elusive moonwalker
Guests
Rogers always been nothing but a jealous bi*** when it comes to mj.
barbee0715;4097832 said:The fact that the execs make so much money was odd since he's "supposedly" their mouthpiece.
Ivy, have you had or will you have any contact with Friedman to express your feelings on him sourcing your blog heavily for his own negative purposes?
The Estate accounting is only news for online MJ fans
The act of sourcing an MJ dedicated blog for his article is troublesome and extremely desperate.
I hope Ivy hasn't received the usual aggressive ish as a result of this.
I have never heard the expression 'grunt work' - doesn't sound very lady like.
I'm told Estate accounting made yahoo news front page.
A court document is a court document and it was publicly posted. I don't see why he or anyone would need to get a copy of their own. He could have written an article based on the document without even mentioning how/where he saw the document. Honestly I'm surprised that he mentioned the blog as source.
I didn't ask to be sourced, I had no idea any media would see and write an article about it, I didn't tweet the article or didn't celebrate or didn't boast about being cited/mentioned but of course I received the usual aggressive ish because of this. Doesn't make much sense when I had no influence and/or control over what RF does or doesn't do.But then again anger / jealousy/ hatred or whatever you call it doesn't make much sense either.
It means menial and thankless job. something boring and repetitive. I'm very sure that he is referring to looking over the 50+ pages of numbers and writing the one sentence summaries and how easily he (mostly used) that already written numbers/summaries. It gets boring, he is right about that.
^^found this article odd since it's supposedly positive but he sneaks in a lot of sarcastic digs to a lot of different people here.
The fact that the execs make so much money was odd since he's "supposedly" their mouthpiece.
And once again the implication that Michael was an out of control spendthrift. Makes me so angry. Of course he needed money when being charged criminal interest rates on loans, battling thousands of frivolous law suits And taking care of mom, dad, kids and who knows how many other family members. I feel it's a lot. I also think he was a proud, responsible man who wanted to take care of them. That's just what you do.
And listened to his advisers? He had terrible advisers who only wanted his money the last 15 yrs.
Let the delusion flow... And who instated those advisors? Who authorised and signed the cheques for his relatively lavish spending.
Michael wasn't some baby. He was responsible for all his financial woes as you or me are for his or her own. Newsflash everybody - Michael's debts are only being paid off now in large part by the Cirque deal; not some master financial plan Michael had in the works!
Michael being a good dad, being a good person; and Michael being irresponsible financially do not have to be mutually exclusive values. He held both.
Let the delusion flow... And who instated those advisors? Who authorised and signed the cheques for his relatively lavish spending.
Michael wasn't some baby. He was responsible for all his financial woes as you or me are for his or her own. Newsflash everybody - Michael's debts are only being paid off now in large part by the Cirque deal; not some master financial plan Michael had in the works!
Michael being a good dad, being a good person; and Michael being irresponsible financially do not have to be mutually exclusive values. He held both.
who was the person that gave said people P.O.A ??
And saying spending after his death is on par with spending when he was alive is delusional