 after their flop album release. It's ridiculous to think they would be successful, apart from Jermaine not a single Jackson 5 member scored a hit solo. Everything they did after MJ left was copying their brother's work.

  3. #18
    Points: 3,950, Level: 39
    Level completed: 43%, Points required for next Level: 200
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran1000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    At home
    Posts
    16
    Points
    3,950
    Level
    39
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default Re: Could The Jacksons Still Have Been Successful Without Michael?

    Nah MJ was without a doubt the main Jackson, and the reason for most of their success.

  4. #19
    Points: 69, Level: 1
    Level completed: 38%, Points required for next Level: 31
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    7 days registered
    MJPhantz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    13
    Points
    69
    Level
    1
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Re: Could The Jacksons Still Have Been Successful Without Michael?

    Haha nooo.
    Even Janet would not have gotten a break without Michael paving the way for her.

  5. #20
    Points: 199, Level: 3
    Level completed: 98%, Points required for next Level: 1
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    31 days registered100 Experience Points
    raulito's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    14
    Points
    199
    Level
    3
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

    Default Re: Could The Jacksons Still Have Been Successful Without Michael?

    Jermaine was a good singer... The Jacksons as a group without Mike? No way they make it IMO

  6. #21
    Points: 19, Level: 1
    Level completed: 37%, Points required for next Level: 31
    Overall activity: 3.0%

    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    3
    Points
    19
    Level
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Re: Could The Jacksons Still Have Been Successful Without Michael?

    Well there was no reason why the first single from 2300 Jackson Street didn't do better than #79 on the pop chart, it's a great track and very current to that point in time, good video too: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQtYbR8vMdo

    I'm guessing that the main reason for the title track from that album featuring every single Jackson was that it would ensure that Michael was on it at least for one song. But that song is incredibly cheesy and I'm not surprised that one wasn't a hit.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •