Latest on MJJC

I need something clarified on Carl Douglas and more

Staffordshire Bullterrier

Proud Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2004
Messages
5,603
Points
113
Hi all,

Ever since 2019 it's been a daily thing for me to visit Twitter and try to school detractors on the facts. Especially since the announcement of the biopic but also this "documentary" on Pellicano it's been full of haters and detractors a like. One clown is now claiming that MJ's 1993 defense attorney Carl Douglas has apparently said that the description by Jordan did match, we all know this is utter nonsense for many reasons but my question is....did Carl indeed say this? It would show he's just one of the many people not to be trusted. It's also the first time I hear this.

Secondly...

This tweet, truly where do these people get this from?

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635594308048027650
 
Staffordshire Bullterrier said:
Hi all,

Ever since 2019 it's been a daily thing for me to visit Twitter and try to school detractors on the facts. Especially since the announcement of the biopic but also this "documentary" on Pellicano it's been full of haters and detractors a like. One clown is now claiming that MJ's 1993 defense attorney Carl Douglas has apparently said that the description by Jordan did match, we all know this is utter nonsense for many reasons but my question is....did Carl indeed say this? It would show he's just one of the many people not to be trusted. It's also the first time I hear this.

Secondly...

This tweet, truly where do these people get this from?

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635594308048027650
Click to expand...
That tweet is probably based on that stupid Radar Online article, which was full of lies and based on biased, non-factual statements made by the persecution during the trial. The only pornography that was found in Michael's bedroom featured adult women. He did have some rare books in his personal library, including nudist mags and artsy photo books, but nothing illegal let alone considered "child abuse images". I've seen some of those supposedly "scandalous" photos and there's nothing shocking about them at all. Some of these books are even in the Library of Congress.

I know nothing about Carl Douglas, so I can't say anything about that unfortunately.
 
DangerousGal91 said:
That tweet is probably based on that stupid Radar Online article, which was full of lies and based on biased, non-factual statements made by the persecution during the trial. The only pornography that was found in Michael's bedroom featured adult women. He did have some rare books in his personal library, including nudist mags and artsy photo books, but nothing illegal let alone considered "child abuse images". I've seen some of those supposedly "scandalous" photos and there's nothing shocking about them at all. Some of these books are even in the Library of Congress.

I know nothing about Carl Douglas, so I can't say anything about that unfortunately.
Click to expand...

Yeah, you're right. It has to be Radar Online and this was disgusting a few years ago, because I remember how they had actually doctored several photos to imply seriously sinister intent. Nothing goes too far for these tabloids, unbelievable that they aren't banned to be honest.

I probably should not bother with some of these detractors because I can see how they ignore all the facts they are given by many fans on Twitter, yet speak about June Chandler as if she's a great source. At some point I just gotta give up I guess.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top