Interesting start for introduction,
"Request in this petition are made as long as it does not violate the terms of the no-contest clause affecting the Decedent's 2002 will in probate"
:scratch:
"I request the authentication of the 2002 will in probate. Due to my personal experience in regard to the Decedent signing a will in 2002 in my presence, I question if this will is authentic, especially since the Decedent MJ told me and my mother in 2003, the will he was forced to sign in 2002, in my presence, no longer existed"
2 x :scratch:
So he says in 2002 MJ was forced to sign 2002 will and he was there when it was signed.
So he is unhappy that the will MJ was forced to sign doesn't exist, and believe 2002 forced will is the correct one, but not the one in probate now?
My head is
Later he writes:
"I was present when MJ was forced to sign the will or his record label would not help him to promote his new album"
I don't know how record labels work, but really? Do they have an interest as whether their artist have will or not?
"I have asked the court in my filing on May 26, 2016 to have the 2002 will authenticated, as long as it will not jeopardise my standing as beneficiary"
Which way this should bee looked at? If court finds 2002 forgery or fake, then PPB are only beneficiaries and he is out altogether. If that is the case, court should accept fake will because Anthony doesn't want to jeopardise his position as beneficiary:smilerolleyes:
"I also believe the Executors have favoured some of the MJ family members who are not named in 2002 will in probate as beneficiaries"
Not only he complains about T3 members, but Jackie gets his share too
"I believe the Decedent MJ's intentions for my well being and support further validates my standing and rights as beneficiary with standing to question any and all Estate activity..."
There is no proof MJ's intentions for his well being or support other than he says MJ told him, his mother and KJ.
The estate should give him money to buy a house, pay his studies, car, money for his business and unlimited use of Sony/ATV based on above and the hat MJ signed.
"Since I believe three other contingent reminder beneficiaries from 2002 will in probate have been receiving help, employment and/or compensation, etc from the executors and the estate and/or their parter and/or affiliates, I believe I should have been receiving the decendants MJ intended inheritance for me.
and
"I request that I immediately receive the descendant MJ's intended bequests for me and for them to be retroactive from June 25, 2009."
He is very confusing with his claims. First he claim the will is fake and demands it to be authenticated (as long as it doesn't change his position as beneficiary), then he demands his share based on because others have gotten some money of the estate.
Over all, I lost count how many times he mentions "as long as it doesn't affect my full beneficiary rights and standing as a beneficiary"
I'm starting to be worried the future and health/safety of PPB, as them out of the way is the only way Anthony can benefit of this will:bogeyed
"I belive I could have done a much better job managing the estate with my skills and advisors..."
I believe it would be in the best interest of the estate to appoint me as temporary trustee or co-trustee to take possession of trust property and administer the trust."
:big_boss:
If I understood correctly from the attached hearing transcript, KJ is not objecting the sale of catalogue, and seemingly Paris and Prince have not objected the sale either as their own legal representation was in that hearing. I'm glad to see that PPB have their own rep in legal proceeding and I assume the sale terms and anything going on was explained to them.
Another interesting tidbit was that appearantly sony wasn't going to renew the loan.
Overall, I found transcript from the July hearing really interesting and enlightening in terms what was going on with catalogue sale and how well PPB are informed regarding the estate issues.
