SmoothCriminal1995
Proud Member
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2012
- Messages
- 2,983
- Points
- 113
Now hear me out.
I was talking to my girlfriend about this tonight and I don't think we would be in this situation now if they would have broadcast the trial live, like the OJ trial, I don't think public opinion would be against Michael as much as it appears today.
The best example of this was "pyjama day", the media were fixated on MJ's PJ's and the testimony from Arvizo but they didn't talk about how Thomas Mesereau destroyed the credibility of the prosecution in the cross examination. Imagine if that would have been on TV how much that could have changed public opinion.
If people had witnessed this trial for themselves instead of being fed biased coverage from a biased media, maybe these allegations that we are currently facing wouldn't be getting the seemingly endless worldwide coverage they are right now.
Who knows if the public would have been more in Michael's favour in 2005, he still might be here today...
I was talking to my girlfriend about this tonight and I don't think we would be in this situation now if they would have broadcast the trial live, like the OJ trial, I don't think public opinion would be against Michael as much as it appears today.
The best example of this was "pyjama day", the media were fixated on MJ's PJ's and the testimony from Arvizo but they didn't talk about how Thomas Mesereau destroyed the credibility of the prosecution in the cross examination. Imagine if that would have been on TV how much that could have changed public opinion.
If people had witnessed this trial for themselves instead of being fed biased coverage from a biased media, maybe these allegations that we are currently facing wouldn't be getting the seemingly endless worldwide coverage they are right now.
Who knows if the public would have been more in Michael's favour in 2005, he still might be here today...