Controversial MJ Documentary Leaving Neverland [GENERAL DISCUSSION THREAD]

ScreenOrigami

Proud Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2019
Messages
2,675
Points
48
JichaelMackson;4286993 said:
OK, do you happen to know the ratings of that positive MJ doc that showed on German tv a couple of weeks ago? Was anything written in the media about it?

The Akte Spezial Documentary? Yeah, I think it was around 8.5%. If you go to the thread you’ll probably find it, I posted it back then.
 

NatureCriminal7896

Proud Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2019
Messages
10,270
Points
0
Being an MJ fan is hard sometimes. but there also good in it. i always look at it like Michael said a family of different races and backgrounds enjoying and celebrating Michael life and achievements.

no fan better than the other. it's okay if some of us want to take a break from the fanbase for while. but that doesn't make any of us weak. we all have mental health to worry about.
 

NatureCriminal7896

Proud Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2019
Messages
10,270
Points
0
Michael will always have haters. Us as fans should realize that. keep in mind we all have haters. it doesn't matter who you are. some people hate Michael for no reason at all i believe most of them was and still is jealous of Michael. Michael was human being like the rest of us. he cried. he laugh. deep inside he was very lonely. Michael was different. and an easy target.

Michael had haters when he came on this earth and did when he die. the samething will happen to us.

and i understand what JM meant, while in our own little circle. Michael is still hated. honestly i don't care because what i just said in the beginning of this post.

we all have haters. Michael had haters. and still do.

just face it. BUT don't let it get to us. there been and still positive things about Michael.

when i look at Michael i think of positives yes then negatives too due the past and everyone who hurt him and still hurt him. but also the good memories the talent and joy he gave us and still give us to this day.

Michael have haters. but also have a lot people who love him.

r.i.p michael. bless you.
 

somewhereinthedark

Proud Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2012
Messages
1,017
Points
63
ScreenOrigami;4286999 said:
The Akte Spezial Documentary? Yeah, I think it was around 8.5%. If you go to the thread you’ll probably find it, I posted it back then.

Since we are discussing ratings, let’s not forget that the child porn/ NAMBLA inspired fraudomentary had dismal ratings. It seems some people CONVENIENTLY forget that. I guess it doesn’t fit into that person’s negative “@genda”, er narrative.
 
Last edited:

ScreenOrigami

Proud Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2019
Messages
2,675
Points
48
somewhereinthedark;4287071 said:
Since we are discussing ratings, let’s not forget that the child porn/ NAMBLA inspired fraudomentary had dismal ratings. It seems some people CONVENIENTLY forget that. I guess it doesn’t fit into that person’s negative “@genda”, er narrative.

Exactly. As a former casual MJ listener, I wouldn’t have watched LN if it hadn’t become such a huge topic on Twitter right about the time I returned from my social media hiatus. For me, the case was closed after the 2005 verdict. And I didn’t really follow the trial either, as the claims sounded sketchy from day one. I trusted they’d sort it out, and they did.

I think between active MJ supporters and the small number of very vocal haters, there’s a majority of people who are really tired of hearing anything about this topic either way.
 

ozemouze

Proud Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2018
Messages
852
Points
28
ScreenOrigami;4287072 said:
I think between active MJ supporters and the small number of very vocal haters, there’s a majority of people who are really tired of hearing anything about this topic either way.

I think too that's the case. The reactions to the last MJ bashing "docu" by the BBC showed exactly that. Even if some of these people still accepts the guilty narrative they don't want to hear about that anymore, especially now when there are clearly more important things to care about. They rather listen to Heal The World which was criticized as "corny" at the time but now gives comfort to a lot of people. It may be idealistic (which isn't the same as "saccharine"), but it's genuine thanks to MJ and its message is simple and clear, and gives hope.

I won't diminish the damage done by the "mute MJ" campaign (sure it's bad PR if prominent media personalities call for your boycott), but it was an orchestrated campaign and not a spontaneous reaction by the public (even if some fell for it). This now clearly shows as people turn to MJ's music for comfort, but even small things like illustrating mask wearing with MJ pictures proves that his place in pop culture is cemented (and perhaps make some people question if MJ was indeed that lunatic as he was portrayed).

As fans we tend to blow out of proportions the negatives and the positives as well. The reality is somewhere in between.
 

ScreenOrigami

Proud Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2019
Messages
2,675
Points
48
ozemouze;4287077 said:
I won't diminish the damage done by the "mute MJ" campaign (sure it's bad PR if prominent media personalities call for your boycott), but it was an orchestrated campaign and not a spontaneous reaction by the public (even if some fell for it).

Personally, I wouldn’t even notice when “the media” mutes someone, unless they specifically announce it and people outrage-tweet about it. I rarely watch live TV, never listen to the radio at all, and for news I rely on a handful of credible sources that don’t bother with this kind of things anyway.

I’m really more than ready to leave all this behind and focus on the art and the positive movements, like all those new Heal The World renditions that people are posting during this pandemic. There’s no point spending too much energy on the negative. It brings more attention to these people than they are worth.
 

myosotis

Proud Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2009
Messages
4,224
Points
48
Staffordshire Bullterrier;4287092 said:
Apparently BBC received 168 complaints because of their ridiculous "documentary". Lol at that quoted Randy part in that article.

https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-...michael-jackson-documentary-a9473686.html?amp

Also from The Mirror (about the Jacques Peretti doc. called 'the Real Michael Jackson'):

The BBC has been bombarded with complaints over a Michael Jackson documentary which some viewers have branded "biased".
The Real Michael Jackson aired on BBC Two last month and prompted 168 complaints to the Beeb.
The figures posted on the BBC's website show the complaints were concerning "bias against Michael Jackson".

The film, which aired on March 30, featured investigative reporter Jacques Peretti charting Jackson's rise to stardom
Jackson's descent into notoriety amid child sex abuse allegations was featured at the end of the film.
However, the coverage enraged Jackson's fans who flocked to the BBC to complain that the reporting on the King Of Pop's life had not been fair.
There were also plenty of gripes about the film on Twitter as viewers flocked to social media to express their views.

One wrote: "Don't waste your time with that bulls**t documentary on BBC2 tonight about MJ.
"He's been dead nearly 11 years and these lynch mobbers refuse to leave him alone, always trying to make money defaming his name & selling lies - patheic a** wipes. I know who #TheRealMichaelJackson was."

Another angry viewer expressed similar sentiments, writing: "THIS is the real Michael Jackson. F*** BBC."

One more added: "I do not defend Michael Jackson because he is my favourite artist or because he was a great dancer.
"I defend him because he was the victim of a modern day witch hunt fueled by greed, jealousy and racism. I defend him because of this: #SquareOneMJ#TheRealMichaelJackson."

However, other viewers were enraged by the number of MJ fans seemingly defending him online.
One tweeted: "I find it hard to believe that there are people out there who still defend the multi-millionaire child abuser Michael Jackson. #TheRealMichaelJackson."
"Can't believe people still don't think Michael Jackson was a paedophile when so many people accused him of it.
"Boggles the mind #therealmichaeljackson," explained another.

......The Jackson family have hit back at the allegations and compared the hounding of Michael to a "public lynching" as the late singer is unable to defend himself in person.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/michael-jackson-documentary-gets-168-21896340

The Mirror then followed up with this headline, thereby proving that they will print ANYthing 'MJ' for clickbait, knowing they can't be sued. (R Dolezal is a known MJ 'guilter' who speaks ill of MJ at every opportunity - ideally for money) :

Horrifying state of Michael Jackson's 'real' nose - 'exposed cartilage and no nostrils'

witnesses claimed that Jackson's 'prosthetic nose' was absent, exposing the true state of his nasal cavity after decades of surgery.

"The prosthesis he normally attached to his damaged nose was missing, revealing bits of cartilage surrounding a small dark hole," the onlooker told Rolling Stone magazine of the horrifying scene.

..... Music video director Rudi Dolezal alleged that when he was filming the Dangerous tour in Munich in 1992, he was told Jackson refused to appear on camera if he wasn't performing because, “on those days, he doesn’t have a nose.”

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/horrifying-state-michael-jacksons-real-21821869
 
Last edited:

ScreenOrigami

Proud Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2019
Messages
2,675
Points
48
Isn’t it pathetic how they scrape every bit and piece together to somehow generate a “new” MJ story?
Don’t click on that crap, every click brings them money and motivates them to write more. Clicks are the new currency. To buy it is to feed it.
 

Rhilo

Proud Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2010
Messages
2,816
Points
0
Yeah, saw those articles when I googled Michael news -there was another about his feet- and almost regretted googling Michael which I gave up beginning of last year with the news of LNL coming out. It's unbelievable that they'd be writing rehashed crass BS about Michael after all this time.
 

christy

Proud Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2003
Messages
1,193
Points
38
Yes her backlash is real even she admits it. yes, her ratings drop and her network is hit. Yes high profile people have attacked her from Monique, Snoop, 50 cent, Bill Beillamy, Ricky smiley, etc. and even on the radio to callers who call about her. She felt it. Like I said, she got a backlash more than MJ. And see that is what I do not get about you, You are WILLING to question if there is really a backlash against Oprah (something even she admit she got and still feeling) YET you want to hype up as if MJ is done despite all the great things that are going on for MJ even people giving MJ praise for wearing the mask now. I do not sense no "Pessimism" when you discuss Oprah.
Dunno if Beyonce is still in Michael's corner...coz if she still is ..
I wish her to OVERTAKE Oprah in POWER, in WEALTH & in INFLUENCE.
Oprah will be defeated and fallen from her pedestal.
The trajectory of her fall is gonna be nothing short of staggering
And her Oprah Winfrey Network (O W N) studio would be reduced to nothing,
sitting there rotting and wasted.
A white elephant where modern technology does not need it anymore
 

ScreenOrigami

Proud Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2019
Messages
2,675
Points
48
Rhilo;4287112 said:
Yeah, saw those articles when I googled Michael news -there was another about his feet- and almost regretted googling Michael which I gave up beginning of last year with the news of LNL coming out. It's unbelievable that they'd be writing rehashed crass BS about Michael after all this time.

Just stop googling MJ. If there’s anything worth reporting, we’ll hear it from his music & studio people or other trustworthy sources anyway. The “media” don’t know anything we don’t. :)

I mean, really? There are millions of living musicians out there, and they prefer to make up stories about MJ’s feet? How legendary do you have to be for that to happen? :D

EDIT: On that note, Taj is going to do another Q&A session at 1 pm pacific today. :)

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Hey everyone. Doing another live Q and A tomorrow (Monday) at 1 pm (Pacific Time). My wife <a href="https://twitter.com/ThayanaScoJaxn?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ThayanaScoJaxn</a> will be joining me for the first time. Should be a lot of fun. Make sure to watch.<a href="https://t.co/9042OsIF0j">https://t.co/9042OsIF0j</a></p>&mdash; Taj Jackson (@tajjackson3) <a href="https://twitter.com/tajjackson3/status/1251934127068045314?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 19, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Last edited:

NatureCriminal7896

Proud Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2019
Messages
10,270
Points
0
Google full of crap when it comes to Michael. back in the day they sort of had a heart for Michael and he was and still is one of most people who are search for especially after his death. a lot search engines crash when people want it to make sure Michael actually passed. nowadays they wanna erase that with bad negative fake old news. when black history started it this year they didn't put Michael in their line up. everybody else but Michael.

they knew what they was doing because during that whole month they search engine didn't really celebrate black history month once everybody got on them for it by using the hashtag all that month #michaeljacksonblackhistory. which i liked it and they will be doing it again later this year in October. some people still using hashtag too. which make me proud.

just the other day prince was helping out with giving food to people during the virus. guess what? there was negative news about prince saying he sorry about his controversial post.

how the heck he needs to say sorry for? for helping people during this virus? seriously? they talk about prince harry and meghan (I don't hate them.) doing the same thing but they gonna leave out prince and make him look like a bad person.

that's one the reason i don't trust or use google too much anymore. they bunch of crap when it comes to Michael and other topics.

I hope his kids be careful. they all know that they adults now so they know now they can bully them just like they did Michael. i really hope and pray that his kids are safe.

the world was and still is very cruel to Michael.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2004
Messages
5,463
Points
63
I haven't seen the "documentary" but Randy T was part of it as well, wasn't he? Truly...LOL at him saying he can't watch LN with an open mind. Dude is full of shit, then again, didn't he claim to be a friend but in actuality Michael didn't like him at all?
 

ScreenOrigami

Proud Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2019
Messages
2,675
Points
48
NatureCriminal7896;4287127 said:
they talk about prince harry and meghan (I don't hate them.) doing the same thing but they gonna leave out prince and make him look like a bad person.

Harry & Meghan have just opted out of tabloids, btw. :D

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">NEW: In a Sunday night letter, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have written to editors of the four major British tabloids - The Sun, Daily Express, Daily Mirror and Daily Mail - promising never to work with them again, barring all access into the future. The letter in full: <a href="https://t.co/V4CWc8jKu5">pic.twitter.com/V4CWc8jKu5</a></p>&mdash; Mark Di Stefano (@MarkDiStef) <a href="https://twitter.com/MarkDiStef/status/1252009109446176769?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 19, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

When they mention people having their lives pulled apart by the tabloids, I bet Harry also had MJ in mind, as his mom was friends with him.

I hope more people stop talking to tabloids and stop reading tabloids. No stories, no readers, no money.
 

dam2040

Proud Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
5,971
Points
113
Re: MJ feeling the LN backlash in Belgium

Dam2040 if you think Drake has a nr 1 hit because he sings about MJ then you are deluded and I don't feel bad saying that.

Lol. Ridiculous. You being unable to read does not make me 'delusional'.
 

NatureCriminal7896

Proud Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2019
Messages
10,270
Points
0
Dunno if Beyonce is still in Michael's corner...coz if she still is ..
I wish her to OVERTAKE Oprah in POWER, in WEALTH & in INFLUENCE.
Oprah will be defeated and fallen from her pedestal.
The trajectory of her fall is gonna be nothing short of staggering
And her Oprah Winfrey Network (O W N) studio would be reduced to nothing,
sitting there rotting and wasted.
A white elephant where modern technology does not need it anymore

I hope she still is. she need to be careful too. they can do the samething they did to Michael to her as well.
 

NatureCriminal7896

Proud Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2019
Messages
10,270
Points
0
ScreenOrigami;4287131 said:
Harry & Meghan have just opted out of tabloids, btw. :D

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">NEW: In a Sunday night letter, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have written to editors of the four major British tabloids - The Sun, Daily Express, Daily Mirror and Daily Mail - promising never to work with them again, barring all access into the future. The letter in full: <a href="https://t.co/V4CWc8jKu5">pic.twitter.com/V4CWc8jKu5</a></p>&#8212; Mark Di Stefano (@MarkDiStef) <a href="https://twitter.com/MarkDiStef/status/1252009109446176769?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 19, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

When they mention people having their lives pulled apart by the tabloids, I bet Harry also had MJ in mind, as his mom was friends with him.

I hope more people stop talking to tabloids and stop reading tabloids. No stories, no readers, no money.

I hope tabloids go away in general. i don't think that's gonna happen any time soon though sadly. like Michael said BURN THE TABOIDS!
 

terrell

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
9,540
Points
0
somewhereinthedark;4286994 said:
1. Of course, you won’t read what MJ fans uncovered from reading a newspaper. Surely, you don’t think the media will admit that they are biased and wrong. I don’t know how o.d you are or how long you have been a fan. BUT, the media has NEVER admitted they were wrong about Michael because they WANT him to be guilty. Btw, if you haven’t been around for 30+ years. Then you won’t know what I am speaking of.
2.Factual proof? Where is your FACTUAL proof? I haven’t seen any from you. I’ve only seen NEGATIVE assumptions.
3. From the comments that I have read on different forums, it seems as if people who believe these fake allegations have the sick tendency to FANTASIZE about children being abused when they really weren’t. I have ready many, many co ments from people who seem to actually “get off” or take glee in the graphic NAMBLA inspired me crap that the two extortionists spewed. THAT’s offensive!
4. I have stated several times that maybe it’s your location, friends, family, etc. that guides your narrative. According to YOU, you have not been around anyone who had anything except a negative response toward Michael after watching the fraudomentary. SEE, that’s where you and I differ. The people that I am around- friends, family, associates, people I work with, radio stations I listen to, celebrities that I follow and read about had a positive view of Michael after watching LN. It didn’t take a rocket scientist to know that these pieces of trash were lying through their teeth. Of course the people who already hated Michael and WANTED it to be true, didn’t care abut the extortionists’ lies and fantasies.Their allegations were based on pure fantasy and gossip. NO FACTS!
5.You state that you have never met anyone who had a positive opinion of Michael after viewing the fraudomentary. Again maybe it’s who you surround yourself with-friends, family, associates, your location, etc. FTR, I haven’t experienced what YOU are stating. I truly thought that I would have heard negativity from the people zi work with, associates, etc., to this day I have NOT. After the R.Kelly Docu, that was the talk of the workplace. It was complete opposite with Michael, people who were not really MJ fans came up to me saying they didn’t believe the @#$& that was spewed from LN.
6. Finally, you state that you don’t have any evidence that LN had the opposite effect than what you experienced. However, I DO HAVE THAT EVIDENCE. So, is it baseless assumptions on your part to ASSUME that everyone is negative, just because YOU say so? Sorry, it doesn’t work that way in the real world. Btw, YOUR world is not everyone’s world. Stop acting as if it is.

You summed it up
 

terrell

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
9,540
Points
0
Magic Johnson just said Jordan, Jackson, and Beyoncé are the best performers in his time. Guess what, Beyoncé is now being dragged. The point is Everyone has people hating on them including all of us in our own lives. I had someone hatin on me because I did not party in college.
 
Last edited:

terrell

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
9,540
Points
0
myosotis;4287109 said:
Also from The Mirror (about the Jacques Peretti doc. called 'the Real Michael Jackson'):

The BBC has been bombarded with complaints over a Michael Jackson documentary which some viewers have branded "biased".
The Real Michael Jackson aired on BBC Two last month and prompted 168 complaints to the Beeb.
The figures posted on the BBC's website show the complaints were concerning "bias against Michael Jackson".

The film, which aired on March 30, featured investigative reporter Jacques Peretti charting Jackson's rise to stardom
Jackson's descent into notoriety amid child sex abuse allegations was featured at the end of the film.
However, the coverage enraged Jackson's fans who flocked to the BBC to complain that the reporting on the King Of Pop's life had not been fair.
There were also plenty of gripes about the film on Twitter as viewers flocked to social media to express their views.

One wrote: "Don't waste your time with that bulls**t documentary on BBC2 tonight about MJ.
"He's been dead nearly 11 years and these lynch mobbers refuse to leave him alone, always trying to make money defaming his name & selling lies - patheic a** wipes. I know who #TheRealMichaelJackson was."

Another angry viewer expressed similar sentiments, writing: "THIS is the real Michael Jackson. F*** BBC."

One more added: "I do not defend Michael Jackson because he is my favourite artist or because he was a great dancer.
"I defend him because he was the victim of a modern day witch hunt fueled by greed, jealousy and racism. I defend him because of this: #SquareOneMJ#TheRealMichaelJackson."

However, other viewers were enraged by the number of MJ fans seemingly defending him online.
One tweeted: "I find it hard to believe that there are people out there who still defend the multi-millionaire child abuser Michael Jackson. #TheRealMichaelJackson."
"Can't believe people still don't think Michael Jackson was a paedophile when so many people accused him of it.
"Boggles the mind #therealmichaeljackson," explained another.

......The Jackson family have hit back at the allegations and compared the hounding of Michael to a "public lynching" as the late singer is unable to defend himself in person.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/michael-jackson-documentary-gets-168-21896340

The Mirror then followed up with this headline, thereby proving that they will print ANYthing 'MJ' for clickbait, knowing they can't be sued. (R Dolezal is a known MJ 'guilter' who speaks ill of MJ at every opportunity - ideally for money) :

Horrifying state of Michael Jackson's 'real' nose - 'exposed cartilage and no nostrils'

witnesses claimed that Jackson's 'prosthetic nose' was absent, exposing the true state of his nasal cavity after decades of surgery.

"The prosthesis he normally attached to his damaged nose was missing, revealing bits of cartilage surrounding a small dark hole," the onlooker told Rolling Stone magazine of the horrifying scene.

..... Music video director Rudi Dolezal alleged that when he was filming the Dangerous tour in Munich in 1992, he was told Jackson refused to appear on camera if he wasn't performing because, &#8220;on those days, he doesn&#8217;t have a nose.&#8221;

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/horrifying-state-michael-jacksons-real-21821869
2 so called
people are enrage? LOL. By the writing, that maybe someone in Dan Reed camp typing that. Someone needs to tell that so call viewer when you go by FACTS, it is easy to KNOW MJ was innocent . I just saw a site change the headline from 168 to 150 then back to 168.Dirty dogs. I tell ya there is an agenda. I now bet those 2 people were from that newsroom.
 
Last edited:

ScreenOrigami

Proud Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2019
Messages
2,675
Points
48
NatureCriminal7896;4287150 said:
I hope tabloids go away in general. i don't think that's gonna happen any time soon though sadly. like Michael said BURN THE TABOIDS!

We can make it happen. Each single one of us has to stop clicking on tabloid articles, no matter how strong the temptation might be. Not even to check what it&#8217;s about. Not even to copy the text and paste it here. Just simply never click on them for any reason. Don&#8217;t tweet them, and when others do, don&#8217;t retweet. Just let the tabloids slowly die. :)
 

terrell

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
9,540
Points
0
ScreenOrigami;4287162 said:
We can make it happen. Each single one of us has to stop clicking on tabloid articles, no matter how strong the temptation might be. Not even to check what it&#8217;s about. Not even to copy the text and paste it here. Just simply never click on them for any reason. Don&#8217;t tweet them, and when others do, don&#8217;t retweet. Just let the tabloids slowly die. :)

And that is clearly what it is now. Mainly from the UK media tabs.
 

NatureCriminal7896

Proud Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2019
Messages
10,270
Points
0
ScreenOrigami;4287162 said:
We can make it happen. Each single one of us has to stop clicking on tabloid articles, no matter how strong the temptation might be. Not even to check what it’s about. Not even to copy the text and paste it here. Just simply never click on them for any reason. Don’t tweet them, and when others do, don’t retweet. Just let the tabloids slowly die. :)


lol. that's not gonna be easy not even in Michael case.
 

somewhereinthedark

Proud Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2012
Messages
1,017
Points
63
terrell;4287157 said:
2 so called
people are enrage? LOL. By the writing, that maybe someone in Dan Reed camp typing that. Someone needs to tell that so call viewer when you go by FACTS, it is easy to KNOW MJ was innocent . I just saw a site change the headline from 168 to 150 then back to 168.Dirty dogs. I tell ya there is an agenda. I now bet those 2 people were from that newsroom.

Of course, there is an AGENDA. Anyone who has been a fan of Michael for 30+ years knows 1000% that there is an agenda against him. Also it is very easy to spot those who are a part of THAT agenda. It’s equally sickening AND baffling how some people can dismiss the @genda against Michael when those of us IN THE KNOW(fans, family, music insiders,etc.) have the EVIDENCE of that agenda AND contrived conspiracy. Btw, a person would pretty much have to be a complete idiot to not know what is REALLY going on and it has @#$& to do with bogus allegations. Wake up and smell the coffee. This had to do with power and influence and STILL does, even though Michael is no longer here.

Some really are naive and weak minded if you think the Chandler extortion, the 2005 trial and the fraudomentary has to do with child abuse. It doesn’t. It’s a part of the agenda to destroy the most powerful man EVER in the entertainment industry. Look at the players involved. Look at who introduced this bull@#$&, and promoted it. Look at how MSM gleefully and willingly went along with this. @#$*. Don’t be fooled by those who want to push this negative agenda. It’s a handful and they want you to think that it is a huge number in the public. Let’s not forget that there were only TWO parents who wanted to change that school name in California. The media acted as if it was the entire parent organization who wanted it. The same with the so-called mute from radio stations. The media and others want you to think All radio banned Michael. Not true. The ones who stopped playing him didn’t matter anyway. The ones who STILL play him( the ones I hear every single day) are the ones that matter to his legacy and fans. These are the people who supported him anyway. End of story.
 

NatureCriminal7896

Proud Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2019
Messages
10,270
Points
0
Tabloids are dying out in someways. but we still sort of got a long way to go. at least people are trying to sue them now. which is great news. (y)
 

somewhereinthedark

Proud Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2012
Messages
1,017
Points
63
terrell;4287157 said:
2 so called
people are enrage? LOL. By the writing, that maybe someone in Dan Reed camp typing that. Someone needs to tell that so call viewer when you go by FACTS, it is easy to KNOW MJ was innocent . I just saw a site change the headline from 168 to 150 then back to 168.Dirty dogs. I tell ya there is an agenda. I now bet those 2 people were from that newsroom.

Exactly that&#8217;s what these tabloids and low life media do. They act like 2 people represent the majority. Believe it or not some pathetic people fall for that crap and spread the negative propaganda that Michael is done or finished. That&#8217;s how the weak minded are brainwashed. Seriously people are going to have to be smarter than that. Of course, when it comes to Michael logic, common sense, and rational thinking goes out the window. So sad!
 

NatureCriminal7896

Proud Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2019
Messages
10,270
Points
0
somewhereinthedark;4287183 said:
Exactly that&#8217;s what these tabloids and low life media do. They act like 2 people represent the majority. Believe it or not some pathetic people fall for that crap and spread the negative propaganda that Michael is done or finished. That&#8217;s how the weak minded are brainwashed. Seriously people are going to have to be smarter than that. Of course, when it comes to Michael logic, common sense, and rational thinking goes out the window. So sad!

somewhereinthedark;4287178 said:
Don&#8217;t be fooled by those who want to push this negative agenda. It&#8217;s a handful and they want you to think that it is a huge number in the public. Let&#8217;s not forget that there were only TWO parents who wanted to change that school name in California. The media acted as if it was the entire parent organization who wanted it. The same with the so-called mute from radio stations. The media and others want you to think All radio banned Michael. Not true. The ones who stopped playing him didn&#8217;t matter anyway. The ones who STILL play him( the ones I hear every single day) are the ones that matter to his legacy and fans. These are the people who supported him anyway. End of story.

this (y)
 
Top