- Jul 14, 2003
I can second christy. So many amazing posters back in the day. I could real the names off. Wonder where they are now. Lots of transcripts and audio saved by ppl
elusive moonwalker;4303847 said:I can second christy. So many amazing posters back in the day. I could real the names off. Wonder where they are now. Lots of transcripts and audio saved by ppl
elusive moonwalker;4303980 said:Yeah the board and posters were so good sneddon tried to shut us down
Staffordshire Bullterrier;4304172 said:The fact that this guy is only tagging tabloids, the worst of the worst.....is very telling. And as for these notes by MJ, what kind of notes is he claiming them to be? Same as the LN stuff, completely harmless notes made out to look nefarious?
ScreenOrigami;4304177 said:Well, the reason I brought it up in this thread is that it’s possible that he’s the one who sold the “Elvis is not King” notes to the tabloids.
We know he is in possession of a 2005 juror notebook, but he never mentioned owning any notes by MJ – until earlier this year. According to an MJ Facebook group, he allegedly tweeted that he owned some notes by MJ that he was planning to release, but he deleted the Tweet recently.
All of a sudden the 4 page document appears in the tabloids – and this dude starts tagging them in his Tweets.
This is why I believe it’s a good idea to keep an eye on him.
Personally, I’m still not 100% convinced that the recently published handwriting is real. It may be, but it also may be a convincing fake. If it is a fake, it could have been a test to see if people believe it, and there may be more controversial stuff to come.
Again, I’m not saying that the document is fake, but it is possible. Too many coincidences, for my taste.
Christ. It just never ends does it? Unbelievable. If handwriting can be faked now too....it's becoming very scary. And if that's the case, yeah you can bet these notes will read very controversial, sigh.
Oh, forging handwriting is actually not that hard. Have you ever heard of the Hitler Diaries? A nobody from Germany forged a whole set of them, sold them to a magazine for millions, and fooled the whole world. Forensic analysis finally proved them to be fake. :laughing:
Check this out: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitler_Diaries
Staffordshire Bullterrier;4304181 said:Damn! That's nuts. It could easily be fake as hell then.
ScreenOrigami;4304183 said:Yeah, you can not 100% verify by only looking at the handwriting itself and the content that something was actually written by the person. Especially a person who is so well known.
Again – just to make sure people don’t misunderstand me – the document may very well be real. I’m just personally not convinced.
Staffordshire Bullterrier;4304185 said:It's just odd that this Vincent guy is doing this. He's a friend of the Cascio family right? A family that has always defended Michael, unless I'm mistaken. But yeah, if the document IS fake and we may never really find out, if he comes with more notes and they are bad.....it could get ugly. Haters and tabloids alike will love it.
Staffordshire Bullterrier;4304188 said:Do you have a Twitter link to that MJ fan that wrote the first part? I'd like to read that discussion.
ScreenOrigami;4304190 said:Which first part? Excuse me for not understanding your question, it’s late and I’m quite tired.
Staffordshire Bullterrier;4304191 said:I understand. .
The text written here, that person. He/she is on Twitter, I would like to see that discussion.
ScreenOrigami;4304192 said:Oh! Sure, let me check. I’ll update this post when I find it.
Here you go: https://twitter.com/Tashawithatea/status/1302163939401388032
These are MJ advocates that I regard as trustworthy.
OK, need sleep now. Good night!
alot people tend to forget Elvis helped black people he also when to a black church. black people did listen to Elvis but like racism at the time people told Elvis not to sing his song anymore because it was "black" music.
ScreenOrigami;4304365 said:Questions to the people who think the documents is authentic. I would really like to hear your theories:
Who do you think has sold the document to the tabloids?
How did that person obtain the document?
Why didn’t the person release it earlier?
Why tabloids instead of auction?
Why does the person not make his or her name public?
I believe these are questions we should ask, no matter which side we’re on regarding the authenticity.