No not the doc. What I have read extensively online due to 2 more accusers coming forward. The doc itself did not change my opinion as it didn’t provide any new evidence or facts that I wasn’t already aware of.MJInnocent;4257545 said:It's a sad shame when fans are questioning the truth when it's not up to MJ or the Estate to prove him innocent,its up to others to prove him guilty,that's a fact,that's the law.
So you are admitting that LN has swayed your mind.....it's a bullshit film made to discredit MJ and for all involved to make money.....I'm sorry but if you believe that pile of shit,theres no hope for ya and I don't mean any disrespect.....its just that shitfest is a joke and a real disservice to actual CSA victims.
Your logical thinking seems to have left you....he can have people stay over,he can spoil them,he had more money than most people on earth and yet a few adult accusers who's stories have more holes than the Titanic is all it takes to make people believe because some think....well it is possible??? It's also possible I might own Neverland one day but don't be holding your breath.
I respect your opinion but I feel I am being more logical than most fans by acknowledging certain facts that most refuse to. You could argue it’s not logical to try and defend a grown adult sharing a room and bed with children he is not related to. Yes it’s perfectly possible that it was innocent, but the most logical explanation is not the one that we believe. Just as it could be argued that logically speaking it is highly unlikely for someone to be accused of the same crime by multiple independent accusers and be innocent. I am playing devils advocate here slightly to make my point but I am just trying to emphasis that I don’t think it’s fair to say my thinking is not logical when in fact the most logical approach is to acknowledge the strong argument for both sides as well as the holes in both arguments.