Themidwestcowboy
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 6,518
- Points
- 113
As we are getting close to the end of a decade I wanted to take an in-depth look into the estate and what they have a accomplished under these ten years. It has a been quite a wild ride. I want us to have a real discussion about this. Let’s get this discussion going!
Best release from the Estate since 2009?
Starting from 2009 we have had concert films, posthumous albums, album anniversary re releases, documentaries, video games and more. What do you think about those releases? Are you particularly unhappy with some of them? (lol...) or maybe all of them? which ones are the best and how would you rank them?
Have they done a good job preserving and protecting Michaels legacy?
The brand and Michael as a person has come under attack many times during the last ten years. From lawsuits, to accusations to controversial documentaries to slander against his musicality. Do you think the estate has done a good job protecting the brand and more importantly, do you think they have done a good job protecting Michael the person?
What should they have done differently?
This ones speaks for itself. Express your dissatisfaction with the estate and give me your reasoning why? It can be from the way they packaged their project or the way they market them etc. Do you think the Estate made the right choice when they sold the Beatles catalogue?Should they have released more stand alone singles without an accompanying album?
What do you wish too see in the future?
How is your attitude towards the estate today? Moving on to a new decade what do you want to see from the estate?
Best release from the Estate since 2009?
Starting from 2009 we have had concert films, posthumous albums, album anniversary re releases, documentaries, video games and more. What do you think about those releases? Are you particularly unhappy with some of them? (lol...) or maybe all of them? which ones are the best and how would you rank them?
Have they done a good job preserving and protecting Michaels legacy?
The brand and Michael as a person has come under attack many times during the last ten years. From lawsuits, to accusations to controversial documentaries to slander against his musicality. Do you think the estate has done a good job protecting the brand and more importantly, do you think they have done a good job protecting Michael the person?
What should they have done differently?
This ones speaks for itself. Express your dissatisfaction with the estate and give me your reasoning why? It can be from the way they packaged their project or the way they market them etc. Do you think the Estate made the right choice when they sold the Beatles catalogue?Should they have released more stand alone singles without an accompanying album?
What do you wish too see in the future?
How is your attitude towards the estate today? Moving on to a new decade what do you want to see from the estate?
Last edited: