The Leaving Neverland - Lie Collection

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jan 24, 2019
Messages
1,676
Points
0
To the "soldiers of Love"......

I thought it is time to make a thread were we can collect and present all exposed Lies and credibilty issues of Leaving Neverland, the two accusers and the filmaker for new visitors and to have a collection were we can give people a link to when we are defending Michael in these days.

Please post only things which are really sure that they are lies or very sure.
WITH EVIDENCE!
No speculations.

Don't replay on posts here.
Whrite a personal message to the posters when he/she posts something wrong that he can correct it.

---------------------------------------

To the readers of this thread.....
First you should watch all the five follerwing videos for some important basic informations about the Wade Robson and James Safechuck case.






This collection is not a full collection of the admitted lies and credibility issues from the two Michael Jackson Accusers Wade Robson, James Safechuck and the Filmaker Dan Reed.

There are many admited lies and credibility issues which are collected elswhere.
But I/we try to fill this thred with so many content as possible in the next days, to give you an overview.
 
Last edited:
In the Oprah Winfrey interview:

Oprah: "So when Wade came out and we saw him on The Today Show, was that the first time you consciously recognized there were others? Cause obviously you recognized there were others because you testified in a trial."

Safechuck: "I mean I testified when I was a little kid. And you don't think about there being others. Your brain doesn't go there, you're just thinking about you and him."

In the documentary:

Safechuck: "There was one particular boy who sort of entered and replaced me. And so I saw him grow closer and closer to that boy. And I was pushed out more and more. And that was really difficult to handle. It was a lot of jealousy and hurt. You're no longer special. One specific night that was really tough, it was at Avenue of the Stars. You're spending the night there and the boy was there. The boy would sleep in Michael's room and I would sleep downstairs on the sofa. It's like being cast out. And it was like a realization that, like, 'Okay, I'm not number one.' And I just wanted to go home. I cried and cried. And I cried out for my mom. And I just cried myself to sleep. So it was like the first night it really hit. Michael's my, like, partner, and then he's gone."

***

In the Oprah Winfrey interview:

Oprah: "Why when your mother asked you in the first trial, why did you deny it?"

Safechuck: "I didn't not testify out of thinking I was doing something good or knowing that what he did was bad. I was afraid of being caught. It was on the news 24/7. I mean it was just being broadcast. And there was so much attention on it from the world."

Oprah: "So by that time, you thought of what you were doing as a bad thing."

Safechuck: "No."

Oprah: "Or just as a thing that you all did, but you had to keep it a secret."

Safechuck: "I didn't think of it as good or bad."

In the documentary:

Safechuck: "And so I told my mom then that he wasn't a good person."

Safechuck’s mother: "Jimmy was over and he said to me, "Michael's an evil man."

In Safechuck's complaint:

"Plaintiff talked to her about the call and told his mother that the decedent was a "bad man", but was unable to tell her any details or say anything but the very briefest statement that he had been abused."

***

In the Oprah Winfrey interview:

Oprah: "When did you start to think of it as abuse?"
Safechuck: "It wasn't until Wade came out [in 2013]."

In the documentary:

Safechuck, about 2005 trial: "And so I told my mom then that he wasn't a good person."

Safechuck’s mother, about 2005 trial: "Jimmy was over and he said to me, "Michael's an evil man."

In Safechuck's complaint:

About 2005 trial: "Plaintiff talked to her about the call and told his mother that the decedent was a "bad man", but was unable to tell her any details or say anything but the very briefest statement that he had been abused."
 
Re: The Leaving Neverland - Lie Collection (No comments)

Judi Brisse

54278856_10156119651536220_4103915365283659776_n.jpg


My summery to the credibilty of the story with the wedding ceremony and MJ and James did so much incredible sexual stuff together in Neverland:

How can it ever be beliveable that Michael and James spend so much time TOGETHER and did all this many sexual stuff there over a long perid of time when they only show three pictures in the movie of Michael and James in Neverland (one picture of James in a pool one pictures of Michael alone, anouther picture of MJ looking on Hitler at the screen, where he seames much older, and it can't be sure that it is really MJ, cause his face is covered) and a Birthday Party at neverland where no Michael showed up?

James said in LN that MJ and he filed out a document about their "marriage".
They didn't explain, what happened to this document.
Why could James not keep this damm document but the rings?
James seames not to have it and Michael Jackson seamed also not to have it cause the police turned his house upside down in 1993 and 2003 and found nothing!!!

The wedding cermomy should beliveable because they showed three cheep rings in the camera in Leaving Neverland?

When I would be so much in love with Michael and had a loveing relationship with the biggest superstar in the world, I whould make photos with the rings on my finger as a child.
But there is not a single one in LN!

The whole story with the wedding ceremony and the sex adventures in Neverland is unbeliveabe!

I think they knew by making the film that the Neverland Part, the weekest part of James story is, because of the incredible lack of evidence they could show about it (three photos, birthday party, the rings).
So they brought the most graphic crazy details into this to manipulate the emotions of the viewer so far as possible that he don't reconize when they only watch LN once (what the most people do) the lack of evidence they are showing.

Even the first version was not strong enough so Reed decided to bring the wedding ceremony in.
This was the last thing they filmed.
They made this also cause they know it whould trigger the media extreamly who always wanna sell the storys that MJ abused kids in the "kiddie-candy Land" Neverland and not somewere else!

---------------------------------

Watch this video to see that James Safechuck is definitly lieing on the the subject in Leaving Neverland that MJ beggin him to testify in the 2005 trail:

 
Last edited:
Re: The Leaving Neverland - Lie Collection (No comments)

Confusion about the Credibility of Wade Robsons Story Part I


Wade was already 8 in that video of 1990.
So he danced after all horrible painful things he claimed, whould have happened to him months before were he must practicing oral sex, to the music of his molester, idolized him when he could have chossed every other music to dance to!
He could have choosed also every other song of Michael Jackson but it had to be "The Way You Make Me Feel" which has this very sexual dance break szene included in its short film?
Very strange behavior for a sexual abused victim!
It is very possible that the relationship between MJ and Wade was in reality compleatly harmless and the 8 year old Wade here didn't know anything about sex at this moment like every normal child in this age!!!
_____________________________________________________

Wade Robson is bying the History CD with his mother in 1995:


Why must Wade Robson who had an longtime loving sexual relationship at this time with Michael Jackson buy the Historyalbum on his own?
Why wouldn't his generous lover MJ (who seamed to loved to always groom and seduce him and his family) send him a personal free copy of his most personal album?

It seames that MJ wasn't his lover in reality and don't even care about Wade or their friendship during this time cause he instead was a Ladys Man (Which is proven by the maaany adult Porn Magazines, found in Neverland sometimes with traces of his sperm), in love with Lisa Marie and wanna seduceing, grooming her in bed all the time!

I remember that friends of Michael and even staff members very often got personal copys from his albums from MJ.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Chantal Robson the sister of Wade Robson never showed public support to her brother as a sexual abused victim on her offical twitter account exept from a video she shared and an announcement about an interview with Wade back in 2014, but not a single personal statememt!

https://mobile.twitter.com/chantalrobson

For a sister who works also in the music industry as a choegrapher from a real victim of childabuse who has the courage to come forward and stand up against Michael Jackson there whould be much more public support expectable!

It seames that Chantal Robson in reality knows that Wade Robson is lying and couldn't stand to support it!

------------------------------------------------------

This is a must watch videos about Wades actual victimfund AND his past victim fund he had in 2013:


This so called "victim" and his not selfish financial motives behind this funds can't be taken seriously!
 
Last edited:
Re: The Leaving Neverland - Lie Collection (No comments)

I wonder why mj did not want to be around the safechucks?
 
Dan Reed is plagiarizing Victor Gutierrez's pro-pedophilia book again in this interview: https://www.hit.com.au/story/leavin...dan-reed-slams-brandi-jackson-s-claims-125583

Dan Reed: “The intense period of Wade's - it's terrible to say it, but - sexual relationship with Michael Jackson was from the age of 7 to the age of 9. That was if you like to begin to use it the dreadful word the 'honeymoon' period, the period when they were really seeing each other a lot.”

Victor Gutierrez: Meanwhile, Jackson and Jordie told June that they wouldn't be able to go, since they both had a cold, and they stayed in the hotel room. According to Jordie, this was an excuse that they had agreed upon so that they could have complete freedom and privacy. "It was fun. I felt very special waiting for the moment of the 'honeymoon', as we called it, when we could be alone."

***

Dan Reed: “She's (Brandi) saying they were together for 7 years. Now he met his wife Amanda when he was 19 or I think maybe even younger, 18 or 19. So that would have meant that Brandi was in a sexual relationship with Wade from the age of 12. Really?"

He's trying to discredit Brandi by saying Wade met his wife Amanda when he was 18 or 19 years old, but if anything, if this is true, it only reinforces Brandi's claims that he was cheating on her with multiple women.

***

Dan Reed: Mike Pesca, host of The Gist, asked director Dan Reed whether the items are “actual Michael Jackson–worn gloves and jackets,” and Reed responded that they’re the real deal. “Of course, it’s all genuine. I verified this with Wade,” he said in an interview. “He’s not gonna go and buy some Michael Jackson memorabilia on eBay and then burn it in front of his little boy. I mean, come on.”

Wade Robson: "The Thriller jacket that I burned in the photos was my custom childhood Thriller jacket that I used to perform in. Those are the images portrayed in Leaving Neverland.”
 
Re: The Leaving Neverland - Lie Collection (No comments)

This is a must watch video to see that this two accusers are lying for finanzial motivations and to understand why they are doing it:


The money they can get out of their claims depends on the amount of demage, that they abuse had to endure as children and how much it has infected their lifes.

Thats why....

- They say it happened multible times (100 times)
- They say it happened over a long period of time from many years
- They say when it hapened it happened nearly everytime they were togeteher with Mj without days or weeks breaks between the molestations
- They say the molestations were always very extreme and intense
- They roll everthing what went wrong in their lifes off the things MJ did to them

Everything makes the financial outcome from the lawsuits, the interviews and from the sells of LN higher for them!

When they would only say it happend one til 5 times and it was only some inapropreate touching, it whould be not so valuable for the outcome of their lawsuits, not enough to get huge public attention and fill out a film with this.

When they must get trogh this they wanna 'win big time' not only a few dollers... bilions of dollars so everthing what did happen to them has to be so EXTREAME as possible!!!

They are collecting the dollars since the sundance premier now and will collect much more til they are really exposed publically.
When they are exposed they can leave the country and don't have to give anything back cause nobody can sue them for deformation of a dead person.
 
Last edited:
Re: The Leaving Neverland - Lie Collection (No comments)

This videos exposes Lies of the two Michael Jackson Accusers:



Watch the last video above also to clearly reconize that this interview uploaded on July 13 2012 didn't fit in Wades newest version of the burning MJ memorbilia story because of his abuse he told in LN.
Here he is still highly prising Michael Jackson with no visuable psychlogical problems:


This dancesession who Wade Robson dances in 2012 to Michael Jacksons song "Unbreakable" contredict also very strongly the story in his lawsits:


In the video you can also see how negative "triggered" Wade Robson is from MJs music when he heared it puplically and had "to leave" immediatly.

-------------------------------
The comparession between Wade Robsons Lawsuit and Leaving Neverland reveals anouther lie/inconcistancy in the story he tells how the first abuse does happen.

 
Last edited:
Re: The Leaving Neverland - Lie Collection (No comments)

Dan Reed is a unprofessional greedy filmaker who used foreign video footage in the childporngraphic movie "Leaving Neverland" without asking the footageowner for permissions or paid for it.
It is a movie from which he makes huge money out of it on his own after it is sold to over 130 countries.

The footage from a Neverland visit in 2017 of this man was used in Leaving Neverland:


PS the footage of Neverland was NOT 'OK'd' by the distributer of the footage, was unaware that it was even going to be in a film..

The Neverland footage was not approved by the publisher of the footage, I spoke to him and he said a few things. He has a 'nasty' lawyer that he could talk to regarding the use of the footage and may look into seeing what he can do.

He was there in an exclusive visit by the agent with the company he works for. That agent has ties to those who are selling the property. They went there to tour it, have lunch, have a Q&A on the property and luxury real estate etc. His footage was used by someone in the past trying to pretend they broke into Neverland and it was up on youtube. He complaint to youtube and expressed he hopes it was taken down. Dan Reed was not there!

The fact that Dan Reed gives the imagination in the credits of "Leaving Neverland", that he filmed everything with his filmcrew on his own what he used ouside the privat footage of Wade and James, makes him uncredible Liar in this case.
--------------------------------------------

Here are the reactions from two MJ fans who were misportraid in Dan Reeds Leaving Neverland:

[video=youtube;S86vKwVhB8o]https://youtu.beS86vKwVhB8oS86vKwVh...rent case [MEDIA=youtube]88GuhFpACGU[/MEDIA]
 
Last edited:
Re: The Leaving Neverland - Lie Collection (No comments)

I found two video collections today with fotos of James and Michael.
You will find there most of the pictures which were used by Dan Reed in Leaving Neverland.
So the most fotos which were used there to Support James shocking story are not private (never before seen) fotos from, or shoot from the Safechucks.
They are publically relesed fotos shoot from other people.

This was uploaded on September 20 2014

This was uploaded on August 2018

Seames that Dan Reed used the photos from this video collections uploded on a MJ Fanchannel for Leaving Neverland and again don't had the rights for using this pictures.

--------------------------------------------

Proof that the interviews with James and Wade in Leaving Neverland are filmed by Dan Reed in multible different takes which were edited together like a movie and not in a few long ones what would be normal in a documentary where the maker want tell the unsmask truth.

 
Last edited:
new, detailed and helpful article from TheMichaelJacksonAllegations

NOTE: This article includes lots of screencaps of legal docs, photos and links which don't appear below.

Differences Between Leaving Neverland/interviews and the Robson/Safechuck lawsuits
Posted on March 17, 2019

While the story in “Leaving Neverland” is based on Wade Robson and James Safechuck’s lawsuits, there are some differences between the film, their interviews during the promotional campaign of the film and their complaints. Here I will post a list of those differences:

1) In the film Wade Robson makes the allegation that Michael Jackson made him get rid of a bloody underwear after attempting to anally penetrate him when Wade was 14.

Robson does claim the anal penetration attempt in the court filing, but does not claim anything about a bloody underwear and Jackson allegedly making him get rid of it. This is all that is alleged in the complaint about the alleged anal penetration [1]:


Is this yet another example of Wade Robson’s ever evolving “memories”?

2) In interviews during the promotional campaign of the film, James Safechuck made an allegation that Jackson supposedly made a video tape of their alleged sex acts. Safechuck, conveniently, alleges that Jackson then destroyed this evidence.

“Both men claim Jackson never wore condoms during their sex acts. They allege he often plied them with alcohol and pornography before molesting them, and even recorded one of his sexual encounters with Safechuck.

“He immediately freaked out when he realized what he just did and taped over it,” Safechuck says. Although he was aware Jackson was filming, “it was fun at the time, and when you’re having fun, (Jackson) isn’t thinking about it. But later, he’s like, ‘Wait a minute. I just documented this.’ He was very careful, but that was his one sort of slip.“ [2]

This claim was neither in his complaint, nor in the film. It was first alleged during the promotional interviews of “Leaving Neverland”. There is no evidence of Jackson ever making or having such tapes. Keep in mind that his premises were raided and thoroughly searched in both 1993 and 2003 and also that he was a disorganized hoarder. No sex tape was ever found in his possession either with Safechuck or any other child.

(Maybe we should take a mental note of the fact that when Safechuck first started claiming this, the R. Kelly case, that heavily features sex tapes, was very prominent in the media.)

3) James Safechuck alleges in his court filings that Jackson showed him child pornography – movies in which children were masturbating [3].


Safechuck made the claim in the film that Jackson showed him pornography, but there was no mention of movies with children masturbating in it or any kind of child pornography.

There is no evidence of Jackson ever having such movies. No such movies were ever found at his premises during the extensive house searches in both 1993 and 2003.

4) In the film Wade Robson alleges that what finally convinced him of protecting Jackson in Court in 2005 was a dinner that they had together before Wade’s testimony where Jackson looked very sick and Wade felt sorry for his children and was worried for them that they would be left without a parent if Jackson went to jail. Wade tells about this in a dramatic tone where he attempts to seem compassionate for Jackson’s children.

Here you can watch that part: https://streamable.com/bkqkd

In his complaint this was never mentioned as a motive for him to testify the way he did. There his reason was Jackson’s alleged role playing of him on the phone and him not understanding that he was abused [1]:


Moreover, Michael Jackson’s nephew, Taj Jackson claims that Robson is definitely lying in this clip as this dinner actually took place AFTER Wade Robson already had testified. Taj was there, along with other witnesses, such as the Barnes family. [4]


5) Although Robson in the film mentioned Jackson calling him on the phone before his 2005 testimony, but he leaves out the part where Jackson told him: “They are making up all these lies about you and me, saying that we did all this disgusting sexual stuff.”

Probably because – although Robson now, in the hindsight tries to characterize this as some sort of “role play” -, it actually looks like something that an innocent man would say, not an abuser to his victim. Jackson calls the allegations “made up” and “lies”, and calls them “disgusting sexual stuff”. Not love. Not romance. Not a beautiful thing.

It defies Wade’s claim of him believing it was love until 2012, because he was allegedly brainwashed into that by Jackson. Here he quotes Jackson himself telling him that such acts would be “disgusting sexual stuff”, so how would that not, at least, ring a bell to an adult man, like Wade was in 2005, that something was wrong with the “love” angle, after all?

6) In the film the narrative is that these two men protected Jackson for so long because they were brainwashed to be “in love” with him. However, in their lawsuit there are other angles that are omitted from the film – possibly because they would contradict the “in love” narrative.

For example, in Safechuck’s complaint there is also a strong narrative of alleged constant intimidation and threats by Jackson. In a declaration he claims that Jackson constantly checked on him over the years by calling him once or twice a year and reminded him to keep his mouth shut or else his “life would be over”.

This narrative in his complaint was used to support an equitable estoppel argument. Equitable estoppel is a legal doctrine that prevents that someone could take advantage of his wrongdoings in court. For example, in relation to statutes of limitations, if a claimant or plaintiff fails to file a timely claim because the defendant threatened or intimidated him, then equitable estoppel can be invoked and in that case claimant’s/plaintiff’s complaint would not be dismissed even if statutes of limitations have already run.

For this argument and to get around the statutes of limitations Safechuck needed to establish ongoing threats and intimidation by Jackson, so he filed a declaration in which, next to the “love” narrative, he is also going on and on and on about alleged threats and intimidation by Jackson, although the exact nature of it remains vague. He writes:

“During the entire time I knew [Michael Jackson], he continued to intimidate and threaten me in a manner that can be described as subtle only in the sense that he did not threaten actual physical violence – but his intimidation and threats were no less real and effective. He told me over and over again that my life would be finished if anyone found out about what he/we had done, and I believed him. I had no reason not to, because he trained me to believe that and I had no reason to doubt or question what he said. And because of who [Michael Jackson] was – his power, his iconic status around the world, his fame and fortune – I knew that he could see to it that my life would be over if what happened ever came out.” [5]

Let us note here, that there is no record of Jackson being a vengeful, threatening, intimidating character who would “see to it” that people’s life were over if they crossed his path. On the contrary, he was a pretty meek guy. But Safechuck needed to claim intimidation and threats for an equitable estoppel argument to try to get around statutes of limitations, so he claimed intimidation and threats.

7) A LOT is left out of the film about the legal proceedings of both Robson and Safechuck. In actuality, the fact that they are both suing Jacskon’s entities (Estate and companies) for a monetary compensation is only mentioned fleetingly. It is mentioned in the film that the lawsuit was dismissed “based on technical grounds and not merit”, but it fails to explain the legal background to that and that the ruling does include implicit judgements about the truthfulness of some of their claims.

For example, to get around statutes of limitations, Robson claimed that he did not know about the administration of the Michael Jackson Estate before March 4, 2013, which proved to be a blatant lie – and that under oath.

Safechuck’s complaint never even got past the demurrer phase, because, unlike Robson, he was never even employed by Jackson’s companies during the time he claims sexual abuse. To be able to even sue, he needed to make up a very contrived theory about how the fact that he danced with Jackson (and other children) on stage during the Bad Tour was somehow “employment” by Jackson’s companies.

Considering that they claim this is not about about money, it is interesting that they both go lengths to get to that money in Court, even if they have to lie or twist things for that.

Both men’s lawsuits allege that Jackson’s companies, MJJ Productions and MJJ Ventures, were “the most sophisticated public child sexual abuse procurement and facilitation organization the world has known” that knowingly and deliberately “facilitated” their alleged abuse.

They make up contrived ways to try to blame their alleged abuse on the companies just to be able to sue them, calling Jackson’s personal assistant at the time, Norma Staikos a “madam” or “procurer” of child sexual abuse victims for Michael Jackson”, all the while never mentioning their own parents’ responsibility in their lawsuit.

While doing this, they make several false claims which were inadvertently destroyed by Wade’s own mother, Joy Robson in her 2016 deposition.

For a detailed discussion of Robson’s civil lawsuit see this article (like mentioned, Safechuck’s lawsuit never even got to this stage, but he made similar allegations about the companies as Robson).


To be continued…
 
Re: The Leaving Neverland - Lie Collection (No comments)

Here is an very informative video about Adrinan Mc Manus which debunked her actual credibilty in interviews.

 
Re: The Leaving Neverland - Lie Collection (No comments)

Interesting informations about "Leaving Neverland":

- The same Lawfirm "Melveny & Mayers LLP" which now represents HBO against the estate is the same Lawfirm which represented AEG in the AEG Trail in 2013 were Wade Robson in the middle of this trail suddenly decided go public with his allegations what influenced this trail.

- Amanda Robson is an actress who has two movies data base credits besides LN.
Chantal Robson is an actress who has three movies data base credits besides LN.
Proof that Wade Robson is an professional actor who is very well educated since childhood days to tell lies on the screen as selfcalled 'Master of Deception':
James Safechuck is an professional actor since childhood days.
Both call LN a MOVIE in which normally actors work and telling in general fabricated storys so real and beliveable for the viewer as possible to make them sucessful!

- The composer/company who created the Music to LN created also the music to surviving R Kelly!

- James father died in the same year they start filming LN.
Thats the reason why he is not in it.
When the father bought the family the most/important income they whould have anouther motive for being part of this mocementary and making money out of it!

- A lawer who workes for Oprah Winfrey works for the lawfirm Sifrin Britgton Law in which John Branca is Partner.

- James and Wades actual Lawfirm won the largest sexual abuse case in the History of Los Angeles.

-----------------------------------

"Leaving Neverland SHOCKING LINKS to Harvey Weinstein, Oprah, & HBO

 
Last edited:
More lies from James Safechuck are exposed:

Lightbringer;4252235 said:
OK. I AM DONE WITH THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Safechuck claims he and Michael had sex every day in a room above the train station.

The train station was built in 1993 and finished in 1994.

Safechuck was abused from 1988 to 1992. Safechuck also claims they had sex every day and alot because it was so new, that also makes more likely the period he is speaking about is right towards the end of the relationship.

I have had enough of this bullshit now, I am at the point where I would like to go and just give Safechuck what he deserves! The guy belongs in jail.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Bro this is where he is mentioning &quot;train station&quot; <a href="https://t.co/4aZXdyLvhZ">pic.twitter.com/4aZXdyLvhZ</a></p>&mdash; Aden Branson (@Adenbranson) <a href="https://twitter.com/Adenbranson/status/1110978644430643201?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 27, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">From Getty:<br><br>August 1993 - 2005 <a href="https://t.co/geGBO4U6bB">pic.twitter.com/geGBO4U6bB</a></p>&mdash; kapowski (@santikapowski) <a href="https://twitter.com/santikapowski/status/1111002219585957888?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 27, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<twitter-widget class="twitter-tweet twitter-tweet-rendered" id="twitter-widget-0" style="position: absolute; visibility: hidden; display: block; transform: rotate(0deg);"></twitter-widget> <script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

-----------------------------

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/danreed1000?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@danreed1000</a> Safechuck says he was molested on the beds in the castle and the arcade. Brad Sunberg and Allan Scanlan both independently stated there were no beds in the castle or the arcade. They knew Neverland in and out. <a href="https://t.co/EK9zd8sO0X">pic.twitter.com/EK9zd8sO0X</a></p>&mdash; Believe the victims of false accusers (@Hammertonhal) <a href="https://twitter.com/Hammertonhal/status/1113882531915603969?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 4, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

---------------------

The video underneath exposed the Robson Family but it shows also something very interesting what did matter for James story:...

ManBehindTheMirrOr - Dona;4251542 said:
[video=youtube;2hKUe2RdyJA]
https://youtu.be/2hKUe2RdyJA[/video]

To the people OF YOU WHO HAVE SEEN LEAVING NEVERLAND COMPLEATLY:
Can it be possible that pictures of an MJ impresator who is in the friends list of the Robsons in Facebook, looked so simular to MJ (who only wants to work with the best people) that he maybe have worked as bodydouble for MJ (because of the second picture in th video which can be the impresator standing in front of a big audiance of fans) are in LN?

Can it be possible that they have hiard him to stage some pictues in LN?

You can see that the picture is in LN in this, upload of the movie at around 0:26:30.

https://youtu.be/VXW1pJWYbY4

They make it look like in the movie as it was MJ sitting in James nursery together with next pictures of the impresator/MJ they are showing there with the same MJ poster in the backround.

What is the name of the impresator at facebook which is in the Robsons friendslist?

I would love to ask the uploader of exposing video if she can give us the facebookadress of the impresator which is the Robsons friendslist but I sadly have no youtube account at the moment.
You can see the uploader facebook name in the video.

Can someone ask her if she can give you the facebook adress of the impresator which is in the Robsond Facebook list to be sure it is this impresator she showed in her video and not pictures of LN who maybe showed MJ?

I am sure now that the foto is not showing Michael sitting in James bedroom.

You can see little James sitting in his nursery on his bed in this video
https://youtu.be/VXW1pJWYbY4
at 0:21:50.
The nursery who MJ or the impresator sits on the floor at 0:26:30 looks compleatly different with different hanging.
They also datet this Photo in LN in the year 1987 before James jointed MJ with his family at the Bad tour in Summer 1988.
But the official bad tour poster in the backround is dated June 5th, 6th, 7th 1988 Bad tour Rotterdam.
It is impossible that the poster was hanging there before James joined the tour in 1988.

It doesn't matter if this is an impresator or not on the picture
They definitly lied again.
MJ is not sitting in James bedroom and the picture was not taken at the timepoint they claimed it was made in LN.

So the proof they show in LN that James and MJ spend so muuuch time together in Neverland and did all that much sexual stuff together are a few pictures with MJ and James ALONE on it and the only proof they show that MJ spend time with him in the Safechucks house are FAKES!

To be continued...
<iframe id="rufous-sandbox" scrolling="no" allowtransparency="true" allowfullscreen="true" style="position: absolute; visibility: hidden; display: none; width: 0px; height: 0px; padding: 0px; border: medium none;" title="Twitter analytics iframe" frameborder="0"></iframe>
 
Last edited:
Re: The Leaving Neverland - Lie Collection (No comments)

STORYS AND THINGS "LEAVING NEVERLAND" DIDN'T WANTED TO TELL ABOUT WADE ROBSON PART 1

Wade Robson is not only a dancer and choegrapher. He is also very interestingly a Rapper

"Quo was a short-lived rap group composed of Wade Robson (born 1982) and DeWayne Turrentine jr (born 1981) they were the first artist signed to Michael Jackson's Epic Records sub-label, MJJ Music The duo came together in 1993 in 1994 Quo released their single "Huh What" Produced by RED MAN Followed by there 2nd single "Blowin' Up (Don't Stop the Music produced by Teddy Riley)", which became a hip hop hit, charting on both the Hot Rap Songs and the Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs charts. On October 25, 1994, the duo's self-titled album was released. The following year, a 3rd single, "Quo Funk," was released, which heavily sampled The Jacksons' "This Place Hotel,"Produced by Battlecat. Quo Funk Charted #2 on the Bubbling Under R&B/Hip-Hop Singles. After "Quo Funk," the duo disbanded, with Robson becoming a successful choreographer, producer, and actor; Turrentine became a successful international super model, producer, and actor. Turrentine also married actress Reagan Gomez and has two children with Gomez, a daughter named Scarlett Annette Turrentine (born May 14, 2007,) and son named Tyger Attila Turrentine (born April 2, 2011)."

This is their first video to "Huh What?"



This is the second video "Blowing up ( Don't stop the music)" what Wade and his buddy made under Michaels wings and his Music Label with the help of Teddy Riley


So it was not just only a Hip Hop video where Wade participaed in like Wade claims and downplayed it. It was a much bigger project what MJ trough his music label finanzed for Wade with a whole album!

The album you can find here:

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCutyQqRO4IEeHDAbLiCfql4vvT8LAGzQ

This is the third single "Quo Funk" from 1995


This seamed to didn't fit so well to the narrative and the storys they wanted to tell in LN.
 
Last edited:
Re: The Leaving Neverland - Lie Collection (No comments)

STORYS AND THINGS "LEAVING NEVERLAND" DIDN'T WANTED TO TELL ABOUT WADE ROBSON PART 2

Wade Robson is also A PROFESSIONAL ACTOR






And for the last two parts I can give you the link to the videos

https://youtu.be/JXBnx_s1XQI

https://youtu.be/x6wCq9lnkro


I think in the first video it is not difficult to reconize him.
His name appears then in the second and in the fourth video.

Link to the compleate Playlist with all this videos from the MJFan Gypsy Taylor:

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLppAR_5Q8Tj7yUofY8ePs2pMvRT2mzjP-
 
Last edited:
As it seems as though there'll be no further additions, in terms of lies discovered, I shall close the thread and leave it here as a "read only" option. If there comes a time in the future when a member, or members wish to add something else to the thread, please don't hesitate to send one of the staff a PM and we'll open it again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top