Sony Music Sued By Guild Over Use of Michael Jackson, Whitney Houston Songs

HIStory

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
6
Points
0
[h=1]By Eriq Gardner
[/h]1 hour ago









The American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada is back with another lawsuit. This time, the guild is targeting Sony Music over its use of music for films, television specials and new recordings. The guild aims to enforce agreements covering musicians who contributed instrumentals to songs from Michael Jackson, Whitney Houston, Earth Wind & Fire, and Tony Bennett.
With regards to the King of Pop, AFM flags Sony for calling its musicians for a 2009 recording session to complete a duet by Jackson and Paul Anka for the film, This Is It and its soundtrack. The session is said to be a violation of a labor agreement that provides that recording sessions are only to be called for a phonographic record, and if it was to be for a movie, AFM says it would have required an arrangement where the musicians got residual compensation.
Additionally, Sony is cited for authorizing the use of Jackson's "Bad" on a track by the hip hop artist Pitbull without telling AFM so that the musicians who contributed to Jackson's original recording could get paid. Similarly, Sony's decision to license such Jackson songs as "Billie Jean," "Man in the Mirror," and "The Way You Make Me Feel" for This Is It is said to be a "sampling new use" triggering payment obligations on behalf of those who worked on the original songs.
The lawsuit filed Tuesday in New York details other ways that Sony has allegedly breached contract.
When Sony released a CD/DVD of a work titled Whitney Houston Live: Her Greatest Performances, that allegedly required notice and eventual residuals to the musicians who accompanied the singer.
Sony's license of Earth, Wind & Fire's "Boogie Wonderland" for the 2012 film The Intouchables is flagged too. The song's new use in a film gives rise to obligations to pay musicians in "an amount equal to all payments that would be required under the terms of the AFM Basic Theatrical Motion Picture Agreement that were then in effect," according to the complaint.
And AFM says that when Sony licensed 17 sound recordings featuring duets by Tony Bennett and other vocal artists for a television program broadcast by PBS, its musicians were due payment there as well under the applicable collectively bargained agreement.
AFM's latest action follows lawsuits in recent months against film studios for recycling old film soundtracks and recording music outside of North America. The guild has new leadership and has clearly decided to become more aggressive in court. Here's the complaint.

http://news.yahoo.com/sony-music-sued-guild-over-michael-jackson-whitney-153117729.html
 
So they have aggressive new management. Do they try to negotiate first or just run off and sue??
Do they only go after the ones that had big sales or ALL of them??
 
As already stated its seems strange to go straight through the courts unless there is a reason why Sony don't think they owe these people the money.
 
They sued Warner Bros., MGM and Paramount in April over the same issues so talks must have broken down.

Reuters:

"We did not want to go to court, but Sony repeatedly refused to do the right thing and pay the musicians fairly,” [Ray] Hair said. [Guild President]
 
As long as they don't sue Michael (for once), I'm ok:D


Edited to add, maybe they do sue Michael? Is Sony Music Entertainment INC connected to MJ or Sony/ATV by any means?
 
As long as they don't sue Michael (for once), I'm ok:D


Edited to add, maybe they do sue Michael? Is Sony Music Entertainment INC connected to MJ or Sony/ATV by any means?

Michael's Estate is not being sued. The suit concerns musicians, not music publishing (Sony/ATV and MiJac).
 
I wonder if the Bad Tour DVD is impacted by this because none of the videographers or audio people were credited in the video at all.
 
I wonder if the Bad Tour DVD is impacted by this because none of the videographers or audio people were credited in the video at all.

Those most ususally work on "work for hire" basis. They get paid once and that's it.
Same with all the studio engineers and session musicians who worked albums.
At least that's the way it should be done. In the 80s they made some strange deals.
 
there really are too many ways to be able to make 'legitimate' lawsuits. While often they can be very understandable, it's just too much.... I would dread to have a position to protect a company from lawsuits... Way too many ways for them to slip in..

I guess that's why companies pay the people the BIG bucks.. To protect from and when lawsuits happen and to find others that are using things they have 'rights' to - to make lawsuits. .
 
Back
Top