Search results

This, sadly, is standard in the United States.

Bing bang boom:

I think the last two steps are fairly quick tbh. They are petitions to get the full appeals panel just to hear it and then Supreme Court for the same. Both requests should be denied.

He can appeal En Banc (will be denied) and then finally to the Supreme Court (will be denied). Then I guess Dan Reed can do LN2 about how terribly their court cases went.

Other than the media, which is less trusted now more than ever, where is the public criticism coming from since the media firestorm immediately after LN? The fringe media? I think you vastly overestimate how many people care about LN. It will probably take some time for celebrities to be able to...

It's such a small group of people, though, and this is basically just what social media is. If social media had been around during 2003-2005, it'd have been a billion times worse. Negative connotations about MJ permeated society from 2003-2005. Leaving Neverland was a blip, the very large...

No offense, but I have to ask if you were around during 2005? The polling during 2005 had 75-80% of the US believing he was guilty and over 60% believed the case was proven beyond a reasonable doubt even by the end of it. The media coverage globally was probably 100 times what Leaving Neverland...

Nobody can ever top THIS interpretation of the Pepsi accident…

American pop star. He’s pretty big.

Father with similar drive, but without the abuse. Had MJ not suffered the physical and emotional abuse he had from his father, there never would have been the Safechucks/Robsons/Chandlers/Arvizos. There would have been people trying to leach, for sure, but he never would have emotional trauma...

Charlie Puth Tweeted yesterday about Billie Jean being the greatest song of all time. Not sure that counts lol.

I’m already looking forward to the controversy of Myles being nominated for his role. My money says the Tony’s won’t have the guts to give him the award, they’ll cave to media wah wahing. But I could be wrong!

Australia apparently edited the part out where Janet said Michael was innocent 🙄🙄🙄. That country has been messed up in this, I guess because Wade is Australian? So is Brett Barnes, of course…

Roger used to work for FoxNews and did all the Michael Jackson coverage. I will say this...the way he treated Jackson leading up to and at the beginning of the trial was standard Diane Diamond tabloid media. BUT, he did appear to be one of the few people who was actually willing to allow himself...

Janet was VERY positive towards Michael in the documentary. Naturally, the media took literally everything out of context. She dedicated the entire thing to him at the end. She adamantly said Michael would never do what he was accused of, put the teasing into context, everything. It was great.

The most likely explanation for this was extreme sleep deprivation. MJ went SIXTY DAYS without REM sleep, and paranoia is one of the first symptoms associated with sleep deprivation.

Her career almost certainly did get hurt in some capacity, but that's not Michael's fault. He didn't try to extort himself for millions of dollars and lie about sexual abuse. I don't think she's blaming Michael there anyway, though maybe she's upset he settled instead of going to court (but then...

Why would the news mention Michael Jackson? He’s been dead for over 12 years… You gotta accept he will slowly fade over time because that’s what happens. It ain’t the 80s anymore. Still, it’s 12 years after his death, and he is STILL number 1 on YouGov’s fame scale for musicians and top 10 in...

Yup! And THIS is what Reed wants to focus on for LN2. GOOD. Bring it on.

ABSOLUTELY. Beyond that, LN actually WAS debunked on social media and some media, so that narrative is spreading every day, I see it myself. There’s a lot of younger generation becoming fans and dismissing LN, which is amazing to watch. And, God, do I hope there’s a LN2 featuring fucking Gavin...