(When I think of Destiny, I think of the London show)
Darn. I'd enter if I lived in New York.Got the email too. Entered immediately lol
It seems there may be a theatre screening in New York on Feb 1st, if this is genuine:
------
To kick off Black History Month, on February 1st, The Estate of Michael Jackson & Spike Lee present an exclusive screening of 'MICHAEL JACKSON's Journey from Motown to Off The Wall" at The BAM Rose Cinemas.
Submission Period Ends: Monday, January 25 at 11:59pm ET
https://mjotw2016.splashthat.com/
It seems there may be a theatre screening in New York on Feb 1st, if this is genuine:
------
To kick off Black History Month, on February 1st, The Estate of Michael Jackson & Spike Lee present an exclusive screening of 'MICHAEL JACKSON's Journey from Motown to Off The Wall" at The BAM Rose Cinemas.
Submission Period Ends: Monday, January 25 at 11:59pm ET
https://mjotw2016.splashthat.com/
As long as John & John are on the estate....it won't happenI hope Paul McCartney is talked to on the Thriller doc and Janet sits down for a supposed History doc.
^^Both of these reviews thought Spike did a great job in explaining the exact hows and whys and the hard work Michael put into everything he did from little boy on-they think the Kobe Bryant references are good, because it's easy to explain in sports metaphors-well, they just really like the way he did these. It sounds better and better by each review.
'Michael Jackson’s Journey From Motown To Off The Wall': Review
Dir: Spike Lee. US. 2015. 93mins
An exuberant and often thought-provoking music documentary, Michael Jackson’s Journey From Motown To Off The Wall doubles as a sort of origin story of its subject, insightfully tracking the development of Michael Jackson from his early years with the Jackson 5 all the way to the release of his first solo album, which heralded the major artist who would soon dominate the pop charts.Michael Jackson’s Journey is an especially shrewd piece of cultural analysisStandard objections apply — the film can feel like too much of a promotional device, and its structure rather predictable — but director Spike Lee (who previously made a documentary about Jackson’s 1987 album Bad) has dug deep to find talking heads who don’t just lionise the King of Pop but also put his extraordinary talent into cultural context. In the process, Lee makes history sing.
Debuting at the Sundance Film Festival, Michael Jackson’s Journey will air on Showtime in the States on February 5. (Later that month, it will be included as part of a reissue of the Off The Wall album.) Considering that Jackson was a global superstar, there should be international interest in the film, and Lee’s ability to gather a who’s-who of musical guests to speak about Jackson — including Motown founder Berry Gordy and contemporary hitmakers such as Pharrell Williams — will make the documentary attractive to music connoisseurs.
As the film opens, we see footage from an early-1980s concert in which Jackson, onstage with his brothers, objects to singing their old songs, more excited to run through his new material. That moment foreshadows the central theme of Michael Jackson’s Journey, which explores how Jackson, the youngest of The Jackson 5, slowly fought his way out of the group’s shadow to become his own performer. The documentary spans much of the ‘70s, tracing the rise of The Jackson 5, their eventual decision to leave Motown, Jackson’s solo aspirations, his appearance in the big-screen version of The Wiz and the making of 1979’s Off The Wall, which paved the way for the even more popular Thriller just a few years later.
Michael Jackson’s Journey is an especially shrewd piece of cultural analysis, transcending the conventional behind-the-scenes stories of how a particular song was made to mount a compelling argument for how Jackson both reflected and influenced his times. (That said, some of the tales about Off The Wall’s indelible tracks are excellent, particularly when we get a chance to hear the demo for the dazzling Don’t Stop ‘Til You Get Enough.) It’s easy to simplify a decade’s worth of music and current events into vapid talking points — disco, unrest in New York City, Studio 54, etc — but Lee’s guests are remarkably articulate, offering first-person perspectives that bring the ‘70s to life so that we see Jackson’s artistic blossoming through a larger societal prism.
Because of Thriller’s blockbuster status and Jackson’s subsequent superstardom — not to mention the increasingly bizarre personal behaviour that accompanied it — there might be a tendency to romanticise the younger Jackson, viewing him as an innocent, unblemished talent who would later be sullied by fame. Intriguingly, Michael Jackson’s Journey doesn’t paint him this way, instead emphasising the ambitious, driven perfectionist he always was. Even as an adorable youngster, Jackson clearly recognised that he was meant for more than The Jackson 5, and the wealth of performance footage and archival interviews at Lee’s disposal — the Jackson estate, unsurprisingly, participated in the film — astounds us all over again with his singular vocal style, otherworldly dancing and clear-eyed focus.
Trenchant observations about race find their way into Michael Jackson’s Journey effortlessly, and Lee’s speakers make important points about the tendency for black artists’ genius to be dismissed by the mainstream media as merely God-given talent, glibly overlooking the relentless work ethic exhibited by someone such as Jackson to compete with his white peers. (Of the modern artists to speak in the film, The Roots’ drummer Questlove shines brightest: his deep musical knowledge is as winning as his playful, almost nerdish enthusiasm.)
Granted, some of the film’s talking heads feel extraneous — random famous people who have some thoughts on what Jackson meant to them — and the later sections devoted entirely to Off The Wall can be a little more tedious. (And, because the film is part of an Off The Wall rerelease, it’s a resolutely rosy portrait of the singer.) But at 90 minutes, Michael Jackson’s Journey deftly sums up why the young Jackson still enthrals so many. More importantly, it backs that affection up with a strong grasp of musical and cultural history, proving illuminating as well as entertaining.
Dir: Spike Lee. US. 2015. 93mins
Sundance review: Spike Lee’s Michael Jackson documentary
A new documentary by Spike Lee looks at the least-known years of the King of Pop’s life. But it omits one crucial dimension of his star power, writes critic Owen Gleiberman.
25 January 2016
- By Owen Gleiberman
In one of the many startling clips in Michael Jackson’s Journey From Motown to Off the Wall, an exciting if conventional documentary directed by Spike Lee, we see Michael leading his brothers in a 1976 American Bandstand performance of Shake Your Body (Down to the Ground). The song, with its rolling synthesiser riffs and lyrical attack (“Let’s dance! Let’s shout!”, was the first to define the Jacksons’ new groove after leaving the Motown label. And you can feel that thrill – and see it – in the newfound freedom of Michael’s dancing. He’s wearing a baby-blue outfit with white piping that makes him look like a tall marionette, and suddenly his twirls and cocks of the hip are more than the sum of their parts. They’ve become an electrifying language. For the first time, he’s using those moves to talk to us.
Michael Jackson glimpsed his own lightning, then bottled itA little later, we hear a letter that Michael wrote while on tour with the Jacksons in 1979. He says that he plans to start calling himself “MJ” (no more “Michael”, as a way to leave behind his boyhood identity as the singer of the Jackson 5. He says that he’s going to borrow from entertainers throughout history to become a greater entertainer than any of them. If you’d read this letter back then, it would have sounded like pure arrogance, but hearing it now, we realise that part of Jackson’s genius is that he was able to envision what he would become. He glimpsed his own lightning, then bottled it.
You might think there’s very little left to discover about Michael Jackson, but the shrewd pleasure of Lee’s film is the way it locates a hidden sweet spot: the period stretching from the end of the Jackson 5’s legendary Motown era – they left the label in 1975 to join CBS – to the moment when Michael broke from his brothers to become the virtuoso architect of dancefloor bliss who made Off the Wall, his first truly great album, in 1979. During that period, the Jacksons made formidable recordings.
But even if you already know the songs, Lee fills in the transformational mystery of this lesser-seen musical-bridge era, when Michael forged his identity as an iconic pop star. He learns everything he can about the recording studio, rehearses dance moves until he can barely stand, and – in one jaw-dropping moment caught by amateur video – gets into an onstage argument with his brothers about doing the “old songs” which he has no further interest in performing. Lee interviews a vast range of musicians and producers (Pharrell Williams, Questlove, Valerie Simpson), who evoke how the sounds and moves that Michael was inventing altered the rhythm of the world.
Man in the mirror
Michael Jackson’s Journey doesn’t have a dull moment, yet when it reaches the epiphany of Off the Wall, the game-changer that paved the way for Thriller, the film begins to lose its sense of discovery. Lee works through the album track by track, with testimonials to what makes each song great, but we hardly need a Spike Lee documentary to do that. It’s the stuff of a VH1 Behind the Music special.
In his late teens he fought alienation and acne and despairThe underlying flaw, however, is that Lee has chosen to omit a major dimension of Jackson’s transition from Motown to Off the Wall. In his late teens, touring and recording with the Jacksons, he fought alienation and acne and despair, and he was aghast that people no longer saw him as “little Michael”, the pint-size whirligig who led the Jackson 5. Back then, he’d been the sublime cherub of soul. But as an adolescent, he wore his conflicts on his face.
The transcendence of that despair was a crucial element in the joy of Off the Wall. I wish that Lee had dealt with the early days of Jackson’s plastic surgery, which began, tellingly, as he was making that album. We see the technologically primitive yet blissed-out video for Rock with You, and part of its ebullience is that you can just about see Michael’s happiness shining through his face – because to a degree, it’s about that face. His remoulded features made him feel reborn. Lee’s film takes a deep dive into the music, and it succeeds in making that aural nostalgia exhilarating. But a movie called Michael Jackson’s Journey that leaves out the personal dimension of that transformation is missing a key part of the story.
★★★☆☆
If you would like to comment on this story or anything else you have seen on BBC Culture, head over to our Facebook page or message us on Twitter.
Thanks for all the tweets and reviews. Am I right in saying Bad 25 didnt get a release like this?
This looks very positive.
The criticism, if there is any, seems to be centered around Spike Lee leaving out the controversy: allegations (not in this article, but I have seen that in one Guardian review - what would that have to do with OTW era?) plastic surgery, Joe's abuse - but I am glad it did. The media talked about nothing but the controversy for the last 20-25 years of MJ's life, is that not enough for them? There are full (typically horrible) documentaries dedicated to analyzing his face. How many more years they want to spend with discussing MJ's plastic surgery? Boring. Let the music speak for itself!
Bubs;4130613 said:From that BBC review:
But even if you already know the songs, Lee fills in the transformational mystery of this lesser-seen musical-bridge era, when Michael forged his identity as an iconic pop star. He learns everything he can about the recording studio, rehearses dance moves until he can barely stand, and – in one jaw-dropping moment caught by amateur video – gets into an onstage argument with his brothers about doing the “old songs” which he has no further interest in performing.
"The clothes are old... The choreographys is old...
JACKIE IS OLD!"
I am 99.9% sure that the reviewer (hopefully not Spike Lee) actually bought into the shtick they did every single night on where MJ supposedly didn't want to do the old stuff, before launching into the J5 Medley.Bubs;4130613 said:From that BBC review:
But even if you already know the songs, Lee fills in the transformational mystery of this lesser-seen musical-bridge era, when Michael forged his identity as an iconic pop star. He learns everything he can about the recording studio, rehearses dance moves until he can barely stand, and – in one jaw-dropping moment caught by amateur video – gets into an onstage argument with his brothers about doing the “old songs” which he has no further interest in performing.
I so want to see that
Is that from that amateur video and thats what Michael says in it?