Latest on MJJC

T-Mez on Today Show

Oh man! I had no clue Mez was gonna be on.

Gotta love Mez, always speaks with common sense.
 
I like Mez, but I kind of like him a little bit less after what he said about MJ's kids..

Anyway.. I was wanting to hear his thoughts after the prelim so i'm glad for this, i'm listening now.. seems by the words he used, he kept saying 'reckless', that he thinks it should be murder two.. but then he talks about invol manslaughter being easier to prove, that they have the evidence to prove that already..
 
Last edited:
ScrEAm.Jack5on said:
I like Mez, but I kind of like him a little bit less after what he said about MJ's kids..
Click to expand...

Oh, Ya I know what u taking about! I think it was only his opinion though! It's not like he asked MJ that question obviously!

T-mez was given an example about how MJ loved people of all races and wouldn't mind adoption!

But, yea he made it out to be like that was the case with MJ's children without knowing for sure! Plus MJ never said that! Oops!:doh:

But, hey I still love the guy! :yes:
 
bluetopez said:
Oh, Ya I know what u taking about! I think it was only his opinion though! It's not like he asked MJ that question obviously!

T-mez was given an example about how MJ loved people of all races and wouldn't mind adoption!

But, yea he made it out to be like that was the case with MJ's children without knowing for sure! Plus MJ never said that! Oops!:doh:

But, hey I still love the guy! :yes:
Click to expand...

Yeh I saw the video.. he said 'MJ has two white children, and one latino child'... :/ then talked about MJ wanting to adopt kids from all races.. but anyway, that's off topic sorry for bringing it up, I only saw the video the other day & it peed me off a little.

He has done a lot for Michael :)
 
Can we now move on from that issue and focus on what he said about Murray? Since this is the trial/case section, and we're not here to discuss someone's personal feelings in regards to Michael's kids DNA. Thank you.
 
I thought it was interesting that he thought Murray would have to testify. I look forward to hearing what excuses he will come up with for all his recklessness.
 
As always T Mez speaks a lot of sense. I have great respect for him as a lawyer.
 
jrsfan said:
I thought it was interesting that he thought Murray would have to testify. I look forward to hearing what excuses he will come up with for all his recklessness.
Click to expand...



well I think he does too, because he's the only one that will explain why he did what he did.. Every other professional has said that what Murray did was insane and stupid and they can't understand why a medical doctor would give his patient anesthesia as a sleep aid at home. To be honest we know why he did it and that's because of the money and the opportunity of a lifetime to be MJ's doctor, but like T Mez said it backfired on him. Murray will never admit that money was the factor. He's going to say how he just wanted to help his friend and all kinds of bs but we know the truth.
 
StacyJ said:
well I think he does too, because he's the only one that will explain why he did what he did.. Every other professional has said that what Murray did was insane and stupid and they can't understand why a medical doctor would give his patient anesthesia as a sleep aid at home. To be honest we know why he did it and that's because of the money and the opportunity of a lifetime to be MJ's doctor, but like T Mez said it backfired on him. Murray will never admit that money was the factor. He's going to say how he just wanted to help his friend and all kinds of bs but we know the truth.
Click to expand...
Well said. :agree:
 
jrsfan said:
I thought it was interesting that he thought Murray would have to testify. I look forward to hearing what excuses he will come up with for all his recklessness.
Click to expand...

whether he will i dont know but in the scheme of things he really doesnt have much choice when u look at what hes accused of. how can he defend against those allegations without giving his side of the story? he cant. hes gonna be lacking in defence witnesses anyway besides experts testifying that mj could have self injected and ppl like faye etc who will say mj was already frail etc.and previous drs and use of diprivan there really isnt any other defence witnesses he can call that are actually releated the charge hes facing heck even the ones i named arent really related to the charge. only he can defend what he did and without him putting on a oscar winning performance theres really no defence for jurrors to take into consideration
 
jrsfan said:
I thought it was interesting that he thought Murray would have to testify. I look forward to hearing what excuses he will come up with for all his recklessness.
Click to expand...

If he testifies, I think it will be full of 'pity me' histrionics..of the 'I was only trying to do good' kind. I don't think the truth will get a look-in. I don't think we will be any the wiser afterwards.
 
Last edited:
im not hearing anything about michaels children, am i the only one?

Good video, nice to hear some thought from him. im shocked to hear murray said his not quilty part.. i can not stand that accent of him off topic though.

I hope he will testify and then be cross examed by our site, would be much blood spelt right?
 
Ingelief said:
im not hearing anything about michaels children, am i the only one?

Good video, nice to hear some thought from him. im shocked to hear murray said his not quilty part.. i can not stand that accent of him off topic though.

I hope he will testify and then be cross examed by our site, would be much blood spelt right?
Click to expand...

No, not this interview T-mez wasn't! That was another interview from last yr I believe that me an someone else were talking about briefly!

But, anyways yea that would be something if he testifies, I mean in court! I would love to hear him explain why in any circumstances would it be okay to leave a patient unattended!
 
I would love to see murray on the witness stand but can't see how that would happen. The prosecution would tie him in knots with all of his different versions of what happened. I suppose if the defense thought he could elicit sympathy from the jury they might risk it or unless he has some secret blockbuster info to
reveal at the last minute. But I think it would be awfully risky of them.

Tom Mesereau, so nice to hear a person say what he really thinks! That bit about the debate between M2 and IVM. Wish we could have heard more about why not m2. I understand they feel they can win with IVM but what did they lack for M2? Maybe we'll know after the trial.
 
^^^^yea I think we will find out why not mur 2 afterward also.
 
Ingelief said:
im not hearing anything about michaels children, am i the only one?

Good video, nice to hear some thought from him. im shocked to hear murray said his not quilty part.. i can not stand that accent of him off topic though.

I hope he will testify and then be cross examed by our site, would be much blood spelt right?
Click to expand...

No, I didn't hear anything about the children either in the interview.

Good guy T-Mez, tells it like it is and yes Murray was totally reckless! How Murray could use Michael's "I am an innocent man" speech like he did was grotesque and he had some nerve too! Arrrrgggh!

I hope he testifies and totally screws up!!! I want to see the arrogant expression disappear from that monster's face!
 
T-Mez is a class act as always. Interesting comment about the d.a's office considering 2nd degree murder, then choosng involuntary manslaughter due to it being easier to prove. Just wish they could put dr. death away for longer than the max 4 yrs. Surely his conduct warrants some extra charges?
 
elusive moonwalker said:
whether he will i dont know but in the scheme of things he really doesnt have much choice when u look at what hes accused of. how can he defend against those allegations without giving his side of the story? he cant. hes gonna be lacking in defence witnesses anyway besides experts testifying that mj could have self injected and ppl like faye etc who will say mj was already frail etc.and previous drs and use of diprivan there really isnt any other defence witnesses he can call that are actually releated the charge hes facing heck even the ones i named arent really related to the charge. only he can defend what he did and without him putting on a oscar winning performance theres really no defence for jurrors to take into consideration
Click to expand...

I agree.. He is the only that can really defend what he did.. There were no witnesses and like I've said before I don't think he can find any expert medical witnesses who will testify on his behalf for his behavior. Every doctor questioned as said what he did was stupid and insane and they were all shocked that this cardiologist did this to MJ in a house without medical monitoring equipment. If he finds someone who will say that MJ could've self-injected, then the question to that expert is then why would Murray even leave his patient in the situation where he could be self-injecting? That proves he was negligent and left his patient alone and unmonitored under anethesia.. That's insane!!
 
I still also don't understand how Murray thinks he's innocent.. He's acting like he had absolutely no participation with MJ's treatment, even though he bought the stuff and administered it. The man is either a sociopath or he's in very bad denial
 
But doesn't all the defense have to do is plant some doubt in the jury's mind?
He could say that Michael was sleeping so deeply (ha!) that the phone calls didn't disturb him blah blah.. then he went to the bathroom blah blah and when he came back blah blah. If he comes across as caring, doing this for Michael as a friend (ignore the 150000 dollars please), that there hadn't been any problems before, yada yadda, if he can plant doubt in even one juror, then what happens?

The defense can say that after all what murray did was not illegal. He was using his professional judgement as a doctor. Yes, it was flawed judgement, reckless even but not illegal. Maybe a juror will start thinking, well, after all he is a doctor and who am I to second guess a doctor...then what happens?
And if murray comes across the least bit sympathetic then...

He walks, doesn't he.
 
cinzia said:
But doesn't all the defense have to do is plant some doubt in the jury's mind?
He could say that Michael was sleeping so deeply (ha!) that the phone calls didn't disturb him blah blah.. then he went to the bathroom blah blah and when he came back blah blah. If he comes across as caring, doing this for Michael as a friend (ignore the 150000 dollars please), that there hadn't been any problems before, yada yadda, if he can plant doubt in even one juror, then what happens?

The defense can say that after all what murray did was not illegal. He was using his professional judgement as a doctor. Yes, it was flawed judgement, reckless even but not illegal. Maybe a juror will start thinking, well, after all he is a doctor and who am I to second guess a doctor...then what happens?
And if murray comes across the least bit sympathetic then...

He walks, doesn't he.
Click to expand...

Let's hope not... Hopefully the prosecutor will convince all 12 jurors that Murray was reckless and endangered his patients' life which resulted in his death
 
Well it is soooo blindingly obvious isn't it!
But I just can't shake memories of that OJ trial...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top