kma1819
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 10
- Points
- 0
Re: MJ Estate Sues Katherine Jackson's Business Partner Howard Mann
lol, I am asking myself the same things as many of you ... Does Katherine really understand what this court case against Mr Mann is really about? Why doesn't she accept that the estate executors are the people Michael wished to run his affairs? Is she really as naive as she seems? What about her other children? are they making a financial commitment to care for her?
And I will say one thing ... Katherine is an 80 something year old woman ... and it is fairly easy to confuse people at that age ... generally people at that age also don't seem to grasp / understand things so well as younger people do ... also, although she is mother to the Jackson 5, that does not mean she understands important things like copyright law, she (as best as I am aware) never studied law / to become a lawyer and although she may have played a role in managing the J5, I understood it was Joe who usually handled the negotiations & more likely than not, when it came to registering / copyrighting songs & other items, it would have been either the J5, Joe or their record label who handled that. Additionally those laws probably would have changed between then and now and what people could have probably gotten away with back then, they can't now.
All of the above can be partially responsible for Katherine's apparent naivety in this case.
As for the other kids, all I can say is those who are in debt, probably are not financially supporting their Mother but for those who are not in debt, I hope they are not leaving the full financial burden on MJ's estate ...
Also, this whole rumor about binding MJ's kids ... I wonder ... I don't think it's legal ... and I wonder if she realises that if hard evidence of this comes to light, it possibly might give child welfare services a reason to ask the judge to revoke her guardianship of the children.
lol, I am asking myself the same things as many of you ... Does Katherine really understand what this court case against Mr Mann is really about? Why doesn't she accept that the estate executors are the people Michael wished to run his affairs? Is she really as naive as she seems? What about her other children? are they making a financial commitment to care for her?
And I will say one thing ... Katherine is an 80 something year old woman ... and it is fairly easy to confuse people at that age ... generally people at that age also don't seem to grasp / understand things so well as younger people do ... also, although she is mother to the Jackson 5, that does not mean she understands important things like copyright law, she (as best as I am aware) never studied law / to become a lawyer and although she may have played a role in managing the J5, I understood it was Joe who usually handled the negotiations & more likely than not, when it came to registering / copyrighting songs & other items, it would have been either the J5, Joe or their record label who handled that. Additionally those laws probably would have changed between then and now and what people could have probably gotten away with back then, they can't now.
All of the above can be partially responsible for Katherine's apparent naivety in this case.
As for the other kids, all I can say is those who are in debt, probably are not financially supporting their Mother but for those who are not in debt, I hope they are not leaving the full financial burden on MJ's estate ...
Also, this whole rumor about binding MJ's kids ... I wonder ... I don't think it's legal ... and I wonder if she realises that if hard evidence of this comes to light, it possibly might give child welfare services a reason to ask the judge to revoke her guardianship of the children.