Page 11 of 75 FirstFirst ... 9101112132161 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 165 of 1123

Thread: Monster - The Great Debate (Only Go Here if You Want To Continue The Controversy)

   
  1. #151
    barok232
    Guest

    Default Re: Monster - The Great Debate

    Quote Originally Posted by BabeBeMine View Post
    I respect your opinion, but MJ vocals on Off the Wall, Triumph, Thriller, Jacksons when he was a teenager, is much better on dance tracks than when he was older.

    Young Mike could sing fast, still sound clear and smooth when singing fast. Older MJ when he had to sing fast, it was like he was grunting, screaming, hard to understand what he was saying.

    Im not even talking about popular tracks. Listen to the underated dance songs such as "get on the floor"..."Burn this Disco Out"..."PYT"...."Working Day and Night"....."Your Ways"

    "lovely one".."everybody"....."walk right now"

    Honestly there is a huge difference in vocal ability from young MJ to older Mike on dance tracks. Huge....When did older MJ sing fast, yet with range? All the faster songs when he was older, he is grunting and screaming. Where is the vocal range? Slower and Mid-Tempo tracks older Mike was still great.
    Quote Originally Posted by BabeBeMine View Post
    For example the songs "Invincible" and "heartbreaker" unless your in denial and don't want to admit it. Comparing those vocals to MJ on the older tracks, and you think 2001 sounds better, than i don't know what to say.

    Younger MJ on dance tracks is popular to the entire world. Not just the fan base. Die hard fans will love and support anything you put out. You can drop "Lost Children" to radio stations and die hard fans will vote for the top nine at nine countdown. Does that mean that song is hot? Nope
    Quote Originally Posted by BabeBeMine View Post
    The angry style is popular to the fan base, but not popular to the average music fan simply turning on the radio, or at a club just wanting to dance. They would much rather here some "Dont Stop To You Get Enough", " Working Day and Night", "PYT", Tracks from the triumph album.

    Grunting and singing angry is cool, but when a artist actually sings. Dance or slow, you feel it more. Hitting those notes with range. You feel it, and that makes the song CATCHY

    For example the song "Invincible" to me the vocal arrangement is horrible. Im a die hard fan who can admit MJ was wrong. Im not the type of fan to say he does everything right all the time.
    I don't understand why you always need to reply to everybody. Some threads "transform" into "Babybemine threads" because half the posts are your replies to others.

    EDIT ....

    Anyway, since you don't like MJ's angry voice when he got older (to me it is the same voice tbh), then be happy now that you got some Malachi "velvet"(lol) voice on 3 tracks, one of them "Monster"

    EDIT You can admit that MJ was wrong, WOW THAT TAKES STRENGTH MAN! LOL

    EDIT2 I LOVE the "Lost Children"

    EDIT3 Stop belittling Mike
    Last edited by barok232; 23-12-2010 at 07:55 AM.

  2. #152
    Points: 2,492, Level: 30
    Level completed: 28%, Points required for next Level: 108
    Overall activity: 0.4%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience Points
    BabeBeMine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    309
    Points
    2,492
    Level
    30
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default Re: Monster - The Great Debate

    Huh! Are you sure you got the right person?

  3. #153
    Points: 2,492, Level: 30
    Level completed: 28%, Points required for next Level: 108
    Overall activity: 0.4%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience Points
    BabeBeMine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    309
    Points
    2,492
    Level
    30
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default Re: Monster - The Great Debate

    Malachi is a obsession from some MJ fans. Unreality and assuming he is singing on tracks from a new MJ album. So sad.

    Michael's own fans ruined his album. Spamming every website that allows you to send a message with the 1 million times...Its fake, its fake, fake.

    If i were Sony i would never release another MJ album again. Thats a rap. Complain and whine every single album is annoying.

    Lack of promotion, its not him...blah blah blah. No other artist fans complain like this

    Im with Will i Am. Enjoy the legacy and stop worrying about new material

  4. #154
    BUMPER SNIPPET
    Guest

    Default Re: Monster - The Great Debate

    Quote Originally Posted by BabeBeMine View Post
    Malachi is a obsession from some MJ fans. Unreality and assuming he is singing on tracks from a new MJ album. So sad.

    Michael's own fans ruined his album. Spamming every website that allows you to send a message with the 1 million times...Its fake, its fake, fake.

    If i were Sony i would never release another MJ album again. Thats a rap. Complain and whine every single album is annoying.

    Lack of promotion, its not him...blah blah blah. No other artist fans complain like this

    Im with Will i Am. Enjoy the legacy and stop worrying about new material

    It is true that many fans whine about everything, but it is not true that fans destroy the album. If fans had the power to destroy the album, they would also have the power to promote it, which is not the case.

    If SONY had a proper promotion no one would be able to boycott it! They have that media power and the money to do it. Not us.

  5. #155
    Points: 58,130, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Three FriendsTagger Second ClassOverdriveVeteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    18,066
    Points
    58,130
    Level
    100
    Thanks
    5,433
    Thanked 3,093 Times in 1,315 Posts

    Default Re: Monster - The Great Debate

    Quote Originally Posted by BabeBeMine View Post
    For example the songs "Invincible" and "heartbreaker" unless your in denial and don't want to admit it. Comparing those vocals to MJ on the older tracks, and you think 2001 sounds better, than i don't know what to say.

    Younger MJ on dance tracks is popular to the entire world. Not just the fan base. Die hard fans will love and support anything you put out. You can drop "Lost Children" to radio stations and die hard fans will vote for the top nine at nine countdown. Does that mean that song is hot? Nope
    Whoa whoa....I was just asking you a simple question! No need to slip some minor jabs in there...I just wanted to know exactly what you meant, so I can understand what you're saying...


  6. #156
    Points: 862, Level: 15
    Level completed: 62%, Points required for next Level: 38
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered500 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1
    Points
    862
    Level
    15
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Audio Experiment that MONSTER is sung by Michael Jackson

    i've read a lot of post's regarding the authenticity of the vocals on the latest michael jackson album. in regard to the song "Monster" i know 100% the vocals are him. however that peticular track has been sped up and that his vocals have been pitched shifted up a little bit.

    a friend of mine actually mixed on one of the three tracks that were given to Teddy Riley.
    Being an audio engineer myself, i got some information on how that track was edited.

    The original casio track was much slower, so for Teddy to make it more modern with the production he decided to speed it up (about 9 percent) and recreate the whole song from scratch, using the casio demo as a guide.

    So when you speed up an acapella. the pitch will obviously change.
    but with audio software like Melodyne (youtube it) you can fine tune pitch of the vocal take.
    regardless of how well of a singer you are, 99% of the time Melodyne, or Autotune is used to tighten up the vocals. this HAD to be done because the whole track was sped up.

    now if you try to slow down, or "Time Strech" the monster track it will NOT sound like michael no matter how hard you try because again, the key of the song will change and it just wont be the same. There is software that i've come across to slow down, and pitch down the track without changing the key.

    i used "The Amazing Slowdowner" software to slow and pitch down the song.
    i used the following settings and got it sounding close to Mike as possible.

    Pitch: -23cents
    Speed: 91.74speed

    What do you guys think?

    http://uploading.com/files/c33e277c/...1.74speed.mp3/

  7. #157
    Points: 10,560, Level: 68
    Level completed: 28%, Points required for next Level: 290
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    Three FriendsVeteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Tampa, Florida - USA
    Posts
    491
    Points
    10,560
    Level
    68
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 23 Times in 15 Posts

    Default Re: Audio Proof that MONSTER is sung by Michael Jackson

    I believe Monster's vocal are legitimate as well, but you don't have to be an audiophile to know that.

    We're not just fans, we're apart of a family that was started by Michael Jackson and whose very foundation began with L.O.V.E. Music is an important part of Michael's legacy, but let's not forget that the role of Michael's music has always been bringing people together.

  8. #158
    Points: 8,809, Level: 63
    Level completed: 20%, Points required for next Level: 241
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Three FriendsVeteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    London, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,046
    Points
    8,809
    Level
    63
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 295 Times in 83 Posts

    Default Re: Audio Proof that MONSTER is sung by Michael Jackson

    I know it's him and don't require your information to back it up but I applause you all the same - very informative and useful. Thanks.

  9. #159
    BUMPER SNIPPET
    Guest

    Default Re: Audio Proof that MONSTER is sung by Michael Jackson

    Quote Originally Posted by mixedbymike View Post
    i've read a lot of post's regarding the authenticity of the vocals on the latest michael jackson album. in regard to the song "Monster" i know 100% the vocals are him. however that peticular track has been sped up and that his vocals have been pitched shifted up a little bit.

    a friend of mine actually mixed on one of the three tracks that were given to Teddy Riley.
    Being an audio engineer myself, i got some information on how that track was edited.

    The original casio track was much slower, so for Teddy to make it more modern with the production he decided to speed it up (about 9 percent) and recreate the whole song from scratch, using the casio demo as a guide.

    So when you speed up an acapella. the pitch will obviously change.
    but with audio software like Melodyne (youtube it) you can fine tune pitch of the vocal take.
    regardless of how well of a singer you are, 99% of the time Melodyne, or Autotune is used to tighten up the vocals. this HAD to be done because the whole track was sped up.

    now if you try to slow down, or "Time Strech" the monster track it will NOT sound like michael no matter how hard you try because again, the key of the song will change and it just wont be the same. There is software that i've come across to slow down, and pitch down the track without changing the key.

    i used "The Amazing Slowdowner" software to slow and pitch down the song.
    i used the following settings and got it sounding close to Mike as possible.

    Pitch: -23cents
    Speed: 91.74speed

    What do you guys think?

    http://uploading.com/files/c33e277c/...1.74speed.mp3/
    Basically what you just explained anyone could be a singer today thanks to melodyne. But how come that if the original Monster track was slower that:

    1) Nobody from SONY guys wants to share in order to prove it's Michael
    2) When you speed up a track the vocals would hit higher pitch, which means that the original would have been sung even deeper. Could Michael sing really that deep?

  10. #160
    Points: 58,130, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Three FriendsTagger Second ClassOverdriveVeteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    18,066
    Points
    58,130
    Level
    100
    Thanks
    5,433
    Thanked 3,093 Times in 1,315 Posts

    Default Re: Audio Proof that MONSTER is sung by Michael Jackson

    Thank you for the effort...It sounds the same to me, except just slowed down...


  11. #161
    Points: 76,389, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Three FriendsVeteranTagger Second Class50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,937
    Points
    76,389
    Level
    100
    Thanks
    1,374
    Thanked 3,224 Times in 1,090 Posts

    Default Re: Audio Proof that MONSTER is sung by Michael Jackson

    This proves nothing, nada, zip. Sounds exactly like the original version, only slowed down with a bit pitched. I could do this to many Malachi songs and get the exactly same voice.

  12. #162
    BUMPER SNIPPET
    Guest

    Default Re: Audio Proof that MONSTER is sung by Michael Jackson

    just listened to your version, the voice timbre did not move a bit and the husk isn't Michael's. The part "stalking me" doesn't sound Michael's accent.

  13. #163
    Points: 22,584, Level: 93
    Level completed: 24%, Points required for next Level: 766
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Three FriendsTagger Second Class10000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    #MWA
    Posts
    5,297
    Points
    22,584
    Level
    93
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 545 Times in 177 Posts

    Default Re: Audio Proof that MONSTER is sung by Michael Jackson

    Quote Originally Posted by Pentum View Post
    This proves nothing, nada, zip. Sounds exactly like the original version, only slowed down with a bit pitched. I could do this to many Malachi songs and get the exactly same voice.
    Right back at ya!


    "I wonder if God ever asked Mike how to moonwalk"

  14. #164
    barok232
    Guest

    Default Re: Audio Proof that MONSTER is sung by Michael Jackson

    Quote Originally Posted by mixedbymike View Post
    i've read a lot of post's regarding the authenticity of the vocals on the latest michael jackson album. in regard to the song "Monster" i know 100% the vocals are him. however that peticular track has been sped up and that his vocals have been pitched shifted up a little bit.

    a friend of mine actually mixed on one of the three tracks that were given to Teddy Riley.
    Being an audio engineer myself, i got some information on how that track was edited.

    The original casio track was much slower, so for Teddy to make it more modern with the production he decided to speed it up (about 9 percent) and recreate the whole song from scratch, using the casio demo as a guide.

    So when you speed up an acapella. the pitch will obviously change.
    but with audio software like Melodyne (youtube it) you can fine tune pitch of the vocal take.
    regardless of how well of a singer you are, 99% of the time Melodyne, or Autotune is used to tighten up the vocals. this HAD to be done because the whole track was sped up.

    now if you try to slow down, or "Time Strech" the monster track it will NOT sound like michael no matter how hard you try because again, the key of the song will change and it just wont be the same. There is software that i've come across to slow down, and pitch down the track without changing the key.

    i used "The Amazing Slowdowner" software to slow and pitch down the song.
    i used the following settings and got it sounding close to Mike as possible.

    Pitch: -23cents
    Speed: 91.74speed

    What do you guys think?

    http://uploading.com/files/c33e277c/...1.74speed.mp3/
    Far from proof.

    Join Date: December 2010?

    Welcome to the forum newbie! (And also welcome to my ignore list)

    EDIT Usually normal people say "hello" and introduce themselves when first posting. Showing your agenda from the first post already? You joined to PROVE? Unbelievable

    EDIT2 Malachi's former manager also said that Jason's vocals were pitched on the Cascio tracks
    Last edited by barok232; 27-12-2010 at 04:41 PM.

  15. #165
    Points: 152,225, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 19.0%
    Achievements:
    Three FriendsOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    16,078
    Points
    152,225
    Level
    100
    Thanks
    423
    Thanked 34,447 Times in 7,257 Posts

    Default Re: Audio Proof that MONSTER is sung by Michael Jackson

    I think nobody should expect to get a perfect result - regardless of the song and the methods used.

    In every case you will be editing/modifying an already edited/modifying song hence you cannot get the actual raw vocals but double edited vocals. The pitch, vibrato etc bound to sound unnatural.


    Quote Originally Posted by barok232 View Post
    Join Date: December 2010?
    let me remind you that new -old , real -fake fan talk is not allowed here.
    Twitter : Ivy_4MJ

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •