Controversial MJ Documentary Leaving Neverland [GENERAL DISCUSSION THREAD]

Cinnamon234

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
3,366
Points
48
Location
U.S.A
And yet I still see no one asking for Roman Polanski films to be removed from Netflix

That's because they're all a bunch of hypocrites.

There are murals of Tupac all over the city and he was convicted of rape and did time in prison but no one says anything about that.

Can you send the right people some facts about what sorry liars these accusers are?

I would love too. Maybe I can find out who the artist of the mural is and try to contact them on socia media or something?
 

analogue

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
7,989
Points
113
The media is still salty about 2005's Not Guilty verdicts. They were hoping and pushing for a guilty verdict, because that would have made them more money. They would have done prison updates, they would have sold books about it, made ''documentaries'' covering it. They had a lot to gain from a guilty verdict. But when Michael was found Not guilty that ended up causing the media to lose money (I think billions)
 

Themidwestcowboy

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
6,083
Points
113
The media is still salty about 2005's Not Guilty verdicts. They were hoping and pushing for a guilty verdict, because that would have made them more money. They would have done prison updates, they would have sold books about it, made ''documentaries'' covering it. They had a lot to gain from a guilty verdict. But when Michael was found Not guilty that ended up causing the media to lose money (I think billions)

And they didn't stop there. Remember how in 06 (the WMA), how they falsely reported that MJ got booed out of the staged. And mind you it was several reputable news outlet reporting that lie.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2019
Messages
1,676
Points
0
MJs children should wrote an open letter to the celereties with the request to keep themself out of the debat about LN and not playing jury when they don't know everthing about the accusation cases and didn't really know MJ.
They should imagine when something like this would happen to them when they are gonr and defenceless.

Do you think the media offered some celebreties money gor saying wahat they want them to say?
 
Last edited:

Soundmind

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
3,667
Points
0
MJs children should wrote an open letter to the celereties with the request to keep themself out of the debat about LN and not playing jury when they don't everthing about the accusation cases and didn't really know MJ.

The celebrities will take Geffen's side otherwise they can kiss goodbye to their careers. This attack is planned with orders to everyone to stick to one narrative.
 

Soundmind

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
3,667
Points
0
Three judges so far have recused themselves from the case between the estate and HBO. The first two said they have financial interests in AT&T and the third has a financial interest in one of the parties.
 

KOPV

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
13,016
Points
83
leaving-neverland-wade-robson-james-safechuck-dan-reed.jpg

8037381_072d19c8-4c80-11e9-983a-df4f404eddc3-1_1000x625.jpg

wire-8999194-1548454430-291_634x507.jpg


why is Dan always the focal point of their photoshoots? I find it odd that in a sex abuse film the primary character is the Director.. Why is Dan Reed more of a house hold name than Ryan Coogler? The director of Black Panther!
 

mthalen

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
453
Points
28
leaving-neverland-wade-robson-james-safechuck-dan-reed.jpg

8037381_072d19c8-4c80-11e9-983a-df4f404eddc3-1_1000x625.jpg

wire-8999194-1548454430-291_634x507.jpg


why is Dan always the focal point of their photoshoots? I find it odd that in a sex abuse film the primary character is the Director.. Why is Dan Reed more of a house hold name than Ryan Coogler? The director of Black Panther!
"no guys, you have been molested. Try not to smile. Look SAD"

- "sorry, keep thinking of those $$$$$$$$."
 

Soundmind

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
3,667
Points
0
Muller has just submitted his report on Trump and Russia to the General Attorney. We should have a break finally.
 

terrell

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
9,540
Points
0
Yeah imagine someone making a film about two black woman who acussing Elvis about (child) sexual abuse in the 60ies.
It neeeeeeer would get so much media attention and their guilty verdict!!!!
And if a doc is made on Elvis, will it get the media freezy like this trash got?
 

Soundmind

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
3,667
Points
0
And if a doc is made on Elvis, will it get the media freezy like this trash got?

Who still cares about Elvis? I used to listen to him sometimes before MJ died. Since MJ's death I lost all interest. MJ is something else.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2019
Messages
1,676
Points
0
Who still cares about Elvis? I used to listen to him sometimes before MJ died. Since MJ's death I lost all interest. MJ is something else.

The comment with elvis was based on a comment which said that racism has a big role in the treatment of MJ now and in the past.

When there would be a doc "Leaving Gracelend" instead of LN where two BLACK woman would accuse Elvis about (child) sexual abuss it 70ies it would never get this huge media attention, mean treatment, worldwide guilty verdict and mute.
 

terrell

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
9,540
Points
0
I remember when larry King put Diana Diamond in her place during thee 2005 case. He was on MJ's side. He was called to testify but did not have to do it at the last minute.
 

Cinnamon234

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
3,366
Points
48
Location
U.S.A
And why are these reporter asking these celebs about it? they do not ask about other people.

Because they want them to say something negative. The media wants as many negative headlines about Michael as possible. They love trashing him more than they do anything else.

You can tell they really get off on it.

Sick vultures.
 

Soundmind

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
3,667
Points
0
And why are these reporter asking these celebs about it? they do not ask about other people.

They want this shit to remain alive. Every new comment from a celeb = new article with an opportunity to slander MJ. Anyway, Muller's report is in, the liberals with their believe all victims shit are heading for yet another big defeat which should keep them busy for some time. Considering what they have been doing to MJ I don't feel sorry for them at all.
 

Soundmind

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
3,667
Points
0
I remember when larry King put Diana Diamond in her place during thee 2005 case. He was on MJ's side. He was called to testify but did not have to do it at the last minute.

I believe Larry King did take the stand or may be he appeared before the judge during the trial but without the jurors. He was going to testify that he met Larry Feldman for lunch where they discussed the Arviso case and Larry told him their case was not as strong as the Chandlers, that he did not trust them or did not believe them I don't remember exactly. The judge of course ruled it was hearsay and prevented him from testifying to that.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2004
Messages
5,463
Points
63
Never seen "victims" doing photo shoots like they are doing promo for a new boy band!

Yep that's exactly it. Like a band that is promoting their new single or album. So very similar of those photos you usually see and they always look serious too. This shit is beyond pathetic. I would ask what other similar docs there have been and if the director and subjects held these photo shoots too.

Then you quickly realize there isn't anything quite like LN out there, not that I know of. I hate their fake victim looks so damn much.
 
Top