Latest on MJJC

Non-Tabloid Pictures of Michael Jackson's Children (This is a family Photo Scrap Book)

Status
Not open for further replies.
elusive moonwalker said:
non tabloid?
Click to expand...

Think, Andy Warhol, and his "Triple Elvis".

16332246-mmmain.jpg


This undated file photo provided by Christie's shows Andy Warhol's "Triple Elvis." Executed in ink and silver paint in 1963, the work brought $81.9 million on Wednesday, Nov. 12, 2014 when it was sold at auction by Christie's in New York during their Post-War & Contemporary Art Evening Sale. (AP Photo/Christie's, File)


http://www.nola.com/arts/index.ssf/2014/11/andy_warhol_elvis_portrait_sol.html
 
Last edited:
pics from the paps stalking the kids. sorry cherub while i see no problem with pics from offical events etc those pis are paps stalking the kids as they try to live their life. we shouldnt fule them
 
I'm fairly sure that the image Andy Warhol used for his "Triple Elvis" was not a paparazzi shot. Looks like it was from a still from a film Elvis was in.

Does one not see the difference then from a fan collage of pap pictures of Paris from what Warhol did?

If the rule here in this thread is that there is to be no pap pics...that collage then should be viewed as pap pics and should not be posted in this thread.

I like the art the fan did :), but there are probably other places for those here on MJJC to go see art like that being posted. But not here, right? That's my understanding.
 
Last edited:
I feel to see any connection between the elvis pic and pj
 
If they are attending an offical event in support of their dad i see no issue.. very diff to paps
 
I feel sad for those who could not appreciate the beauty in the fan art work I posted.
The lost is yours alone.
 
Last edited:
CherubimII said:
I feel sad for those who could not appreciate the beauty in the fan art work I posted.
The lost is yours alone.
Click to expand...

You shouldn't feel sad, I think we all know it's not about the fan art work but what's in it. Weren't you the one who started this thread and wrote its title?
 
CherubimII said:
I feel sad for those who could not appreciate the beauty in the fan art work I posted.
The lost is yours alone.
Click to expand...

Sadly there is nothing 'beautiful' about adult men being paid to stalk and photograph young girls.

We all know that tabloid picture editors and the like will pay for 'innocent' photos when they are rare. But after a short while, there is nothing special about an 'innocent' photo and editors will only pay for something more unusual; a 'scoop' of some kind. Like Kate Middleton's 'topless' photos, Like Diana with her boyfriend.
When Paris wants to lead a private life, and visit personal places or friends, I don't think anyone will find 'pap' photos of that to be beautiful. It is the start of a long journey into harassment and distress. Please don't create a welcoming market for it.
 
Guys, settle down please. It has been dealt with. No need to derail a beautiful thread with this. Just make sure whatever pictures you post are not paparazzi pictures, no matter how much they have been edited and no matter how beautiful they are. The question is not whether those pictures are beautiful or not, it's about respecting MJ's children and their privacy, and by doing so, respecting Michael. That is what MJJC is about.
 
I beginning to believe some insiders are tipping off the paparazzi, whenever, Paris Jackson steps out the door.
 
CherubimII said:
I beginning to believe some insiders are tipping off the paparazzi, whenever, Paris Jackson steps out the door.
Click to expand...
I hate to say it, but I think you are right. A lot of people do that for money-
And it's also an old show biz trick for publicity reasons-stars would have paps notified if they were going to be in a specific place or something.
Since Paris is not a celebrity, and especially since Michael wanted them to be so protected, I think it's someone at their house or close circle.
 
barbee0715 said:
I hate to say it, but I think you are right. A lot of people do that for money-
And it's also an old show biz trick for publicity reasons-stars would have paps notified if they were going to be in a specific place or something.
Since Paris is not a celebrity, and especially since Michael wanted them to be so protected, I think it's someone at their house or close circle.
Click to expand...

fans are also part of the problem. In this thread alone, you have pics of the kids in their private home, bedrooms, schools, holiday trips, and so on. All of this deprives them of their privacy. Their lives should not be treated as a public spectacle.
 
Lynn88 said:
The most recent pics are from this past weekend at a baby shower for Frances Jackson--Tj's wife. It was held at Hayvenhurst.
Click to expand...

why would they hold it at Havendurst? Doesn't TJ have his own house? I guess it's another "family gathering" the estate is wasting money on.
 
passy001 said:
why would they hold it at Havendurst? Doesn't TJ have his own house? I guess it's another "family gathering" the estate is wasting money on.
Click to expand...

I'm not really sure. Taj had his wedding there. Maybe they just like to use it for large family gatherings.
 
I for one am glad they use it for family events. I am proud of Michael for building that beautiful house and really hope it will be turned into his museum one day.

It is so beautiful and to me as much a reflection of his imagination as Neverland.

I was reading a LA historical place article the other day and it's listed. It said architectural style was "story book."

I remember old interviews where people asked him about the castle he was building and he would correct them with English Tudor.
 
Last edited:
I think it is beautiful that the family use Hayvenhurst for family gatherings. It must hold such wonderful memories. Rather the family than sell it to some inflated pop or rapper person.IMO. I hsve brother-in-law who lives near there.
 
It would be even nicer if the estate didnt have to pay for them all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top