I think the unconstitutional rulings was the main issue interms of the criminal case. This has dragged on so long due to the new ruling and re filingsThis is one of the reasons why Michael settled in 1993. He was told that a civil case could go on for up to 7 years. It's been 9 years now and this current case is still being dragged out.
All this new rulings and refiling is all just a cheating way to get the Estate to lose the case. Justice has been trying to cheat Michael since 93’ and still lose each time. Cheaters never prosper.I think the unconstitutional rulings was the main issue interms of the criminal case. This has dragged on so long due to the new ruling and re filings
Probably long forgotten.
I remember the Jane Doe a bit. Her claims were dropped eventually, and she was conveniently ignored by the press and the hater crowd. I think Diane Dimond even called her an "opportunist".I just searched it yesterday and found a list with at least 3 accusers I had never heard about, if I remember well, one in 2009, the girl Jane Doe in 2015 I think and one boy in 2019... but I expect if we haven't heard more of them they're probably nothing solid... (just writing from memory, maybe check these info)
He is long discredited. An well known attention seeking z list wannabe celebrity from my home town in the u.k. he was a fan who met mj in the 80s and when he couldnt get close to mj during the dangerous tour (police treated him as a stalker) he concocted the phone sex story at the same time he was promoting a gay phone chat sex line business he had set up in 1993. Hes changed his story more times than the wind. First claims friends sold the story to the tabloids and he knew nothing. Then claimed he had to go along with it as the tabloid threatened him.in 2003 he was in that louis theroix doc claiming the same thing. That docu was over shadowed by bashir as they aired around the same time. Within days of june 2009 he went on a local news shows saying how upset he was and that he and mj were friends who were going into business together. The police invested his story back in the day and found him to be full of B.S.throwing stones to hide your hands comes to mind from the things ive heard and seen myselfThe other from 2009 is named Terry George "Accused of masturbating on phone by Terry George when Brit was aged 13 in 1979"
That's from The Sun: https://www.thesun.co.uk/wp-content...POSITE-JACKO-TIMELINE-new.jpg?strip=all&w=322
I had never heard of that one too before yesterday.
(The article I saw yesterday concluded that all accusations were dismissed, but I don't find that precise article anymore)
Hard to say. As I understand it these cases are being brought as civil cases not criminal cases (since Michael is dead they can't bring a criminal case). The burden of proof in a civil case is much lower than it is in a criminal case. I'm not a lawyer so I don't understand *why* the burden of proof is lower but it is.If they somehow do get to sue, would they have to prove that abuse took place, or only that his company was responsible for his actions, proved or otherwise?
If the former, wouldn't it actually be good if it goes to court? I just feel the question over this is never going to go away without some sort of legal outcome.