Search results

The reason why he got 6 millions more is because the jury interpreted "this is it" movie as a video show. otherwise he failed on most of his claims. the first right to remix is also a problem because, it QJ succeeded there, it means everything the estate wants to re-release old hits he produced...

The estate could appeal by the look of things. I suppose that right of first remix will expire when QJ dies, right? This will definitely affect future releases. because it means QJ will have to be approached first until his death for any repackaging of the old produced hits, which is bullshit...

Re: [Discussion] Sexual abuse claims against MJ Estate (Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe) Agree to all the points above. It's really frustrating how the media for decades have invested so heavily on playing the chandler card to falsely imply MJ guilt, despite the lack of corroborating evidence and the...

Re: [Discussion] Sexual abuse claims against MJ Estate (Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe) You are correct. This is a smoke screen to deflect attention away from the real news: safechuck case has been toasted for good. This is very Finaldi and Co. They like using smear tactics. In reality they wished...

Then, why didn't her children alert the authorities and order a thorough investigation? why didn't her children report the matter to the estate since she's a beneficiary? Also, Trent, as the accused in this case, has the right to face his accuser. Denying him that would be unconstitutional. So...

An absolute waste of court time and resources. Janet has a home in LA. Why didn't fly back to LA to show her baby to her family? Why London? Obviously so the curbs could play out this farce unobstructed. This is so embarrassing. MJ deserves better than this. He does not need this kind of...

Great News! Why do i get the feeling that the judge didn't want to deal with KJ and all her baggage by issuing the ruling a few days just before a hearing on her motion to join? Anyhow this is a good riddance of the parasites. Raymond Bain has been a disgrace. she's still unemployed since...

Re: [Discussion] Sexual abuse claims against MJ Estate (Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe) Comments on the bold part, Robson never solved the control issue. The only reason the judge allowed his case to survive the demurrer is because he was an employee of MJ companies. and because of that, the judge...

Exactly!

I find it hard to believe that KJ probate attorney was not briefed on this. if he failed to brief her in return, then the estate cannot be blamed. there is a reason why she hired a probate attorney, which the estate pays for by the way.

They'll probably recommend someone they can easily control. The reality is that this another pathetic money grab exercise, I really wish MJ was born from a completely different family. He does not deserve to be embarrassed like this.

how do you know her previous attorney was not briefed in probate matters. she even changed attorney recently. probably because he knew this was a scam. still, she's trying to use this to make it look like she's actually entitled to 10% of MJ companies by representing to the court that she's...

The only duty of care is the distribution of income as per MJ will. nothing more and nothing less. besides, what do you want the estate to tell her? that she owns 10% of MJ companies? this makes no sense. The executors did tell her from day one that she's just a beneficiary. she's not a heir to...

Ignorance is a poor excuse. she's proven to be a wiling participant in many bogus schemes that failed to materialize. The bottom line is she's a failure as a parent, a failure as a guardian. she has no credibility whatsoever.

You and I both know that MJ was the full owner of his companies. this thing of him being part owner is pure nonsense, designed to steal money from MJ, his estate, and worse his children who are the sole heirs of MJ.

Lol. So this is granny gate chapter 2. KJ is a joke. like Oxman once said, she's a "despicable woman".MJ deserves much better than this.

The estate believes for good reasons that MJ was the full owner of his own MJ company and told her already that from day one. KJ again is failing MJ. Hasn't she benefited enough from him?

How is the estate supposed to communicate with her when it's known that MJ owned his companies 100%? She acts as if it's a fact that she owns 10% of MJ company which is not true. and the judge has not even ruled on that, probably sleeping on it as long as he can. and if she owns 10%, shouldn't...

The trial on this case concluded in January 2016. this is over a year ago. why the judge is not making a ruling already? even if you take into account all the post trial briefs and motions, really this is over the top. we've seen the same thing with the tohme case where it took 2 and a half year...