California Medical Board Subpoenas Dr. Arnold Klein

I detest vanity fair almost as much as i detest klein. I don't know why the usa have public court proceedings if journalists just prefer to quote from some sleazy tv documentary rather than a judge's considered remarks re 'doctor' murray and his supposed 'entrappment'.

Nice touch in the 'journalist' talking about the 'strip search' that mj underwent to determine whether jc's description of his body was accurate or not and then not making any comment on whether it did or didn't match but instead stated that mj settled the case for $25m. They just depend on subtle slanders and twisting of information rather than facts.
 
So very true. vanity fair lost all credibility when orth went on about mj bathing in cows blood and putting vodoo spells on ppl. who owns that magazine cause they sure have an agenda when it comes to mj. in the words of a great man "half of me you'll never be so dont u feel threatened by me"
 
How did you conclude that the journalist had an agenda? Journalist has talked to Klein as well as the opposite side Khilji and Pheffer, asked Hoefflin for comment and talked to the coroner as well as some patients of Klein. He didn't do a one sided interview.
 
Commenting on the comment above about 93 and the fact such articles get created in the first place.
 
ivy;3601212 said:
apparently to the coroner she said Arnie claiming to be the sperm donor was BS. So the only new thing in that article Debbie denying Klein's "it could be my sperm" claims.

I was refering to this part. Not the part where she said Arnie claiming he was the sperm donor BS. I was speaking of the supposed NOW tape of her and this VF article stating that after MJ's death she admitted Paris and Prince were concived through Artificial insemination. As far as I know and heard for myself from her own Lips. she adamently stated publically they were Michael's children when asked.

In 1996, Debbie Rowe gave Jackson what she called the ultimate “gift”: she offered to bear his children. Although Jackson would later insist that his first two children, Prince and Paris, were produced through intercourse, Rowe, taped without her knowledge in a recording that was subsequently quoted by the News of the World in England, revealed that Prince, the first child, had been conceived through artificial insemination. (After Jackson’s death, Rowe acknowledged that both children had been artificially conceived.)
 
No tape was ever produced by the news of the world claiming that tmk. the only tape of her was made back in 96 which was the tape that confirmed the pregnency and leaked the story. neither do i remem her saying anything after june 09 either . even if it was A.I it doesnt mean they werent biologically mjs
 
How did you conclude that the journalist had an agenda? Journalist has talked to Klein as well as the opposite side Khilji and Pheffer, asked Hoefflin for comment and talked to the coroner as well as some patients of Klein. He didn't do a one sided interview.

It's not so obvious but he's making biased remarks, raising sympathy for one side (the side of his sources, obviously). With remarks such as: "When I met Khilji for dinner in the restaurant of the Holiday Inn in Long Beach, he hardly seemed the type to conduct covert transactions using a terrorist network, as Klein had implied. He was polite and soft-spoken."

As if being polite and soft-spoken means anything about someone being capable or uncapable of covert transactions. (The terrorist network may be an exaggaration by Klein, however they might have stolen from him - the lawsuit is still going on.)

Also the journalist never questions Pfeiffer's and Khilji's motives to throw dirt on Klein now - only after they got sued by him, while at the time of his employment Pfeiffer was full of praise of Klein, not only in the media, but also on Twitter and all around the Internet. (And Pfeiffer's own family seemed to be very fond of Klein too.) He also doesn't question Pfeiffer's ridiculous story of being sexually harassed by Klein and why he didn't quit and sue him THEN if that was the case? And how come that this sick, old man is able to harass this young, big guy and poor little Jason isn't able to do anything about it? Though he is harassed, but he chooses to be employed by Klein, moves in with him, goes on vacations with him and gets a 90K salary... His life was a "living nightmare", right? And don't even get me started on the ridiculousness of the "MJ was my lover" part.

If the journalist would be unbiased, he would ask these questions about Pfeiffer and Khilji but that would mean their whole credibility should be questioned and obviously he doesn't want that.
 
No tape was ever produced by the news of the world claiming that tmk. the only tape of her was made back in 96 which was the tape that confirmed the pregnency and leaked the story. neither do i remem her saying anything after june 09 either . even if it was A.I it doesnt mean they werent biologically mjs

They are Michael's kids, so of course they are his biologically kids. But , it's not a secret, they have been artificially conceived. Lol, we all know that since 1996 guys.
 
That article is so poorly written, i am flabbergasted at this clusterfuck of innuendoes, tabloids bits and porn.

The writer is all over the place, jumping from one idea to the next like a schizophrenic rabbit.
Meme my goodness I think you have found the right description for this article: a schizophrenic rabbit-- Brilliant!!!! Thank you for the laugh.

I notice that the author uses parts of other people's book that deal with drugs or other negative content. Basically you write a positive book about Michael and the small negative pieces in the book are quoted by many over and over while the majority of the positive aspects are ignored. Notice also how excerpts used are never presented in their original context.
 
They are Michael's kids, so of course they are his biologically kids. But , it's not a secret, they have been artificially conceived. Lol, we all know that since 1996 guys.
not that i care one way or the other re A.I but how have we known since 96?
 
Last edited:
We don't however someone who hates Debbie for no reason at all would love to assume that
 
Her name is Debbie. And you need to chill out

So the job of Debbie Rowe was surrogate. And you know it.

There is nothing wrong with that. Debbie knew since the beginning that she will do a job, receive good salary for that, and bye.

 
Is this last report/article^^ a reharshing of the article a few pages back?
 
It's not so obvious but he's making biased remarks, raising sympathy for one side (the side of his sources, obviously). With remarks such as: "When I met Khilji for dinner in the restaurant of the Holiday Inn in Long Beach, he hardly seemed the type to conduct covert transactions using a terrorist network, as Klein had implied. He was polite and soft-spoken."

As if being polite and soft-spoken means anything about someone being capable or uncapable of covert transactions. (The terrorist network may be an exaggaration by Klein, however they might have stolen from him - the lawsuit is still going on.)

Also the journalist never questions Pfeiffer's and Khilji's motives to throw dirt on Klein now - only after they got sued by him, while at the time of his employment Pfeiffer was full of praise of Klein, not only in the media, but also on Twitter and all around the Internet. (And Pfeiffer's own family seemed to be very fond of Klein too.) He also doesn't question Pfeiffer's ridiculous story of being sexually harassed by Klein and why he didn't quit and sue him THEN if that was the case? And how come that this sick, old man is able to harass this young, big guy and poor little Jason isn't able to do anything about it? Though he is harassed, but he chooses to be employed by Klein, moves in with him, goes on vacations with him and gets a 90K salary... His life was a "living nightmare", right? And don't even get me started on the ridiculousness of the "MJ was my lover" part.

If the journalist would be unbiased, he would ask these questions about Pfeiffer and Khilji but that would mean their whole credibility should be questioned and obviously he doesn't want that.

Agreed, and they never asked him why he claimed in his blog that Klein was his father figure and why did he asked the court to force Klein to pay Khiliji-Pfeiffer llc if he wrote a book. Khiliji-Pfeiffer llc was created in August 2009 and I wonder why?
 
So you are learning now. Debbie Rowe= surrogate.

Lol, in fact you already know it.You just don't want to say it.


The only thing I know for sure is that you were not there. And I would I do not believe what I just read. Your rudeness is astounding
 
Back
Top