Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 25

Thread: Reason for poor USA single chart performance of Dangerous & HIStory singles?

   
  1. #1
    Points: 1,031, Level: 17
    Level completed: 31%, Points required for next Level: 69
    Overall activity: 63.0%
    Achievements:
    1000 Experience Points31 days registered

    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    160
    Points
    1,031
    Level
    17
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 30 Times in 24 Posts

    Default Reason for poor USA single chart performance of Dangerous & HIStory singles?

    Apart from the first 2 tracks of each album the follow up singles performed mostly very average. For example "heal the world" or "TDCAU". I find this surprising as with songs were smash hits all over Europe. What could be a possible explanation for it? Were the sales too low, didn't they receive airplay?

    Another thing that baffles me is the poor performances for "Who is it" all over the world. Especially "who is it" I read there was demand for it after the Oprah singing snippet yet it didn't show in the charts.
    If you compare his 80s single releases they almost all hit top 10 or even top 5.

    Black or White, Remember the Time and You Are Not Alone are basically his only smash hits in the USA during the 90s. Will you be there and in the closet also performed well but they seem to be forgotten, they are never ever on the radio these days. As for scream despite top 5s all over the world it disappeared in no time, if this was a 3rd or 4th single it perhaps wouldn't even have charted at all.

    So anyone with knowledge about this?

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to JichaelMackson For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Points: 7,786, Level: 59
    Level completed: 18%, Points required for next Level: 164
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,290
    Points
    7,786
    Level
    59
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 203 Times in 126 Posts

    Default Re: Reason for poor USA single chart performance of Dangerous & HIStory singles?

    I think for certain singles, the chart position was lower in the USA because some singles didn't get a physical release. For example, Earth Song wasn't released as a CD single but the video was number 1 on the MTV countdown. Apparently they didn't release a CD single in order to boost the sales of the HIStory album.
    Put all your energy into your finger and throw it out like fire.


  4. #3
    Points: 20,114, Level: 89
    Level completed: 53%, Points required for next Level: 236
    Overall activity: 21.0%
    Achievements:
    Three FriendsOverdriveVeteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    2,999
    Points
    20,114
    Level
    89
    Thanks
    1,949
    Thanked 4,439 Times in 1,607 Posts

    Default Re: Reason for poor USA single chart performance of Dangerous & HIStory singles?

    For one thing, commercial decline is an inevitability for any successful recording artist. Prince, Madonna, Bruce Springsteen, and many others went from dominating the charts to barely making a splash. This seemed to hit Michael harder than most simply because of how astronomically successful he was at his peak; he ruled the 1980s and was breaking records left and right; it was practically impossible for him to get any bigger. Dangerous was the beginning of a gradual decline.

    For another thing, Michael's overseas popularity was always remarkably consistent. Take Europe for example -- of the 20 singles MJ released between 1991 and 2001, twelve were top five hits, and only four failed to reach the top ten. (Ever wonder why This Is It was set in London?) After Bad became Michael's first album to sell 2/3rds of its copies overseas, Epic/Sony emphasized overseas marketing, which is why you'd see the elaborate HIStory statues, physical CD singles, and stadium shows everywhere but the United States.

    There are many other factors at play -- the child molestation allegations, the sharp shift in tone/lyrical content on HIStory, the increasing fascination towards Michael's personal life -- but these two are the predominant ones in my eyes.

  5. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to AlwaysThere For This Useful Post:


  6. #4
    Points: 63,187, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 61.0%
    Achievements:
    Three FriendsTagger First ClassVeteranOverdrive50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Nibiru
    Posts
    10,325
    Points
    63,187
    Level
    100
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 1,528 Times in 997 Posts

    Default Re: Reason for poor USA single chart performance of Dangerous & HIStory singles?

    I live in the USA. I don't think some of the songs got much radio airplay and others were not released as singles. To this day I've never heard Earth Song or They Don't Care About Us on any radio station. Jam was a big R&B hit and still occasionally gets airplay on the local Adult R&B station.

    During that time, Billboard was still under their old system in which if there wasn't a physical single it didn't chart. The B-side to a single could chart, but not an album track. Even if the album track got radio airplay. Isn't She Lovely by Stevie Wonder was never a single in the US and it didn't chart. Stevie did not want the song to be edited for a 45 and it was too long for to fit on a single. Technically it could fit, but the sound quality would not be that good. But it did get a lot of radio airplay and is one of Stevie's most known songs.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to DuranDuran For This Useful Post:


  8. #5
    Points: 11,466, Level: 70
    Level completed: 54%, Points required for next Level: 184
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    Created Blog entryTagger First Class3 months registeredOverdrive10000 Experience Points
    Awards:
    Activity Award
    NatureCriminal7896's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    3,441
    Points
    11,466
    Level
    70
    Thanks
    1,362
    Thanked 709 Times in 499 Posts

    Default Re: Reason for poor USA single chart performance of Dangerous & HIStory singles?

    Quote Originally Posted by AlwaysThere View Post
    There are many other factors at play -- the child molestation allegations, the sharp shift in tone/lyrical content on HIStory, the increasing fascination towards Michael's personal life -- but these two are the predominant ones in my eyes.
    I agree with this.



    a female with major depression,generalized anxiety,behavioral and emotional disorder,ocd mild retardation, and learning disability. i'm not contagious but my smile is.

  9. #6
    Points: 9,586, Level: 65
    Level completed: 79%, Points required for next Level: 64
    Overall activity: 46.0%
    Achievements:
    5000 Experience PointsVeteran
    mj_frenzy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    1,421
    Points
    9,586
    Level
    65
    Thanks
    35
    Thanked 738 Times in 407 Posts

    Default Re: Reason for poor USA single chart performance of Dangerous & HIStory singles?

    From his ‘Dangerous’ album onwards, Michael Jackson wanted to focus on international markets, rather than on his home country.

    So, he decided not to tour in USA at the time (for the ‘Dangerous’ and the ‘HIStory’ album) but outside USA, despite knowing that this could also negatively affect the USA chart success of his singles.

    Also, there is another thing: after the allegations (August 1993), SONY Music stronly believed that Michael Jackson’s image was harming the overall image of the SONY company in USA.

    For that reason, SONY Music’s top executives did not want to invest a lot of money (in USA) in Michael Jackson, contrary to what they were doing for him there before the allegations.

    So, his lower USA chart success of many of his singles at that time there was a result of these factors.

    One very characteristic exception to this is the phenomenal chart success of the ‘You Are Not Alone’ single in USA.

    That particular song had exactly the sound that USA listeners are so familiar with and also they like to listen on the radios, which to a large extent explains the song’s chart success there.

    But the interesting thing about ‘You Are Not Alone’ is that Michael Jackson did not originally want to record it, let alone release it as a single.

    R. Kelly had a strong feeling that he should record it, and he eventually persuaded him to do that.

  10. #7
    Points: 8,890, Level: 63
    Level completed: 47%, Points required for next Level: 160
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    Three Friends5000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Doggone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    1,174
    Points
    8,890
    Level
    63
    Thanks
    438
    Thanked 759 Times in 326 Posts

    Default Re: Reason for poor USA single chart performance of Dangerous & HIStory singles?

    They Don’t Care About Us got boycotted because the jews, once again, got offended by the words “kick me, **** me” and “jew me, sue me”. Michael was accused of anti semitism. Are you for real? When the jews started to complain, radio stations gave in and started to boycott the song.

    I don’t understand why Sony didn’t release some songs as a CD single. Earth Song was going to be #1 in the USA 100000%

    It’s a shame that especially the Dangerous album only had 1 #1 song. Remember the Time, Who Is It, Will You Be There and In The Closet should have been #1. They should have released Give In To Me in the States as well.

    Sony made a lot of bad choices. Michael could have topped the charts once again...

    I wonder if Michae had more freedom at Epic than at Sony?

  11. #8
    Points: 14,770, Level: 78
    Level completed: 80%, Points required for next Level: 80
    Overall activity: 63.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience PointsOverdrive

    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    26,450
    Points
    14,770
    Level
    78
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1,358 Times in 582 Posts

    Default Re: Reason for poor USA single chart performance of Dangerous & HIStory singles?

    American chart system was more complicted than the basic standard of many euro markets back then. Ie been based on single sales and nothing else. Usa was based on airplay aswell. Mj struggled to get alot of airplay sometimes because the radio stations are so seperate interms of genre and which did mj fit. You also had the bias against him and also the corruption that went on back then with stations been paid to play certain artists by their labels

    Also as said above no physically releases made it hard. History was a prime example of that and sonys games

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to elusive moonwalker For This Useful Post:


  13. #9
    Points: 2,245, Level: 28
    Level completed: 64%, Points required for next Level: 55
    Overall activity: 15.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    51
    Points
    2,245
    Level
    28
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 48 Times in 26 Posts

    Default Re: Reason for poor USA single chart performance of Dangerous & HIStory singles?

    Michael did something incredible with the BAD album... so many hit singles... the album is a greatest hits album on its own. But don't forget that's really unique. You can't find a Beatles album with that many hits. As fans, we are a bit spoiled by that experience... we expected him to do that time and again. And may be Michael himself expected that too. But BAD was a unique moment in time. It wouldn't be fair to expect that to happen with every album...

    Some songs age well, by the way. They Don't Care About Us wasn't a massive hit when it was released – but it's a universally known protest song now!

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Piek For This Useful Post:


  15. #10
    Points: 63,187, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 61.0%
    Achievements:
    Three FriendsTagger First ClassVeteranOverdrive50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Nibiru
    Posts
    10,325
    Points
    63,187
    Level
    100
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 1,528 Times in 997 Posts

    Default Re: Reason for poor USA single chart performance of Dangerous & HIStory singles?

    Quote Originally Posted by Piek View Post
    You can't find a Beatles album with that many hits.
    The Beatles didn't usually release songs from their albums as singles. They recorded songs exclusively for singles. Although in the USA, songs from albums were singles because the US albums were different than the ones released in other countries, which used the original British versions of the albums.

    During the 1960s and before, it was impossible to have a lot of singles from an album. It was common for acts to release 2 albums a year. In some cases, even 3 or 4 albums a year. Most albums only had 1 or 2 singles released, and then another album came out 5 or 6 months later. It was also common to release non-album singles (like The Beatles did). Some smaller labels only released singles and didn't release albums at all. The record labels didn't milk albums like they did later, starting in the mid-1970s. The 1970s is really when the concept of blockbuster albums came about, which is the same time period the blockbuster movie really began with Jaws & Star Wars.

  16. #11
    Points: 8,907, Level: 63
    Level completed: 53%, Points required for next Level: 143
    Overall activity: 25.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Glasgow, Scotland
    Posts
    2,893
    Points
    8,907
    Level
    63
    Thanks
    281
    Thanked 631 Times in 309 Posts

    Default Re: Reason for poor USA single chart performance of Dangerous & HIStory singles?

    Quote Originally Posted by elusive moonwalker View Post
    American chart system was more complicted than the basic standard of many euro markets back then. Ie been based on single sales and nothing else. Usa was based on airplay aswell. Mj struggled to get alot of airplay sometimes because the radio stations are so seperate interms of genre and which did mj fit.
    Exactly. Michael's music wasn't radio-friendly pop in the 90s. He was branching out, broadening as an artist. The USA also developed quite differently from the European markets in terms of the sounds that were popular. Grunge came in, then the likes of Matchbox Twenty and Hootie and the Blowfish, hip-hop/rap then all the boyband Max Martin stuff (ironically a European songwriter haha). The USA was so separate from the rest of the world as the 90s progressed to the point that I think Billboard ran an article noting that not one British artist had managed to crack the Hot 100 in around 10 years (or at least not the upper echelons, my memory struggles). The drought was that strong. American music continued to export well, but imports were struggling and anything that didn't match those dominant sounds couldn't be programmed on those clearly defined radio stations, and without airplay in the days when physical singles became rare in US record stores resulted in MJ having a massive uphill battle.

    You had to make music designed to fit the criteria set by the stations or just coincidentally be making that style of music anyway. HAD he wanted to focus on the American market, he would have had far more hits, but his own artistry was far more important to him. Of course Michael's critics paint it as constantly chasing commercial success and becoming increasingly alienated, repeating ideas and being rejected by the market - but of course that's a different discussion.

    Edit: some of the music on HIStory would have struggled to find a place on UK radio too, were it not for the wealth of headliner DJs remixing the singles. I don't think I ever heard the LP versions of TDCAU or SIM on UK radio while SIM became a massive hit on the dance charts here thanks to Todd Terry and Basement Boys. Even Earth Song, while it became Michael's biggest selling single ever in the UK was frequently played on UK radio with the Hani remix instead. The dance music scene in Europe definitely kept HIStory afloat for the Sony marketing team over here. A scene that wasn't enjoying the same exposure in America.
    Last edited by ChrisC; 24-02-2020 at 06:56 PM.

  17. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ChrisC For This Useful Post:


  18. #12
    Points: 34,384, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.6%
    Achievements:
    Created Blog entryThree FriendsVeteran25000 Experience Points
    PoP's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Northern Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    6,083
    Points
    34,384
    Level
    100
    Blog Entries
    24
    Thanks
    702
    Thanked 1,551 Times in 967 Posts

    Default Re: Reason for poor USA single chart performance of Dangerous & HIStory singles?

    I still strongly believe it’s a conspiracy that Michael didn’t get #1 on U.S. charts for both “Dangerous” and “HIStory”, because these idiots were eating up lies and controversies around Michael. Major conspiracy!
    SUPPORTER/FAN of MICHAEL JACKSON & NARUHINA

  19. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PoP For This Useful Post:


  20. #13
    Points: 63,187, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 61.0%
    Achievements:
    Three FriendsTagger First ClassVeteranOverdrive50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Nibiru
    Posts
    10,325
    Points
    63,187
    Level
    100
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 1,528 Times in 997 Posts

    Default grunge

    ^^Dangerous (the album) did make it to #1 in the USA. That's probably why a big deal was made about Nirvana's Nevermind taking over its spot. What they don't mention is that Garth Brooks knocked Nirvana off #1 the next week. Garth eventually wound up having 7 albums go diamond, the only act to do so. Grunge wasn't as popular at the time as it was made to be in the rock press later on. Grunge was mainly popular for around 2 years. The popularity of New Jack Swing and glam metal lasted longer than that. The way grunge was written about in the rock press, it was like it killed the popularity of everything else in the mainstream Top 40. That was not true.

  21. The Following User Says Thank You to DuranDuran For This Useful Post:


  22. #14
    Points: 8,748, Level: 62
    Level completed: 99%, Points required for next Level: 2
    Overall activity: 44.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience PointsTagger Second Class

    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    972
    Points
    8,748
    Level
    62
    Thanks
    885
    Thanked 821 Times in 379 Posts

    Default Re: grunge

    Quote Originally Posted by DuranDuran View Post
    ^^Dangerous (the album) did make it to #1 in the USA. That's probably why a big deal was made about Nirvana's Nevermind taking over its spot. What they don't mention is that Garth Brooks knocked Nirvana off #1 the next week. Garth eventually wound up having 7 albums go diamond, the only act to do so. Grunge wasn't as popular at the time as it was made to be in the rock press later on. Grunge was mainly popular for around 2 years. The popularity of New Jack Swing and glam metal lasted longer than that. The way grunge was written about in the rock press, it was like it killed the popularity of everything else in the mainstream Top 40. That was not true.
    Just wondering...
    How many weeks did Dangerous stay at #1 in the US?
    And was that around the time of its release or later?

  23. #15
    Points: 6,449, Level: 52
    Level completed: 50%, Points required for next Level: 101
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    50
    Points
    6,449
    Level
    52
    Thanks
    30
    Thanked 10 Times in 5 Posts

    Default Re: grunge

    Dangerous album on US Billboard Top 200

    4 weeks at nr1.

    You can check the chart week-by-week on Billboard magazine's page:
    https://www.billboard.com/charts/billboard-200/1991-12-14
    Last edited by Dani; 26-02-2020 at 12:54 PM.

  24. The Following User Says Thank You to Dani For This Useful Post:


Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •