Jacksons vs AEG - Closing Statements / Jury Deliberations - News Only (no discussion)

Michael Jackson jury explains why it sided with AEG
print
Comments
89
Email
Share
2K



AEG attorney Marvin Putnam smiles during verdict polling at the conclusion of the Katherine Jackson v. AEG Live civil trial in Los Angeles County Superior Court. The jury found AEG not liable in Michael Jackson's death. AEG attorney Jessica Stebbins Bina is at left.
CAPTIONS
1/13
By Jeff Gottlieb, Ruben Vives, Victoria Kim
This post has been corrected. Please see below for details.
October 2, 2013, 4:53 p.m.
Jurors in the Michael Jackson wrongful-death case sided with AEG Live that the singer's death was a tragedy -- but not one for which the concert promoter was responsible.

After three days of deliberations, the jury unanimously agreed that AEG Live hired the doctor, who gave the singer a fatal dose of the anesthetic propofol. But they said Dr. Conrad Murray was competent and awarded no money to the pop star's family.

"There are really no winners in this," jury foreman Gregg Darden said. "Somebody had to die for us to be here. ... It was really a tragic situation."

AEG-Michael Jackson wrongful death trial
AEG-Michael Jackson wrongful death trial

MICHAEL JACKSON: Complete trial coverage

Darden said the jurors struggled with questions about Murray. They found him competent to serve as a general practitioner -- he had a medical license from an accredited university.

"We felt he was competent," Darden said. "That doesn’t mean we felt he was ethical. If ethical was in the question, it might have been a different outcome. In the end, he was very unethical. He did something he shouldn’t have done. "
 
AEG Cleared Of Wrongdoing In Michael Jackson’s Death
October 2, 2013 2:08 PM

Share on email 29
View Comments
Filed Under

Local, News, Syndicated Local
Related Tags

AEG, Dr. Conrad Murray, Jackson, Jurors, Jury, Katherine Jackson, Michael Jackson, Propofol, Verdict, Wrongful Death Trial
Top Features

CBSLA iPhone AppYourDay for iPhone and Android
CBSLA Text Alerts
Back To School: Features, News & PhotosFollow Us On Twitter

LOS ANGELES (CBSLA.com) — AEG Live was cleared of wrongdoing Wednesday as jurors reached a verdict in Michael Jackson’s wrongful death trial.

Michael Jackson’s mother, 83-year-old Katherine Jackson, filed a lawsuit against AEG Live in Sept. 2010 on behalf of herself and her son’s three children. She claimed AEG negligently hired Dr. Conrad Murray to care for the singer as he prepared for his ill-fated “This Is It” comeback concert series and sought to have the firm held liable for her son’s death.

Murray was convicted of involuntary manslaughter in Jackson’s death and sentenced in November 2011 to four years in the Los Angeles County men’s jail.

The 12-person jury found that AEG Live did hire Murray to care for Jackson but did not find the physician unfit or incompetent to perform the work for which he was hired. KCAL9′s Randy Paige reports Katherine Jackson was in the Los Angeles courtroom as the verdict was read but gave no reaction.

AEG Live lead attorney Marvin Putnam and general counsel Shawn Trell spoke to members of the media shortly after the verdict was read, commending the jurors for their service during the 80-day trial and revealing their team is pleased with the outcome.

“Obviously we’re very pleased with the result,” Trell said. “We’re very grateful to the jury for the result that they reached.”

“It’s remarkable to have a five-month long trial and not one juror left the jurors’ box,” he said.

Putnam also indicated that AEG never considered negotiating a settlement with the Jackson family, contending that his client was in no way negligent.

“I can say there was never a chance that AEG Live would have settled this matter because that would have been inappropriate,” Putnam said.

Jackson family attorney Kevin Boyle said that his team plans to explore its options.

“We of course are not happy with the result as it stands now,” Boyle said.


The jury foreman, juror number six Greg Barden, said outside the courtroom he felt the appropriate verdict was reached.

“We reached a verdict that we understand not everybody is going to agree with,” he said.

Barden also revealed that the wording of the second question on the jury form – asking if Murray was “unfit or incompetent to perform the work for which he was hired” – narrowed the jurors’ decision.

“Conrad Murray was hired to be a general practitioner. Conrad Murray had a license. He graduated from an accredited college… That doesn’t mean we felt he was ethical, and maybe if the word ‘ethical’ was in the question, it might have been a different outcome,” he said.

AEG officials argued throughout the trial the pop star’s death was a matter of personal, not corporate, responsibility.

Attorneys for the company, who rested their defense Sept.18, argued Jackson maintained secrecy surrounding his medical care, including the treatment Dr. Conrad Murray provided the pop star inside his bedroom when he died from an overdose of the anesthetic propofol in June 2009.

Attorneys for the Jackson family told the jury a reasonable compensation for the loss of Michael Jackson would be $85 million for each of Jackson’s three children, and $35 million for his mother, far less than the $1 billion experts in the case had predicted based on projections of what Jackson could have earned if he lived.

The jury began deliberating Sept. 26., about five months after opening statements were made.

Judge Yvette Palazuelos presided over the case.

AEG Live CEO Randy Phillips and co-CEO Paul Gongaware were dismissed as defendants last month.
 
Michael Jackson concert promoter AEG Live NOT liable in $1.5B wrongful death suit, jury rules in bombshell verdict
Family of King of Pop sued AEG Live over hiring of Dr. Conrad Murray, the doctor who administered the lethal dose of the anesthetic propofol in 2009, but L.A. jury finds company didn't have reason to suspect physician at the time.

Comments (16)
BY NANCY DILLON / NEW YORK DAILY NEWS

PUBLISHED: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 2, 2013, 5:16 PM
UPDATED: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 2, 2013, 8:35 PM
42
75
2

Print
POOL PHOTO
AL SEIB/AP

Jurors rejected the $1.5 billion dollar lawsuit brought by the family of the late Michael Jackson claiming concert AEG Live is responsible for the pop singer’s death by hiring the doctor whose negligence killed him.
RELATED STORIES
Michael Jackson wrongful death trial: Katherine Jackson leaves courtroom before jury is shown photo of pop star's corpse
Michael Jackson’s mom wants handwritten notes allowed in court
Michael Jackson family’s wrongful death suit against AEG honchos thrown out
Michael Jackson’s wrongful death trial opens as lawyer slams AEG Live as ‘ruthless’ for hiring Conrad Murray
Powered by Inform
In a resounding rebuke of the claim Michael Jackson died at the hands of greedy concert promoters, a Los Angeles jury decided the singer’s mom and kids don’t deserve a dime from AEG Live for his bizarre overdose in his private bedroom.

The jury of six men and six women returned their unanimous verdict Wednesday after four days of deliberation in the billion-dollar wrongful death lawsuit.

The panel decided AEG hired Dr. Conrad Murray, but the King of Pop’s own fancy footwork kept his use of the surgery-strength anesthetic propofol a secret from AEG Live. The jurors found the company had no reason to suspect a licensed doctor with no malpractice claims would violate his Hippocratic Oath with daredevil drug infusions.

The verdict capped five months of testimony in the closely watched case that exposed many secrets of the reclusive “Thriller” singer's personal life.

PHOTOS: MICHAEL JACKSON'S LIFE IN PHOTOS

Michael Jackson died of an overdose of the anesthetic propofol in 2009.
JOEL RYAN/AP

Michael Jackson died of an overdose of the anesthetic propofol in 2009.

“The jury’s decision completely vindicates AEG Live, confirming what we have known from the start — that although Michael Jackson’s death was a terrible tragedy, it was not a tragedy of AEG Live’s making,” said Marvin Putnam, the concert promoter’s lead attorney.

More than 50 witnesses, including Jackson’s eldest son, Prince, 16, and his ex-wife, Debbie Rowe, took the stand.

Rowe told jurors that Michael used propofol to sleep as far back as 1997 during his HIStory tour.

Michael’s mother and brother, Randy, and mom revealed previously unconfirmed reports of drug interventions.

RELATED: 'MICHAEL JACKSON'S DEATH WAS CAUSED BY HIS OWN CHOICES,' AEG LIVE LAWYER SAYS

Press conference outside of the federal courthouse in Los Angeles following the jury's verdict in the Michael Jackson wrongful death trial on Wednesday. The six men and six women of the jury found that the singer’s mom and kids don't deserve a dime from AEG Live.
NANCY DILLON/NY DAILY NEWS

Press conference outside of the federal courthouse in Los Angeles following the jury's verdict in the Michael Jackson wrongful death trial on Wednesday. The six men and six women of the jury found that the singer’s mom and kids don't deserve a dime from AEG Live.

“There was simply no evidence that anyone at AEG did anything wrong,” Putnam said.

He called the verdict a “great victory” for AEG Live, particularly its Chief Executive Officer Randy Phillips.

Phillips said the verdict was bittersweet.

“I counted Michael Jackson a creative partner and a friend,” Phillips said. “We lost one of the world’s greatest musical geniuses, but I am relieved and deeply grateful that the jury recognized that neither I, nor anyone else at AEG Live, played any part in Michael's tragic death."

RELATED: FULHAM REMOVES CONTROVERSIAL MICHAEL JACKSON STATUE

Paris Jackson (from left), Prince Jackson, La Toya Jackson and Blanket Jackson attending an event in Beverly Hills in October 2012. Paris, Prince and Blanket stood to receive damages from AEG Live in the wrongful death case.
TOMMASO BODDI/WIREIMAGE

Paris Jackson (from left), Prince Jackson, La Toya Jackson and Blanket Jackson attending an event in Beverly Hills in October 2012. Paris, Prince and Blanket stood to receive damages from AEG Live in the wrongful death case.

Dan Beckerman — president and CEO of AEG Inc., AEG Live’s parent company — also expressed relief over the jury’s decision.

“I am pleased that the jury recognized that this lawsuit was without merit, and the entire AEG family looks forward to putting this unfortunate chapter behind us,” Beckerman said.

Katherine Jackson maintained a stoic demeanor as the verdict was announced about 6:30 p.m. Pacific time. She walked out of the courtroom, but once outside got into a wheelchair with the help of her nephew, Trent Jackson.

She did not make a statement or accept bouquets of roses from diehard fans of her dead son gathered outside the courthouse.

RELATED: KANYE WEST: ‘I’M THE NUMBER ONE ROCK STAR ON THE PLANET’

Rebbie Jackson, sister of the late singer Michael Jackson, arrives at the courthouse in Los Angeles in July.
FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

Rebbie Jackson, sister of the late singer Michael Jackson, arrives at the courthouse in Los Angeles in July.

“This is a complete shock to Michael’s fans and Katherine’s supporters,” fan Karlene Taylor, who attended almost every day of the trial, told the Daily News.

During the trial, jurors also got a detailed look at Michael’s personal spending and heard he was awash in debts topping $400 million when he died.

Katherine Jackson’s lead attorney, Brian Panish, built his case on the notion that AEG created a dangerous conflict of interest when it drafted a contract with Dr. Murray that pulled the plug on his $150,000-per-month salary if Michael didn't perform.

He said AEG executives saw Michael simply as a cash cow and failed to check on Dr. Murray's dire financial distress or help Michael as he deteriorated into a cold, emaciated basket case before their very eyes.

RELATED: JURORS DELIBERATE IN MICHAEL JACKSON CASE

AEG Live lead attorney Marvin Putnam delivers his closing arguments last Friday.
IRFAN KHAN/ASSOCIATED PRESS

AEG Live lead attorney Marvin Putnam delivers his closing arguments last Friday.

Panish asked the jury to find AEG liable for most of the $1.2 billion that his side believed Michael could have earned had he lived. He also asked for $85 million in personal damages for each of Michael's kids and his mom.

But AEG produced medical records that tied Michael to Dr. Murray as far back as 2006, and the company argued that Michael kept his thirst for propofol a fiercely guarded secret.

Putnam said in his closing argument that Dr. Murray shipped propofol to Los Angeles for Michael in April 2009, before AEG even knew he existed. He said had AEG known what Murray and Michael were doing behind closed doors, his client would have acted immediately.

"Simply stated, AEG never would have agreed to finance this tour if it knew Mr. Jackson played Russian roulette every night in his bedroom. It wasn't going to happen," Putnam said. "If AEG knew, it would have ruined everything."

PHOTOS: INSIDE MICHAEL JACKSON'S NEVERLAND RANCH

Brian Panish, attorney for the Michael Jackson family, delivers his rebuttal argument to jurors last week.
AL SEIB/AP

Brian Panish, attorney for the Michael Jackson family, delivers his rebuttal argument to jurors last week.

He said Murray had no history of malpractice claims or overdosing patients before Michael and passed a criminal background check to get his medical license in California.

He called Panish's request for $1.5 billion both "ridiculous" and "absurd."

Katherine, 83, sat through most of the trial along with her nephew Trent and a revolving cast of relatives that included daughters Rebbie and Janet, and grandsons Taj and TJ.

Dr. Murray, convicted of involuntary manslaughter, followed the trial from his jail cell in downtown Los Angeles but signaled he would plead the fifth if called as a witness, his lawyer said.

He's expected to be released later this month due to good behavior and jail overcrowding.

Michael's only daughter, Paris, 15, was a highly anticipated witness at the start of the trial last April but appeared only in snippets of videotaped deposition testimony after she slashed her arm with a kitchen knife in a suicide bid last June.

In one revealing deposition excerpt, Paris claimed her dad had a strange relationship with her mysterious longtime nanny Grace Rwaramba.

"He said she was sneaky," Paris testified during her deposition. "When he would stay in a hotel, or whatever, she would call the hotel and say that she was his wife. She was obsessed with him. ...They'd let her in, and she'd be, like, in his bed."

Rwaramba was on Katherine's original witness list but was not called despite sitting for deposition testimony after the trial started.

Celebrities on the Jackson family witness list — including Spike Lee, Diana Ross and Lisa Marie Presley — were never called to testify.



Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/entertai...aches-verdict-article-1.1474418#ixzz2gcCFo9DX
 
Jury Rejects Case Linking Company to Jackson Death
LOS ANGELES October 3, 2013 (AP)
By ANTHONY McCARTNEY and LINDA DEUTSCH Associated Press
Associated Press
A jury cleared a concert promoter of negligence on Wednesday in a case that attempted to link the death of Michael Jackson to the company that promoted his ill-fated comeback shows.

The panel rejected a lawsuit brought by Jackson's mother claiming AEG Live was negligent in hiring Conrad Murray, the doctor who killed Jackson with an overdose of a hospital anesthetic the singer used as a sleep aid.

The five-month trial provided the closest look yet at Jackson's drug use and his battles against chronic pain and insomnia.

It also took jurors behind the scenes in the rough-and-tumble world of negotiations with one of the world's most famous entertainers looking to solidify his legendary status after scandal interrupted his career.

With its verdict, the jury also delivered a somewhat surprising message: Jurors did not believe Murray was unfit or incompetent to perform his duties involving Jackson.

"That doesn't mean we felt he was ethical," jury foreman Gregg Barden said after the verdict was read.

He said the panel knew many people would not agree with the verdict but explained that the jury followed the language of the verdict form and instructions.

The ruling on the competence of Murray ended any further consideration of possible damages and who was at fault for the death. AEG Live lawyers suggested throughout the trial that Jackson was the only one to blame for his death.

"AEG didn't do anything wrong and would not allow themselves to be shaken down," lead defense attorney Marvin S. Putnam said.

After the hearing, juror Bryant Carino of Los Angeles was asked who was to blame for Jackson's death.

"I don't want to say whose fault it is," the 36-year-old Carino responded. "I'm not one to point fingers."

Katherine Jackson told reporters she was OK after the verdict.

A victory could have meant hundreds of millions of dollars in damages for her and the singer's three children and provided a rebuke of AEG Live, the nation's second-largest concert promoter.

Kevin Boyle, an attorney for Katherine Jackson, said he was disappointed with the verdict.

"We, of course, are not happy with the result as it stands now," Boyle said. "We will be exploring all options legally and factually and make a decision about anything at a later time."

He added: "We think that what we've done with this case is prove some things that are important for the Jackson family and for the concert industry and the sports industry with regards to treatment by doctors."

Boyle declined to answer further questions.

Murray was convicted in 2011 of involuntary manslaughter after giving Jackson the overdose as he prepared for the comeback shows dubbed "This Is It." Witnesses at the trial said Jackson saw the concerts as a chance for personal redemption after being acquitted of child molestation.

But as the opening date of the shows approached, associates testified that he had bouts of insecurity and agonized over his inability to sleep. They said he turned to the drug propofol and found Murray, who was willing to buy it in bulk and administer it to him on a nightly basis even though it is not meant to be used outside operating rooms.

Testimony at the civil trial showed that only Jackson and Murray knew he was taking the drug.

In his closing argument, AEG Live attorney Putnam told jurors the company would have pulled the plug on the shows if executives knew Jackson was using the anesthetic.

"AEG would have never agreed to finance this tour if they knew Mr. Jackson was playing Russian roulette in his bedroom every night," Putnam said.

Brian Panish, a lawyer for the Jackson family, countered that AEG Live was negligent by not looking far enough to find out what it needed to know about Murray. He claimed in his closing argument that the lure of riches turned the company and Murray into mercenaries who sacrificed the pop star's life in a quest to boost their own fortunes.

He said Murray's $150,000-a-month contract to care for Jackson was a lifeline to help him climb out of his financial troubles, which included $500,000 in debt. AEG Live, meanwhile, had only one interest — launching a world tour for the King of Pop that would yield untold millions in profits, the lawyer said.

AEG Live's lawyers framed the case as being about personal choice, saying Jackson made bad choices about the drug that killed him and the doctor who provided it. They said he was the architect of his own demise and no one else can be blamed.

Putnam said Jackson insisted on hiring the cardiologist, despite objections from AEG Live.

"It was his money and he certainly wasn't going to take no for an answer," the lawyer said.

Jurors heard testimony from more than 50 witnesses, including Jackson's mother and his eldest son, Prince, as well as days of testimony from AEG executives who were repeatedly asked about emails in which they discussed Jackson's missed rehearsals and described Murray's pay as a done deal.

They also heard about Jackson's close relationship to many of his doctors, including Murray, who he first met in Las Vegas in 2007.

Katherine Jackson called the case a search for the truth about the death of her son and the trial featured potentially embarrassing revelations for both sides. AEG's executives had their emails picked apart, revealing concerns that Jackson wouldn't be able to perform the shows as planned, that a lawyer at their parent company referred to Michael Jackson as "the freak," and that Jackson was derided even though the company had invested more than $30 million in his shows.

Jackson's greatest hits were in heavy rotation throughout the trial, with jurors watching footage of him moonwalking across stages and playing to packed arenas around the globe, with some fans so overcome with emotion that some had to be carried out on stretchers. A world few saw was also on display, with private videos of Christmas mornings Jackson spent with his children and stories about his devotion to them being recounted throughout the trial.

AEG Live, meanwhile, laid out Jackson's medical history, presenting testimony about his use of drugs, including the powerful painkiller Demerol, for pain stemming from an accident that occurred decades ago while he was filming a Pepsi commercial. Jackson had no trace of that drug in his system when he died.

The lawyers called witnesses who recounted Jackson's use of propofol dating back to the 1990s. In 1997, two German doctors administered the anesthetic to help the singer sleep between shows in Munich.

Jackson's mother and his three children are supported by his estate, which provides a comfortable lifestyle for them and erased hundreds of millions of dollars in debts by debuting new projects and releasing new music featuring the King of Pop.
 
Katherine Jackson reportedly 'devastated' by verdict in son's wrongful death case, was counting on cash
By Hollie McKayPublished October 02, 2013FoxNews.com
Jackson Family Disput_Forg.jpg
Jan. 26, 2012: This file photo shows, from left, Prince Jackson, Blanket Jackson and Paris Jackson after a hand and footprint ceremony honoring their father musician Michael Jackson in front of Grauman's Chinese Theatre in Los Angeles. (AP)
After five months of testimony in the wrongful death suit filed by Michael Jackson's family against concert promoters AEG, a jury concluded Wednesday that while the company hired Dr. Conrad Murray to tend to Jackson's medical needs, he was not unfit or incompetent to treat the star.

So Jackson family matriarch Katherine – as well as the late entertainer’s three children – lose out big time.

“They were counting on at least $2 billion, so there's no question that those who wanted this suit are devastated,” a source closely connected to the Jackson family told FOX411. “Katherine wanted the money because the Jacksons don't have what people think they do. She gets money from the estate as does Prince, Paris, and Blanket, but once Katherine dies, she has nothing to leave her children, Jermaine, Jackie, etc… There is now going to be a lot of in-house fighting.”

According to our source, the decision also indicates that perhaps Conrad Murray wasn't exactly the monster he was painted to be.

“He wasn't unfit, the jury said, or incompetent. He simply caved to his famous patient's demands,” said the insider.“He shouldn't be in prison, he should have been dealt with by the medical board and civilly.”

Murray is currently behind bars after being found guilty of “involuntary manslaughter” in the June 2009 death of the King of Pop after injecting him with a lethal dose of sleeping anesthetic Propofol. Although sentenced to four years in prison in 2011, reports suggest he could be released early, perhaps at the end of this month.

Subsequently, the Jacksons filed suit against AEG alleging the company negligently hired and supervised Dr. Murray and pushed Michael way beyond the limits for his "This Is It" tour.

We’re told the verdict is going to take some time to sink in, since the Jackson family was counting on a big pay day.

“They felt that that sentiment would be on their side. They will now say that they just wanted to find the truth, well, the truth that was revealed was that Michael was indeed an addict and because he didn’t get help, he met the fate that he had set out for himself,” the source explained.

However, the family apparently won’t be slapped with mammoth legal bills as the deal they established was a “pay if we win” case, and there is a good chance they may appeal.

“This was not a surprising verdict at all. The jury clearly believed that MJ was responsible for his own demise, and that his family was merely trying to cash in based on public sympathy. The law was clearly not on their side,” observed California trial attorney, David Wohl. “But they can appeal and they most certainly will… Only that process will take years.”

Lawyers for both AEG and the Jackson family did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
 
KATHERINE JACKSON
SPINS JURY VERDICT
WE PROVED OUR POINT
EXCLUSIVE0507-katherine-jackson-tmz
Katherine Jackson has a rather tortured analysis of the jury verdict -- she seems to be saying even if she didn't get any money, she still kinda won.

Katherine says, "We have said from the beginning that this case was a search for the truth. We found the truth. AEG hired Dr. Conrad Murray, the man who is in jail for killing Michael Jackson."

She's right to this extent ... the jury did say AEG Live hired Murray. In fact Katherine scoffs at AEG, saying, "AEG has denied for years, and continues to deny, that they hired Dr. Conrad Murray. The jury found unanimously that AEG hired Dr. Murray."

But then the jury delivered a knockout punch to the Jackson lawsuit, by deciding essentially that when AEG Live hired Murray, they had no reason to believe he was an incompetent general practitioner ... which was the whole point of bringing a doctor on board in the first place. Therefore, AEG was not negligent.

Katherine is pissed, saying, "AEG has repeated the mantra that in the face of the entire judicial system that allowed this case to go to a jury." She goes on ..."Such a statement is a slap in the face to the entire judicial system that allowed this case to get to a jury."

Katherine and her lawyer, Perry Sanders, say "All options regarding the balance of the jury verdict (the ruling there was no negligence) are being considered."


Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2013/10/02/katherine-jackson/#ixzz2gcskwueK
Visit Fishwrapper: http://www.fishwrapper.com
 
video at link : http://ktla.com/local-news/stories/jackson-vs-aeg-live-trial/#axzz2gct0z9Ib

Jury Awards Jackson Family Nothing in Wrongful Death Lawsuit
See bio, contact info, and more articles from KTLA 5 Web Staff
2 hours ago
by KTLA 5 Web Staff

Comments (5)
Share Update


After five months of testimony in the Michael Jackson wrongful death trial, a jury found Wednesday that AEG Live was not responsible for the singer’s death.

Michael Jackson Performing
Michael Jackson

The verdict stated that Dr. Conrad Murray, who administered the fatal dose of the anesthetic propofol that killed the singer in 2009, had been hired by AEG Live but that the doctor was not unfit or incompetent to perform the work for which he was hired.

The findings, reached by the 12-person Los Angeles Superior Court jury on its third full day of deliberations, mean that AEG is not liable for damages in Jackson’s death.

The Jackson family will not get any of the $290 million in personal damages its lawyers had asked for, nor the more than $1 billion in economic damages attorneys had claimed.

The verdict was a vindication for AEG Live, which had never considered settling, the company’s attorney told news media outside the courthouse.

“AEG Live didn’t do something wrong here and they weren’t going to allow themselves to be shaken down,” said Marvin Putnam, lead trial counsel for AEG.

In a statement, Putnam said Jackson’s death “was a terrible tragedy, (but) was not a tragedy of AEG Live’s making.”

Attorneys for the Jackson family said they were considering their options.

Jackson’s mother, Katherine Jackson, and his three children sued AEG in 2010, claiming the entertainment firm was negligent in its hiring of Murray, who was convicted in 2011 of involuntary manslaughter in Jackson’s death and is expected to be released from prison later this month.

Michael Jackson was preparing for his “This Is It” comeback tour when he died at the age of 50.

Dozens of witnesses testified in the civil case against AEG, often describing in detail Jackson’s life, including drug abuse.

The jury was tasked with determining who was responsible for hiring Murray – AEG Live LLC or Michael Jackson himself.

Jurors were handed the case on the afternoon of Thursday, Sept. 26. Judge Yvette Palazuelos had told jurors that the verdict need not be unanimous, only 9 to 3.

After being asked to find if AEG had hired Murray, the jury was faced with a series of questions leading to a potential determination about the amount of damages AEG could have been required to pay.

filephoto Conrad Murray
Conrad Murray appears in court.

Special Verdict Form: Jury Questionnaire (PDF)

However, because the jury answered “no” to the second question — finding that Murray was not unfit or incompetent — jurors were not required to weigh other questions about AEG’s alleged negligence or about the amount of damages.

An attorney for the Jackson family had told the jury that the children — Michael Joseph Jackson Jr., Paris-Michael Katherine Jackson and Prince Michael Jackson II — should each get $85 million and Katherine Jackson should receive $35 million.

And an expert who testified for the family said the singer would have earned as much as $1.5 billion had he lived, an amount AEG’s attorney called “absurd.” AEG could have been required some or all of that amount in economic damages, had the company been found liable.

Jurors spoke with media outside the courthouse afterward, seeking to explain the verdict. One man, who identified himself as Greg, juror No. 6, said the jury focused closely on the language of the question about Murray’s competence.

The question asked jurors if Murray was “unfit or incompetent to perform the work for which he was hired.”


“We felt he was competent to do the job of being a general practitioner,” Greg said. “That doesn’t mean we felt he was ethical. Maybe had the word ‘ethical’ been in the question, it could have been a different outcome.”

“I don’t see this as a vindication of Dr. Murray,” he added.

Michael Jackson fans outside the courthouse were stunned, some saying they strongly believed Murray was incompetent and that the jurors must have been confused.

Murray’s own attorney said the verdict was positive in part for her client, who is appealing his conviction.

“It’s a vindication in the sense that he’s been found by a jury to be competent,” lawyer Valerie Wass said. “Unfortunately it doesn’t impact the fact that he has a felony conviction.”



Read more: http://ktla.com/local-news/stories/jackson-vs-aeg-live-trial/#ixzz2gcu84DIu
 
Michael Jackson verdict doesn't vindicate Conrad Murray, jury says
print
Comments
0
Email
Share
1



AEG attorney Marvin Putnam, right, and AEG Live General Counsel Shawn Trell answers reporters' questions following the verdict Wednesday in the trial over the wrongful-death lawsuit filed by Michael Jackson's mother, Katherine Jackson, and three children outside the Stanley Mosk Courthouse in Los Angeles.
CAPTIONS
1/19
By Jeff Gottlieb, Victoria Kim, Ruben Vives
October 2, 2013, 8:00 p.m.
The jury in the Michael Jackson case found that Dr. Conrad Murray was competent to serve as the pop star's physician, but they said after the verdict that they don't believe that vindicates him in the death.

"There are really no winners in this," jury foreman Gregg Barden said. "Somebody had to die for us to be here.… It was really a tragic situation."

Valerie Wass, Murray's appellate attorney, said the verdict wouldn't help the physician's appeal of his involuntary manslaughter conviction, but it may help "in the court of public opinion."
"Hopefully, it will vindicate him in a small way," she said.


Murray, who is at the Men's Central Jail, is due to be released in 26 days, she said.

But when told of Wass' comment, Barden criticized Murray's treatment of Jackson.

"We felt he was competent," Barden said. "That doesn’t mean we felt he was ethical. If ethical was in the question, it might have been a different outcome. In the end, he was very unethical. He did something he shouldn’t have done. "

He added later: "I don’t see this as a vindication of Dr. Murray. I would not hire him as my doctor."

The family’s attorney painted a picture of a cold, calculating entertainment enterprise that failed to notice that Murray was financially desperate and then pushed the physician to get Jackson ready to tour even though the singer was in frail health and was crippled by fear.

"They're going to kill me, they're going to kill me,'" Jackson’s eldest son, Prince, testified, recalling the singer's words in one his final conversations with his father.

AEG tried turning the tables during the trial, all but putting Michael Jackson on trial. AEG said Jackson was the one who brought aboard Murray and that the singer was a fully-formed drug user who had demanded anesthetics as a sleep aid during earlier tours. AEG said it was Jackson who planted the seeds of his demise.

AEG released a statement expressing vindication.

“We lost one of the world’s greatest musical geniuses, but I am relieved and deeply grateful that the jury recognized that neither I, nor anyone else at AEG Live, played any part in Michael’s tragic death,” said Randy Phillips, an AEG executive who was named in the lawsuit.

“The jury’s decision completely vindicates AEG Live, confirming what we have known from the start — that although Michael Jackson’s death was a terrible tragedy, it was not a tragedy of AEG Live’s making,” said AEG's lead attorney Marvin Putnam.

Juror Calvin Smith said he didn’t believe AEG could have done anything about Jackson’s problems.

“If AEG had known what was going on behind closed doors, it would probably have made a difference, but they didn’t," Smith said.

"Michael Jackson was pretty used to getting his own way, he was a big star. He had all these doctors who wanted to be his doctors. And he could pretty much get what he wanted. If anybody said no, well they were out of the mix, and he’d find somebody else. … How could AEG have done anything about it when they were kept in the dark?”

Katherine Jackson left the courthouse without speaking to reporters. Her attorney, Kevin Boyle, said they were "not happy" with the verdict and plan to "explore all options."
 
NANCY GRACE

AEG Found Not Liable in Michael Jackson`s Death

Aired October 2, 2013 - 20:00 ET

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.


(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Sir, I have a -- we have a gentleman here that needs help, and he`s not breathing.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Katherine Jackson versus AEG Live. We the jury in the above entitled action answer the questions submitted to us as follows. Did AEG Live hire Dr. Conrad Murray? Answer, Yes. Was Dr. Conrad Murray unfit or incompetent to perform the work for which he was hired? Answer, No.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Conrad Murray caused the death of Michael Jackson. Conrad Murray abandoned Michael Jackson.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

NANCY GRACE, HOST: Good evening. I`m Nancy Grace. I want to thank you for being with us.

Bombshell tonight. The Michael Jackson family money machine screeches to a halt after decades of living off the pop icon. Tito, Jermaine, Marlon, Randy, Jackie, go get a job like the rest of us!

In the last hours, a California jury refuses to fork over even one red cent to the Jackson family when they go after entertainment giant AEG, who promoted Michael Jackson`s comeback tour titled "This Is It," the jury refusing to hold AEG responsible for Jackson`s death at the hand of Michael Jackson`s prescription-pad-loving personal doctor, who let Michael Jackson die using anesthesia propofol as a sleep aid.

The Jackson family, as always, coming up with a money-making scheme like no other to sue AEG for up to $2 billion!

We are live and taking your calls. Live there outside the L.A. courthouse, Alan Duke, CNN digital reporter. Alan, I`m actually stunned. I don`t disagree with the verdict, but I`m stunned. Tell me what happened. Don`t leave anything out.

ALAN DUKE, CNN DIGITAL REPORTER: There was no one more stunned than Valerie Wass. She is the lawyer for Conrad Murray, who will be freed from jail after two years in about three weeks. She almost fainted. She was sitting right behind me. I heard a gasp when the jurors read that question, Was he unfit and incompetent? No. I thought that was going to their easiest question. It was the one that ended the trial. It was the one that stopped the deliberations. They said...

GRACE: Yes! Alan, you`re right.

DUKE: ... they couldn`t find that he was unfit and incompetent.

GRACE: There was a series of five questions. And before the jury could go from one to two, from two to three, from three to four, ending up at five, where they forked over up to $2 billion -- and I am not talking about just giving Paris and Prince Jr., and Blanket, his three children, money. I`m talking about Katherine Jackson was involved, too. Translation -- so was the daddy, so were all of the brothers, so were the sisters. Everybody was going to get a piece of that pie. And I think the jury just would not allow it!

DUKE: That`s not what happened, Nancy. They were very clear when they were speaking to us tonight that this was a situation where they were boxed in by the wording of question number two, Was he unfit or incompetent for the work for which he was hired? He was a licensed doctor, never been sued. He was fit and competent.

However, I asked the jury foreman, Gregg Barden, I said, Does that mean that you would allow him -- hire him to be your doctor? He said, No, this does not vindicate Dr. Murray. I wouldn`t let him be my doctor.

GRACE: Well, you know what? That just absolutely doesn`t make one ounce of sense, to say, I wouldn`t let him touch me. I mean, come on! His patient died while he was in the other room talking to his mistress on the phone and Michael Jackson`s under propofol. You know, it`s -- of course he was unfit.

You know what, Alan? I don`t care if they put perfume on the pig tonight. I think the reality is they`re not going to give the Jackson family money to say that Conrad Murray, the guy who let Jackson die -- he`s been found guilty of manslaughter criminally -- is fit?

Oh! Oh! Alan, please tell me you`re not that gullible. You really think that`s what happened?

DUKE: Well, they never -- in deliberations, they never got to those questions. Those were down -- the 16 questions down toward the end about the money. They couldn`t get past number two. Was he fit and incompetent? They said, He`s got a license, so I guess he was, to be a general practitioner. But they said his job wasn`t to give him propofol, that...

GRACE: Oh, yes, a general practitioner...

DUKE: ... that wasn`t what he was hired to do.

GRACE: ... behind bars...

DUKE: So it was a technicality.

GRACE: Out to Pat Lalama, correspondent, Investigation Discovery. We have followed this case from the beginning, since way back when. Pat Lalama, thank you for being with us tonight.

You know, Alan Duke did speak to jurors. They did say that. But I think they went in there knowing the Jackson family has been living off Michael Jackson, sucking him dry for years and years. And here, even in his death -- I don`t know how many albums they`ve released.

Clark, how many have they released since Jackson died? Millions have been made since he died, and now they come up with this scheme to sue AEG!

PAT LALAMA, CORRESPONDENT, INVESTIGATION DISCOVERY: Nancy, I think it`s clear they smelled a rat from the start. You`re absolutely right -- took advantage of him in life -- I`m not afraid to say that -- took advantage of him in death.

The fact of the matter was, if you look at how that read, that form, it said that he was supposed to do these services he was expected to do at the time. But nobody knew -- there`s no way that AEG could have known about propofol. They couldn`t have known.

Michael Jackson wanted Conrad Murray. He knew he could control him, so he went to AEG and said, I want this -- this man to be my doctor. He didn`t have a record. There was no problem. They let him have it. They didn`t know the scourge that was happening inside of that bedroom...

GRACE: Well, Pat...

LALAMA: ... in the house.

GRACE: ... here`s the deal. Here`s the deal. Jackson had been using Dr. Conrad Murray as his personal physician for years. He had been using propofol, which -- everybody, if you didn`t learn this during Conrad Murray -- Dr. Conrad Murray`s homicide trial, propofol is given -- I`ve had it. You fall asleep immediately, and the minute they unplug it, you wake back up. You have it for a lot of procedures in hospitals. You`re not supposed to use it out of a hospital.

LALAMA: Right.

GRACE: Conrad Murray was pumping Jackson full of propofol whenever Jackson wanted to sleep. He was actually robbing Jackson of the restful REM sleep period, which was hurting him, but Conrad Murray didn`t care.

But Jackson had been using Conrad Murray for years. How was AEG supposed to know what was going on?

LALAMA: Well, Nancy, that`s my exact point. And if you think about Debbie Rowe, his ex-wife, who testified in the trial that he had been using propofol for years. So if AEG wants this tour to go on, they`re going to go to Jackson, Jackson`s going to say, Conrad Murray`s my man, I want him, give him to me, they got him.

GRACE: Pat Lalama joining us from LA. Also with us, Alan Duke CNN digital reporter. And Alan, I heard the same thing. I think you actually observed it. Conrad Murray`s own lawyer in court, when the jury gets to question two, says, Well, you know, AEG`s not responsible because Conrad Murray is fit to practice medicine. His own lawyer goes -- and it was, like, shocked! I mean, I think that that was an audible gasp that you could hear in the courtroom.

DUKE: Yes. And she was sitting right behind me. So I had to bring her out here, and of course, I did an interview with her live, and she was just basically -- she`s probably visiting with Dr. Murray right now. That was her next stop, to go and see him in his jail cell, where he`s counting the days until he`s free again, to tell him that he was, in a way, vindicated. And I think he`s going to be -- he`s been watching this trial very closely, and I think he thinks this was his victory.

GRACE: We are taking your calls. Out to Nancy in Pennsylvania. Hi, Nancy. What`s your question?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Hi, Nancy. I think what I`d like to question is Michael Jackson`s parents. They`ve been living off of him for a long time. They want more money and more money, and they`re so greedy. I think it`s time that they were more concerned about the children they entrusted to Katherine Jackson`s care. And I just wondered what you thought about that.

GRACE: You know, Nancy in Pennsylvania, I`ve been worried about that for a long time, and I`ll tell you why. I think Katherine Jackson must be a saint to have put up with Joe Jackson. I mean, every time you turn around, he`s in some other scam, some money-making scheme. He`s with this woman, that woman.

They`re still married. And of course, Michael Jackson always said his father brutally abused him and forced him into show business, beating him.

Now, Jackson -- Katherine Jackson stood by and let this happen, OK? I don`t think she did that willingly, but it happened under her watch. She`s the mommy, all right? And I was always concerned when Michael Jackson`s children went to her -- not that she would willingly ever hurt them, but what would happen under her watch with them.

Now, interesting, Nancy in Pennsylvania, this case today, this verdict that was just handed down in the last couple of hours, also precludes the children from getting any money from AEG. They were part of this lawsuit.

Out to Jean Casarez, legal correspondent. Which of the children actually testified in front of the jury, just Prince?

JAY CARNEY, WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY: Well, Paris Jackson also testified in front of the jury.

GRACE: Oh, I thought that was a deposition recording.

CASAREZ: It was a deposition recording, you`re right, but it was under oath. And the children did. But it was Kenny Ortega of AEG that when he testified, the jury actually clapped, Nancy.

GRACE: And what was his testimony that moved the jury to applaud?

CASAREZ: I think it was just in awe of Kenny Ortega, the name that everybody knows, the person that was responsible for this grand tour that was about to happen. I think it showed their affinity for him.

GRACE: Well, I mean, everybody loves Michael Jackson, even if you`re like me -- I always thought that he was guilty of those child molestation charges. But that did not take away from his actual talent. I also think that he loved his own children.

So you`re saying that Prince testified in front of the jury. Paris`s deposition testimony was played in front of them. She did not come in the jury room and go under oath and testify in front of the jury, but they saw her.

And the youngest child, Blanket -- I think a child psychologist said he should not testify, is that correct, Jean?

CASAREZ: Yes, that is definitely correct. But you know, Nancy, when I covered the criminal trial of Conrad Murray, the jury -- there were claps from the fans for the prosecutor that permeated the walls of that hallway on the ninth floor of that courthouse.

This jury claps for Kenny Ortega. I think it`s strikingly different.

GRACE: It is. Everyone, we are live in L.A., where a jury has just handed down a monumental verdict in the Michael Jackson civil trial, as it has been called, Jackson`s family, including his mother, Katherine Jackson, going after AEG entertainment giant for up to $2 billion, a civil lawsuit claiming the entertainment giant was responsible for Michael Jackson`s death.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: He`s not breathing. And we need to -- we`re trying to pump him, but he`s not -- he`s not...

911 OPERATOR: OK. Is he on the floor? Where`s he at right now?

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: He`s on the bed, sir. He`s on the bed.

911 OPERATOR: OK, let`s get him on the floor. Did anybody witness what happened?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: ... as one of the greatest and nicest guys ever.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: My brother was not healthy, and they didn`t care.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: He`s pumping. He`s pumping his chest, but he`s not responding to anything, sir.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Thank you so much from the bottom of my heart.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

GRACE: And the saga goes on, the Michael Jackson story. In the last hours, a California jury hands down a verdict, refusing to fork over $2 billion, up to $2 billion, to the Michael Jackson family.

Now, Katherine Jackson, his mother, was on that lawsuit. And you know whatever money she got up to $2 billion, not only would she share that with his children, Blanket, Prince, Paris, but it would go right into the pocket of Joe Jackson, his father, who has manipulated the Jackson family for all these years.

Joining me at the courthouse, Alan Duke. Alan, tell me the scene when the jury read that verdict. I was stunned.

DUKE: Yes. It was a packed courtroom. You know, we had the trial for five months in a very small courtroom, limited to 60 seats. We had 313 seats in the big courtroom and the television camera. So there was a big crowd there.

And it was very quiet. And you know how those ceremonies can go. But this was a case where people had been together for five months, this jury and -- with the judge. And as she was flipping through, looking at the verdict form, reviewing it, there was actually for a moment an indication it might be a good verdict for the Jacksons because she looked through all of the pages, indicating she was going down all the questions.

But she really only needed to go to the first two. It ended so quickly, it was like a heavyweight fight that ended in the second punch because question number one, Yes, people said he hired -- they hired Dr. Murray. That was what we thought was the big question. Once they got over that, everything else might follow.

The knockout punch, though, is question number two. Was Dr. Murray unfit or incompetent? The answer to that was stunning. It was no. And the gasp that went out in the courtroom was from one person, Conrad Murray`s lawyer, sitting behind me. I thought she had fainted.

GRACE: You know, did the jury know, Alan, that the doctor that they say is fit and competent is sitting behind bars for letting Michael Jackson die under the influence of propofol anesthesia used as a sleep aid while he talked in the other room on the cell phone to his mistress? Do they know that?

DUKE: They knew it. They said he`s fit to be a general practitioner, maybe a cardiologist, but not to do propofol. But he wasn`t hired to do propofol. They said that was the language in the question...

GRACE: That doesn`t even make sense!

DUKE: ... so they stuck to it, the job for which he was hired.

GRACE: Joining me right now...

DUKE: It was a stunning decision.

GRACE: It is, and I`m not saying I disagree with it. I`m just very surprised they rendered it.

To Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, author of "The Michael Jackson Tapes," Michael Jackson`s personal mentor and rabbi. Rabbi, thank you for being with us.

RABBI SHMULEY BOTEACH, MICHAEL JACKSON`S RABBI: Thank you for having me, Nancy.

GRACE: Are you surprised at the verdict? And also, $2 billion, Rabbi?

BOTEACH: Well, Nancy, you`re a moral person, so let`s go beyond just the legal implications of AEG. They may not be legally culpable.

But give me a break. AEG didn`t know that Michael had drug problems? You just showed video of Michael turning up to the 2005 trial in his pajamas! The whole world knew Michael had drug problems. Michael was treated for drug problems.

And I find it astonishing that AEG Live -- since Michael was not close to his family in the last years of his life, didn`t they have a certain responsibility to go beyond the greed and the money and actually look at how gaunt he was? In the "This Is It" documentary, he looks terrible! He looks emaciated.

And if you look at the funeral that AEG Live staged, with Michael`s family`s participation, to be sure, it was a concert. There was no mourning. There was no tragedy. It was turned into a global concert, and everyone was making cash even off a man`s funeral while he lay dead in a coffin, having orphaned his children.

So this is a stunning and shocking act of immorality by all the players because beyond the music left to us, this guy is dead! And I find it just crushing that no one seems to be culpable. You said about Dr. Conrad Murray -- at the very least, he was found culpable because of course, what he did was negligent. You can`t give somebody hospital-grade anesthetics to fall asleep because he wants it, because he`s famous, because he`s rich and can pay you.

So I`m saddened all around. There are no winners in this trial.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Justice for Michael.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: It`s great to be home. It`s a wonderful feeling.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: You`re looking at the bedroom where Michael Jackson took his last breath.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: We have a gentleman here that needs help, and he`s not breathing.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: He only wanted sleep because he had problems with sleeping, not to die.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: He died so quickly...

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: ... to see justice (INAUDIBLE)

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Justice shall prevail.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: I feel so much love and I felt it then. And I`m just so happy that that love is still there.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

GRACE: Welcome back. In the last hours, a stunning verdict handed down by a California jury, the jury refusing to hand over up to $2 billion to Michael Jackson`s family, the family, including his mother, Katherine Jackson, suing the entertainment giant AEG, claiming it`s their fault Jackson died.

I want to go back to a special guest, Rabbi Shmuley Boteach. Rabbi, again, thank you for being with us. I want to go over what you just said, how everybody was using Jackson, sucking him dry. I couldn`t agree with you more.

But the question this jury had to answer was, was AEG, who set up his final tour -- Michael Jackson wanted to do it -- were they responsible for his death? Now, true, they had an agreement to pay Conrad Murray, his doctor, who let him die. They never paid him. And Jackson asked for Conrad Murray. That was his personal physician for years. Jackson had been using propofol to go to sleep.

So how, may I ask you, Rabbi, is that AEG`s fault?

BOTEACH: Nancy, I`m a rabbi, not a lawyer. But let`s be clear. There were e-mails in this trial from AEG executives...

GRACE: Yes.

BOTEACH: ... and they`re saying, Michael looks terrible, gaunt, emaciated, e-mails from Kenny Ortega saying that Michael looks horrible. So did they have a moral responsibility, even a legal responsibility to maybe pull the plug on this concert?

These concerts would`ve killed Michael one way or another. He was in no way up to it.

GRACE: OK, question...

BOTEACH: Everyone who knew him...

GRACE: Question...

BOTEACH: ... knew that he was not up to it.

GRACE: Question, Rabbi. Were they under a moral duty to pull the plug on the concert because they knew Michael Jackson was -- I want to say a drug addict because he was addicted to this propofol. That`s not the question before the jury.

Now, I agree with you they knew they had a star who was on drugs, like many stars. That doesn`t mean it`s OK. But it was Michael Jackson`s decision, in his addled mind -- he was not thinking with all of his faculties -- to continue to use Conrad Murray.

In fact, in one of AEG`s e-mails -- and I`m glad you brought that up, Rabbi -- AEG says, Remember, remind Conrad Murray we`re the ones that are going to pay him, not Michael Jackson. Now, I take that to mean, Conrad Murray, you better do the right thing and not just what Michael Jackson wants you to do, i.e., giving him drugs.

BOTEACH: Well, it could also mean -- And I don`t know the exact context of that e-mail. It could also mean, You better keep him performing, you better keep him healthy because this cash cow and this golden goose better lay the golden eggs.

But according to so many of these e-mails, the people who were working with Michael in the preparations for the concerts every day saw him falling to pieces. He was falling apart. Why didn`t they pull the plug? He might be alive today.

The man needed help. Was there not one moral person to say that his life was more important than cash? Was there not one person to say that beyond him being a singer, he`s a father? There are three kids that are going to be orphaned. He`s going to die. The man is going to die.

GRACE: Rabbi...

BOTEACH: And I find it astonishing that that is not a question that anyone wants to address.

GRACE: Rabbi, I agree with you! Everybody -- and I`m precluding his three minor children. Everybody around him was sucking him dry -- his brothers, his sisters, his father, everybody.

But the question to this jury was, was it AEG`s fault that Conrad Murray pumped him full of propofol and let him die?

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Get him on the floor. Did anybody witness what happened?

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: No, just the doctor, sir.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Prince said his father would cry after phone calls, saying quote --

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: They`re going to kill me. They`re going to kill me.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: He was referring to to AEG Live CEO Randy Phillips. Prince testified that Phillips visited Jackson`s home and aggressively spoke to Dr. Conrad Murray the night before his father`s death.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Testimony of a Harvard doctor, who said a physically deteriorating Jackson did not get REM sleep for 60 straight days while receiving propofol from Dr. Murray.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: This is going to freak you out.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Was Dr. Conrad Murray unfit or incompetent to perform the work for which he was hired? Answer, no.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Like, what?

(END VIDEO CLIP)

GRACE: $2 billion hanging in the balance. The Michael Jackson family on this lawsuit headed by Katherine Jackson. You know Joe Jackson, the father, was behind this, set to earn $2 billion in a lawsuit against AEG, the entertainment giant who put together Michael Jackson`s final tour, "This is it." With me special guest Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, also with me, correspondent Pat Lalama. Rabbi, again, thanks for being with us. Pat, response.

LALAMA: With all due respect to the rabbi, it`s easy to portray these executives, the AEG giants as these snakes and leeches. But at the same time, why are we not talking about personal responsibility? I`m a Jackson fan too. But we have to stop and think. This man essentially killed himself. And he orchestrated his life so he could have all the drugs he wanted and be in control he wanted. This particular tour to set his legacy. He was not going to stop.

And in the end, it was up to him. Yes, I like to take the moral road too. People tried to stop Elvis. People tried to stop Marilyn. People are still trying to stop Lindsay Lohan. But it`s up to that individual, and it was he, in fact, who killed himself in the end.

BOTEACH: You know, with all due respect, Pat, that`s like saying the NFL bears no moral responsibility for things like concussions. The moment you know people are destroying their lives and careers, you have a moral and perhaps even a legal responsibility to take action.

Michael worked by finding facilitators for his self-destructive habits. Once you can`t help an addict like Michael, you have a choice. You can either force him into getting help, and if he refuses to -- because it`s still a free country -- then you have a moral responsibility to stop being a facilitator, to stop giving him the money, the power, the clout and the access to these drugs that are killing him.

GRACE: Rabbi, question, you were extremely close to Michael Jackson. You had to know he was using drugs. You had to. His family had to know. So whose responsibility? Does that mean somehow it`s your fault or his family`s fault? At least you weren`t sucking him dry financially like his family was.

LALAMA: Exactly.

GRACE: Should we put everybody in jail that was using Michael Jackson? Should we start with his father? I mean, how does that work?

BOTEACH: Nancy, I`ve been criticized for walking away from my friendship -- my very close friendship with Michael, who I still miss today.

LALAMA: Yes, you have.

BOTEACH: Because I could not help him. You can`t stand by and watch a man drive his life off a cliff. You can`t give him the keys. And if you can`t help him, then you`ve got to not give him gasoline and at least try to stop being a facilitator.

Now, there were facilitators, I said on your sister network, on CNN I think in March of 2004 that Michael had a few years left to live and he would die. And the next day I was savagely attacked by his publicist and his family, and I said it on purpose, to tell them they would be held responsible. The people around him would be held responsible the moment he died and orphaned his children.

To say that none of them today bear any responsibility when they saw him gaunt and emaciated, no REM sleep. When I hear they were -- the jury was clapping for --

(CROSSTALK)

GRACE: Stop, stop, stop. Hold on, Pat.

(CROSSTALK)

GRACE: With me right now is the jury foreperson, Gregg Bater (ph). Thank you for being with us.

GREGG BARDEN, JURY FOREMAN: Hi.

GRACE: Excuse me, Greg Barden. Thank you, Mr. Barden, for being with us.

BARDEN: Hi, thank you.

GRACE: Well, Mr. Barden, you knew you were on a high profile trial. And you knew whatever the verdict was going to be would be controversial one way or the other.

I agree with the verdict. But I`m very surprised that it was actually rendered. Tell me the jury`s thinking. I mean, to say that Dr. Conrad Murray was fit when you know he`s in jail for a homicide charge for letting Michael Jackson die and pumping him full of propofol? Was the jury at all concerned that Michael Jackson`s family, particularly his father and the others, were sucking Jackson dry, and this was their last chance at money?

BARDEN: You know, that never came into our thought process at all. We really didn`t say that Conrad Murray was fit.

I guess you have to understand they didn`t just throw us in the room and say tell us was AEG liable or not. They gave us a series of guiding questions, and the first five questions we had to answer, which really broke it down for us.

And question two, it doesn`t stop at just saying was Dr. Conrad Murray unfit or incompetent. It goes on to say, was he unfit or incompetent for the work which he was hired to do? He was hired to be a general practitioner for Michael Jackson. And to look at the definition of fit and competent, he -- all his licenses were intact. He had gone to a legitimate school. He had passed all of his doctor board exams. So he was fit and competent to be a general practitioner was the way we felt.

Now, was he unethical? You bet you, because he went beyond what he was supposed to be. So maybe had the word unethical been in there as opposed to unfit, I think the decision could`ve gone the other way.

GRACE: So you believe -- the jury believed that Dr. Conrad Murray, who is sitting behind bars right now for pumping Michael Jackson full of propofol until he died, you believe that doctor is fit to practice medicine?

BARDEN: No. He was fit at the time that he was hired as a general practitioner.

What we know now in hindsight, absolutely not. He was unethical. I certainly wouldn`t hire him as my doctor. But at the time, he was fit. Nobody knew that he was unethical and would pump Michael Jackson full of propofol.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

GRACE: Welcome back, everyone. We are live and taking your calls. Out to Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, also with me Alex Sanchez, Darrell Cohen. Both veteran defense attorneys. Also with me, Pat Lalama from Investigation Discovery. Out to you, Sanchez.

SANCHEZ: You know, I think you and Pat Lalama are not giving the rabbi a break over here. Yes, he may bear some responsibility as a friend or the family might bear some responsibility, but AEG was a business partner of Michael Jackson. They were the ones putting him under tremendous pressure. There was time pressures there. There was a lot of pressure to perform. To suggest that somehow they didn`t understand what Conrad Murray was doing and are hiding behind him, therefore not taking responsibility, I think is very unfortunate. They did bear some responsibility in this case.

GRACE: OK. Sanchez, No. 1, no one is blaming Boteach for anything. He stood by Jackson and only left Jackson after all those years when he could no longer help him --

SANCHEZ: But you`re criticizing his position. You`re criticizing his position.

GRACE: I disagree with him.

SANCHEZ: That somehow AEG is not responsible.

GRACE: OK.

LALAMA: Michael Jackson could`ve pulled the plug.

SANCHEZ: But Michael Jackson was a sick person and AEG knew it.

(CROSSTALK)

GRACE: Darrell Cohen, the reality is everybody was using Jackson. The question before this jury is was AEG responsible for the death? Michael Jackson had Conrad Murray as his personal physician giving him propofol for years before AEG even came on to the scene. So how could that be their fault?

COHEN: Sometimes, Nancy, you have to understand logic is not what rules in the entertainment world. The entertainment world is all about me and all around the hangers-on. AEG was absolutely aware of what he was doing. They wanted him on the road. They wanted to make billions of dollars off of and because of Michael Jackson. And only because of that was -- they turned a blind eye, did not see what Conrad was doing, chose not to see it because all they wanted was Michael on the air, Michael in front of an audience, Michael moonwalking.

GRACE: Pat?

LALAMA: Are you telling me -- all of us were shocked to find that this doctor was administering propofol. I mean, yes, maybe they could see that he wasn`t doing well, that he was haggard, that he was tired --

GRACE: I agree.

LALAMA: Who among us could`ve known what this man was doing to Michael Jackson, and what Michael Jackson was doing to himself.

GRACE: I don`t think his own family even knew.

LALAMA: Exactly.

(CROSSTALK)

SANCHEZ: That company had a vested interest in knowing exactly what was going on because there was hundreds of millions of dollars at stake. They knew --

(CROSSTALK)

GRACE: Out to (inaudible). Alexis, what more can you tell us?

TERESZCUK: What I can tell you is about AEG, you know who they dragged into this trial? Those children. They did not have to use the deposition of Paris Jackson after that poor little girl tried to commit suicide because she was so devastated that she had to testify about her father`s death. She was heartbroken. And this is how she wound up in the hospital, and it was because of AEG she had to do that. I think that is the biggest tragedy of all. These children have had their lives ruined. Their father is dead, their mother doesn`t take care of them, their grandmother doesn`t take care of them, their cousins are mean to them. Their aunts fight with them, their uncles want their money. They have no one to take care of them, and this big company still picked on these innocent little children. I think it`s awful.

GRACE: You know, I don`t know that I agree with you, except in the sense that everyone was using him, no one is concerned about the welfare of the children.

Out to you, Brian Oxman, you`re a long-time Jackson family friend. Don`t you think that $2 billion was excessive? If I had been on that jury, I would have been so turned off by Katherine Jackson, you know she`s the puppet of Joe Jackson, who abused Michael Jackson his whole childhood, was set to rake in that money $2 billion, Brian?

OXMAN: Nancy, the money was never the issue in this case. I just talked to Randy Jackson about ten minutes ago. And Nancy, he is heartbroken. He cried, I cried. This is not about money, Nancy. These tears are not the product of somebody trying to suck on Michael Jackson or do any of that.

We loved this man. He was someone who was my friend for 25 years. He is someone who I gave up all of my -- literally worldly possessions to try to help -- and when I talked to Randy Jackson, he was devastated. I can feel the pain of his entire family. This was never about money.

GRACE: Well, Eris Huemer, psychotherapist joining me out of LA, I understand the pain the Jackson family`s going through, having been a crime victim myself. So I think this verdict stirs all that back up and will stir it all back up for his three children. But still, we have to look at what is just and what is fair. Did AEG cause Michael Jackson`s death? Jackson was using Conrad Murray to pump him full of propofol for years, before AEG created this tour that Michael Jackson was going to go on. But what does this verdict do to those three children?

DR. ERIS HUEMER, PSYCHOTHERAPIST: Nancy, the three children are who is going to suffer the most. Michael Jackson ultimately is responsible for his drug addiction. And the family continues to (inaudible) off of him and never forced him in a situation where he needed to get help. Someone needed to draw the line in the sand because now these children are orphaned forever, and will have to live with this pain and grief forever. And in the spotlight, in this huge spotlight will these children forever suffer. And they don`t have a family to come together. What the Jackson family really needs --

(CROSSTALK)

GRACE: -- make the whole pain -- all the pain resurface for these children.

To Dr. William Morrone, joining us out of Vegas tonight. Dr. Morrone, he died from acute propofol overdose. Dr. Morrone, I really believe the family should have declared him incompetent and had him put into a hospital to get off drugs and get well. What would that have entailed? What would it have taken to clean up Michael Jackson so he could live?

DR. WILLIAM MORRONE, MEDICAL EXAMINER: He needed to be in recovery, in a really good 12-step program, and maybe have substitution therapy and counseling. And he needed to be in detox. He had no insight. He didn`t know what was happening. It`s a great disservice. A 12-step program and he needed recovery.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

GRACE: In the last hours, a jury hands down a verdict. A verdict in favor of AEG. The Michael Jackson family suing the entertainment giant claiming they were responsible for Michael Jackson`s death. At the courthouse, there in L.A., Allen Dukes, CNN digital reporter. Allen, how long had Conrad Murray been a doctor for Michael Jackson?

ALLEN DUKES, CNN DIGITAL REPORTER: He met him in 2006 in Las Vegas. Treated the kids for some minor illnesses as well as Jackson for three years. Nothing serious. For three years until he joined him in Los Angeles in 2009, probably early May.

GRACE: So he had been his doctor for over three years?

DUKES: One of his doctors, yes.

GRACE: One of his doctors. We`re getting a flood of e-mails and twitters about Conrad Murray, how long had he known Michael Jackson? So the bottom line is, he had been Michael Jackson and the Jackson family doctor for over three years.

Out to jury foreperson Greg Barden. Again, thank you for being with us.

You were saying earlier that the jury found Conrad Murray fit to be a doctor. That no one knew he was pumping Jackson full of propofol. Is that the standard in your mind whether people believed he was fit, because they didn`t know what he was doing?

BARDEN: Well, at the time that he was hired, he was fit. He had, like I said, he had the licenses. He was -- had no complaints against him. He certainly had no malpractice lawsuits. You could have checked him out six ways to Sunday and there were no complaints there. So at the time, you know, looking backwards now, of course you realize that when you know he was pumping him full of propofol, you know now that he wasn`t. But at the time, all signs pointed to the fact that --

(CROSSTALK)

GRACE: Oh, you`re saying -- wait a minute. I think I get it, Greg. Are you saying that AEG at the time they hired him had no reason to know he was unfit?

BARDEN: Right. And there was -- you know, Nancy, there was not one shred of evidence presented over five months to back up the fact that AEG could have known Conrad Murray was doing that.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

GRACE: Tonight, we remember American hero, Army Specialist James Page, just 23, Titusville, Florida. Purple Heart, Bronze Star. National Defense Service Medal. Parents, Diana and James. Sister, Christie. Son, Jared. James Page, American hero.

And now, back to our coverage of the Michael Jackson civil verdict. Earlier we were talking about the families suing AEG for $2 billion and what will become of Jackson`s children. Just FYI, since Jackson`s death, he`s sold 50 million albums, that is the biggest selling artist iTunes, and made more money since his death than he has made in his lifetime.

But to Pat Lalama, Alexis Tereszcuk, Jean Casarez, first to you, Jean, who has the children right now? Who are they with tonight? How do we know they`re going to get that money and not Joe Jackson, the grandfather?

CASAREZ: You know, those children should be with Katherine Jackson in the family home. That`s the latest that we know of. How do we know who is going to get what money? I don`t think we`ll ever really know.

GRACE: What about it, Pat Lalama?

LALAMA: I think there`s a trust and I think it`s doled out a little bit at a time. I think they are well taken care of.

GRACE: You know, Alexis, it`s all about the children. The Jackson family, the rest of them, they need to go get jobs like the rest of us. Those children, do you believe that they`re being taken care of, that the Jackson family can`t get to that money?

TERESZCUK: I hope the Jackson family can`t get to that money, and I think that the people that are managing Michael`s estate since his death have been very careful about doing this. But to speak what Jean was talking about, Paris is actually out of the state (ph) and not living with Katherine anymore.

GRACE: Everyone, the end of another chapter in the Michael Jackson story. Dr. Drew up next. I`ll see you tomorrow night 8:00 sharp Eastern. Until then, good night, friend.

END
 
showbiz tonight

Hello. I`m A.J. Hammer. Thank you for watching tonight.

The shocking verdict in the Michael Jackson trial and the big loss for Michael Jackson`s family.

Jackson`s family claim that concert promoters AEG Live, who were working with Michael Jackson on a tour, were responsible for his death, and AEG should pay them $2 billion.

But just hours ago the jury delivered its verdict. The concert promoters AEG Live were not responsible for Michael`s death. It came down to two questions, and here is how it all played out when the verdict was read, and we saw it live right here on HLN.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Question number 1, did AEG Live hire Dr. Conrad Murray? Answer yes. Question number 2, was Conrad -- was Dr. Conrad Murray unfit or incompetent to perform the work for which he was hired? Answer, no.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

HAMMER: And with that, separate from any appeals, this legal battle is over.

With me tonight from right outside the courthouse in Los Angeles where the verdict came down tonight, CNN Wire entertainment editor Alan Duke, he`s been covering this trial from the very beginning.

So Alan, given what you saw day in and day out over the past 21 weeks, everything that was presented to us, did this verdict surprise you?

ALAN DUKE, ENTERTAINMENT EDITOR, CNN: I would never have predicted that this verdict would hinge on the question if Conrad Murray was competent or incompetent, or unfit. This was about a man who is in prison right now for involuntary manslaughter for the death of Michael Jackson.

Yet, this jury voted, at least nine of them, that Conrad Murray was fit and competent for the job for which he was hired. That to me was a stunner. It was so stunning his own lawyer, Valerie Wass, almost fainted. She was sitting behind me and let out a gasp.

HAMMER: Just amazing to have seen this come down so quickly. They read question number 1, determined that, in fact, AEG Live did hire Dr. Conrad Murray, which was a big lingering question. And then question two about his incompetence.

CNN legal analyst Sunny Hostin also with us tonight. It was really a shocker to me, having watched this trial very closely. From a legal perspective, you know, the guy is in jail. The guy that they found competent. Were you surprised?

SUNNY HOSTIN, CNN LEGAL ANALYST: I wasn`t surprised, because this way this case sort of shook out, A.J., was that a lot of the executives that were involved in this were released from the case. So the only question in front of jury was, was AEG negligent in hiring Dr. Conrad Murray?

Now, I thought perhaps the issue was going to be did AEG hire Conrad Murray? Because so many people testified about Michael Jackson having this relationship with Dr. Murray and, you know, making it clear that he sort of hand-picked this man. He hand-picked this doctor.

But in my view, once the jury found that AEG hired Dr. Murray, I didn`t think that it was a crazy outcome for them to say, "But he was actually fit and competent to perform the work for which he was hired."

Because what was he really hired to do? He wasn`t hired to give Michael Jackson Propofol. Right? He was hired to give Michael Jackson medical care, to make sure that he could perform. Not to give him anesthesia so that he could sleep.

And so when you look at it like that, what was he hired to do? He was hired to be Michael Jackson`s doctor. I think that the jury actually came back with the right verdict in this case.

HAMMER: And now that we have that verdict, Sunny, it`s hard to imagine what the family is going through right now. I mean, Alan, this family has been dealing with legal drama surrounding Michael Jackson`s death literally since the day he died over four years ago.

You know Katherine Jackson well. This was very important for her to bring this lawsuit to get, if not closure, to bring some kind of an end to all of this drama. How devastated do you think she is right now?

DUKE: Well, first of all, this didn`t cost her any money, if you`re wondering about her losing millions of dollars because she had to pay legal fees. The lawyers took care of that on a contingency. So she`s not out there.

And she can at least say that her search for the truth yielded some gold for her. She was able to learn and the world was able to hear firsthand a lot about how Michael Jackson died and his last months. If it`s not about the money, then it`s about the truth; then perhaps she feels that she got something out of this.

By the way, she was so relaxed. She was playing word games on her iPad as she waited for the verdict to happen.

HAMMER: Remarkable. What a day it is for the Jackson family. We`ll have to see what happens with any appeals, if there are going be any. But this is yet another monumental day in the history and legacy, if you will, of Michael.
 
video on link

CONRAD MURRAY
Delusional Ex-Doc Thinks
MJ DEATH VERDICT VINDICATES HIM
EXCLUSIVE

Michael Jackson's former doctor and convicted killer, Conrad Murray, must be getting pretty strong meds behind bars ... because he thinks the jury in the wrongful death trial proved he's a good physician -- he's dead wrong.

TMZ obtained audio of Murray leaving a message for someone shortly after the judge announced AEG Live was not accountable for MJ's death -- and on the recording, Murray says the decision proves, "I have never been and never will be an inept physician."

Murray's missing one giant point ... which is that the jury really only said they felt he was fit to do what AEG hired him to do -- be a good general practitioner for MJ. The part about pumping Michael full of Propofol every night was never relevant to the questions the jury was asked to answer.

In fact, the jury foreman made it clear they were NOT saying they felt Murray was ethical -- and said the verdict might have been different if ethics were in play during this trial.

Nonetheless, Murray feels vindicated ... so, you gotta hear him gushing and praising God, the jury, and the justice system ... this time, anyway.

100313_conrad_murray_today_launch


Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2013/10/03/conra...n-wrongful-death-trial-verdict/#ixzz2gfK68S00
Visit Fishwrapper: http://www.fishwrapper.com
 
Michael Jackson wrongful death trial: Jury rules in favor of AEG Live
Wednesday, October 02, 2013

Related VideoALL LIVE VIDEO : ALL VIDEO »
AEG attorney Marvin Putnam speaks exclusively to Eyewitness News on Wednesday, Oct. 2, 2013. Gregg Barden, the foreperson on the jury, discusses the verdict in the Michael Jackson wrongful death trial on Wednesday, Oct. 2, 2013. Gregg Barden, the foreperson on the jury, discusses the verdict in the Michael Jackson wrongful death trial on Wednesday, Oct. 2, 2013.
Jury talks after Jackson trial verdict
TAGS:legal, celebrity, court case, entertainment
Comment NowEmailPrintReport a typo
ShareThis via email, AIM, social bookmarking and networking sites, etc.
By Miriam Hernandez, Robert Holguin and Marc Brown
DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES (KABC) -- The jury in the Michael Jackson wrongful death trial found that AEG Live was not liable in the pop star's death, which means the Jackson family will receive no damages from their lawsuit.

"We are disappointed by the verdict but respect the jury system," said Jackson attorney Brian Panish.

The verdict was reached on the fourth day of deliberations after more than five months of testimony.

"The jury's decision completely vindicates AEG Live, confirming what we have known from the start -- that although Michael Jackson's death was a terrible tragedy, it was not a tragedy of AEG Live's making," AEG Live lead defense attorney Marvin S. Putnam said in a statement.

Michael Jackson's mother, Katherine Jackson, sued AEG over the hiring of Dr. Conrad Murray, who was convicted of involuntary manslaughter for giving Jackson an overdose of the anesthetic propofol in 2009. Jackson's attorneys claimed AEG should have done a thorough background check on Murray and was negligent in monitoring the doctor.

The jury found that while AEG Live hired Murray, the doctor was competent to do the job he was hired to do. Jurors agreed with AEG Live that the concert promoter expected Murray to be a basic doctor, providing basic medical care for the pop star -- not secretly providing Jackson with propofol as an insomnia treatment.

"Conrad Murray was hired to be a general practitioner. Conrad Murray had a license. He graduated from an accredited college, and we felt he was competent to do the job of being a general practitioner," said jury foreperson Gregg Barden. "Now that doesn't mean that we felt he was ethical."

It came down to the specific language in the questionnaire. Barden said if the word "ethical" was in the question, the outcome could have been different.

Attorneys for Katherine Jackson released the following statement on her behalf:

"AEG has denied for years, and continues to deny, that they hired Dr. Conrad Murray. The jury found unanimously that AEG hired Dr. Murray. AEG has repeated the mantra that this lawsuit was a shakedown. Such a statement is a slap in the face of the entire judicial system that allowed this case to get to a jury. We have said from the beginning that this case was a search for the truth. We found the truth. AEG hired Dr. Conrad Murray, the man who is in jail for killing Michael Jackson. All options regarding the balance of the jury verdict are being considered."

In an exclusive interview with Eyewitness News after the verdict, Putnam said it wasn't about attacking the pop star.

"What I thought we shouldn't do, because it wasn't appropriate, was attack Michael Jackson. One shouldn't do that. Rather, what we had to look at was the reality of the situation, which was Michael Jackson was a longtime addict. And that is a tragedy, but it's a tragedy that people had to face," Putnam said.

Jurors and AEG Live expressed the same sentiment that there were no real winners in the case because it stemmed from the death of a great artist.

Related Content
VIDEO: Jury talks after Jackson trial verdict
STORY: Jackson trial: Murray's lawyer weighs in
STORY: Michael Jackson trial: More about the jurors
STORY: Jackson trial: AEG delivers closing arguments
"I counted Michael Jackson a creative partner and a friend," said AEG Live executive Randy Phillips in a statement. "We lost one of the world's greatest musical geniuses, but I am relieved and deeply grateful that the jury recognized that neither I, nor anyone else at AEG Live, played any part in Michael's tragic death."

Katherine Jackson showed no reaction when the verdict was read. The Jackson family was seeking $1.5 billion in damages.
 
Promoter not liable in *****’s death
By Helen Kumari and David K. LiOctober 2, 2013 | 6:39pm
Modal Trigger
Promoter not liable in *****’s death
Photo: AP
A jury Wednesday cleared Michael Jackson’s concert promoters of any wrongdoing in connection to The King of Pop’s shocking death.
The LA County Superior Court panel found that entertainment conglomerate AEG Live isn’t liable for MJ’s death on June 25, 2009, when The Gloved One was given a deadly overdose of anesthesia.
Jackson’s loved ones failed to show that AEG knew it was hiring an “incompetent,” prescription-pad-loving doctor, Conrad Murray.
Family matriarch Katherine Jackson and nephew Trent Jackson were in court to hear bad news — that she, MJ’s sons Prince and Blanket and daughter Paris are being denied a civil payout of up to $2 billion.
“I couldn’t be more pleased with the way the jury came out,” smiling AEG lawyer Marvin Putnam said after the verdict. “They got it exactly right.”
For Jackson’s family to cash in, jurors in this civil case needed to answer “yes” to five consecutive questions that linked Murray to AEG.
Jurors answered “yes” to: “Did AEG Live hire Dr. Conrad Murray?”
But the plaintiff’s case fell apart on the second question: “Was Dr. Conrad Murray unfit or incompetent to perform the work for which he was hired?” The panel unanimously said “no,” ending deliberations.
When Murray agreed to work for Jackson, he was a licensed cardiologist in Texas and Nevada.
“He was competent,” jury foreman Gregg Barden said. “But not necessarily ethical. If `ethical’ had been in the question, it would have a different answer.”
Juror No. 9 Kevin Smith said AEG showed it had no real control over Murray, who was handpicked by Jackson.
“AEG wanted another doctor but Michael said `no,’ ” Smith said. “If he [Jackson] couldn’t admit to his own mother that he was addict to get help, he wasn’t going to get a doctor that would help him.”
Lead Jackson family lawyer Brian Panish had a medical procedure done on Wednesday afternoon, and couldn’t make it to court to hear the verdict.
Later, Panish told The Post he couldn’t fathom how jurors could have deemed Murray as a competent physician when was brought on board: “Confusing [that the] jury could find Murray fit and competent.”
Panish’s legal partner Kevin Boyle said he hopes entertainment executives pay more attention to the doctors they’re hiring.
“We think that what we’ve done with this case is prove some things that are important for the Jackson family and for the concert industry and the sports industry with regards to treatment by doctors,” Boyle said.
A criminal jury found the Doctor Feelgood Murray guilty of manslaughter two years ago, for using the anesthesia propofol on Jackson as sleep medication.
Murray never signed a contract with AEG, but Jackson family lawyers tried to link the company and doctor with e-mails and other communications between them.
Jackson, 50, died inside his rented mansion in LA, where he had been rehearsing for a 50-show run at London’s O2 Arena.
 
Conrad Murray speaks out on 'justice' in Michael Jackson death trial verdict
By Alan Duke, CNN
updated 9:04 AM EDT, Thu October 3, 2013
Watch this video
Jackson friend: This was not about money
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
NEW: "For once, the world was allowed to hear some of the facts," Dr. Conrad Murray says
Jury foreman: "I don't see it as a vindication of Dr. Murray"
Jackson lawyer: "We have said from the beginning that this case was a search for the truth"
Juror: AEG Live had no way of knowing about Murray's risky treatments of Jackson

Los Angeles (CNN) -- The doctor convicted in Michael Jackson's death sees the jury's verdict in a wrongful death civil trial as "justice."
"I cried because, for once, the world was allowed to hear some of the facts at they pertain to this matter -- a lot of facts that have been suppressed, much of which I was denied and my attorneys could not present during my criminal trial," Dr. Conrad Murray said on NBC's "Today" on Thursday.
He described himself as "relieved."
A jury found Wednesday that concert promoter AEG Live was not liable in Jackson's death. The jury found that AEG Live had hired Conrad Murray, but that Murray was competent.
"The jury's decision completely vindicates AEG Live, confirming what we have known from the start -- that although Michael Jackson's death was a terrible tragedy, it was not a tragedy of AEG Live's making," AEG Live attorney Marvin Putnam said.
The jury rejected Putnam's contention that AEG Live did not hire Murray, but the conclusion that the doctor was not "unfit or incompetent" got the company off the hook for a potential billion dollar judgment.
The decision ended a five-month trial, but likely began a years-long appeal process.
It will not help Murray's appeal on his criminal conviction, however.
And the jury foreman disputed suggestions by Murray's legal team that the verdict supports his case. The foreman added that he would not want Murray treating him.
AEG not liable in Michael Jackson death AEG not liable in Michael Jackson death Juror: AEG didn't know what was going on Murray's attorney gasped at AEG verdict Jackson's doctor sings to Anderson Cooper
Jackson lawyer: 'We found the truth'
"AEG has denied for years, and continues to deny, that they hired Dr. Conrad Murray," Katherine Jackson's lawyers said in a statement released late Wednesday. "The jury found unanimously that AEG hired Dr. Murray. AEG has repeated the mantra that this lawsuit was a shakedown. Such a statement is a slap in the face of the entire judicial system that allowed this case to get to a jury."
While the verdict means no money in damages for the Jacksons, the statement suggested they believe they gained something from the trial. "We have said from the beginning that this case was a search for the truth," it said. "We found the truth. AEG hired Dr. Conrad Murray, the man who is in jail for killing Michael Jackson."
Jackson lawyers, who were discussing the grounds for an appeal even before the verdict was read, indicated the legal fight is not over. "All options regarding the balance of the jury verdict are being considered," their statement said.
Katherine Jackson, 83, sat with nephew Trent Jackson and a lawyer for the reading of the verdict in a large Los Angeles courtroom Wednesday. She played a word game on her iPad while sitting on a hallway bench to pass the time before the reading. None of her sons, daughters or grandchildren attended court Wednesday.
Testimony by 58 witnesses over 83 days included intimate revelations by those closest to the singer -- pulling back the curtain on Jackson's dreams, passions, pain and fears. It shed light into his intractable insomnia that led to Jackson's death from an overdose of the surgical anesthetic propofol just days before the planned premiere of his comeback concerts.
Fit and competent, but unethical?
Jury foreman Gregg Barden suggested jurors were boxed in by the wording of the second question on their verdict form: "Was Dr. Conrad Murray unfit or incompetent to perform the work for which he was hired?"
Jurors interpreted "the work" to be as a "general practitioner" who was expected to treat Jackson and his children for routine illnesses -- not to infuse him with profopol to put him to sleep every night, Barden said.
"Conrad Murray had a license, he graduated from an accredited college and we felt he was competent to do the job of being a general practitioner," Barden said. "Now, that doesn't mean that we felt he was ethical, and maybe had the word ethical been in the question, it could have been a different outcome. But because it was for the job he was hired to do, that was what we had to focus on."
Jackson lawyers argued that one reason Murray was unfit was because he had a conflict of interest. His deep financial debt made him conflicted to the point that he took dangerous risks with his patient because he feared losing the $150,000 monthly salary that AEG Live agreed to pay him to treat Jackson, they argued.
Jurors apparently did not see medical ethics as an essential element for a fit and competent physician.
HLN's Nancy Grace asked Barden if he believed Murray was unethical. "You betcha!" he answered. "Because he went way beyond what he was supposed to do."
Juror: AEG was 'in the dark'
Interviews with Barden and another juror indicate that even if they had decided Murray was unfit and incompetent, the jury still might not have held AEG Live responsible for the doctor giving Jackson the dangerous nightly infusions of propofol that eventually killed him.
"There was not one shred of evidence presented over five months to back up the fact that AEG could have known that Dr. Murray was doing that," Barden said.
Juror Kevin White agreed. "If AEG had known what was going on behind closed doors, it probably would have made a world of difference, but they didn't," White said.
AEG Live lawyers were apparently effective with their strategy of calling several of Jackson's former doctors to testify about how the singer developed close friendships with them. Jackson was talented at "doctor shopping" and keeping his various physicians in the dark about each other, they argued.
"Michael Jackson was pretty used to getting his own way," White said. "He was a big star. He had all these doctors who wanted to be his doctor and he could pretty much get what he wanted. If anybody said 'No,' well, they were out of the mix and he'd find somebody else."
Murray treated Jackson in an upstairs bedroom at his mansion, where no one else could see, White said. "How could AEG have done anything about it when they were kept in the dark?"
Murray's lawyer: 'This is huge'
No one seemed more surprised in courtroom when the verdict was read than Murray's lawyers. Valerie Wass, who had sat in on much of the trial so she could give personal reports to her jailed client, let out an audible gasp when the court clerk read the jury's "No" to the question "Was Dr. Conrad Murray unfit or incompetent to perform the work for which he was hired?"
Murray was "very, very emotional" when Wass visited him in jail to discuss the verdict Wednesday evening, Wass said.
The civil trial verdict has no impact on Murray's criminal appeal, "but in the court of public opinion, this is huge," Wass told CNN.
Murray, who is appealing his involuntary manslaughter conviction, is scheduled to be released from jail this month after serving two years of a four-year sentence.
His medical licenses were suspended after his conviction two years ago, but he could regain them, Wass said "He has a lot of patients who really want him to come back and practice," she said. "And we'll see."
On NBC, Murray said, "I will restart my life and, God willing, I will be a model to show the world that despite adversity, and when bad things happen to good people, they can restart their life and succeed.
The jury foreman -- a high school football coach -- bristled at the suggestion that Murray was vindicated by his verdict.
"Absolutely not," Barden said. "I don't see it as a vindication of Dr. Murray, and no, I would not hire him as my doctor. It's not a vindication. Again, it's the way the question was worded."
Asked by NBC whether he felt vindicated, Murray said the verdict showed him that "you have to wait on the Lord. You just have to know that he is there for you, and he is going to deliver his justice on his time."
 
Verdict in, but what's next for Jackson family?

A jury Wednesday found AEG, promoter of Michael Jackson's planned final tour, not liable in pop star's death
As result of verdict, Jackson family will not be awarded any money
There's a lot of confusion about what the jury's decision means, because it isn't a typical verdict

AEG live, the promoter of Michael Jackson’s planned final tour, was found not liable late Wednesday in the pop star’s death, but there’s more to the jury’s verdict than just that.

The case will likely not end with the verdict because attorneys for the Jackson family have already said they have grounds for an appeal.

The Jackson family’s lawsuit against AEG Live hinged on whether the company was negligent at the time Dr. Conrad Murray was hired.

Murray was convicted November 7, 2011, of involuntary manslaughter in Jackson's death from an overdose of propofol, a powerful anesthetic, and sentenced to four years behind bars with eligibility for parole after two. Murray is scheduled to be released from prison early on October 28.

To convince a jury that AEG Live was negligent in hiring Murray, the Jackson family attorneys would have had to prove the company did not take proper or reasonable care in making their hiring decision. Therefore, the instructions given to the jury included a series of questions that had to be answered affirmatively in order to find the company negligent.

The first question asked if AEG Live hired Murray. The jury answered "Yes" to that question, but got hung up on the second question, which was “Was Dr. Conrad Murray unfit or incompetent to perform the work for which he was hired?”

The jury answered this question with a “No.” Therefore, they believed AEG Live took reasonable care in hiring Murray because he was competent to practice medicine.

AEG Live’s attorney Marvin Putnam reminded the jury during his closing argument that, before Jackson’s death, Murray was in good standing to practice medicine in multiple states, with no complaints, no pending lawsuits and no criminal cases on his record.

Since the jury answered the second question with a “No,” the deliberations were finished, and a verdict was reached.

The verdict also means that the Jacksons' legal battles may not be over. They could appeal their case against AEG Live to a higher court, and they could also sue Murray for damages for his role in Jackson’s death.

The doctor may have limited resources as he sits in prison, but the family could sue him for future earnings. If the Jacksons are successful in suing Murray, he may have to turn over any proceeds from a book deal or any income if he ever practices medicine again.

http://www.hlntv.com/article/2013/10/03/what-does-verdict-mj-trial-mean
 
Disbelief — and explanations — after AEG wins Michael Jackson case
Michael Jackson fans don't understand the verdict, but AEG says the case never should have gone to trial. And jurors didn't always speak with one voice.


A Michael Jackson fan and her T-shirt speak out against AEG Live after the verdict. (Allen J. Schaben, Los Angeles Times / October 2, 2013)


By Victoria Kim, Ruben Vives and Jeff Gottlieb

October 2, 2013, 9:44 p.m.

For the dedicated Michael Jackson fans who came to the trial day after day, the singer still could do little wrong. They wore T-shirts expressing their love for the singer and their support for his aged mother. One fan even brought a bouquet of red roses to give Katherine Jackson and her attorneys.

So when the judge announced Wednesday that jurors had decided AEG Live was not responsible for Jackson's death, they weren't just stunned, they were angry. They didn't understand how a five-month trial that seemed to expose the concert promoter as caring little about the singer's well-being could end this way.

"My heart is broken," said Barbara de L'Orme, 42. "This was the greatest artist that we ever had, and they treated him like this. The evidence was right there."

When Marvin Putnam, AEG Live's lead attorney, stood in front of the scrum of TV cameras, microphones and notebooks, fans could be heard shouting, "Michael Jackson! Michael Jackson!"

Putnam told reporters AEG never considered settling the case, which could have cost it hundreds of millions — if not billions — of dollars in damages if a jury had voted the other way. "They wouldn't allow themselves to be shaken down," he said.

The attorney said that he didn't think the case should have gone to trial and that the judge should have dismissed it early on. He admitted the verdict was an emotional one for him, and some people in the courtroom said they saw a tear slide down his cheek.

Shawn Trell, AEG Live's general counsel, was asked if the concert promoter and producer would negotiate a deal with a doctor again if an entertainer made such a request. "I think that answer is self-evident," he said.

Several jurors explained how they answered "no" to the question on the verdict form that asked whether Conrad Murray, the doctor who gave Jackson the fatal dose of the anesthetic propofol, was "unfit or incompetent to perform the work for which he was hired."

Once they came to that conclusion, there was no need to answer the remaining 14 questions. Their work was done.

Gregg Barden, the jury foreman, said the verdict was not a vindication of Murray, who will soon be released from jail, where he is serving a sentence for involuntary manslaughter.

"Conrad Murray had a license; he graduated from an accredited college," Barden said.

Then he added, "It doesn't mean we thought he was ethical."

Juror Kevin Smith, 61, said he loved Jackson's music and his dancing. Still, he voted against the pop star's mother and three children.

"Murray," he said, "was fit and competent for the job he was hired for ... Michael Jackson thought he was competent enough."

He said AEG executives had tried to persuade Jackson not to bring Murray, who was supposed to be paid $150,000 a month, on tour with him. "Michael Jackson was very used to getting his own way.... If anybody said no, he would find somebody else," Smith said.

Barden said that when jurors were handed the case after closing arguments last Thursday afternoon, the first time they could talk about the case after spending five months listening to testimony, they spent several hours "letting off steam and talking about things."

They took three or four votes to answer the first question, "Did AEG Live hire Dr. Conrad Murray?" before agreeing unanimously that it had.

"Minds were changed," Barden said.

Some people felt that Murray was hired by both Jackson and AEG, he said.

On the second question, about whether Murray was incompetent, there was confusion when the court clerk polled jurors on their votes. However, after a couple of tries, they appeared to have taken a unanimous stand.

But outside the courthouse, Barden told a different story. He said jurors had started out 12-0 but finally came up with a 10-2 tally. Jurors in a civil case only need to vote 9-3, as opposed to the unanimous count needed in a criminal case.
 
Katherine Jackson’s Contingent Fee Lawyers Lose $484M Payday In Failed Michael Jackson Death Trial
Posted on Oct 3, 2013 @ 11:43AM | By Jen Heger - Assistant Managing Editor

Getty
Getty

If Katherine Jackson is the biggest loser in the failed wrongful death lawsuit against concert promoter AEG Live, her team of high-powered and high-priced lawyers are a VERY close second.

Brian Panish and Kevin Boyle had hoped to score a whopping 33 percent of the $1.6 billion in damages they’d asked the jury to award the King of Pop’s family, RadarOnline.com is exclusively reporting.

That equates to more than $484 million.

“Panish and Boyle had taken on the case on a contingency, meaning, they wouldn’t charge her, but would have taken a third of any award the jury had given Michael’s mother,” a source close to the case told RadarOnline.com.

PHOTOS: Katherine Jackson Holds Memorial For King Of Pop In His Hometown

“For the jury to not award one penny to Katherine means her lawyers walk away with nothing. Plus, Katherine does not have to pay her lawyers anything.”

Added the legal insider, “It was a huge gamble for Katherine’s lawyers and unfortunately for them, they lost.”

Had the Los Angeles-based lawyers billed the Jackson family matriarch on an hourly basis, the legal bill would have exceeded $15-20 million, the source added.

“This case was filed over three years ago and there were hundreds of depositions taken, expert witnesses to be paid, all which came out of the pocket of Katherine’s lawyers,” the source said.

PHOTOS: Michael Jackson Through The Years

After three days of deliberations, a jury on Wednesday cleared AEG Live of liability in the 2009 death of Michael Jackson, a few weeks before his 50-concert London comeback was to begin.

In the lawsuit, Jackson’s 83-year-old mother and three children — Prince Michael, Paris and Michael — had alleged that AEG was to blame for the King of Pop’s death because it was negligent in the hiring and supervision of the doctor, Conrad Murray, who gave Jackson a fatal dose of the anesthetic proposal.

AEG successfully argued that Jackson had a history of abusing drugs, including the anesthetic. He was responsible for his own death, they claimed.

It’s standard practice in California for lawyers that take cases on a contingency basis to take 33% of any settlement or jury award.

PHOTOS: Shocking Evidence Found In Michael Jackson’s Bedroom

While Katherine is coming to terms with the verdict, “she is already being pressured by youngest son, Randy, to appeal the decision,” a Jackson family insider told Radar.

“But Katherine’s lawyers are now heavily in the red on this case, it would seem unlikely they would continue to represent her if she is persuaded to appeal. The fact the decision was unanimous also doesn’t bode well for Katherine’s chances of mounting a successful appeal.”
 
NEWS/ Katherine Jackson Is "Very Sad" About Michael Jackson's Wrongful Death Verdict, Says Source
by Senta Scarborough and JORDANA OSSAD Today 10:38 AM PDT

Katherine Jackson, Paris Jackson
Kevin Winter/Getty Images
We are now learning how Katherine Jackson is coping following the verdict that the concert promoter AEG Live was not liable in the 2009 death of her son, Michael Jackson.
"Katherine was very sad about the verdict," a source close to the situation tells E! News exclusively.
The source could not provide any more information.
The six-man, six-woman jury decided in favor of the concert promoter on Wednesday, Oct. 2, after nearly five months of testimony.
Katherine had alleged that AEG Live contributed to her son's death by negligently hiring Dr. Conrad Murray to oversee his medical care without properly vetting the doctor or paying concern to signs that her 50-year-old son's health was in decline.
NEWS: Michael Jackson's Family "Not Happy" With Wrongful Death Verdict, Exploring Options as AEG Live Is Found Not Liable
"We think this was a very important case to bring for a lot of reasons," Kevin Boyle, an attorney for Katherine, told reporters after the verdict was reached.
"We think what we've done with this case is proved some things that are important for the Jackson family and for the concert industry and the sports industry with regard to treatment by doctors," Boyle said. "We, of course, are not happy with the result as it stands now, we will be exploring all options legally and factually and make a decision about anything at a later time."
Katherine was present for the reading of the verdict.
The jury started deliberations on Thursday, Sept. 26, after dozens of witnesses testified, including Jackson's mother; his son Prince; daughter Paris (via video deposition); and ex-wife Deborah Rowe.
 
Michael Jackson's influence echoes across genres, generations
print
Comments
13
Email
Share
121



Michael Jackson fans
Upset supporters of the Jackson family react outside court in Los Angeles after the verdict in the AEG Live trial. (Joe Klamar / Agence-France Presse / October 2, 2013)
Related photos »
Michael Jackson: A look back at the king of pop's style
Photos: Michael Jackson: A look back at the king of pop's style
Jackson family to 'explore all options' after AEG Live verdict
Jackson family to 'explore all options' after AEG Live verdict
Michael Jackson verdict and 7 other tragic pop music figures
Michael Jackson verdict and 7 other tragic pop music figures
Disbelief — and explanations — after AEG wins Michael Jackson case
Disbelief — and explanations — after AEG wins Michael Jackson case

By Randall Roberts
Los Angeles Times Pop Music Critic
October 3, 2013, 9:11 a.m.
With Wednesday’s verdict that concert promoter AEG Live was not liable in the death of Michael Jackson, the singer’s road to artistic redemption can move forward -- minus the depressing personal details.

The trial's revelations of the civil suit filed by Jackson's mother and three children featured toxicology reports, airing in public Jackson's many dependency issues, stuff that has little to do with the glory of "Rock with You." Outside Neverland, the King of Pop was quite mortal. But we already knew that. We just keep being reminded of it whenever we turn on the news.

So hopefully Oct. 2, 2013, will be remembered not so much as the day that AEG dodged a bullet/the Jackson family was denied justice (take your pick), but as the day that his musical legacy begins an uninterupted ascent.

PHOTOS: Michael Jackson | 1958-2009

Billie Holiday was a lifelong junkie and died a horrible death, after all, but that detail pales beside her work with Lester Young. Elliott Smith was smoking crack and heroin in the year before he stabbed himself in the heart. He's dead and that's a drag -- but we've still got "Clementine." Elvis Presley's final years were horrifying; his version of "A Little Less Conversation" was not.

One glimpse at pop music in 2013 is enough to confirm that Jackson's musical spirit, that floating body of rhythm and bliss that typified his best work, is drifting through contemporary music at a steady clip. Hints of his sound permeate both hip clubs and the dance underground, and hum through the new frontiers of contemporary R&B.

The classic sound of Jackson circa "Off the Wall," "Thriller" and "Bad," for example, dots the new album "Days Are Gone" by Los Angeles sister group Haim. The stuttering lines that pepper the chorus of "Forever" are pure "Off the Wall" groove, worked into a funky stomp but fully connected to the joy of MJ release. "Go Slow" rolls along with the candlelit grace of "Human Nature."

PHOTOS: Major works from the 'King of Pop'

Another relatively recent nod was delivered by Toronto seducer and Drake collaborator the Weeknd, whose breakout EP, "Echoes of Silence," featured a much lauded cover of "Dirty Diana" woven into his alt-soul groove.

Most prominently, this summer the wickedly funky guitar lines snaking through Daft Punk's "Random Access Memories" were played by the same session musician, Paul Jackson Jr., who offered the classic lines on Michael Jackson's "Thriller" and "Bad." That's one reason "Random Access Memories" resonated so deeply with American audiences: The guitarist in "Get Lucky" is the same guy who played on "Wanna Be Startin' Something."

So good riddance to the gory details. We've been reminded of the artist's flaws pretty much nonstop for the past few decades. He's dead and the blame has been legally resolved. Now let MJ rest in peace, so the melodies and grooves that changed the course of global pop can continue to wend their way through contemporary culture, blossoming in wonderfully unpredictable ways.

"Just take it slow, 'cause we got so far to go" indeed.
 
Verdict should ease Jackson's court 'appearances'
Published: October 3, 2013 Updated 18 minutes ago

E-MAILPRINT

Jackson-AEG Suit
FILE - In this Oct. 8, 2011 file photo, from left, Prince Jackson, Prince Michael II "Blanket" Jackson and Paris Jackson arrive on stage at the Michael Forever the Tribute Concert, at the Millennium Stadium in Cardiff, Wales. A Los Angeles jury on Wednesday, Oct. 2, 2013, rejected a negligence lawsuit by singer Michael Jackson's mother, Katherine Jackson, against AEG Live LLC that claimed the concert promoter was responsible for hiring the doctor convicted of causing her son’s 2009 death. (AP Photo/Joel Ryan, file) *Editorial Use Only*
JOEL RYAN — AP
STORY PHOTOS:
Jackson AEG Suit Jackson-AEG Suit Jackson-AEG Suit
Previous PageNext Page
EVENTS CALENDAR

3 Thu 4 Fri 5 Sat 6 Sun 7 Mon
Search Events

10 am 10/04 SAQA, Carl Stewart, &…10 am 10/04 Jane in Japan,…5 pm 10/04 Art after Five - The…8 pm 10/04 Lewis Black10 am 10/05 Jumpin' Pumpkin Jamboree10 am 10/05 Fall Festival
Restaurants
Movies
Music
Add an Event
Performing Arts
Venues

ENTERTAINMENT VIDEOS


Deals!
$10 for a Detox Foot Bath. ($25 value)

$10.00
Buy Now!
dealsaver
Featured AdvertisersView All
Money Metals & Glass

Landmark Realty, Inc.

Search for Deals
Search local inventory, coupons and more


Powered by
Find n Save


By ANTHONY MCCARTNEY — AP Entertainment Writer

LOS ANGELES — A jury's rejection of a long-running lawsuit by Michael Jackson's mother against the promoter of his ill-fated comeback concerts could finally allow Jackson to disappear from a forum he has dominated for years — the courtroom.

For five months, jurors were given an intimate look at Jackson's life, his drive to be the top entertainer of all time, and his devotion to his mother and three children.

Barring the intervention of an appeals court, Katherine Jackson's case against concert promoter AEG Live LLC figures to be the last time a jury is asked to consider the life and death of the King of Pop in such detail.

Several court cases involving Jackson remain, including disputes related to his estate, which erased nearly $500 million in debt after his death and keeps churning out new products. It opened a Las Vegas Cirque-du-Soleil show this year and is likely considering additional releases of Jackson-related material to ensure his mother and children keep living comfortably and fans have new material to see and hear.

The financial well-being of his children wasn't an issue at the trial, but the effects of the family's fight against AEG Live will likely linger for some time. Despite AEG's victory, legal experts expect that entertainment companies will change how they deal with celebrities' requests for specialized staff such as doctors.

"I just think it's a multiple lesson book on ways for companies to mitigate risk," said Marcellus McRae, a former federal prosecutor who now handles white collar defense cases for the Gibson Dunn & Crutcher law firm.

Katherine Jackson sued AEG Live in September 2010, alleging the company negligently hired Jackson's doctor to work on his planned "This Is It" comeback shows. Jurors determined that AEG hired the physician but rejected attempts to link the firm to the death of Jackson.

The lawsuit failed on the jury form's second question: Was Dr. Conrad Murray unfit and incompetent to serve as the singer's general practitioner?

The jury decided he was fit and competent, and deliberations ended, even though jury foreman Gregg Barden said the panel did have doubts about the ethics of Murray.

The jury instructions didn't define unfitness or incompetence, although the panel was repeatedly told during the trial that Murray had been convicted of causing Jackson's death.

The instructions also didn't mention ethics, which Barden acknowledged might have changed the outcome if it was included in the question.

"There's a lot of room for interpretation in there," McRae said.

There also was no mention of propofol on the jury form, the powerful anesthetic that killed Jackson. The drug is meant only for use in hospitals, but Murray was administering it on a nightly basis to Jackson as a sleep aid.

The structure of the verdict was crucial and didn't allow the jury to consider all the theories that Katherine Jackson's lawyers raised throughout the trial, said John Nockleby, director of the Civil Justice Program at Loyola Law School, Los Angeles.

Lawyers for Katherine Jackson said they are exploring all possible legal options, which could include asking a judge to set aside the verdict or appealing rulings in the case.

Nockleby said they could have a tough task unless the judge refused to give an instruction that the plaintiffs requested and that altered the outcome of the case.

McRae and Nockleby said they expect corporate lawyers to revise how they deal with requests by celebrities for staff to avoid a lawsuit similar to the AEG Live litigation.

AEG emails were picked apart in court, with lawyers for Katherine Jackson highlighting negative references to her son. As a result, McRae said, lawyers are likely going to instruct clients to change the way they use email for business deals.

Shawn Trell, AEG Live's general counsel, acknowledged after the verdict that his company would be making changes. He was asked whether the promoter would reconsider the use of doctors to help entertainers prepare for tours.

"I think that answer is self-evident," Trell said.

Read more here: http://www.bnd.com/2013/10/03/2831258/katherine-jackson-loses-last-chance.html#storylink=cpy
 
Conrad Murray speaks out on 'justice' in Michael Jackson death trial verdict
By Alan Duke, CNN
updated 6:23 PM EDT, Thu October 3, 2013
Watch this video
Jackson friend: This was not about money
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
NEW: MIchael Jackson won a new fan during trial -- the jury foreman
Jury foreman: "I don't see it as a vindication of Dr. Murray"
"For once, the world was allowed to hear some of the facts," Dr. Conrad Murray says
Jackson lawyer: "We have said from the beginning that this case was a search for the truth"

Los Angeles (CNN) -- The doctor convicted in Michael Jackson's death sees the jury's verdict in a wrongful death civil trial as "justice."
"I cried because, for once, the world was allowed to hear some of the facts at they pertain to this matter -- a lot of facts that have been suppressed, much of which I was denied and my attorneys could not present during my criminal trial," Dr. Conrad Murray said on NBC's "Today" on Thursday.
He described himself as "relieved."
A jury found Wednesday that concert promoter AEG Live was not liable in Jackson's death. The jury found that AEG Live had hired Conrad Murray, but that Murray was competent.
"The jury's decision completely vindicates AEG Live, confirming what we have known from the start -- that although Michael Jackson's death was a terrible tragedy, it was not a tragedy of AEG Live's making," AEG Live attorney Marvin Putnam said.
The jury rejected Putnam's contention that AEG Live did not hire Murray, but the conclusion that the doctor was not "unfit or incompetent" got the company off the hook for a potential billion dollar judgment.
The decision ended a five-month trial, but likely began a years-long appeal process.
It will not help Murray's appeal on his criminal conviction, however.
And the jury foreman disputed suggestions by Murray's legal team that the verdict supports his case. The foreman added that he would not want Murray treating him.
AEG not liable in Michael Jackson death AEG not liable in Michael Jackson death Juror: AEG didn't know what was going on Murray's attorney gasped at AEG verdict Jackson's doctor sings to Anderson Cooper
Jackson lawyer: 'We found the truth'
"AEG has denied for years, and continues to deny, that they hired Dr. Conrad Murray," Katherine Jackson's lawyers said in a statement released late Wednesday. "The jury found unanimously that AEG hired Dr. Murray. AEG has repeated the mantra that this lawsuit was a shakedown. Such a statement is a slap in the face of the entire judicial system that allowed this case to get to a jury."
While the verdict means no money in damages for the Jacksons, the statement suggested they believe they gained something from the trial. "We have said from the beginning that this case was a search for the truth," it said. "We found the truth. AEG hired Dr. Conrad Murray, the man who is in jail for killing Michael Jackson."
Jackson lawyers, who were discussing the grounds for an appeal even before the verdict was read, indicated the legal fight is not over. "All options regarding the balance of the jury verdict are being considered," their statement said.
Katherine Jackson, 83, sat with nephew Trent Jackson and a lawyer for the reading of the verdict in a large Los Angeles courtroom Wednesday. She played a word game on her iPad while sitting on a hallway bench to pass the time before the reading. None of her sons, daughters or grandchildren attended court Wednesday.
Jurors became Jackson fans
Testimony by 58 witnesses over 83 days included intimate revelations by those closest to the singer -- pulling back the curtain on Jackson's dreams, passions, pain and fears. It shed light into his intractable insomnia that led to Jackson's death from an overdose of the surgical anesthetic propofol just days before the planned premiere of his comeback concert.
Contrary to some expectations that the trial would damage Jackson's reputation with its focus on his drug abuse, jury foreman Gregg Barden said Thursday that what he saw and heard made him a bigger fan of the King of Pop. He bought some of Jackson's albums growing up, but it wasn't until serving as a juror in the wrongful death trial that he realized his talent, generosity and personality, Barden said.
Barden -- a high school football coach -- said he came close to crying in court when Jackson lawyers played a video of Jackson's children as he sang "Speechless," a song he wrote to describe his love for his children.
"This Is It" show director Kenny Ortega also won new fans from the jury.
Barden said jurors believed Ortega was "absolutely truthful" in his testimony about Jackson's deteriorated condition a week before he died, but his "miraculous" recovery at his last two rehearsals.
"He got emotional a couple of times and had to walk off the stand, we really felt bad for him, but he was also a man who put in so much work and so much effort and did everything he could, we felt, to try to help Michael," Barden said.
Several jurors, including Barden, applauded at the end of Ortega's dramatic testimony.
"It was just the absolute honesty of what he was doing," Barden said. "All of the sudden the jurors sitting there for all those months, we watched all these other guys get up there and we were asking 'Is that the truth or is that a lie?' Now all of a sudden we didn't have to do that. We could just relax and listen because everything he said was the truth. That's why he got applauded."
Fit and competent, but unethical?
Barden suggested jurors were boxed in by the wording of the second question on their verdict form: "Was Dr. Conrad Murray unfit or incompetent to perform the work for which he was hired?"
Jurors interpreted "the work" to be as a "general practitioner" who was expected to treat Jackson and his children for routine illnesses -- not to infuse him with profopol to put him to sleep every night, Barden said.
"Conrad Murray had a license, he graduated from an accredited college and we felt he was competent to do the job of being a general practitioner," Barden said. "Now, that doesn't mean that we felt he was ethical, and maybe had the word ethical been in the question, it could have been a different outcome. But because it was for the job he was hired to do, that was what we had to focus on."
Jackson lawyers argued that one reason Murray was unfit was because he had a conflict of interest. His deep financial debt made him conflicted to the point that he took dangerous risks with his patient because he feared losing the $150,000 monthly salary that AEG Live agreed to pay him to treat Jackson, they argued.
Jurors apparently did not see medical ethics as an essential element for a fit and competent physician.
HLN's Nancy Grace asked Barden if he believed Murray was unethical. "You betcha!" he answered. "Because he went way beyond what he was supposed to do."
Juror: AEG was 'in the dark'
Interviews with Barden and another juror indicate that even if they had decided Murray was unfit and incompetent, the jury still might not have held AEG Live responsible for the doctor giving Jackson the dangerous nightly infusions of propofol that eventually killed him.
"There was not one shred of evidence presented over five months to back up the fact that AEG could have known that Dr. Murray was doing that," Barden said.
Juror Kevin White agreed. "If AEG had known what was going on behind closed doors, it probably would have made a world of difference, but they didn't," White said.
AEG Live lawyers were apparently effective with their strategy of calling several of Jackson's former doctors to testify about how the singer developed close friendships with them. Jackson was talented at "doctor shopping" and keeping his various physicians in the dark about each other, they argued.
"Michael Jackson was pretty used to getting his own way," White said. "He was a big star. He had all these doctors who wanted to be his doctor and he could pretty much get what he wanted. If anybody said 'No,' well, they were out of the mix and he'd find somebody else."
Murray treated Jackson in an upstairs bedroom at his mansion, where no one else could see, White said. "How could AEG have done anything about it when they were kept in the dark?"
Murray's lawyer: 'This is huge'
No one seemed more surprised in courtroom when the verdict was read than Murray's lawyers. Valerie Wass, who had sat in on much of the trial so she could give personal reports to her jailed client, let out an audible gasp when the court clerk read the jury's "No" to the question "Was Dr. Conrad Murray unfit or incompetent to perform the work for which he was hired?"
Murray was "very, very emotional" when Wass visited him in jail to discuss the verdict Wednesday evening, Wass said.
The civil trial verdict has no impact on Murray's criminal appeal, "but in the court of public opinion, this is huge," Wass told CNN.
Murray, who is appealing his involuntary manslaughter conviction, is scheduled to be released from jail this month after serving two years of a four-year sentence.
His medical licenses were suspended after his conviction two years ago, but he could regain them, Wass said "He has a lot of patients who really want him to come back and practice," she said. "And we'll see."
On NBC, Murray said, "I will restart my life and, God willing, I will be a model to show the world that despite adversity, and when bad things happen to good people, they can restart their life and succeed.
The jury foreman bristled at the suggestion that Murray was vindicated by his verdict.
"Absolutely not," Barden said. "I don't see it as a vindication of Dr. Murray, and no, I would not hire him as my doctor. It's not a vindication. Again, it's the way the question was worded."
Asked by NBC whether he felt vindicated, Murray said the verdict showed him that "you have to wait on the Lord. You just have to know that he is there for you, and he is going to deliver his justice on his time."
 
Influence of Jackson Verdict Is Limited
By BEN SISARIO
Published: October 3, 2013

After finding on Wednesday that the concert promoter A.E.G. Live was not liable in the death of Michael Jackson, members of the jury told reporters that despite their relatively short deliberations — about 13 hours, after a five-month trial — the job was not easy.

“There are really no winners in this,” the foreman, Gregg Barden, said outside California Superior Court in Los Angeles. “This was a difficult decision for us to make.”

In the music industry, however, and for the lucrative businesses that surround Jackson and his legacy, the case leaves a status quo largely unchanged.

Jackson’s 83-year-old mother, Katherine, filed the wrongful death suit, saying A.E.G. Live had negligently hired Dr. Conrad Murray, the cardiologist who was convicted of involuntary manslaughter for giving Jackson a fatal dose of the anesthetic propofol four years ago. Jurors rejected arguments that Dr. Murray was unfit for his job, which rendered the other questions in the case moot and relieved A.E.G. Live of liability in Jackson’s death.

Music executives and industry commentators said that even if A.E.G. Live had lost the case, it would have had little effect on the larger business.

“No matter which way the jury went, there is really only one thing that is going to change, and that is the amount of legal boilerplate clauses and liability waivers that will be included in future contracts,” said Gary Bongiovanni, editor of the trade publication Pollstar.

Jackson was an exception to so many of the usual rules of the music business that few of the case’s central issues apply to other performers, according to several top executives in the concert industry. While a physical trainer or even a masseur is not an uncommon adjunct on a major tour, a doctor attending to only one star, and for such a large fee — $150,000 a month — is all but unheard-of, said these people, who spoke on the condition that they not be named to protect their dealings with A.E.G. Live.

Lawyers for Mrs. Jackson asked for up to $1.5 billion in damages, but losing the case is unlikely to affect her finances. She and Jackson’s three young children are the main beneficiaries of his estate.

While Jackson was nearly $500 million in debt at his death, the estate has lifted his finances with a string of music deals. In its most recent public accounting, through May 2012, the estate said it had earned $475 million since Jackson’s death.

Mrs. Jackson’s lawyers told reporters outside the courthouse on Wednesday that they were “exploring all options” for a possible appeal.

How A.E.G. Live will be affected is unclear. The company, part of a sports and entertainment conglomerate controlled by the billionaire Philip F. Anschutz, won the case, but in the trial the Jacksons went to great lengths to portray its executives as heartless and duplicitous, showing internal e-mails in which Jackson was mocked as “the freak” or described as “a self-loathing emotionally paralyzed mess.”

In his closing arguments, Brian J. Panish, one of Mrs. Jackson’s lawyers, showed a video montage of A.E.G.’s leaders saying “I don’t remember” and “I don’t recall” dozens of times in their depositions.

Dean Crutchfield, a branding consultant, said that A.E.G. Live could repair any damage to its reputation by apologizing for remarks that seemed to insult its clients and concentrating on its business of putting on superstar concerts. Last year, the company sold more than 10 million tickets to its events, according to Pollstar, making it the second-biggest promoter in the world, after Live Nation Entertainment.

“The fact that A.E.G. has put itself in a position where it is getting more attention than some of its clients,” Mr. Crutchfield said, “is exactly where that kind of business should not be.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/04/business/influence-of-jackson-verdict-is-limited.html
 
Was The Michael Jackson Jury Wrong In Ruling For AEG?
Comment Now Follow Comments
This week’s jury verdict sent shock waves through Michael Jackson fans who were hoping to see concert promoter AEG Live held at least partially responsible for Michael Jackson’s death. Many expressed outrage at the verdict. At first blush, the jury verdict does seem odd.

Michael Jackson
Michael Jackson (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The jury was charged with answering 16 questions, in order, given to them on a jury verdict form. If they answered any one of the first few questions in the negative, then AEG Live would prevail and there would be no need to answer the remaining questions.

The jury unanimously answered the first question in favor of the Michael Jackson heirs: AEG Live did hire Dr. Conrad Murray, the jury determined. This was a hotly disputed issue, with AEG Live arguing that Michael Jackson had hired the doctor himself. Michael Jackson’s legal team cleared that first hurdle.


Top 5 Legal Challenges Facing Michael Jackson's Estate Executors
Danielle and Andy MayorasDanielle and Andy Mayoras
Contributor

Michael Jackson Verdict: AEG Not Liable For King of Pop's Death
Zack O'Malley GreenburgZack O'Malley Greenburg
Forbes Staff

Is Promoter AEG Responsible For Michael Jackson's Death?
Danielle and Andy MayorasDanielle and Andy Mayoras
Contributor
Question two pertained to whether Dr. Murray was “unfit or incompetent to perform the work for which he was hired.” Based on the criminal conviction and the fact that Dr. Murray administered propofol to Michael Jackson in an unmonitored setting, contrary to medical and ethical guidelines for its use, it would seem that this question would have been an easy one for the jury to answer in the affirmative.

Instead, the jury voted 10-2 that Dr. Murray was not “unfit or incompetent” when he was hired. After the trial, the jury foreman said that if the verdict form had used the word “ethical”, the vote may have been different. Instead, he said, the jury believed that because Dr. Murray was licensed and graduated from an accredited college, he was not unfit or incompetent.

This takes a very narrow reading of the words “unfit or incompetent.” Being a properly educated and licensed doctor does not make one “fit,” at least in the minds of most people. Certainly, ethics can and should play a part in it.

So does this mean the jury got it wrong? Not so fast. While the attention has been placed on that particular question because it was the one that triggered the verdict for AEG Live, the next few questions would have made a verdict in favor of Michael Jackson’s mother and children unlikely, based on how the jury viewed the evidence.

Even if Dr. Murray had been found to be “unfit or incompetent,” the next questions addressed whether AEG Live knew or should have known about his unfitness and whether AEG Live’s conduct was a “substantial factor” in causing Michael Jackson’s death. Based on statements made to the media, it seems clear that the jury likely never would answered these questions in favor of Katherine Jackson and her grandchildren, even if they did answer the second question differently.

One of the juror’s pointed out how Michael Jackson was used to getting his own way, and if Dr. Murray had not done what he wanted, Jackson would have replaced him with another doctor who would have. Further, as AEG Live attorneys pointed out throughout trial, the company did not know the specifics of what was going on behind closed doors, between Jackson and Dr. Murray.

This isn’t to suggest that AEG Live was entirely free of any blame — especially if the e-mails that surfaced before trial were indicative of how the company behaved. Select internal company e-mails were leaked to the media before the trial started, detailing how AEG Live executives e-mailed each other about concerns over Michael Jackson’s health, the immense financial harm that would come if Michael Jackson didn’t perform, and the great respect that at least some at the company had for Dr. Murray. In other words, concerns were raised, but the company wanted the show to go on.

However, at trial, there were compelling arguments and evidence presented from both sides. The jury had to balance Michael Jackson’s dangerous choices versus the financial pressure from a corporation who wanted him to perform. In the end, Michael Jackson’s own behavior convinced the jury that AEG Live’s conduct wasn’t enough to create legal responsibility for his death.

It’s hard to say that this wasn’t a reasonable decision by the jury, in terms of how the law looks at it. Our legal system has to trust juries to make tough decisions like this, and then to accept their decisions (unless there was a legal error committed along the way).

And for that very reason, chances are good that the verdict will stand up if challenged. The Michael Jackson legal team can attack it, both by asking the trial judge to overturn the jury verdict, and by appealing and seeking a new trial. Neither approach will likely work.

Our legal system is built on the concept of letting a jury of our peers resolve disputes after reviewing the evidence and listening to the testimony and lawyers’ arguments. If enough was presented by both sides so that a reasonable person could decide in either direction, then the jury verdict should stand.

That’s why litigation can be so costly and risky. No one ever knows what a jury will decide. It all depends on who is on that particular jury, and what those jury members believe. This leads most people and companies involved in court battles to settle, rather than take the risk. AEG Live said it never considered settling, because it always believed the jury would rule in its favor.

AEG’s position was very risky, however, and the jury easily could have decided differently. And, certainly, AEG spent many millions of dollars in legal fees defending the case. Most people going through litigation — from estate feuds to wrongful death claims — should think carefully about settling and not taking on the risk and expense of a trial. No one ever has a crystal ball to accurately predict the outcome.

In this case, AEG Live was proven correct. Ultimately, the majority of the jury members were not prepared to find AEG Live legally responsible in light of Michael Jackson’s own decisions. Regardless of how the jury verdict questions were worded, nothing likely would have changed this outcome based on how this particular jury felt about the evidence. And there was enough evidence presented by AEG’s attorneys to justify the verdict.

So, legally, the jury was not “wrong”. Even if Michael Jackson’s fans think the verdict was not right.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/trialan...michael-jackson-jury-wrong-in-ruling-for-aeg/
 
Michael Jackson's mother Katherine is 'disappointed' by AEG Live's not-liable verdict but is 'doing the best she can,' says lawyer
The lawsuit against AEG Live filed by Jackson's mother and the King of Pop's children sought $1.5 billion for his wrongful death, alleging the company hired Murray as Jackson's doctor during his 'This Is It' Tour.

Comments (31)
BY NANCY DILLON AND LARRY MCSHANE / NEW YORK DAILY NEWS

PUBLISHED: THURSDAY, OCTOBER 3, 2013, 11:37 AM
UPDATED: THURSDAY, OCTOBER 3, 2013, 11:42 PM
27
46
0

Print

Michael Jackson's mother Katherine Jackson leaves the sentencing hearing of Dr. Conrad Murray, who was convicted of involuntary manslaughter in the death of pop star Michael Jackson, in Los Angeles California in this November 29, 2011 file photo. Opening statements in civil trial over the death of Jackson begin April 29, 2013, with Katherine Jackson accusing concert promoters AEG Live of negligence in the hiring of convicted physician Dr. Conrad Murray. REUTERS/Gus Ruelas/Files (UNITED STATES - Tags: ENTERTAINMENT CRIME LAW)
GUS RUELAS/REUTERS

Katherine Jackson sued AEG Live for $1.5 billion in a wrongful death suit after her son Michael died in 2009.
RELATED STORIES
Michael Jackson concert promoter AEG Live NOT liable in $1.5B wrongful death suit, jury rules in bombshell verdict
Michael Jackson wrongful death trial: Katherine Jackson leaves courtroom before jury is shown photo of pop star's corpse
Michael Jackson’s mom wants handwritten notes allowed in court
Michael Jackson family’s wrongful death suit against AEG honchos thrown out
Powered by Inform
Katherine Jackson is a “strong woman" who won’t just beat it after losing her bid to collect $1.5 billion in damages from the King of Pop's last concert promoter, her lawyer said Thursday.

“She's obviously disappointed, but she's a very strong woman,” lead plaintiff's lawyer Brian Panish told the Daily News in an exclusive interview Thursday.

“She's been through a lot in life, and she's doing the best she can. She only wants what is best for Michael's children, who are her No. 1 priority.”

He said the five-month wrongful death trial was “a search for the truth” that likely didn’t end with Wednesday’s verdict.

“There's going to be more to this story. I don't think it's over yet,” Panish said. “We're not giving up all hope yet.”

He said Katherine, 83, was heartened by the jury's unanimous vote that AEG Live did in fact hire Dr. Conrad Murray.

AEG Live argued during the trial that it was Michael who hired the doctor now serving four years for providing the anesthetic propofol that killed him in his bedroom on June 25, 2009.

“AEG denied it all along, but the truth was that AEG hired the doctor who killed Michael Jackson,” Panish said.

He declined to give specifics on how he might file an appeal, but said he believes the wording of the verdict form question that decided the case in AEG's favor was possibly faulty.

RELATED: MICHAEL JACKSON CONCERT PROMOTER AEG LIVE NOT LIABLE, JURY RULES

The form had 16 questions total. But jurors were instructed to stop at the second question and award no damages if at least nine jurors voted "no" on the query, “Was Dr. Conrad Murray unfit or incompetent to perform the work for which he was hired?”

Jurors who spoke after the verdict said Murray was qualified to act as Michael's general practitioner — not an anesthesiologist — at the time of his hiring.

“Conrad Murray had a license, he graduated from an accredited college, and we felt he was competent to do the job of being a general practitioner,” said jury foreman Gregg Barden.

“Now that doesn't mean that we thought he was ethical. Had the word 'ethical' been in the question, it could have been a different outcome.”

Panish also said some jurors expressed annoyance over the length of the trial that started last April — possibly leading to a bias against Katherine as the plaintiff.

“They were upset about how long it took. They told the judge that in her chambers,” he said, referring to a 20-minute closed-door session the judge held with the jurors and lawyers for both parties after the verdict.

Katherine was “taking a break” Thursday and not giving any direct media interviews, her personal lawyer Perry Sanders told The News.

He released a statement on her behalf late Wednesday that slammed AEG for repeatedly calling Katherine's lawsuit "a shakedown."

“Such a statement is a slap in the face of the entire judicial system that allowed this case to get to a jury,” the statement said.

Dr. Conrad Murray is currently in prison for administering a lethal dose of propofol to Michael Jackson.
REED SAXON/AP

Dr. Conrad Murray is currently in prison for administering a lethal dose of propofol to Michael Jackson.

RELATED: 'MICHAEL JACKSON'S DEATH WAS CAUSED BY HIS OWN CHOICES,' AEG LIVE LAWYER SAYS

Michael's siblings including Jermaine, Randy and La Toya had no immediate comment on Twitter.

Tito's son Taj Jackson, who testified during the trial and accompanied Katherine in the gallery on several occasions, bashed the verdict as unjust.

“Thank you guys for all your support. Unfortunately there will be no closure for my family #bigmoneywinsagain AEG,” Taj tweeted.

Michael's ex-wife Debbie Rowe — the mother of Prince, 16, and Paris, 15 — defended Katherine on Twitter.

“She wanted answers to questions,” Rowe tweeted.

Rowe also challenged her fellow ex-wife Lisa Marie Presley after Elvis' daughter praised Michael's makeup artist Karen Faye.

Lisa Marie, who was on Katherine's original witness list but never testified, said she was thankful because Faye alerted her that an alleged hacker somehow accessed her Twitter account and posted a video suggesting Michael was a pedophile.

“Thank God for Karen Faye for giving me the heads up about all this," Lisa Marie tweeted, claiming she was hacked.

Faye testified early in the wrongful death trial that she was close friends with Michael and witnessed him acting “paranoid” and disoriented the week before he died with unusually dry skin that was cold as an “ice cube.”

PHOTOS: MICHAEL JACKSON'S LIFE IN PHOTOS

Faye also told jurors that Michael was getting large amounts of painkillers during his 1993 Dangerous tour from a doctor who put his hands around her neck when she objected.

Rowe answered Lisa Marie's tweet about Faye saying, “really? She could have stopped it she chose not to”

AEG Live's lead trial lawyer Marvin Putnam said Wednesday that the jury's verdict "completely vindicates" the concert giant.

“Although Michael Jackson's death was a terrible tragedy, it was not a tragedy of AEG Live's making,” he said.

Dr. Conrad Murray also found some vindication in the verdict.

Murray called into NBC's “Today” show Thursday morning and admitted he wept upon hearing the decision.

"I cried because for once the world was allowed to hear some of the facts as it pertained to this matter," said Murray, still serving time for involuntary manslaughter.

He called the verdict the “correct” decision.

"This was about the Jacksons bringing a lawsuit which I felt from the beginning was frivolous," he said. "They brought a lawsuit that indicated that something was done and a lot of claims that were made were clearly incorrect, and I knew that for a fact.”



Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/entertai...trial-verdict-article-1.1475200#ixzz2glyR3Rlu
 
Why AEG Live Won the Michael Jackson Lawsuit
'This jury was most persuaded by the personal-responsibility narrative," an expert says

Comment2

Brian Panish, attorney for the Michael Jackson family, delivers his closing argument in Los Angeles, California.
Al Seib-Pool/Getty Images
By STEVE KNOPPER
October 4, 2013 9:40 AM ET
Michael Jackson's final concert promoter, AEG Live, won't have to pay as much as $1.5 billion to the late superstar's mother and children, a Los Angeles jury ruled Wednesday. The jury found the promoter not liable in the wrongful-death case after a trial that lasted more than five months and made public many disturbing facts about Jackson – from his alleged desperation to obtain powerful sleep medication to AEG's chief executive officer slapping the "despondent" star on his rear-end to psych him up.

Where Does Michael Jackson Rank on Our 100 Greatest Artists of All Time?

In three days of deliberations that foreman Gregg Barden called "extremely stressful," according to the Los Angeles Times, the jury debated the question of whether Jackson or AEG hired Dr. Conrad Murray, who was convicted of involuntary manslaughter after giving Jackson a deadly dose of propofol in June 2009. The jury found that AEG did, in fact, hire Murray, but answered "no" to the next crucial question, which was whether Murray was unfit or incompetent at the time to be Jackson's doctor.

"We didn't really expect the jury to find against us on that question," says Kevin Boyle, one of the Jackson family attorneys, suggesting the jury may have been "confused" about the phrasing of the question. "I don't know if anyone would predict that."

But Shawn Trell, AEG Live's senior vice president and general counsel, argues Jackson's lawyers made contradictory points throughout the trial. "The jury heard what poor condition Michael Jackson was in, how he had deteriorated, he was frail, underweight, he wasn't going to be able to do the 50 shows," he says. "Then when it came to damages, somehow he was going to tour more from age 50 to 66 than he did at any point in his life. The jury could pick up on that. They couldn't have it both ways."

At the time of his death, Jackson was preparing for a series of London concerts and was having trouble sleeping at night after rehearsals. The trial came down to whether AEG pressured Dr. Murray into propping up Jackson so he could complete the shows. Jackson's lawyers argued AEG's pressure created "excessive risk," says Jody David Armour, a University of Southern California law professor who followed the case. "There were two strong narratives here, and this jury was most persuaded by the personal-responsibility narrative," he says. "There was evidence that Michael Jackson wanted Dr. Murray – personal choice. He's a big boy."

Where Does Michael Jackson Rank on Our 100 Greatest Singers of All Time?

After the verdict, the opposing lawyers continued to trade barbs in separate interviews with Rolling Stone. "I heard Katherine Jackson get on the witness stand and say that the filing of this lawsuit was about a search for the truth," AEG's Trell says. "I think it was obvious to everybody this had nothing to do with the truth. It had everything to do with money." Boyle called Trell's statement "outrageous" and added: "The only thing the law provides in this country is money damages. So why would he be outraged that Mrs. Jackson and the Jackson children would be entitled to the same thing that anybody else would be entitled to?"

Boyle said her team will make a decision "shortly," after studying its options. Experts differ on whether an appeal is worth it. Stan Goldman, a Loyola Law School professor, wonders why the jury didn't consider a third question -- whether AEG was competent in supervising Murray. "With all this money involved, why not appeal?" he says. USC's Armour counters: "I can't imagine a successful appeal. I can't remember any kind of evidence that should have been submitted."



Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/music/n...ichael-jackson-lawsuit-20131004#ixzz2gn3WFjtk
Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook
 
*****'s mom Katherine Jackson isn't giving up after lawsuit loss, looking at appeal
The jurors felt Murray was competent when he was hired and there was no reason for AEG to think he would start employing surgery-style anesthesiology.

Comments (12)
BY NANCY DILLON / NEW YORK DAILY NEWS

SATURDAY, OCTOBER 5, 2013, 12:44 PM
12
33
0

Print

Michael Jackson's mother Katherine Jackson leaves the sentencing hearing of Dr. Conrad Murray, who was convicted of involuntary manslaughter in the death of pop star Michael Jackson, in Los Angeles California in this November 29, 2011 file photo. Opening statements in civil trial over the death of Jackson begin April 29, 2013, with Katherine Jackson accusing concert promoters AEG Live of negligence in the hiring of convicted physician Dr. Conrad Murray. REUTERS/Gus Ruelas/Files (UNITED STATES - Tags: ENTERTAINMENT CRIME LAW)
GUS RUELAS/REUTERS

Michael Jackson's mother Katherine Jackson “isn’t throwing in the towel,” says Jackson's lead trial lawyer Brian Panish.
RELATED STORIES
Michael Jackson's mother Katherine is 'disappointed' by AEG Live's not-liable verdict but is 'doing the best she can,' says lawyer
Michael Jackson concert promoter AEG Live NOT liable in $1.5B wrongful death suit, jury rules in bombshell verdict
Jurors deliberate to decide Michael Jackson wrongful death case against AEG Live
'Michael Jackson's death was caused by his own choices,' AEG Live lawyer says
Powered by Inform
Michael Jackson’s mom was heartened by a private conversation with the jury that rejected her billion dollar wrongful death lawsuit and told her lawyer late Thursday that she supports his research into an appeal.

“She isn’t throwing in the towel,” Katherine Jackson's lead trial lawyer Brian Panish told the Daily News Friday after his meeting with the matriarch.

PHOTOS: MICHAEL JACKSON'S LIFE IN PHOTOS

“She feels that the jurors ended the trial really liking Michael,” he said, confirming that Katherine was inside the judge’s locked courtroom when both sides spoke with the six men and six women immediately after their verdict was read.

“One question asked of the jury was, ‘What was your impression of Michael?’ And they said it was way better after hearing what a great father he was and how much he did for humanity,” Panish said. “They understood he struggled but that he really did his best.”

RELATED: 'MICHAEL JACKSON'S DEATH WAS CAUSED BY HIS OWN CHOICES,' AEG LIVE LAWYER SAYS

The Los Angeles jury that sat through the five-month trial decided Wednesday that defendant AEG Live – the promoter of Michael’s doomed “This Is It” comeback concerts – did in fact hire Dr. Conrad Murray but shouldn’t be held liable for the physician’s actions because he was neither “unfit” nor “incompetent.”

Jurors said in media interviews that they were aware many wouldn’t understand their decision, but they believed Murray was competent at the time of his hiring – with a valid license and no malpractice claims – and that AEG had no reason to suspect he’d go rogue with surgery-style anesthesiology.

RELATED: FULHAM REMOVES CONTROVERSIAL MICHAEL JACKSON STATUE

Panish said Michael’s oldest son Prince, 16, was mystified by that portion of the verdict.

“Prince is doing okay,” Panish said, recounting a conversation with him Thursday. “He said he felt good about the jury finding that AEG hired Dr. Murray but didn’t understand their answer to the second question – as many of us don’t.”

Dr. Conrad Murray is currently in prison for administering a lethal dose of propofol to Michael Jackson.
REED SAXON/AP

Dr. Conrad Murray is currently in prison for administering a lethal dose of propofol to Michael Jackson.

RELATED: KANYE WEST: ‘I’M THE NUMBER ONE ROCK STAR ON THE PLANET’

Panish said his team is now setting up individual interviews with the jurors and planning to meet with outside appellate lawyers to make a decision on a possible appeal in the next 30 days.

“We can’t give up until we gather all the information. Today is another chapter,” Panish said Friday.

RELATED: JURORS DELIBERATE IN MICHAEL JACKSON CASE

AEG’s lead lawyer said Wednesday that the jury’s verdict “completely vindicates” his client.

“Although Michael Jackson’s death was a terrible tragedy, it was not a tragedy of AEG Live’s making,” lawyer Marvin Putnam said.

PHOTOS: INSIDE MICHAEL JACKSON'S NEVERLAND RANCH

He said outside court that he hoped Katherine would forgo an appeal.

“Sadly, the children have been through a lot,” he said. “In many measures, I hope for their sake that there isn’t an appeal.”

RELATED: MICHAEL JACKSON CONCERT PROMOTER AEG LIVE NOT LIABLE, JURY RULES

He said AEG “loved and cared for” Michael.



Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/entertai...-lawsuit-loss-article-1.1477148#ixzz2guJkDIzu
 
No good guys in the sad saga of Jackson vs. AEG Live
In the end, the trial over Michael Jackson's tragic death boiled down to what people will do for money and how bankrupt that can leave them.

By Sandy Banks

October 4, 2013, 4:25 p.m.

The verdict was delivered in the "Special Events Center" at the Los Angeles County courthouse, with dozens of people queuing up in the hallway as if they were there for a concert.

The case itself had been mostly mundane; rooted in the details of contract and credentials, it dragged on for five months.

But its finish was always destined to be a spectacle, because the man on trial was Michael Jackson, the King of Pop — never mind that the case was named "Katherine Jackson vs. AEG Live."

The billion-dollar lawsuit filed by Jackson's mother blamed the concert promoter for the pop star's death, claiming AEG employed an unfit doctor whose negligence led to her son's overdose on sedatives and propofol.

But the jury sided with AEG, ruling that the doctor, Conrad Murray, was competent to serve as the superstar's physician. Jackson orchestrated his death, jurors said, with bad behavior and poor choices.

"Whatever Michael wanted, Michael got," juror Kevin Smith told reporters. "If AEG had known what was going on behind closed doors, it might have made a difference. But they didn't."

And it looks like they didn't want to know. They just wanted their star on stage when the curtain opened in London on what was supposed to be a legendary, record-breaking tour.

It wasn't the legal responsibility of AEG Live to protect Jackson's health. That's the job they agreed to pay Dr. Murray $150,000 a month to do.

AEG execs might not have known that the physician — now in jail for killing Jackson — was ethically challenged.

But they did know that the entertainer had a long history of being drug dependent and emotionally unstable.

If they expected the cosseted superstar to suddenly shake decades of deep-seated problems, that's either shameful ignorance or cruelly dispassionate thinking.

After all, AEG Live's co-CEO had been the manager 20 years ago of Jackson's "Dangerous" world tour, which had to be abruptly cut short so the star could enter rehab for painkiller dependence.

Even casual fans knew that Jackson's career had been studded with drug problems, bizarre behavior and medical issues. He hadn't toured in more than 10 years.

His struggles were no secret, just an inconvenient truth the promoters seemed determined to disregard.

Getting Jackson the help he needed might have derailed the concert tour that had already cost AEG more than $30 million to arrange. Instead, there was lots of emailing among company leaders about Jackson's obvious disintegration.

He repeatedly missed rehearsals, was emaciated, incoherent, paranoid, obsessive. He couldn't manage signature dance moves or remember the words to songs he'd been singing for years.

One of AEG's top officials was warned by a rehearsal manager a week before Jackson died, "I have watched him deteriorate in front of my eyes over the last 8 weeks."

Another exec acknowledged as much in an email to the company's finance chief: "Trouble with MJ. Big trouble... He is having a mental breakdown."

Yet they treated Jackson not like a troubled man in crisis but like the "freak" that a mocking email from AEG's top lawyer made him out to be.

They questioned his work ethic, waved off his friends, warned Murray that his job was to get the superstar in shape, on stage, on time.

They even doctored Jackson's rehearsal calendar to fool the pop star into thinking he was getting the rest his failing body needed. "Figure it out so it looks like he's not working so much," ordered Paul Gongaware, AEG Live's co-CEO, who'd known Jackson for years.

Jackson was a caricature, a commodity, a cash cow — in death, if not life — for the company.

"Michael's death is a terrible tragedy, but life must go on," AEG Live concert chief Randy Phillips wrote to a business colleague several weeks after Jackson died. "AEG will make a fortune from merch sales, ticket retention, the touring exhibition and the film/dvd."

And it did. The celebratory documentary "This Is It," which AEG co-produced, has grossed more than $260 million worldwide since the superstar died.

::

The promoters weren't the only ones trying to cash in on the legacy of this talented and tortured soul. Katherine Jackson's lawsuit asked for at least $35 million for her and $85 million for each of Jackson's three children.

The greedy wealthy family going after the greedy wealthy firm. In such a mercenary battle, it's hard to know whom to root for.

Still, I found something unseemly about the crowing by AEG lawyers in their celebratory post-verdict meeting outside the courthouse with reporters.

There was lots of talk about how Jackson "made his own choices." But that's only true if you believe addiction is a choice.

This trial was not just about who gets paid but about what people will do for money and how bankrupt that can leave them:

An aging superstar will tempt his demons and push his body past its limits. A high-flying firm will ignore the needs of a troubled man to exploit his celebrity status. A secretive family will go public with painful private drama. There are price tags on all of that.

Jackson's mother said going in that she filed the suit because she wanted to know the truth.

I watched her shuffle out of the courtroom on Wednesday, as soon as the verdict was read. Her face betrayed nothing as she walked past rows of shell-shocked Jackson fans.

"I hope she'll find peace," said Dana Brenklin, an arts activist who covered the trial for radio station KJLH. "She didn't get justice, she didn't get money. But she got some answers about what was going on at the end of her son's life."

Now that the freak show is over, maybe Katherine Jackson's family can pull together and move on.

And her son can rest in peace.

Twitter: @SandyBanksLAT

sandy.banks@latimes.com
http://www.latimes.com/local/la-me-...on-20131005,0,4681726.column?page=2&track=rss
 
Back
Top