Staffordshire Bullterrier
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2004
- Messages
- 5,603
- Points
- 113
Hey all,
For a long time i've given up on going against naysayers, the ignorant people that simply parrot tabloid media. But sometimes i just can't stop myself from replying back, trying to give them the facts. Yesterday i saw a new rare video from '93, MJ with the Cascio family photoshoot. The anti-MJ folks were there in full force in the comment section. Some were just hating for no reason, but others were spreading complete misinformation like how several psychiatrists had confirmed that MJ fitted the profile of a pedophile, but the exact opposite is true. Also that they found plenty of evidence and what not. I decided to reply and say that psychiatrists actually said he never did fit the profile of a pedophile and that no real evidence was found at all. I said that if these people would do some real research that they would be shocked about how anti MJ the media has been most of the time.
One person replied and said this:
The book containing 90% nude boys was not sealed, it was actually enscribed by Michael himself. He kept this book, along with a nude photo of a boy believed to be Jonathan Spence in a cabinet in his bedroom.
The bed-sharing with underage boys is already a massive red flag. Throw in a naked photo of one of his special friends and you have a pedophile. It's that simple.
It's the first time i see someone claiming this. From what i remember he did indeed have a book but it was sent by a fan and it did not contain 90% nude boys. Plus that stuff about a Jonathan Spence. I dont even know who that is. It's been a long time for me that i did a lot of research on that great site full of facts, but can anyone enlighten me on these matters, so i can reply back to the dude with cold hard facts? I'd appreciate that a lot.
You guys always know what you are talking about, so that's why i came back here.
For a long time i've given up on going against naysayers, the ignorant people that simply parrot tabloid media. But sometimes i just can't stop myself from replying back, trying to give them the facts. Yesterday i saw a new rare video from '93, MJ with the Cascio family photoshoot. The anti-MJ folks were there in full force in the comment section. Some were just hating for no reason, but others were spreading complete misinformation like how several psychiatrists had confirmed that MJ fitted the profile of a pedophile, but the exact opposite is true. Also that they found plenty of evidence and what not. I decided to reply and say that psychiatrists actually said he never did fit the profile of a pedophile and that no real evidence was found at all. I said that if these people would do some real research that they would be shocked about how anti MJ the media has been most of the time.
One person replied and said this:
The book containing 90% nude boys was not sealed, it was actually enscribed by Michael himself. He kept this book, along with a nude photo of a boy believed to be Jonathan Spence in a cabinet in his bedroom.
The bed-sharing with underage boys is already a massive red flag. Throw in a naked photo of one of his special friends and you have a pedophile. It's that simple.
It's the first time i see someone claiming this. From what i remember he did indeed have a book but it was sent by a fan and it did not contain 90% nude boys. Plus that stuff about a Jonathan Spence. I dont even know who that is. It's been a long time for me that i did a lot of research on that great site full of facts, but can anyone enlighten me on these matters, so i can reply back to the dude with cold hard facts? I'd appreciate that a lot.
You guys always know what you are talking about, so that's why i came back here.
Last edited: