windy09
Proud Member
Dear MJJC Family,
We have been notified on two different stories that need to be addressed effectively. Remember, our massive participation in rebutting uninformed articles and malicious comments makes all the difference. Our voice can be heard.
Story I
The article here discussing a possible biopic of MJ's life is tolerable; however, the comments are offensive. Please go in and write educational comments that put this artist in perspective. Keep them concise and respectful so they are more likely to be read in completion. It’s important that we keep the comments factual while rebutting the viciousness. Please see link below:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/nov/16/hollywood-eyes-michael-jackson-biopic
You can also go in and flag these comments as abusive. Select the option “hate speech” or “offensive language.” Using the term ***** is racist. Name calling is offensive, etc.... Some comments have already been deleted. The more we flag these comments, the better the chance to have them removed.
Please go here to comment and flag comments: http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/nov/16/hollywood-eyes-michael-jackson-biopic
It helps if you write a short and to the point comment to the moderators when you select the report button on abusive comments.
Story II
The inevitable (because our media is irresponsible and foments half-truths and controversy) comparisons are being made between the scandal at Penn State and the allegations of which Michael was acquitted.
Remember, Michael Jackson was a victim of extortion--and Sandusky is not. There was money to be made in accusing Michael Jackson--not Sandusky. The prosecution never succeeded in producing legions of accusers against Michael despite all their efforts--not so with Sandusky. No one credible ever witnessed Michael m*** children, but it appears Sandusky was seen raping a child and it was reported.
The two cases are entirely different and it is complete travesty to drag Michael's good name back through the mud. He was acquitted on all counts in a conservative county. Does the judicial process count for anything in restoring the presumption of innocence? There is something gravely wrong here.
Please leave your comments at:
http://thyblackman.com/2011/11/16/j...heir-evil-deeds/comment-page-1/#comment-13861
Once again, we thank you for your contribution to defending, protecting, preserving and honoring Michael’s legacy.
Our best,
MJJC Legacy Project Media Advocacy Team
Maria (Maria MJ)
Kim (windy09)
Deborah (DeborahfFrench)
We have been notified on two different stories that need to be addressed effectively. Remember, our massive participation in rebutting uninformed articles and malicious comments makes all the difference. Our voice can be heard.
Story I
The article here discussing a possible biopic of MJ's life is tolerable; however, the comments are offensive. Please go in and write educational comments that put this artist in perspective. Keep them concise and respectful so they are more likely to be read in completion. It’s important that we keep the comments factual while rebutting the viciousness. Please see link below:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/nov/16/hollywood-eyes-michael-jackson-biopic
You can also go in and flag these comments as abusive. Select the option “hate speech” or “offensive language.” Using the term ***** is racist. Name calling is offensive, etc.... Some comments have already been deleted. The more we flag these comments, the better the chance to have them removed.
Please go here to comment and flag comments: http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/nov/16/hollywood-eyes-michael-jackson-biopic
It helps if you write a short and to the point comment to the moderators when you select the report button on abusive comments.
Story II
The inevitable (because our media is irresponsible and foments half-truths and controversy) comparisons are being made between the scandal at Penn State and the allegations of which Michael was acquitted.
Remember, Michael Jackson was a victim of extortion--and Sandusky is not. There was money to be made in accusing Michael Jackson--not Sandusky. The prosecution never succeeded in producing legions of accusers against Michael despite all their efforts--not so with Sandusky. No one credible ever witnessed Michael m*** children, but it appears Sandusky was seen raping a child and it was reported.
The two cases are entirely different and it is complete travesty to drag Michael's good name back through the mud. He was acquitted on all counts in a conservative county. Does the judicial process count for anything in restoring the presumption of innocence? There is something gravely wrong here.
Please leave your comments at:
http://thyblackman.com/2011/11/16/j...heir-evil-deeds/comment-page-1/#comment-13861
Once again, we thank you for your contribution to defending, protecting, preserving and honoring Michael’s legacy.
Our best,
MJJC Legacy Project Media Advocacy Team
Maria (Maria MJ)
Kim (windy09)
Deborah (DeborahfFrench)
Last edited:
