Latest on MJJC

Michael Jackson’s Daughter Paris Uncovers ‘Irregular Payments’ Made by Dad’s Estate, Raising Questions

CherubimII

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
6,922
Points
113

Michael Jackson’s Daughter Paris Uncovers ‘Irregular Payments’ Made by Dad’s Estate, Raising Questions​

By Ryan Naumann
July 10, 2025

https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrit...serious-questions-about-michaels-estate-excl/

Michael Jackson’s daughter, Paris Jackson, discovered “irregular payments” being made by her late father’s estate that raised “serious” questions for her, Us Weekly can exclusively report.

According to court documents obtained by Us, Paris, 27, has objected to a request by the executors of her father’s estate, John Branca and John McClain, for legal fees.

Michael died on June 25, 2009. The beneficiaries of his estate are Paris and his sons, Prince and Bigi Jackson. Michael’s mother, Katherine Jackson, was also taken care of in the will.

The fees relate to work done for the estate between July 2018 and December 2018. The legal fees take a long time to be approved by the court due to Michael’s estate being quite complex.

In her motion, Paris called out the executors for not providing “adequate responses to the court’s inquiries or [making] a clear, enforceable commitment to bring these long-delayed fee petitions current.”
Paris said she is “concerned” with the executor’s practice of granting “so-called ‘premium payments’ for unrecorded attorney time.” Her lawyer explained, “During this one six-month period alone in 2018, Executors request that the Court approve $625,000 in payments to three law firms for what they say is uncaptured time, without explanation as to why counsel was incapable of recording unbilled time, or why such a failure should not preclude payment.”

Her attorney added, “Even worse, these payments appear, at least in part, to consist of lavish gratuities bestowed upon already well-compensated counsel.”

In addition, Paris said it appears two of the law firms were already paid by the executors “in full, in violation of the court’s order allowing only partial payments of attorney fees until court approval is obtained.”

Paris’ lawyer argued, “These irregular payments raise serious and substantial questions about Executors’ ability to effectively supervise counsel by, at minimum … and refraining from wasteful, six-figure gift-giving to themselves and their colleagues.”

Michael’s daughter pointed out that the executors are asking for fees from five years ago to be approved. “Such a delay makes meaningful review of any underlying legal, much less real-time monitoring, of substantial legal work all but impossible,” Paris’ motion pointed out.

The filing added, “Despite repeated inquiries from the Court, Executors are unable to provide even remotely satisfactory explanation for their delay, nor have they provided the beneficiaries any sort of plan to fix this ongoing and worsening issue.”

In addition, Paris said she found “several inconsistencies that demand close scrutiny of all fees and costs sought in the petition.”

She pointed out that the fee requests for each firm changed as the petition was modified by the executors. Paris wondered why one firm was initially owed $194,000, but then the amount grew to $211,000.

He had questions about another firm requesting $789,000 initially, but then reducing the bill to $258,000. “Why was the original amount so grossly overstated?” her lawyer asked.

Another firm’s bill went from $838,000 to $427,000 to $675,000. “Why are the fees repeatedly misstated in such large amounts?” her lawyer wrote.

Paris demanded that the entire request for $625,000 in legal fees be denied until the attorney’s invoices can be gone over in court. She also asked that they submit a plan to figure out how to handle the fees being approved faster.

In court documents, the executors argue that they had an agreement with Michael’s children to present petitions for legal fees in six-month increments.

Last year, Katherine, 95, and the executors were going back and forth over the sale of a portion of Michael’s music rights to Sony for an estimated $600 million. Katherine objected to the sale. https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrit...she-and-riley-keough-were-never-on-bad-terms/
 
Apologies if this has already been posted. I don't recall seeing a response from MJE :unsure:

"How is Michael Jackson’s estate responding to Paris’ accusations?​


"Michael Jackson’s estate has released a statement to deny the accusations brought forth by Paris.

“The Executors’ approval of payments to attorneys have been made with the same business judgment that has earned this Estate over $3 billion,” the estate said in the statement, per People. “We are confident that the objected-to payments are appropriate as, indeed, they are fully consistent with payments made in the decade prior, all of which have been approved by the Probate Court.”


 
Does anyone know if and when MJs kids will be able to have hands on involvement with their father's estate?
 
Given all the misconduct the estate has committed over the years, from releasing fake songs to paying hush money to fraudsters, a normal employee would have been fired countless times.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top