lemon662
Proud Member
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2011
- Messages
- 192
- Points
- 0
So Murray was amassing a HUGE stockpile of Propofol, Lidocaine, Midazolam and other drugs. It's reported that he ordered and received 255 vials of Propofol. Have they all been used? It doesn't seem possible to me that they would have been used.........so was his 'stockpile' ever located? I don't recall anything coming out in the trial thus far, or in the case/Autopsy documents about anyone having found his stash of drugs. Anybody know?
I was watching TV earlier, HLN to be exact, and I had to seriously shake my head and turn the channel. I couldn't believe that they were discussing whether it was a good move for the Prosecution to have played today's recording of MJ. Are these people that daft? How could anyone not see the benefit in the Pros playing this. It clearly shows that Murray PUT HIM INTO THAT STATE and then had the audacity to secretly record him; talk about unprofessional and unethical (isn't it illegal to tape someone without their knowledge?) Murray was the medical professional hired to care for MJ and he was ultimately responsible for the drugs that he administered to him, so if MJ was in that kind of condition, how could that be anyone else's fault other than Murray's?
Of course the defense team may CLAIM that this was the state that Murray "found" MJ in on that day and that he had not given him any medications.........but given the sheer volume of meds that Murray has been found to have ordered (and the nature of them), I don't think anyone in the jury is going to believe that MJ did this 'to himself.' In my opinion, Murray would have to have his side prove 100% indisputable PROOF (that of course wouldn't exist) that Murray had found MJ in that state and had no hand in him being that impaired.
I also wonder how Murray THOUGHT He was going to get his stockpile of medications to London.
I was watching TV earlier, HLN to be exact, and I had to seriously shake my head and turn the channel. I couldn't believe that they were discussing whether it was a good move for the Prosecution to have played today's recording of MJ. Are these people that daft? How could anyone not see the benefit in the Pros playing this. It clearly shows that Murray PUT HIM INTO THAT STATE and then had the audacity to secretly record him; talk about unprofessional and unethical (isn't it illegal to tape someone without their knowledge?) Murray was the medical professional hired to care for MJ and he was ultimately responsible for the drugs that he administered to him, so if MJ was in that kind of condition, how could that be anyone else's fault other than Murray's?
Of course the defense team may CLAIM that this was the state that Murray "found" MJ in on that day and that he had not given him any medications.........but given the sheer volume of meds that Murray has been found to have ordered (and the nature of them), I don't think anyone in the jury is going to believe that MJ did this 'to himself.' In my opinion, Murray would have to have his side prove 100% indisputable PROOF (that of course wouldn't exist) that Murray had found MJ in that state and had no hand in him being that impaired.
I also wonder how Murray THOUGHT He was going to get his stockpile of medications to London.