MJ Estate Sues Howard Mann and business partner Henry Vaccaro - Settlement reached

Re: MJ Estate Sues Katherine Jackson's Business Partner Howard Mann

Howard Mann responds

Mama Jackson's Partner: MJ Estate is a Dictatorship!

Katherine Jackson's business partner who is being sued by the Michael Jackson Estate tells TMZ the Estate is a "fraudulently obtained dictatorship," guarding "a collusive and corrupt status quo."

Howard Mann -- whom the Estate claims in a new lawsuit is violating copyright and trademark laws by cashing in on all things Jackson -- calls the lawsuit "malicious and unfounded."

Mann says, "These lawyers have absolutely NO interest in the preservation of Michael Jackson's legacy and less interest in generating revenues for his beneficiaries."

Mann goes on: "...the Estate will fall as a result of these draconian tactics and it is my hope that Miss Jackson regains control of that which was stolen from her."

One more thing I noticed while reading Mann's response.

He spends ALL of his response on bad-mouthing the Estate of Michael Jackson, but he never says anything about the RIGHTS he is supposed to have in order to exploit all things Michael Jackson related.

I find it odd that he never says: I have the LEGAL right to do what I'm doing.

I mean, BEFORE trying to dog the estate, saying that he is operating legally should have been the first thing out of this mouth, in my opinion.
 
Re: MJ Estate Sues Katherine Jackson's Business Partner Howard Mann

LOL! Joe Jackson would spend a BUNDLE trying to create a record label and Katherine would spend ANOTHER bundle buying multi-million dollars homes and setting up trust funds for all of her children and grandchildren. If the family were in charge, there would be no money left for MJ3, in my opinion.

Michael certainly knew what he was doing when he set up his Last Will and Testament. Some folks are just not good with money and the Jackson's have proved that on more then one occassion.
You speak the truth. Thank you. :agree:
 
Re: MJ Estate Sues Katherine Jackson's Business Partner Howard Mann

Michael knew what he was doing with his will and the family need to accept it.
 
Re: MJ Estate Sues Katherine Jackson's Business Partner Howard Mann

I too am asking the question he may win his judgment but dose that give him the right to reproduce and sell MJ copyright while it was copyright already?
He may can put them on a action bock but how dose it give him right to sell a song that is copyright to Sony already?
Help great mind
 
Re: MJ Estate Sues Katherine Jackson's Business Partner Howard Mann

One more thing I noticed while reading Mann's response.

He spends ALL of his response on bad-mouthing the Estate of Michael Jackson, but he never says anything about the RIGHTS he is supposed to have in order to exploit all things Michael Jackson related.

I find it odd that he never says: I have the LEGAL right to do what I'm doing.

I mean, BEFORE trying to dog the estate, saying that he is operating legally should have been the first thing out of this mouth, in my opinion.

:agree:
 
Re: MJ Estate Sues Katherine Jackson's Business Partner Howard Mann

Someone posted this comment at Leslie's blog. I don't really understand what this law proffesor is talking about.

One interesting article that arose last month is an LA Times story that talks about Howard Mann's claims. A Loyola Law School professor, Georgene Vairo, said

"...from a civil procedure standpoint, Mann appears to be on solid legal ground.

"It's kind of like the civil equivalent of double jeopardy. You get one bite at the apple and that is it," said Vairo, a civil procedure expert. She said that by abandoning the case, Jackson "essentially forfeited his intellectual property."

"The law is rather unforgiving. [Estate lawyers] can argue that there is some reason why there should be a departure from the normal rule we'd apply, but they are going to have a tough row to hoe," she said.

http://articles.latimes.com/2010/dec/12/entertainment/la-ca-michael-jackson-20101212/4

One other point: The "Estate" of Michael Jackson is essentially Katherine Jackson and Michael's children. And Mann has partnered with Katherine. The estate executors manage the estate to help its beneficiaries, but they themselves are NOT the estate.

Attacking a partner of Katherine Jackson's and reducing the financial benefit (remember: Michael named Katherine and the children as "beneficiaries" because he wanted them to be benefitted) that would subsequently flowed to her if the executors had not done so goes contrary to the spirit of their mandate to help the beneficiaries.

And since Katherine and the children are part of the same household, this affront against Katherine is also an affront against Prince, Paris and Blanket.
 
Judge dismisses Michael Jackson's $10 million lawsuit
LOS ANGELES (AP) — A judge tossed out Michael Jackson's $10 million lawsuit against a New Jersey man over memorabilia the pop star claimed had been stolen.

A judge dismissed the lawsuit Michael Jackson filed against Henry Vaccaro because he stopped pursuing it two years ago.
By Michael Mariant, AP
U.S. District Judge Florence-Marie Cooper dismissed the lawsuit Tuesday because Jackson had stopped pursuing the case he filed two years ago, according to court papers.

Calls to Jackson's spokeswoman and a lawyer for Henry Vaccaro seeking comment weren't immediately returned Wednesday night.

Vaccaro had a warehouse full of memorabilia from Jackson family members that included gold-trimmed costumes, financial documents, letters, awards and one of Michael Jackson's first outfits worn with the Jackson 5.

At one point, Vaccaro's lawyer, Edgar Pease III, alleged the items also included gold records and personal items including skin bleach, soiled underwear, sexual videotapes, sexual paraphernalia and a hand-drawn picture by Jackson of a 7-year-old boy.

A lawyer for Jackson at the time said the singer never claimed the bleach, sexual materials, underwear or picture were his.

Vaccaro, an Asbury Park construction company owner, said he was awarded the memorabilia after years of legal wrangling stemming from a failed business venture that wound up in bankruptcy court.

He took items that had been in an Oxnard storage facility but were sold during the bankruptcy proceeding involving Jackson family members.

Vaccaro posted the items on a pay-per-view website about Michael Jackson.

The singer sued, saying some of the items still belonged to him and Vaccaro only had a right to property belonging to his brothers, Tito and Jermaine, and their parents. He got a court order barring Vaccaro from displaying or selling the items until the case was resolved.

However, Vaccaro said that before the order was issued he had shipped some memorabilia to a European buyer who had paid more than $1.4 million.

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/2006-01-05-jackson-lawsuit_x.htm



How it all started:

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=127993&page=1

A S B U R Y P A R K, N.J., March 4

In a strange twist of fate, a New Jersey businessman
hit the music world's jackpot — a warehouse stuffed
with the King of Pop's personal belongings — and he
got it for a song.

Henry Vaccaro said he never expected to get caught
up in a legal battle with Michael Jackson's family. But
he did, and in the end, he wound up with Jackson
memorabilia that could be worth a small fortune.
Vaccaro says his story with the Jackson family began
back in 1993, when, he says, the Jackson family failed
to follow through on a deal to buy Vaccaro's guitar
company. Vaccaro said the family never paid him what
they owed, and after years in the courtroom, the items
of memorabilia became the focus of the legal drama.
Vaccaro says he managed to get the entire
warehoused Jackson collection — thousands of items
— after the Jackson family failed to pay a $60,000 bill
for the storage of the items. Vaccaro said he picked
up the bill, and the case with the Jackson family was
settled as he became the owner of the family's
memorabilia.
The deal of a lifetime left a complete
stranger owning the Jackson family's personal
history.

‘Largest Private Collection’

"It's pretty big. It's the largest private collection in the
world of Michael Jackson and Jackson family
memorabilia," Vaccaro said on ABCNEWS' Good
Morning America. "Well, you know, it's crazy … how
they could let a complete stranger get all their
personal possessions?" Vaccaro's enormous
collection had been displayed in a 6,000-square-foot
section of a 50,000-square-foot warehouse. But the
collection — which was only seen by outsiders on
jacksonvault.com, a pay-per-view Web site — is on its
way out of the United States, according to Vaccaro.
The collection has been sold to a mysterious
overseas buyer, and will be shipped out of the
country in just a matter of days Why didn't Michael
Jackson, the wealthiest and most famous member of
the musical family, step in and stop this? According
to the pop star's spokesperson, Michael Jackson was
shocked to find out that the warehouse contained
some of his most personal items. Jackson says he
only gave his family permission to use this
memorabilia for a theme restaurant they supposedly
planned on opening. Jackson wasn't directly involved
in this legal battle, and he says he now wants to buy
back his family's treasured possessions, according to
his spokesperson.
Vaccaro says the collection
includes Jackson family costumes, including one of
Michael Jackson's earliest stage costumes with his
name handwritten on the inside label. Vaccaro also
has a photo of a young Jackson wearing that very
costume.

Surprising and Private Items

While Vaccaro says he was excited to see the
costumes and the gold and platinum records that
came with the collection, he says he was surprised by
the inclusion of very personal items — such as
sketches, notes and a medical contract for surgery
supposedly performed on Janet Jackson's nose. "Yes,
we have that contract … and I think Michael paid for
the first plastic surgery," Vaccaro said. Vaccaro said
he also found another nose-related item in the
collection — a sketchbook that contained several
drawings of noses of various shapes and sizes.
Vaccaro also revealed sketches that he claims were
signed by Michael Jackson. One is a sketch of a boy,
titled "Little Boy 1994"; another is a sketch of Charlie
Chaplin. ABCNEWS checked with some handwriting
experts on the signatures on some of the items. Not



Michael Jackson's History Sold for a Song
Pop Star’s History Sold for a Song Following Family’s Legal Drama
all of them agreed on whether Michael Jackson signed
some of the items. Vaccaro said he was also surprised
by personal letters sent by the Jackson parents. "A lot
of intimate letters going back and forth," Vaccaro
said. "I mean, you know, there's a letter from Joe
Jackson to the producers of the Victory Tour book,
where he approved the photographs of his children,
but he wanted their skin tones to be 20 to 30 percent
lighter in the finished product. That surprised me.
"There's also a letter from Mrs. Jackson complaining
to the Jehovah's Witness Fellowship, because
evidently they must have expelled Michael, and you
know, she's really giving them hell," Vaccaro said.
The New Jersey businessman says Michael Jackson's
legal problems only increased the value of the
collection. "It bought attention back to it because the
initial sale had fallen apart, and then it was
resurrected with his problems," Vaccaro said. Jackson
was charged in December with seven counts of lewd
or lascivious acts with a child under 14 and two
counts of giving the child an "intoxicating agent,"
reportedly wine, between Feb. 7 and March 10, 2003.
Jackson has pleaded not guilty to all the charges.
Vaccaro wouldn't say what his buyer paid for the
collection, but he told ABCNEWS that he did very well.
ABCNEWS' Eric Avram and Gary Wynn contributed to
this Good Morning America report.
 
Last edited:
Re: MJ Estate Sues Katherine Jackson's Business Partner Howard Mann

Here is the original 2004 lawsuit

The charges bear some similarities..but not all.

Michael Jackson vs. Vaccaro And Vintage pop

But Now, there is no mention of Vaccaro or Vintage POP.

Would Vaccaro's court judgment be transferable...after he sold the company to Mann????
 
Memefan;3204821 said:
Judge dismisses Michael Jackson's $10 million lawsuit
LOS ANGELES (AP) — A judge tossed out Michael Jackson's $10 million lawsuit against a New Jersey man over memorabilia the pop star claimed had been stolen.

A judge dismissed the lawsuit Michael Jackson filed against Henry Vaccaro because he stopped pursuing it two years ago.
By Michael Mariant, AP
U.S. District Judge Florence-Marie Cooper dismissed the lawsuit Tuesday because Jackson had stopped pursuing the case he filed two years ago, according to court papers.

Calls to Jackson's spokeswoman and a lawyer for Henry Vaccaro seeking comment weren't immediately returned Wednesday night.

Vaccaro had a warehouse full of memorabilia from Jackson family members that included gold-trimmed costumes, financial documents, letters, awards and one of Michael Jackson's first outfits worn with the Jackson 5.

At one point, Vaccaro's lawyer, Edgar Pease III, alleged the items also included gold records and personal items including skin bleach, soiled underwear, sexual videotapes, sexual paraphernalia and a hand-drawn picture by Jackson of a 7-year-old boy.

A lawyer for Jackson at the time said the singer never claimed the bleach, sexual materials, underwear or picture were his.

Vaccaro, an Asbury Park construction company owner, said he was awarded the memorabilia after years of legal wrangling stemming from a failed business venture that wound up in bankruptcy court.

He took items that had been in an Oxnard storage facility but were sold during the bankruptcy proceeding involving Jackson family members.

Vaccaro posted the items on a pay-per-view website about Michael Jackson.

The singer sued, saying some of the items still belonged to him and Vaccaro only had a right to property belonging to his brothers, Tito and Jermaine, and their parents. He got a court order barring Vaccaro from displaying or selling the items until the case was resolved.

However, Vaccaro said that before the order was issued he had shipped some memorabilia to a European buyer who had paid more than $1.4 million.

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/2006-01-05-jackson-lawsuit_x.htm



How it all started:

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=127993&page=1

A S B U R Y P A R K, N.J., March 4

In a strange twist of fate, a New Jersey businessman
hit the music world's jackpot — a warehouse stuffed
with the King of Pop's personal belongings — and he
got it for a song.

Henry Vaccaro said he never expected to get caught
up in a legal battle with Michael Jackson's family. But
he did, and in the end, he wound up with Jackson
memorabilia that could be worth a small fortune.
Vaccaro says his story with the Jackson family began
back in 1993, when, he says, the Jackson family failed
to follow through on a deal to buy Vaccaro's guitar
company. Vaccaro said the family never paid him what
they owed, and after years in the courtroom, the items
of memorabilia became the focus of the legal drama.
Vaccaro says he managed to get the entire
warehoused Jackson collection — thousands of items
— after the Jackson family failed to pay a $60,000 bill
for the storage of the items. Vaccaro said he picked
up the bill, and the case with the Jackson family was
settled as he became the owner of the family's
memorabilia.
The deal of a lifetime left a complete
stranger owning the Jackson family's personal
history.

‘Largest Private Collection’

"It's pretty big. It's the largest private collection in the
world of Michael Jackson and Jackson family
memorabilia," Vaccaro said on ABCNEWS' Good
Morning America. "Well, you know, it's crazy … how
they could let a complete stranger get all their
personal possessions?" Vaccaro's enormous
collection had been displayed in a 6,000-square-foot
section of a 50,000-square-foot warehouse. But the
collection — which was only seen by outsiders on
jacksonvault.com, a pay-per-view Web site — is on its
way out of the United States, according to Vaccaro.
The collection has been sold to a mysterious
overseas buyer, and will be shipped out of the
country in just a matter of days Why didn't Michael
Jackson, the wealthiest and most famous member of
the musical family, step in and stop this? According
to the pop star's spokesperson, Michael Jackson was
shocked to find out that the warehouse contained
some of his most personal items. Jackson says he
only gave his family permission to use this
memorabilia for a theme restaurant they supposedly
planned on opening. Jackson wasn't directly involved
in this legal battle, and he says he now wants to buy
back his family's treasured possessions, according to
his spokesperson.
Vaccaro says the collection
includes Jackson family costumes, including one of
Michael Jackson's earliest stage costumes with his
name handwritten on the inside label. Vaccaro also
has a photo of a young Jackson wearing that very
costume.

Surprising and Private Items

While Vaccaro says he was excited to see the
costumes and the gold and platinum records that
came with the collection, he says he was surprised by
the inclusion of very personal items — such as
sketches, notes and a medical contract for surgery
supposedly performed on Janet Jackson's nose. "Yes,
we have that contract … and I think Michael paid for
the first plastic surgery," Vaccaro said. Vaccaro said
he also found another nose-related item in the
collection — a sketchbook that contained several
drawings of noses of various shapes and sizes.
Vaccaro also revealed sketches that he claims were
signed by Michael Jackson. One is a sketch of a boy,
titled "Little Boy 1994"; another is a sketch of Charlie
Chaplin. ABCNEWS checked with some handwriting
experts on the signatures on some of the items. Not



Michael Jackson's History Sold for a Song
Pop Star’s History Sold for a Song Following Family’s Legal Drama
all of them agreed on whether Michael Jackson signed
some of the items. Vaccaro said he was also surprised
by personal letters sent by the Jackson parents. "A lot
of intimate letters going back and forth," Vaccaro
said. "I mean, you know, there's a letter from Joe
Jackson to the producers of the Victory Tour book,
where he approved the photographs of his children,
but he wanted their skin tones to be 20 to 30 percent
lighter in the finished product. That surprised me.
"There's also a letter from Mrs. Jackson complaining
to the Jehovah's Witness Fellowship, because
evidently they must have expelled Michael, and you
know, she's really giving them hell," Vaccaro said.
The New Jersey businessman says Michael Jackson's
legal problems only increased the value of the
collection. "It bought attention back to it because the
initial sale had fallen apart, and then it was
resurrected with his problems," Vaccaro said. Jackson
was charged in December with seven counts of lewd
or lascivious acts with a child under 14 and two
counts of giving the child an "intoxicating agent,"
reportedly wine, between Feb. 7 and March 10, 2003.
Jackson has pleaded not guilty to all the charges.
Vaccaro wouldn't say what his buyer paid for the
collection, but he told ABCNEWS that he did very well.
ABCNEWS' Eric Avram and Gary Wynn contributed to
this Good Morning America report.
Memefan;3204864 said:

:bugeyed :bugeyed :bugeyed
 
Re: MJ Estate Sues Katherine Jackson's Business Partner Howard Mann

Howard Mann is a straight-up IDIOT!

In my opinion the Estate of Michael Jackson has done a wonderful job in putting things in order and earning massive amounts of money while doing it. At this rate, by the time Michael's children come of age, they will EACH be billionaires.

And I shudder, SHUDDER, to think what shape Michael's Estate would be in right now, if his family were in charge. They have NOTHING to show for their years in the music business (aside from Janet of course) and every attempt they have made in various business ventures over the years has not only failed, but failed miserable.

I, for one, am delighted the Estate finally took this much needed step!
agree

LOL! Joe Jackson would spend a BUNDLE trying to create a record label and Katherine would spend ANOTHER bundle buying multi-million dollars homes and setting up trust funds for all of her children and grandchildren. If the family were in charge, there would be no money left for MJ3, in my opinion.

Michael certainly knew what he was doing when he set up his Last Will and Testament. Some folks are just not good with money and the Jackson's have proved that on more then one occassion.
agree again

oh and to who ever who claimed katherine is the estate along with ppb, wrong, katherine is just a short time beneficiary whose rights revert back to michaels kids after death
 
Re: MJ Estate Sues Katherine Jackson's Business Partner Howard Mann

At the end of the day, the "family" are just there for their own profits.........including Katherine!!!!!!!



The Estate are the only ones trying pay Michael's remaining debts while making sure Katherine & MJ3 are financially well and fending off all the leeches!!!!
 
Memefan;3204821 said:
Vaccaro said on ABCNEWS' Good
Morning America. "Well, you know, it's crazy … how
they could let a complete stranger get all their
personal possessions?"

Aint this true. Smh...
 
Re: MJ Estate Sues Katherine Jackson's Business Partner Howard Mann

mj sued vaccaro. why should that have anything to with sueing mann. seperate lawsuit seperate defendent
 
Re: MJ Estate Sues Katherine Jackson's Business Partner Howard Mann

mj sued vaccaro. why should that have anything to with sueing mann. seperate lawsuit seperate defendent

I agree ... the main similarities I have been able to see between the two cases are:

1. Vintage Pop is named as defendant in both - my guess is with this supposed court order in effect (if it is still in effect), Vintage Pop may be dropped from the defendants list.

2. Copyright issues - however the first case was strictly about the items Vintage Pop had obtained from the storage locker and (I believe) trying to stop them from auctioning, while this case is about them using Michael Jackson's name & likeness & trademarks & music illegally.

Also in the first case MJ is named as an individual, in this case, it is the estate together with various companies MJ owned who are the plaintiffs. Although they might be able to argue that the estate represents MJ, the individual, it remains to be seen whether or not the Judge / Jury will agree to let the estate sue ... however, I suspect, the inclusion of the other companies as plaintiffs (and with Sony appointing the estate to speak on their behalf) means that if that happens, the case probably will not go away, because that court order would not state that Sony or the other companies can not sue Vintage Pop.
 
Re: MJ Estate Sues Katherine Jackson's Business Partner Howard Mann

Howard Mann responds

Mama Jackson's Partner: MJ Estate is a Dictatorship!

Katherine Jackson's business partner who is being sued by the Michael Jackson Estate tells TMZ the Estate is a "fraudulently obtained dictatorship," guarding "a collusive and corrupt status quo."

Howard Mann -- whom the Estate claims in a new lawsuit is violating copyright and trademark laws by cashing in on all things Jackson -- calls the lawsuit "malicious and unfounded."

Mann says, "These lawyers have absolutely NO interest in the preservation of Michael Jackson's legacy and less interest in generating revenues for his beneficiaries."

Mann goes on: "...the Estate will fall as a result of these draconian tactics and it is my hope that Miss Jackson regains control of that which was stolen from her."

This man has not a drop of sense!

Someone please explain to me how control of MJ's Estate was stolen from Katherine? it just bugs the hell outta me how some people always try to make MJ out to be an idiot who had no clue as to what he was doing.
 
Re: MJ Estate Sues Katherine Jackson's Business Partner Howard Mann

Little update from Leslie at her blog

I followed that case, and Howard Mann is right about that the court awarded Henry Vaccaro back then, because MJ failed to pay his lawyers and give his contribution to the case. That case was about to get back all of the memorablia, and because of the court's decesion the MJ Estate can not sue them for the same issue. As to my understanding this recent case isn't about the same issue, but to stop Mann using the items to gain any money. However that old case involved some copyright issues as well, I see it as a different case. On the top of that according to some legal specialists, the Estate's right to MJ's likeness is above the memorablia rights owned by Mann.
 
Re: MJ Estate Sues Katherine Jackson's Business Partner Howard Mann

This man has not a drop of sense!

Someone please explain to me how control of MJ's Estate was stolen from Katherine? it just bugs the hell outta me how some people always try to make MJ out to be an idiot who had no clue as to what he was doing.


I dread to think of what would happen to Michael's stuff if it all went to any of his family.............


Imagine having genuine deals with all these shady characters................


The family needs to stop...............
 
Re: MJ Estate Sues Katherine Jackson's Business Partner Howard Mann

Someone please explain to me how control of MJ's Estate was stolen from Katherine?

I think that is just quoting Joe's claims about the estate executors. However Mann forgets that 1) MJ's will was never challenged by any of the Jacksons 2) the deadline as passed 3) Joe's objection to executors has been denied up to this time.
 
Re: MJ Estate Sues Katherine Jackson's Business Partner Howard Mann

Little update from Leslie at her blog

I followed that case, and Howard Mann is right about that the court awarded Henry Vaccaro back then, because MJ failed to pay his lawyers and give his contribution to the case. That case was about to get back all of the memorablia, and because of the court's decesion the MJ Estate can not sue them for the same issue. As to my understanding this recent case isn't about the same issue, but to stop Mann using the items to gain any money. However that old case involved some copyright issues as well, I see it as a different case. On the top of that according to some legal specialists, the Estate's right to MJ's likeness is above the memorablia rights owned by Mann.

:bugeyed
 
ABC News has licensed the video Katherine and her business partner Howard Mann have produced in response to the lawsuit. "As far as the estate suing Howard Mann, my feeling is when they're suing Howard Mann they're suing me…because I authorized the book," Katherine said.

Well this isn't just about the book ( 5 sketches), there's more to the lawsuit than just the book.

Howard Mann said Katherine has gone through a difficult time.

"It's not just obviously the lawsuit filed against us, she's obviously going through a criminal trial towards as to the wrongful death of her son, the litigation with AEG, I think there's a lot of compound pressure right now," Mann said.

Us? Estate didn't name Katherine as a defendant so does this mean that Mann will drag her into the lawsuit?
 
It's sad how Michael's own mother supports shady characters and works against his estate.

my feeling is when they're suing Howard Mann they're suing me…because I authorized the book," Katherine said.
Doesn't she understand that it's not about the book?
 
Re: MJ Estate Sues Katherine Jackson's Business Partner Howard Mann

I can't believe that Katherine Jackson is actually defending this clown, against the Estate of Michael Jackson, the same estate that has made her life more comfortable then it has been in years!

She has the nerve to defend Mann after he released that bogus song saying it was a gift to the fans FROM KATHERINE JACKSON. Only to have to turn around and say, Katherine knew nothing about him releasing that song.

Anyway, this lawsuit is about way more that the merchandise Mann is in possession of or her book. After reading the entire lawsuit, I saw the mention of Mann's UNLAWFUL use of pictures and clips from the "This Is It" movie. Nevermind the merchandise, using anything related to the "This Is It" movie is clearly in violation of the law, in my opinion. As well as using Michael's likeness in order to promote any money-making schemes.

What the heck is wrong with these people!
 
Last edited:
Re: MJ Estate Sues Katherine Jackson's Business Partner Howard Mann

It's sad how Michael's own mother supports shady characters and works against his estate.


Doesn't she understand that it's not about the book?
She has a history of supporting shady characters.
Now I'm not surprised by this at all.. besides it's obvious that Katheirne doesnt understand the fact that she is in no position to authorize anything related to Michael Jackson.
 
Re: MJ Estate Sues Katherine Jackson's Business Partner Howard Mann

Also her porn producer pal is going to drag her into this lawsuit, you just wait and watch Mrs. Jackson and you know what? The Estate shouldnt clean up ur mess then, because quiet frankly ur betraying the hand that's feeding ya
 
Back
Top