No Michael Jackson Costume For Brussels Peeing Boy

NatureCriminal7896

Proud Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2019
Messages
10,262
Points
0
Brussels (AFP) - Brussels has decided against decorating its iconic Manneken-Pis statue in a Michael Jackson costume as planned for the 10th anniversary of the US pop icon's death, officials said Friday.
The decision was made in the wake of a new documentary, "Leaving Neverland", which since its release this year has revived claims the singer sexually abused children.
"The city council of Brussels has not been insensitive to the documentary and has chosen to adopt a cautious position," a spokesperson told AFP.
Brussels' famous Manneken-Pis statue of a nude young boy has been cheekily urinating into a Baroque fountain for 400 years.
He is dressed about 130 times a year in various outfits often donated by organisations or embassies to mark a special occasion or event, such as the Chinese new year or the start of football's World Cup.
Manneken-Pis was initially scheduled to dress as Michael Jackson on June 25 on the initiative of a Belgian fan club, a decision approved by the previous city government.
"Leaving Neverland" relaunched the accusations of paedophilia against the pop icon and was broadcast at the end of March in Belgium.
Belgium was the scene of the Marc Dutroux case, a paedophilia scandal that made headlines around the world and is still in everyone's memory in the country.
The Belgian criminal was sentenced to life imprisonment in 2004 for the murder of four young girls he had previously kidnapped and raped. Two others who were also raped survived their confinement.
The Jackson film fuelled reactions around the world since its broadcast at the Sundance Festival in January and early March on television in the United States.
"Leaving Neverland" has broken streaming records in Britain and prompted radio stations from Australia to Canada to drop Jackson's music from their playlists.
The creators of "The Simpsons" also shelved one of the animated series' classic episodes because it features Michael Jackson's voice.

https://news.yahoo.com/no-michael-jackson-costume-brussels-peeing-boy-104743965.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
For those pedophile witch hunters, why don't they arrest the sculptor and the city officials for showing a naked peeing boy statue? Why don't they complain it's pedophilic? Why go after MJ?
 
For those pedophile witch hunters, why don't they arrest the sculptor and the city officials for showing a naked peeing boy statue? Why don't they complain it's pedophilic? Why go after MJ?

That statue is apart of Brussels history.
 
NatureCriminal7896;4260613 said:
That statue is apart of Brussels history.


Am I the only one who is happy that they are not dressing up the “peeing” statue in MJ costume? IMO, it is a blessing in disguise. Sometimes things work out for the better, and THIS is one of those times. FTR, don’t allow the media to manipulate you into thinking that this incident has any importance, it does not.
 
somewhereinthedark;4260642 said:
Am I the only one who is happy that they are not dressing up the “peeing” statue in MJ costume? IMO, it is a blessing in disguise. Sometimes things work out for the better, and THIS is one of those times. FTR, don’t allow the media to manipulate you into thinking that this incident has any importance, it does not.

Is it possible to let these morons know “who cares”? This has nothing to do with Michael’s legacy. FTR, I hope they never use Michael in connection with this statue.
 
Last edited:
Remember to include the source when you post an article.
 
somewhereinthedark;4260642 said:
Am I the only one who is happy that they are not dressing up the “peeing” statue in MJ costume? IMO, it is a blessing in disguise. Sometimes things work out for the better, and THIS is one of those times. FTR, don’t allow the media to manipulate you into thinking that this incident has any importance, it does not.

Agreed. My sister and I were just talking about this yesterday. Considering what particular statue this is, it's probably for the best that they don't dress it up as MJ; it would probably just give the haters more fuel. I understand that it's part of history and not intended to be disrespectful, but it would potentially cause an unintended public response.
 
I'd spit at the Belgian officials for that damning decision. Utter disrespectful to the fans!
 
Agreed. My sister and I were just talking about this yesterday. Considering what particular statue this is, it's probably for the best that they don't dress it up as MJ; it would probably just give the haters more fuel. I understand that it's part of history and not intended to be disrespectful, but it would potentially cause an unintended public response.

I agree 100%!!!
 
Back
Top