SmoothGangsta
Proud Member
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2013
- Messages
- 4,831
- Points
- 113
Nah he's crowdfunded it so solid updates are definitely needed lol.
That the project is being released in 2023 is a very solid update to me, Putting some interview clip or anything else dont matter to me, I have zero interest in it. If you think Charles Thomson has been playing along in a fraud against fans for a couple of years claiming to work on for Taj on the project then you should perhaps think again! The information about the project is out there. I dont find any info btw where Taj has obliged to posting a certain amount of updates, just that he needs to do his project which is what matters!Nah he's crowdfunded it so solid updates are definitely needed lol.
Nobody has said anything about fraud so not really sure where that's coming from, kind of missing the point, I think.
Why would you need "solid updates" if you are confident in the project? There was updates on the gofundme page up til a year ago and plenty of updates on livestreams and the MJ-cast on a regular basis since then. T-Mez gave Taj & Charles a whole day to interview him. They went through all MJs notes and stuff he left after his death, they sat through days of video footage of MJs photographers etc.
Not sure what you qualify as solid updates for you though....video evidence of them doing what they have been describing to be doing the last few years as if you doubt they are being truthful?
Why would I be confident in this project? Most stuff Taj has said about it, and the massive change of direction to make it something people didn't even donate for, has just made me less and less so, and I know I'm not the only one who feels that way.
Charles Thomson is now telling people he's covered this for 30 years? Surely not.On the christmas MJcast episode its confirmed Thomson is helping the project with that. Thomson wrote a script for a TV-series or documentary about the 2005 trial for some other media company already years ago, which was then cancelled by covid.
Thomson is doing the research for the parts about the child molestation and trial matters. Something he has covered for 30 years, so there is probably nobody on the earth with more knowledge about the issue. I am not sure why you have a problem with an investigative multiple award winning journalist providing facts for a fact based documentary? If you have a fan with kind of expertise and experience in the field, I do not have any problems using him, it will ensure the quality of the project!
Clearly nobody neutral is interested in doing a fair Jackson documentary, nor do half the research Thomson has ever done. Facts are facts regardless who presents them!
For the people critical of the Taj producing this? Would you rather have nothing done at all? Thats the alternative. This is a pro piece Michael Jackson series. Leaving Neverland was an anti-MJ film. If you watch both, it balances each other out, thats the way I see it!
Anything I've donated towards a crowdfunding/GoFundMe thing have provided regular updates about progress, at least bi-monthly.What is "solid updates" for you and what would those "solid updates"give you that all the things I already mentioned have not?
Thought this would fit the thread as well as there might be good reason why Taj has not given more than he has on the project:
![]()
Why would you expect a refund for a donation.So it's been over four years since the announcement of this series. Honestly, I would like a refund. I did not expect to be waiting four years. Anyone know of the policies regarding this?
So people can donate literally hundreds of dollars and if the project never sees the light of day they'll never get the money back?Why would you expect a refund for a donation.
There’s always a risk involved when it comes to these sort of things, yes. Having said that, I have never lost my faith in Taj. Some projects, by their nature, just has to be given the time to fully ripe.So people can donate literally hundreds of dollars and if the project never sees the light of day they'll never get the money back?
You'd have to check if it's GoFundMe or Kickstarter. Then it just depends. In certain cases the right for your refund belongs to Taj, and he's certainly not gonna admit the project is not happening.So people can donate literally hundreds of dollars and if the project never sees the light of day they'll never get the money back?
This. I feel like a documentary/series are a bit played out anyway, media-wise. There has to be a different way of explaining Michael Jackson and the allegations to the general public, any suggestions here?My biggest problem with this film, and all other films, is that none of them get the Rizz of Leaving Neverland. Where's the splashy Sundance/Film Festival push for Taj? Until one of these Pro-MJ docs gets that publicity, there'll never be a point to me. It's as relevant as Miss Castaway.
This would be great. Right after the biopic in pipelineOR a major Hollywood motion picture about the allegations/extortion attempt; a thriller (no pun intended) based on true events
I honestly don't get the point for this Taj Jackson documentary. Even if he gets out of his cave filled with BTS memorabilia and actually finishes the doc, it would be pointless. I was thinking about this the other day and a MJ doc filled with never before seen footage that shows a different side of MJ might sound good for now and in the moment but once you sit down and start to think about how that release might look like & it's like huh. I might word this wrong but if people see the name "Taj Jackson", they will say "Oh it's made by MJ's nephew?", think of how he acts on social media & how he heavy defends his uncle on Twitter in a very crazy over the top way (There's nothing wrong with defending but you have to think about how other people might view, I'm speaking from the perspective of a person looking in and seeing Taj) and shut down this doc. They will think it's a joke and won't watch it. Plus as said before, it doesn't have the clout and rizz of LN. And also, the possible JD and MJ comparisons in the documentary, it will turn people off. Hey, you feel how you feel about the whole Johnny Depp and Amber situation and you have your own opinions but you have to realize that Michael Jackson and Johnny are two different people. Keep that JD over there and leave him out of this MJ doc. If you are trying to convince and show the audience that your subject is innocent, it is not best to show another person where he's a tough heavy controversial subject and adding MJ to his problems is bringing down MJ with him, in the mud. What is best for Taj to do is hand over that footage to an unbiased filmmaker even more than Danny, Jin and all those other filmmaker who made docs to counter LN. As much as Square One, Lies of Ln, and Truth by Media are truthful, the public doesn't take these docs seriously. No amount of spamming links to the doc in replies to guilters or the posts about these docs will change other people's opinions and make them hear the truth. The doc needs to show the two sides no matter how much the other side is lying. If the audience sees mostly Jackson associates and MJ's witnesses even though they are telling the truth, they are probably not going to finish the doc with the thought "Oh they got bribed or paid just to lie for Michael Jackson, etc, etc..." Unfortunately, you are going to have to show those people on the other side whether if it's archive footage or actual interviews taken for the doc. And then after you do, you hit them with the facts and the stuff shown in the FBI files or actual footage of Michael doing the opposite of what guilters and accusers say of him. To top it off, you need that "smoking gun" for the accusers. Of course, due to the nature of the NDAs, what exactly those conditions are & privacy of those accusers, Chandler and Arviso will most likely won't speak up or say "they were lying" because that would defeat the purpose of the settlement and contracts. That's why you go with plan B, any footage or audio you could use to counter those lies. Last, you need someone that has actual connections to the big 3 streaming services and video sites. I'm sorry but Youtube & Prime Video won't cut it. You need the doc to premiere at the big festival too for more exposure and get them to buy that rights and stream it. You need HBO's rival in the industry, some company big to compete with HBO.
It's because he wants to do it?I honestly don't get the point for this Taj Jackson documentary.
And no one's stopping him? He could do it and put it out there but who's really going to check into it? Other than the typical audience.It's because he wants to do it?
I agree with you. A documentary should always show both sides. It's why Leaving Neverland was never a documentary. You have to SHOW people how crazy the accusations are.
Idk what's stopping him, but he never said when it'd be ready or that it's coming ASAP, near as I can tell. He says people will talk against it, might as well wait for a Pro-Michael time.And no one's stopping him? He could do it and put it out there but who's really going to check into it? Other than the typical audience.