MusicMan26
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2003
- Messages
- 298
- Points
- 18
Well, personally I never call someone "guilty" without evidence. Anyone can make an accusation. That just seems like common sense to me.
They are nothing alike if you know the facts and testimony in each case. If anyone does that only because MJ is the easy name to bring up. YAWNNNN. These people making this comparison is small number. Most people know the deal or do not care.It was all over twitter the other night. People drawing parallels between MJ and R. Kelly. Awful.
They are nothing alike if you know the facts and testimony in each case. If anyone does that only because MJ is the easy name to bring up. YAWNNNN. These people making this comparison is small number. Most people know the deal or do not care.
terrell;4236472 said:They are nothing alike if you know the facts and testimony in each case. If anyone does that only because MJ is the easy name to bring up. YAWNNNN. These people making this comparison is small number. Most people know the deal or do not care.
Well, personally I never call someone "guilty" without evidence. Anyone can make an accusation. That just seems like common sense to me.
This. They have found physical tapes. The original one that leaked 20 years ago should of been enough to convict him back then. People try to compare MJ to RKelly which is nonsense when you look at the evidense.I'd personally call a sex tape and a legal document proving he married a 15 year old as evidence..