Michael Jackson’s Daughter Paris Uncovers ‘Irregular Payments’ Made by Dad’s Estate, Raising Questions

CherubimII

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
6,927
Points
113

Michael Jackson’s Daughter Paris Uncovers ‘Irregular Payments’ Made by Dad’s Estate, Raising Questions​

By Ryan Naumann
July 10, 2025

https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrit...serious-questions-about-michaels-estate-excl/

Michael Jackson’s daughter, Paris Jackson, discovered “irregular payments” being made by her late father’s estate that raised “serious” questions for her, Us Weekly can exclusively report.

According to court documents obtained by Us, Paris, 27, has objected to a request by the executors of her father’s estate, John Branca and John McClain, for legal fees.

Michael died on June 25, 2009. The beneficiaries of his estate are Paris and his sons, Prince and Bigi Jackson. Michael’s mother, Katherine Jackson, was also taken care of in the will.

The fees relate to work done for the estate between July 2018 and December 2018. The legal fees take a long time to be approved by the court due to Michael’s estate being quite complex.

In her motion, Paris called out the executors for not providing “adequate responses to the court’s inquiries or [making] a clear, enforceable commitment to bring these long-delayed fee petitions current.”
Paris said she is “concerned” with the executor’s practice of granting “so-called ‘premium payments’ for unrecorded attorney time.” Her lawyer explained, “During this one six-month period alone in 2018, Executors request that the Court approve $625,000 in payments to three law firms for what they say is uncaptured time, without explanation as to why counsel was incapable of recording unbilled time, or why such a failure should not preclude payment.”

Her attorney added, “Even worse, these payments appear, at least in part, to consist of lavish gratuities bestowed upon already well-compensated counsel.”

In addition, Paris said it appears two of the law firms were already paid by the executors “in full, in violation of the court’s order allowing only partial payments of attorney fees until court approval is obtained.”

Paris’ lawyer argued, “These irregular payments raise serious and substantial questions about Executors’ ability to effectively supervise counsel by, at minimum … and refraining from wasteful, six-figure gift-giving to themselves and their colleagues.”

Michael’s daughter pointed out that the executors are asking for fees from five years ago to be approved. “Such a delay makes meaningful review of any underlying legal, much less real-time monitoring, of substantial legal work all but impossible,” Paris’ motion pointed out.

The filing added, “Despite repeated inquiries from the Court, Executors are unable to provide even remotely satisfactory explanation for their delay, nor have they provided the beneficiaries any sort of plan to fix this ongoing and worsening issue.”

In addition, Paris said she found “several inconsistencies that demand close scrutiny of all fees and costs sought in the petition.”

She pointed out that the fee requests for each firm changed as the petition was modified by the executors. Paris wondered why one firm was initially owed $194,000, but then the amount grew to $211,000.

He had questions about another firm requesting $789,000 initially, but then reducing the bill to $258,000. “Why was the original amount so grossly overstated?” her lawyer asked.

Another firm’s bill went from $838,000 to $427,000 to $675,000. “Why are the fees repeatedly misstated in such large amounts?” her lawyer wrote.

Paris demanded that the entire request for $625,000 in legal fees be denied until the attorney’s invoices can be gone over in court. She also asked that they submit a plan to figure out how to handle the fees being approved faster.

In court documents, the executors argue that they had an agreement with Michael’s children to present petitions for legal fees in six-month increments.

Last year, Katherine, 95, and the executors were going back and forth over the sale of a portion of Michael’s music rights to Sony for an estimated $600 million. Katherine objected to the sale. https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrit...she-and-riley-keough-were-never-on-bad-terms/
 
Apologies if this has already been posted. I don't recall seeing a response from MJE :unsure:

"How is Michael Jackson’s estate responding to Paris’ accusations?


"Michael Jackson’s estate has released a statement to deny the accusations brought forth by Paris.

“The Executors’ approval of payments to attorneys have been made with the same business judgment that has earned this Estate over $3 billion,” the estate said in the statement, per People. “We are confident that the objected-to payments are appropriate as, indeed, they are fully consistent with payments made in the decade prior, all of which have been approved by the Probate Court.”



 
Does anyone know if and when MJs kids will be able to have hands on involvement with their father's estate?
 
Given all the misconduct the estate has committed over the years, from releasing fake songs to paying hush money to fraudsters, a normal employee would have been fired countless times.
 
On November 10, Judge Mitchell L. Beckloff granted the Estate’s special motion to strike most of Paris’s petition, ruling that many of her challenges were based on filings protected under the First Amendment and California’s anti-SLAPP laws. The judge also ordered Paris to cover the Estate’s legal fees, a clear procedural win for Branca and McClain.

But Paris is far from conceding.
A spokesperson told that the ruling “is limited to minor procedural issues and does not change the facts,” adding that she will be submitting an updated filing soon. “The pattern of behavior displayed by the executors and their attorneys raises significant red flags, and Paris will continue working to ensure her family is treated fairly.”
 
The lawyers of Paris have a good source of income in Paris
 

Paris Jackson Strikes Back: New Filing Accuses Estate of Mismanaging $464 Million​

Just one week after the developments covered in our previous report, Paris Jackson has returned to court with a new round of allegations against the executors of the Michael Jackson Estate, this time focusing on delayed accounting, unproductive investments, and what she calls “enormous” personal gains for the men overseeing her father’s legacy.
Filed in Los Angeles on November 18, Paris Jackson’s latest objection challenges the Estate’s long-overdue accounting for the 2021 calendar year, which she and her brothers Prince and Bigi did not receive until September, nearly four years late. In the filing, Paris alleges that co-executors John Branca and John McClain have allowed more than $464 million to sit improperly invested, earning returns of less than 0.1%, a move she says has cost the Estate tens of millions.
Her objection goes further, accusing the executors of steering the Estate toward “risky entertainment ventures” without the necessary industry experience. Among these concerns is the upcoming biopic Michael, for which Branca serves as an executive producer and even cast actor Miles Teller to portray him. Paris argues that such moves suggest the Estate has “morphed into a private entertainment investment fund” operated for the executors’ benefit rather than to preserve Michael Jackson’s legacy.
 

Paris Jackson Strikes Back: New Filing Accuses Estate of Mismanaging $464 Million​

Her objection goes further, accusing the executors of steering the Estate toward “risky entertainment ventures” without the necessary industry experience. Among these concerns is the upcoming biopic Michael, for which Branca serves as an executive producer and even cast actor Miles Teller to portray him. Paris argues that such moves suggest the Estate has “morphed into a private entertainment investment fund” operated for the executors’ benefit rather than to preserve Michael Jackson’s legacy.
 
And you don't have a problem with the executors possibly funnelling millions of dollars from the accounts?
Not really lawyers make millions of dollars. It's fairly normal for the line of work.

These are the people who are defending Michael against the false accusations. Hell Yeah I want them happy and well compensated.
 
Not really lawyers make millions of dollars. It's fairly normal for the line of work.

These are the people who are defending Michael against the false accusations. Hell Yeah I want them happy and well compensated.
does it really matter that they defend Michael in court when they steal from him as well? With the billions they have generated they never cared to properly rerelease albums, upscale music videos and tour concerts, release documentaries in favor of his innocence and so much stuff. Sure, they are giving us the biopic that we have waited for so long and the MJ musical is a big success but this isn't enough. John Branca sits on his cash cow (MJ) when the cow never appointed him in office to start with and since we don't know a lot of stuff, it might be that he had a helping hand in MJ's ultimate demise. I don't necessarily like Paris but let's call a spade a spade
 
Paris mistake has been antagonizing the fandom because they would have been the firsts rallying with her against Branca if she played the cards right.
 
lastly, if Michael wasn't "cancelled" post LN wasn't surely thanks to the estate. but thanks to fans endless work to change the narrative. fans do the work of preserving his work and his innocence far better than his estate does. and while his family does also nothing, that's still their money that Branca and McClain are stealing. seems that Paris isn't objecting to them having lawyer representation anyways, but to them doing it unlawfully and without keeping her and her brothers updated
 
I would find it hard to sympathise with any Nepo baby who is upset over their legal fees while receiving millions. That is how all this got started, sadly it had nothing to do with protecting MJs legacy. It all reeks of rich peoples problems. Also, not a good look that her brothers are not supporting her in this. Speaks volumes.
 
I would find it hard to sympathise with any Nepo baby who is upset over their legal fees while receiving millions. That is how all this got started, sadly it had nothing to do with protecting MJs legacy. It all reeks of rich peoples problems. Also, not a good look that her brothers are not supporting her in this. Speaks volumes.
did you read the article? from 2021 they mismanaged millions of estate funds in ventures that didn't have a proper return of investment. as beneficiary of the estate, she's right demanding trasparency on where the money goes.
 
did you read the article? from 2021 they mismanaged millions of estate funds in ventures that didn't have a proper return of investment. as beneficiary of the estate, she's right demanding trasparency on where the money goes.
you keep her claims/ her lawayers as fact? I am sure it will go to nothing and she has to pay all involving lawyers.
Can we got now back to topic.
 
I didn't post that article on this thread so I'm merely replying to it. anyways, back on topic
 
did you read the article? from 2021 they mismanaged millions of estate funds in ventures that didn't have a proper return of investment. as beneficiary of the estate, she's right demanding trasparency on where the money goes.
That's what her lawyers claim. Just because they said it doesn't make it true. They are ALLEGATIONS, not facts. And the estate has denied them.

Prince and BIgi have lawyers too you know. Funny theirs haven't found any evidence of this alleged stealing.

Some fans act like Paris is Michael's only child and blindly follow whatever she says.

Until the other 2 children are saying the same thing, I will choose to believe this is nothing more than a stunt on Paris end. She should seek therapy instead of lashing out at the estate. She's been acting crazy ever since she broke up with that guy.
 
did you read the article? from 2021 they mismanaged millions of estate funds in ventures that didn't have a proper return of investment. as beneficiary of the estate, she's right demanding trasparency on where the money goes.
I think it's important to distinguish that these are her claims. As far as I know PJ has never worked for the Estate, I guess I seriously doubt that PJ has the necessary financial expertise/experience to understand/challenge such business dealings. Also, it's a business, businesses do operate on a losses/gains system. The Estate works to protect the Estate (not the beneficiaries), and there are laws specific to estates, they may not be required to provide the information she is requesting, she did lose her last case regarding her claim of the lack of transparency over unreasonable legal fees.

Additionally, for her to criticise the biopic as part of her new claim, when the other two shows have been a success, seems foolishly premature when there is a good chance the biopic will be a commercial success, and she will personally financially benefit from its success.

And yes, while the Estate get their hands dirty to protect MJ in court, and fans get their hands dirty to protect MJ out of court, it's strikingly noticeable that Paris shows little support for MJ. But most striking is how the other beneficiaries show no support for either of her cases, untill they do, her new claims risk looking like poor revenge for the recent claim that she lost.

PJ potentially would have garnered enough fan support to dethrone JB if she actually shared fan concerns regarding the Estate. But sharing fan concerns has never been an area of strength for her.
 
Last edited:
I think it's important to distinguish that these are her claims. As far as I know PJ has never worked for the Estate, I guess I seriously doubt that PJ has the necessary financial expertise/experience to understand/challenge such business dealings. Also, it's a business, businesses do operate on a losses/gains system. The Estate works to protect the Estate (not the beneficiaries), and there are laws specific to estates, they may not be required to provide the information she is requesting, she did lose her last case regarding her claim of the lack of transparency over unreasonable legal fees.

Additionally, for her to criticise the biopic as part of her new claim, when the other two shows have been a success, seems foolishly premature when there is a good chance the biopic will be a commercial success, and she will personally financially benefit from its success.

And yes, while the Estate get their hands dirty to protect MJ in court, and fans get their hands dirty to protect MJ out of court, it's strikingly noticeable that Paris shows little support for MJ. But most striking is how the other beneficiaries do not share her concerns for either of her cases, untill they do, her new claims risk looking like poor revenge for the recent claim that she lost.

PJ potentially would have garnered enough fan support to dethrone JB if she actually shared fan concerns regarding the Estate. But sharing fan concerns has never been an area of strength for her.
I can go behind with most of what you have said here but not that the estate gets "their hands dirty" to defend MJ. be critical of Paris Jackson all you want but let's not fall into the trap of glorifying John Branca & co when still a lot of questions exist about how he ended up in charge after Michael's death.

I think that what's happening here is that a heir and the main executor are playing power games with each other and trying to remind the other party to whom this money actually belongs to. I don't think that any of the parties involved here (whether it's miss Jackson or John Branca) do it on behalf of Michael or because they care about his legacy. it's all a power game.
 
I can go behind with most of what you have said here but not that the estate gets "their hands dirty" to defend MJ. be critical of Paris Jackson all you want but let's not fall into the trap of glorifying John Branca & co when still a lot of questions exist about how he ended up in charge after Michael's death.

I think that what's happening here is that a heir and the main executor are playing power games with each other and trying to remind the other party to whom this money actually belongs to. I don't think that any of the parties involved here (whether it's miss Jackson or John Branca) do it on behalf of Michael or because they care about his legacy. it's all a power game.
The issue of her claims and whether JB should be in charge are separate and should not be conflated with PJs case, this isn't part of her claim. The Estate are involved with ongoing litigation regarding abuse claims, so they are legally defending MJ in court, as they should.

I highly doubt there's any danger of anyone falling into the trap of glorifying JB&co on here. PJ chose to be a public figure, she is not exempt from public criticism just as other public figures aren't.

I do agree that neither are particularly concerned about honouring MJs legacy with the respect it deserves. But if the biopic is a success, it will be a huge win for the Estate and MJs legacy, (and that in no way absolves the Estate from their previous blunders), and PJ fighting against this in her claim isn't a good look for her, especially as there is at least one beneficiary in full support of the biopic while none of the beneficiaries support her claims.
 
The issue of her claims and whether JB should be in charge are separate and should not be conflated with PJs case, this isn't part of her claim. The Estate are involved with ongoing litigation regarding abuse claims, so they are legally defending MJ in court, as they should.

I highly doubt there's any danger of anyone falling into the trap of glorifying JB&co on here. PJ chose to be a public figure, she is not exempt from public criticism just as other public figures aren't.

I do agree that neither are particularly concerned about honouring MJs legacy with the respect it deserves. But if the biopic is a success, it will be a huge win for the Estate and MJs legacy, (and that in no way absolves the Estate from their previous blunders), and PJ fighting against this in her claim isn't a good look for her, especially as there is at least one beneficiary in full support of the biopic while none of the beneficiaries support her claims.
I do feel that whenever something positive happens she pops up,I wish she would be more supportive maybe someone is whispering in her ear a certain family member(s) I have my own thoughts on that one
 
Back
Top