Search results

I find it very funny that Paul Anka knew all those years that Michael allegedly had that tape and didnÂ’t sue. Paul Anka has been big for years. He couldÂ’ve easily taken Michael to court in the 1980s. Why not? But then he accuses Michael after Michael is dead and gone. Huh? Yes. Michael was...

Very true. In all fairness, in the articles I’ve seen, the media dedicated a large paragraph and a half to rehashing the allegations past and present. Then they move on to Michael’s death investigation. But in my opinion, they seem to go overboard as usual talking about the accusations when the...

I’m not happy with the media reporting on the US showing of this. They’re going on and on about the police pictures taken of Michael’s bedroom with those dolls and other things. We all know what they’re implying with that. Disgusting.

Here we go again. Another book for the trash-pail IMO. Michael’s 2005 trial verdict should have been the end of all the tired retreading from 1993. No such luck. Ever. And now, MJ fans will most likely have to weather another public relations nightmare a-la LN. For all the known garbage...

Re: Wade Robson wanted to cash in on Michael Jackson sex abuse claims with tell-all book Wow. No comment except these men make me sick.

What are the latest sales figures for Michael’s albums from “Got To Be There” through “Invincible?

I’m sorry. But this does not sound good to me at all. Michael went through hell and back with that trial. And after all the mess LN caused, I’m beyond sick of so-called documentaries that will undoubtedly throw more fuel on that fire. I don’t believe for even half a second that the Arvizos are...

That article sounds to me like an lawsuit advertisement to attract more MJ accusers. The Estate is probably going to be in court constantly for years unless that law gets repealed or re-worded with punishments to filter out false claims. Fat chance yes. But there are those people who are willing...

It will be up to a jury to decide how this lawsuit ends up. That’s what I think is the hardest part of all this. I mean, who hasn’t heard of LN or this lawsuit by now? And besides fans and fair-minded people, who hasn't decided Michael was guilty a long time before now? I’m sorry. But I blame...

No surprise that Wade said he didn’t care what the estate did. He said that before. I would expect no less from someone like him. Personally, these guys make me sick.

I don't understand the judge's reasoning at all. In my opinion, he should have really thought about the overall issues with this before he gave the initial order allowing the arbitration. I can understand how the Estate thought he was favoring HBO. Now that HBO are making an even bigger stink...

I knew that was going to happen. I just knew it. Now the Estate could have to wait at least another year to show the public what this mess is really about if they're ever able to at all.

I don’t think the new law should be allowed to be used as a smoke screen to mask (what I do think are) the massive problems with these cases. For example, Wade changing his story all the time, especially as to why he testified for Michael’s 2005 trial defense in the first place. The truth has no...

If Elton really said that about Michael, I think he only said it because he’s piggybacking off the LN fallout so haters will buy his book. Sensibly, Why else would he say something like that? We all know what he’s getting at talking about Michael being found with a child. Disgusting.

I hope Elton John was misquoted. Because I’m really getting sick of wondering who will be next to talk that trash about Michael. Also, judging from the articles I seen about Elton in the last couple of days, he’s been (supposedly) attacking people left and right lately, including his own mother...

I think that a fraction of people already think that Michael was guilty and they are looking for anything that they think would confirm their belief. Also, there is a whole generation of people who grew up hearing the most horrible claims about him. So these people will ignore anything that says...

I’m happy that the judge seems to be going on the side of the Estate via his comments. But I’ve always thought the Estate’s claim to enforce the non-disparagement clause in that contract is wobbly. Nevertheless, I hope everything works out for them. Michael deserves to have his name cleared once...

Here's another thing I don't understand. Michael has been constantly trashed over the allegations for 26+ years. For all the negative public perception about him for all that time up until the end of last year, nobody was really canceling him out even with the onset of #MeToo. But it took LN to...

Personally, I think that since these guys chose to make that documentary and put their case out in the court of public opinion, they should have to permanently forfeit their case in actual court. Or at least be found in contempt of court for doing this while the appeal process is still going on...

https://www.yahoo.com/amphtml/entertainment/michael-jackson-marlon-brando-confrontation-145645072.html Michael Jackson allegedly cried when Marlon Brando confronted him about child sexual abuse allegations Suzy Byrne Yahoo Celebrity August 29, 2019, 2:56 PM UTC The public’s...