Controversial MJ Documentary Leaving Neverland [GENERAL DISCUSSION THREAD]

Carmour260

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
512
Points
18
Greetings again from Atlanta,

Yesterday, I was at Walmart, and I saw Michael Jackson t-shirts. I got one, had to grab it. I performed "You Rock My World" and "Human Nature" during karaoke last night. So happy for Janet now that she's in the Rock 'n Roll Hall of Fame. I'm glad she just show up, got her award and split. She knew what she was doing.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2004
Messages
5,463
Points
63
Honey, I am still trying to learn how to download pictures on these computers. LOL. I have the one with the Thriller album cover; my favorite one when he is wearing the brown leather jacket with his thumb in his pocket posing sideway; and the one when he was performing "Beat it" like the poster in Black or White video" that fell down in the scene.

Ah yes, that's definitely a great picture. I have a very cool cartoon This is it Thriller shirt from London. I think I'll wear that during the Jackson event on August 24th in Holland this year. I might want to wear a shirt with **** Wade and James, not sure yet.
 

Arckangel

Proud Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2019
Messages
106
Points
0
terrell;4252616 said:
She is catching it. See how we can research and find the evidence of these liars. She could have done the same and u can believe many folks especially civil right leaders told her she was WRONG. Her creditability is hurt and if u look people even with the opening of the APPle are bring up her association with Weinstein yet jumping on this trash.

We should never embrace Oprah again. It would be a mistake to forget it all and embrace her again, subscribe to her channel, her magazine, follow her, etc. We need to cancel and mute her forever! What she did to MJ is unconscionable and abysmal—words cannot express.
 

john13th

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
566
Points
18
This wedding ring scene with Safecheck, when was that filmed? I know and heard it was filmed 17 months after the main interview hence the different furnitures and different background but which month and year? If this was a crucial scene of evidence, why did they wait so long and why wasn't this part of the main interview? I want to make a point about this to my friend who is convinced by LN.
 

1nn5

Proud Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2014
Messages
1,020
Points
38
This wedding ring scene with Safecheck, when was that filmed? I know and heard it was filmed 17 months after the main interview hence the different furnitures and different background but which month and year? If this was a crucial scene of evidence, why did they wait so long and why wasn't this part of the main interview? I want to make a point about this to my friend who is convinced by LN.

Dan Reed said because Safeshuck was " searching the ring".
 

Soundmind

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
3,667
Points
0
HE REALLY SAID THAT????

LMAO
Yes he did. But he did not explain why he had him wear the same clothes and why did they feel the need to go back to the same hotel room after 17 months to film. He wanted to fool the audience into believing everything was done in one session but probably he knew someone at the hotel might speak up. Liars scumbags
 

Resa

Proud Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2011
Messages
785
Points
0
Paris78;4252589 said:
Wormsby: Michael Jackson documentary, ‘Leaving Neverland,’ not credible

https://www.birminghamtimes.com/201...vOFQLu8bjcWhRlNi8jzJzkjuq8j7RyqOvK7ivSeMAJAfg

It was really difficult for me to watch “Leaving Neverland” as a person who grew up the consummate Michael Jackson fan, but one who is still willing to face facts. Director Dan Reed’s piece is a shameful presentation of contested facts presented in a context to have them received as proven truth. The two main witnesses in the documentary, and the only people to claim abuse first hand, Wade Robson and James Safechuck, have both testified in court, under oath on multiple previous occasions that Michael Jackson never molested them. Their story did not change until Jackson died.

During my undergraduate days in college I was involved in a false identification case involving the robbery of a jewelry store. The store employee initially identified me as the suspect and I was arrested and held in jail overnight. Other than also being a black man, I looked nothing like the tall, muscular, black man with a shaved scalp who was ultimately charged with the crime.

When the case went to trial the defense attorney described how the store employee identified me and how the employee identified the person charged with the crime. In both statements the witness said she was sure beyond a reasonable doubt that the person she identified was the perpetrator. The jury came back with a verdict of not guilty because they felt the witness had no credibility.

I think the same goes for those two making charges against Jackson. They both testified under oath at the trials of young men who said they had experienced abuse at the hands of Jackson and said Jackson had never done anything inappropriate with them.

I also agree with those who claim this is yet another case of the public lynching of a successful black male figure. I do not know and cannot claim that Michael Jackson is innocent of all the things he is accused of, but I do know that he was tried in a court of law, that included sworn testimony from those now accusing him while he was living, and he was acquitted. And the man behind this new so-called documentary presented nothing credible or new in making charges against a man who has been unable to defend himself for more than 10 years.

And the only witnesses to justify this public lynching are two people who have already had their day in court and whose suddenly revised testimony would not be accepted in any court in this land. As a community we should be outraged. Or at least that’s the way I see it.

I'm proud to say that this is from one of the newspapers in the city that I live in.
 

myosotis

Proud Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2009
Messages
4,225
Points
48
Same. I think its the youtube vid that was posted. Its kinda frozen the screen

Apologies, I think post #10060 brought some comments with it from YT, via the 'embed' function. I can't edit or report that post (buttons have gone), so I'll flag it here for deletion by the Mods.....

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now deleted from post 10600 (Thank you Mods), and I'll attempt to re-post here, as it is a very worthwhile video, covering a lot of ground fairly quickly (Includes interviews with Brandi, Taj, Charles Thomson, 2005 PI, Brad Sundberg etc.)

Neverland Firsthand by Liam McEwan

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4trDbeFWTY&t=1346s

 
Last edited:

BadAlicia

Proud Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2019
Messages
46
Points
0
I don't know guys if you have seen this video:

It is an interview with the private investigator Scot Ross who worked on 2005 trial and is talking about it and about James and Wade's case. And what is interesting he is a friend with a older brother of Wade who was a policeman and is a private investigator as well!
 

Robbsaber01

Proud Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2011
Messages
2,281
Points
48
Dan Reed said because Safeshuck was " searching the ring".
lol thats the best excuse he can come up with? As someone pointed out before, If Mj bought the ring for Safechuck how does a child sized ring still fit an adult? If it wasnt child sized, it probably wouldnt fit back then either. That story makes no sense whatsoever. Didnt Safechuck almost laugh when he was asked about the ring (before Wade stepped in) during the Oprah interview?
 

myosotis

Proud Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2009
Messages
4,225
Points
48
There are reporting that Okrah has deleted all videos of Leaving Never land from her channels.

I wonder if she also had an 'anti-disparagement' agreement with one of MJ's companies? It seems odd that she would suddenly do a complete 180 degree turnabout this late in the day (it's quite a long time since she saw the film on Geffen's yacht).

There's a short online article confirming the removals here. (The title mentions an apology, but there is no further mention of one in the text. I don't think she would apologise - big media figures rarely do.)

https://mtonews.com/oprah-apologize...1aJycdjdi1B3wS_M9jOIQinR1lxb-cct6AROnTVskQV6I
 

Soundmind

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
3,667
Points
0
I wonder if she also had an 'anti-disparagement' agreement with one of MJ's companies? It seems odd that she would suddenly do a complete 180 degree turnabout this late in the day (it's quite a long time since she saw the film on Geffen's yacht).

There's a short online article confirming the removals here. (The title mentions an apology, but there is no further mention of one in the text. I don't think she would apologise - big media figures rarely do.)

https://mtonews.com/oprah-apologize...1aJycdjdi1B3wS_M9jOIQinR1lxb-cct6AROnTVskQV6I

Many are saying it is not even true. Some fans are just making shit up. I don't know why. It is really unnecessary.
 

john13th

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
566
Points
18
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="sv"><p lang="und" dir="ltr"><a href="https://t.co/AwPpnQZ1wD">https://t.co/AwPpnQZ1wD</a></p>&mdash; Omar7700 (@Omar77005) <a href="https://twitter.com/Omar77005/status/1111805775192772609?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">30 mars 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 

Soundmind

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
3,667
Points
0
john13th;4252649 said:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="sv"><p lang="und" dir="ltr"><a href="https://t.co/AwPpnQZ1wD">https://t.co/AwPpnQZ1wD</a></p>&mdash; Omar7700 (@Omar77005) <a href="https://twitter.com/Omar77005/status/1111805775192772609?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">30 mars 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

This guy is a liar according to some fans they were never there to begin with and everything is still up on her own channel. I hate liars and attention seekers.
 

1nn5

Proud Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2014
Messages
1,020
Points
38
Tunisian fans were invited today to talk in the biggest radio in Tunisia (Mosaïque FM) to talk about LN.
 

mjbunny

Proud Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2009
Messages
3,326
Points
63
This wedding ring scene with Safecheck, when was that filmed? I know and heard it was filmed 17 months after the main interview hence the different furnitures and different background but which month and year? If this was a crucial scene of evidence, why did they wait so long and why wasn't this part of the main interview? I want to make a point about this to my friend who is convinced by LN.
Yeah, he said in the Rolling Stone article that the main interviews were filmed in February 2017 and the rings scene was from July 2018.

"You did the bulk of your interviews with Wade and James in February 2017." ....."I did go back and do more....The wedding ring was the last thing we shot with James in July 2018. He had mentioned the fact that he had the rings and he had mentioned the fact that there was a wedding in his initialinterview. And then it took, you know, 18 months."

Also, some of their drone shots are definitely from late June of this past year (2018), like when they fly up to the front gate I can see specific cards that were left there in specific places on June 25th from myself and others I know. So, at least the front gate shots were during his trip to California to film the rings crap with Fakechuck. Such a creepy, disgusting feeling to think that scumbag was lurking around Neverland, filming our letters and cards and flowers for MICHAEL. ??
 

L.T.D

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
4,728
Points
63
Guys I have a feeling it's happening, the tide is turning. The Sun and The Mirror post about it, and now I'm seeing pages on Instagram completely unrelated to Michael posting about the lies. Interest in it is building I can feel it!
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2019
Messages
1,676
Points
0
Does it mean she now believes that Wade and James are liars ? Or maybe too many thumbs down ?

I guess Oprah Winfrey didn't saw the LN on her birthday. She only celebrated the project she had finanzed thogther with her friends.
(When she would have watched it then like it was given to the press she must have been the first journalist to stand up for Michael and say that something wrong with the accusations in the movie because she whould have known that James story with the train station can not be true).
Then she did the big promotion for LN with the "Ater Neverland" interview in which she suddenly got doubts about the credibilty of the accusers, watched LN finally compleatly, reconized the big lie with train station before anyone else did it and tried to erase her assosiation with the LN project after she found reports about other lies and inconsistancys and tried to cover up that she saw by herself in 1993 that the trainstation didn't exist in erasing with copy right claims the interview with MJ from the internet.

Thats my imagination.
 
Last edited:

Glanni

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
1,335
Points
38
Location
LA
This guy is a liar according to some fans they were never there to begin with and everything is still up on her own channel. I hate liars and attention seekers.

????

she deleted it all or not

its still all on the OWN channels. but not on oprahs, right?
 

terrell

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
9,540
Points
0

To me, it does not matter. She exposed herself for what she really is as Monique said.
 
Top