Controversial MJ Documentary Leaving Neverland [GENERAL DISCUSSION THREAD]

Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

The person with the problem is the film maker Dan Reed. Really read his comments. He is a promoter of Pedophilia.
His emphasis in the film is on the "sexual acts" not a call for therapy. Check for yourself, and you will find
this is not his first film on the topic of pedophilia. l, also, venture to guess it won't be Dan Reed's last on the topic.
 
Last edited:
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

I have to say, if this documentary airs, and enough people watch it, it will ultimately destroy Michael's legacy and the love people have for him.
Based on the reviews, it's a very devastating documentary.

At this point, regardless of whether or not Michael molested boys, to which non of us for sure know, he's dead. That's what pisses me off about the documentary but what is the point of releasing this documentary accusing a dead man who cannot defend himself of the worst accusations one could face. They both had an opportunity in 2005 to testify against Michael and get him put away, yet they didn't.

Regardless, even as a big fan myself, I will not go as to 100% discredit their claims, because I was not there. I just question the timing and motive of their decision.

"Starting from the suspect timing and the names of the two protagonists, it appears as yet another opportunity to throw mud at a dead person who, as such, can not reply to these terrible accusations.
The documentary, from a cinematographic point of view (as well as ethical) leaves one really perplexed: there are interviews only with the two protagonists and their close relatives...
...with close-ups, pragmatic tears and a somber musical atmosphere, it doesn't offer the plurality of voices and a thorough investigation that are essential elements for every documentary worthy of the name.
Moreover, in the face of very serious accusations, it seems incredible that the director did not take the trouble to listen to or report the facts of one of the legal representatives or the foundation that takes care of Jackson's interests : the right to a defense, in case of criminally relevant accusations, is constitutionally guaranteed in every western state.

From the feature film, of a paroxysmal duration (4 hours!), No concrete evidence emerged, which gives credibility to the testimonies, but only frayed cuts and sewed images and declarations whose sole objective is to discredit Michael Jackson.

In short, Leaving Neverland, more than a documentary, seems a perfect example of "mockumentary", a particular cinematographic genre that simulates the style and the documentary process, concealing the construction of a fiction, between the scandal and the fantastic.

But let's take a step back in time to 1993, to better understand how the urban legend was born of the supposed pedophilia of the artist, a bad story that has been self-perpetuated in time of poisons, suspects and falsehoods.
 
Panorama: MICHAEL JACKSON (IN ENGLISH: http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1sqprsl ) - original article here - https://www.panorama.it/musica/michael-jackson-la-verita-dubbi-sul-documentario-leaving-neverland/

Michael Jackson: i dubbi sul documentario "Leaving Neverland"

Gabriele Antonucci - January 26, 2019


Almost ten years after his death on 25 June 2009 due to an overdose of Propofol administered by his curative doctor Conrad Murray (then sentenced to four years in prison), there continues to be no peace for Michael Jackson , from many considered the greatest performer ever.

On January 25, at the Sundance Film Festival in Park City (Utah), a documentary focusing on the alleged sexual abuse that Michael Jackson perpetrated against two children aged 7 and 10, now in their thirties, was shown: Wade Robson and James Safechuck .

Entitled Leaving Neverland, the 233 minute documentary was directed by Dan Reed, a director who had previously been involved in this issue with the docu-film "The Pedophile Hunters" ("The Hunters of Pedophiles").

Some of the singer's fans protested in front of the Egypianian Theater in Park City, showing placards with the words "Innocente" and "Seek the Truth".

The documentary will be broadcast in the spring, in two episodes, on Channel 4, on British TV, and on HBO pay TV in the US.

Considering that on June 25, 2019 will occur 10 years after the death of the King of Pop, Leaving Neverland , starting from the suspect timing and the names of the two protagonists, appears as yet another opportunity to throw mud at a dead person who, as such, he can not reply to these terrible accusations.

The documentary, ignoring the "artistic" aspect, from a cinematographic point of view (as well as ethical) leaves really perplexed: interview only the two protagonists and their close relatives, with close-ups, pragmatic tears and musichette of atmosphere, not offers that plurality of voices and that deepening that are essential elements for every documentary worthy of the name.

Moreover, in the face of very serious accusations, it seems incredible that the director did not take the trouble to listen to or report the facts of one of the legal representatives or the foundation that takes care of Jackson's interests : the right to defense, in case of criminally relevant accusations, is constitutionally guaranteed in every western state, in the US as in Italy.

From the feature film, of a paroxysmal duration (4 hours!), No concrete evidence emerged, which gives credibility to the testimonies, but only one frayed cuts and sews images and declarations whose sole objective is to discredit Michael Jackson.

In short, Leaving Neverland , more than a documentary, seems a perfect example of "mockumentary" , a particular cinematographic genre that simulates the style and the documentary process, concealing the construction of a fiction, between the scandal and the fantastic.

Marcos Cabotà, a director present at the first, slammed Leaving Neverland , giving 1 to 10 as a vow: "After witnessing the first, it is clear that this is a mockumentary (fictional documentary) instead of a documentary. I can not believe just one word from the two "victims." Poor acting, sometimes shameful, the direction and the lyrics are even worse 1/10 ".

The nephew Taj Jackson , a member of the 3T, has promoted a crowdfunding campaign to create a film-truth in response to that of Dan Reed , to defend the reputation of his uncle. We need at least 777,000 dollars (about 681,000 euros): at the moment the donations amount to 30,000 dollars.

The sons and brothers of the King of Pop, for now, have not made any statements about it.

After the premiere at the Sundance Festival, it was not long before the Jackson Summer hit, which denounced the claims against the singer and the documentary as a whole.

"Leaving Neverland" is not a documentary, it's a kind of murder of the tabloid character that Michael Jackson endured in life, and now in death. The film deals with unproven claims for things supposedly happened 20 years ago and treats them as fact. These statements were the basis of complaints filed by these two liars, who were finally rejected by a judge. The two accusers had (previously) testified under oath that these events never occurred. (In the film) they did not provide any obvious evidence and absolutely no evidence to support their accusations, which means that the entire film is based solely on the word of two perjuries.

It is significant that the director admitted to the Sundance Film Festival that he limited his interviews only to these accusers and their families . In doing so, he intentionally avoided interviewing numerous people who, over the years, have spent significant time with Michael Jackson and have unequivocally stated that he has always treated children with respect and has done nothing wrong with them. Choosing not to include any of these independent voices that could challenge the narrative that was determined to sell, the director neglected to do the verification of the facts thus creating a narration so obviously one-sided that the audience will never have anything close to a balanced portrait .

For 20 years, Wade Robson denied in court and in numerous interviews, even after Michael's death, that he was a victim and said he was grateful for all that Michael had done for him. His family benefited from Michael's kindness, generosity, and support for his career until Michael's death. Regardless of "Leaving Neverland", consider the fact that when Robson was denied a role in a production of Cirque du soleil-themed Michael Jackson, his harassment accusations suddenly emerged.

We are extremely supportive of any effective victim of child abuse. This film, however, makes a disservice to those victims. Because despite all the false denials that this is not about money, there has always been talk of money - millions of dollars - dating back to 2013 when both Wade Robson and James Safechuck, who share the same law firm, have unsuccessfully launched their statements against Michael's Summer.

Now that Michael is no longer here to defend himself, Robson, Safechuck and their lawyers continue their efforts to gain fame and get paid by covering them with the same charges a jury found him innocent when he was alive " (The Summer of Michael Jackson)

But let's take a closer look at who the protagonists of the documentary are.

Wade Robson and James Safechuck were two children attending Neverland, the home of Michael Jackson from 1988 to 2005 , in Santa Barbara County, California, about 150 miles from Los Angeles.

Neverland
The property consisted of 22 structures and a land of almost 1,300 hectares containing a villa with 6 bedrooms and 30 medical beds where children with serious illnesses could receive treatment and see films on the big screen, a zoo, a playground , a train station, a swimming pool, a tennis court and a basketball court, a 50-seat movie theater and two artificial lakes.

Neverland was not the sordid frame where its forbidden meetings took place, as many media have suggested, but a place that for a short period welcomed seriously ill children (even terminals) and their families, giving them moments of joy and fun .

Neverland was always full of people, so you do not really understand how the singer could have committed abuse with dozens of eyes constantly focused on him, including those of the parents of the guests.

Actor Macaulay Culkin spoke recently about his relationship with Michael Jackson during Michael Rosenbaum's "Inside of You" podcast: "In the end, it's pretty easy to say that [our report] was weird or otherwise, but it was not because it made sense. In summary, we were friends. I know that for anyone else it may seem like something, but for me it was just a normal friendship. The charges against Michael are absolutely ridiculous ".

Alfonso Ribeiro, famous worldwide for the role of Carlton Banks in the sit-com "Willy, Prince of Bel-Air", said: "I do not care what people say, I will never believe that Michael did that which they accused him. I was a child of 12, 13, 14 years too. I met Michael, I went out with him and never anything like this happened. Nothing controversial has ever happened . I simply do not believe it . "

Thesis confirmed by sound engineer Rob Hoffman, one who Michael knew him closely: " I spent almost 3 years working with him, and I never questioned his morals, I never believed in any of the allegations that were made to him And at that time I was not even a fan of his, I saw him interacting with his brothers' children, the children of the others and, at some point, even with the children of my girlfriend, I spent a whole day at Neverland. Michael is a truly incredible human being, always looking for a way to improve the lives of all children Every weekend at Neverland, different groups of children were hosted - children with AIDS, children with cancer, etc. And most of the time Michael was not there either . "

Same opinion as Bill Whitfield, Jackson's b odyguard from 2006 to 2009: "When you spend 3 years with someone as a personal bodyguard, they trust and depend on you. You can see their true character, their soul and their heart. Mr. Jackson I knew I knew he could never do or think such a thing would never have abused or harmed a child. He was not like that. He was a good boy and not because I think so but because I know. "

Curious as hundreds of children have attended Neverland, but only four have accused of abuse Michael Jackson: Jordan Chandler, Gavin Arvizo, Wade Robson and James Safechuck.

And that only they have brought millionaire lawsuits, often many years later.

Who is the accuser Wade Robson
The dancer and coregraph Wade Robson, who previously worked with Britney Spears and appeared in the So You Think You Can Dance on Fox series, was called to testify in 2005 in the Arvizo trial, then firmly denying that Jackson had ever bothered him. stating under oath that "never anything inappropriate had happened with Mr. Jackson".

Thomas Mesereau, the brilliant lawyer who defended Michael Jackson, chose Wade Robson as the first witness for Jackson's defense, who now claims to have been molested by MJ when he was a child.

In 2005, Robson - as stated by Mesereau - was "adamant" about the fact that Jackson had never done anything wrong with him.

Robson's mother and sister also said the same things.
The Robsons flew from Australia for the trial. They remained at Neverland, and Mesereau interrogated them repeatedly.

Mesereau, after the premiere of Leaving Neverland , said: " I found Wade eloquent and likeable. He strenuously defends Michael. His mother and sister supported him with their statements . On the witness stand, Wade was referred to a fierce public prosecutor. I am shocked that he has taken a position that is so different from what he told me and that he testified in court. "

When the singer died on June 25, 2009, Robson wrote on the social media: " Michael Jackson has changed the world and, more personally, my life forever, which is why I dance, the reason I play music and one of the main reasons why I believe in the pure goodness of mankind.It has been a close friend of mine for 20 years.Your music, his movement, his personal words of encouragement and inspiration and his unconditional love will live forever in I will miss him immensely, but I know that now he is at peace and enchants the sky with a melody and a Moonwalk ".

Michael Jackson's Summer trusted him and involved him in 2012 in working on the Cirque du soleil show dedicated to Michael, the lucky Immortal , but later fired him, dissatisfied with his work.

In 2013, Robson, four years after the death of the King of Pop, claimed abruptly that he had been molested when he was a child by Michael Jackson and filed two millionaire lawsuits for compensation for moral damages against the singer's Summer for alleged abuse.

In 2017 two different boards of judges rejected the charges brought against lack of evidence.

According to Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Mitchell Beckloff, in addition to the absence of the fact, the reason for the rejection of the accusations by the judge is that Robson has waited too many years to file a complaint against Jackson, even May 2013, almost 4 years after his death.

Truly singular that, with these precedents well known to the press, the Sundance film festival, directed by the expert Robert Redford, has agreed to project a documentary that seems very untrustworthy, even in the monstre duration of almost four hours, in a search too much evident of morbidity at all costs.

The truth about Jackson's relationship with children
But let's take a step back in time to 1993, to better understand how the urban legend was born of the supposed pedophilia of the artist, a bad story that has been self-perpetuated in time of poisons, suspects and falsehoods, to actually destroy its reputation and, consequently, his career.

Jackson was first accused in 1993, at the height of his success, by a 13-year-old Jordan Chandler.

Then the wiretaps immediately revealed that the boy's father, a former dentist who had been unlawed for illegal practices, had planned everything to take revenge on the singer, who had refused to finance him a film project. The man, who committed suicide in 2010, probably driven by guilt, even managed to give his son Amobarbital, a barbiturate with hypnotic properties, to make him "confess" before the judges.

The matter was resolved by an out-of-court agreement with the family, which Jackson will later regret, by paying a check for $ 22 million to quickly close the question on pressure from his record company, which did not want repercussions on the tour in Jackson's course.

The artist's lawyer, Tom Meserau, confided: "It's true that for him it was small change, but it was a very serious mistake, he created a precedent and someone must have thought, why work if you can extort money from Jackson? Michael was badly advised by his staff, whose only concern was to lose money, maybe be forced to cancel the shows because of the trial. "

The Garvin Arvizo process
Even more infamous were the accusations addressed years later by Gavin Arvizo, a 13-year-old who Jackson had helped to recover from cancer. Arvizo accused the King of Pop of sexual abuse on the wave of the media echo created by the television special Living with Michael Jackson by British journalist Martin Bashir, aired on 3 February.

A perfect example of bad journalism, in which, with a clever cut and sew of images and clips of interviews, was put in a bad light the former child prodigy of the Jackson Five.

The trial began January 31, 2005 and ended June 13 of the same year, when the jury issued a unanimous verdict of "not guilty" for all fourteen charges. The news of Jackson's acquittal was given by the media in a fleeting way, for them he has always been guilty and, as recent events show, he still is guilty.

Michael Jackson, who expressed all his anger at the fanciful journalistic reconstructions of his private life in the corrosive Tabloid Junkie , said: "The technique that the newspapers use is very simple: if you keep telling an absurd lie, the reader, at some point, he will begin to think that it is true " .

Journalist Aphrodite Jones followed the trial on behalf of Fox. She also considered the King of Pop guilty, but later changed her mind and wrote a book in 2007, from the unmistakable title The Plot . "When in that hall - reveals the journalist - the judge pronounced 14 times not guilty, I looked Jackson in the face and I realized that his expression was that of a grateful man, satisfied that justice had been done, because he was not guilty . There I changed my mind ".

The singer, although relieved of those terrible accusations, came out of him psychologically and artistically. Her physique did not sustain an overdose of Propofol, the substance that, incautiously administered by her attending physician Conrad Murray (convicted of culpable homicide), killed her on June 25, 2009.

The artistic legacy of the King of Pop
Today, almost 10 years after the tragic event, there is practically no contemporary r & b artist, from Pharrell Williams to Robin Thicke, from Bruno Mars to Justin Timberlake , who is not openly inspired by Michael Jackson's visionary and borderless pop.

His steps are taught in modern dance schools, his albums , both repertoire and posthumously, still sell thousands of copies and every year the number of his fans grows exponentially.

Everyone knows that belongs to him the best-selling album in history, the Thriller masterpiece, with a hundred million copies (although some claim that they are actually 66 million, however, the record does not change), a number that continues to grow in the year in the year.

A lesser-known but more important record is the Guinness record of the most philanthropic primates in show business, with nearly four hundred million dollars donated to charity and philanthropy , particularly hospitals and orphanages.

We hope that on the next 25th of June, the tenth anniversary of the singer's death, it will be a day in which Jackson's artistic genius will be celebrated all over the world, without sterile polemics on accusations that have already been largely denied during a trial.
 
Interesting exchange............

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">David, take your emotional response to the doc out of the equation. Was their any counterbalance to their stories? Any actual evidence to back them up? Are you aware that Safechuck's story comes out of a book so ugly Michael won $2.7 mil against the author?</p>&mdash; Showbiz 411 (@showbiz411) <a href="https://twitter.com/showbiz411/status/1089354498789834752?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 27, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="und" dir="ltr"><a href="https://t.co/CkRa0JNoGC">https://t.co/CkRa0JNoGC</a> <a href="https://t.co/oj8zFurVOS">https://t.co/oj8zFurVOS</a></p>&mdash; Showbiz 411 (@showbiz411) <a href="https://twitter.com/showbiz411/status/1090018703574515713?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 28, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Here ya go:<a href="https://t.co/ygvGXtgaV7">https://t.co/ygvGXtgaV7</a></p>&mdash; Rachel Anne Emily (@rachanneemily) <a href="https://twitter.com/rachanneemily/status/1090030505670565888?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 28, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
MICHAEL JACKSON WINS $2.7 MILLION SUIT AGAINST WRITER https://www.chicagotribun...story.html
CHICAGO TRIBUNE

Michael Jackson won $2.7 million in his slander suit against a freelance writer who claimed to have a videotape of the pop singer having sex with a teenage boy.

"Jurors told us that they not only wanted to compensate Mr. Jackson and punish Victor Gutierrez, but to send a message that they are tired of tabloids lying about celebrities for money," Jackson's lawyer, Zia Modabber, said after a Los Angeles jury decided against Victor Gutierrez on Thursday.

Jackson sued Gutierrez for $100 million in 1995, claiming he told "Hard Copy" reporter Diane Dimond that there was a video of Jackson having sex with a 13-year-old boy, and that she repeated the comments on KABC-AM.

Gutierrez's attorney, Robert Goldman, acknowledged that "some of the jurors wanted to send a message to tabloids."

In 1994, Jackson reached an out-of-court settlement in a sexual molestation lawsuit stemming from the entertainer's friendship with a 13-year-old boy.

Investigations against the entertainer failed to produce criminal charges. Jackson has repeatedly denied the allegations.
 
Last edited:
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

Watched the adult liar Wade Robsonn praise Michael Jackson in this interview:

 
Very.b;4237877 said:
The real answer to all of those questions is: “because it never happened, not by Michael “ but now he needs money but most of all he needs a very good psychiatrist

oh he doesnt need a psychiarst he needs a good kickin in the head!
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

Guys, if you post some American links, many of us from the EU can not open the links and read it, because of new EU regulatuions, so please, post the full text of the articles if needed
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

Has taj even read what thst uneducated woman has said. Ffs someone on twitter send her some facts and tell taj to get his head out of his ass.

Metoo. yeah right is the way its viewed by many now. Its become a withunt. Kinda like peta but for humans!

Jacksons only ever defended mj when it had the potential to effect the money they got from him
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

That David Ehrlich should be told about how a lot of the dirty details are all from the banned book by Victor. They call the doc damning and what not, but how the **** is it damning when there's no actual evidence of anything. It's just two adult guys claiming these things happened, things that again, come from that goddamn book of which MJ won his lawsuit against the author. And the things that aren't based on that book, they made up themselves.


That's what frustrates me so much, people see this doc and get only one side. It's beyond me how such a thing is even allowed really. Completely ruining a person and his image without any actual evidence.

If anything, start a ****ing witch hunt on that Victor guy. Christ! I'm honestly not so confident in the outcome of this and how a lot of people see MJ, after this filth has been shown on TV. All these reviewers praising the doc, smh. Do some actual research yourself for God's sake, ****ing sheep.
 
Last edited:
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

The reviewers dont care about the facts. Dont act like if they see facts they will change. They dont care one iota as it is the plan to destroy mj.they are quite happy to along with it .hand picked haters in the audience to cheer the liars on and then they go write their reviews to give it as much attention as possible before the gen public gets to view it who will take it as fact if somethong is not donn to point out all the lies and contridictions from what was said in the past,in depositions etc etc etc. Will the estate care enough to do it? Only if it effects the bottom line
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

I dont think the estate will do anything
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

I have to say, if this documentary airs, and enough people watch it, it will ultimately destroy Michael's legacy and the love people have for him.
Based on the reviews, it's a very devastating documentary.

At this point, regardless of whether or not Michael molested boys, to which non of us for sure know, he's dead. That's what pisses me off about the documentary but what is the point of releasing this documentary accusing a dead man who cannot defend himself of the worst accusations one could face. They both had an opportunity in 2005 to testify against Michael and get him put away, yet they didn't.

Regardless, even as a big fan myself, I will not go as to 100% discredit their claims, because I was not there. I just question the timing and motive of their decision.

This is where I'm at. I'm just so angry that they did this and I don't agree, I don't think it's helping anyone. Even if I were to entertain the idea that their story is true to some extent, believe it or not, I could find my peace with that, but I think it's incredibly unfair to do this now when he's gone and the only thing that's left is this incredible legacy and all the good he did and the people he helped. His music has saved so many people through tough times and given them hope and they're trying to take that away. Not to mention the impact this will have on his children and everyone who loved him. It's absolutely unforgivable.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="sk"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Corey Haim starts at 1:30 - He begins by saying NO ONE treated <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MichaelJackson?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MichaelJackson</a> with respect he deserved. <a href="https://t.co/FPCWyvmkCy">https://t.co/FPCWyvmkCy</a> - <a href="https://twitter.com/Hammertonhal?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Hammertonhal</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/sanemfan?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@sanemfan</a> <a href="https://t.co/P5QaY60FbN">pic.twitter.com/P5QaY60FbN</a></p>&mdash; MJJJusticeProject (@MJJJusticePrjct) <a href="https://twitter.com/MJJJusticePrjct/status/936268345959112704?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">30. novembra 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

"The Rageaholic" who is a good Defender of MJ aired today a very good video to the documentery: https://youtu.be/9yTTEwBLfUQ


This is excellent.

I have subscribed to his channel for the last couple of years and he's a good guy.

Please share his video far and wide across the internet!!
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

The reviewers dont care about the facts. Dont act like if they see facts they will change. They dont care one iota as it is the plan to destroy mj.they are quite happy to along with it .hand picked haters in the audience to cheer the liars on and then they go write their reviews to give it as much attention as possible before the gen public gets to view it who will take it as fact if somethong is not donn to point out all the lies and contridictions from what was said in the past,in depositions etc etc etc. Will the estate care enough to do it? Only if it effects the bottom line

You're right. I was gonna say that we need a way to inform the media of the facts, the stuff they don't report on at all. The facts that would discredit a lot of the stuff in this doc.

Then I remembered how they covered the 2005 trial and constantly tried to make it look like MJ was having a very bad day while in actuality his team was winning all the way. It was either that from them, or they talked shit about his clothing. They've never cared about the facts at all. Same goes for these fake fans that all of a sudden appeared after his death.

Those will be the first to flock towards these lying ass bastards.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

After we organized a wide protest, now the director hit back.




I don't know how everyone writes to him, maybe some are rational, maybe some are not, I can't control everyone's expressions)

And we are kept writing, never stopped.

Just let you know:




Hollywood reporter: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/n...r-hits-back-at-michael-jackson-estate-1180215




In addition to enduring the wrath of the family and estate, Reed has been inundated with emails, calls and even death threats from fans lambasting the film. The two accusers, who have since left Park City, were flanked by bodyguards as they left the Sundance premiere.




"Over a week I had about a thousand emails from China and then they stopped about as suddenly as they'd begun, saying vile things to me, making threats," he says. "I know that there's a level of organization. Some of the email writing is cut and paste because we found a webpage that explains to people what to do [to protest Leaving Neverland]."


 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="sk"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">THANK U &#8294;<a href="https://twitter.com/NBCNews?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@NBCNews</a>&#8297; 4 FINALLY ALLOWING ME IN MY OWN VOICE 2 SET THE RECORD STRAIGHT! THIS IS THE ARTICLE EVERY1 SHOULD READ!! 2DAY MAKES HISTORY, &amp; ITS ONLY THE THE CREST OF THE TURNING TIDE CALLED <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Kids2?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Kids2</a> (Children&#8217;s Rights Movement) <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/THETRUTHISCOMING?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#THETRUTHISCOMING</a> <a href="https://t.co/kz6HBfvIiV">https://t.co/kz6HBfvIiV</a></p>&mdash; Corey Feldman (@Corey_Feldman) <a href="https://twitter.com/Corey_Feldman/status/1089973603100110849?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">28. januára 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

It is now time for us fans to do something!

For that we need the estate and they need us!

I'll just write down my thoughts:

The documentary is specifically targeted for this year to damage the estate as much as possible. Ultimately, both liars failed at court!
I do not want to comment on both's ridiculous allegations anymore.

We do not have to fight on their low level and respond in the same style with a new documentary.

We should answer with only one weapon!
New project with a hit song or album + video! Even better if other artists participate

The Estate has to stop this doc and has to do something for the 10th anniversary. And for that they have us behind them!

That's how I feel right now. We just have nothing left in our hands!
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

I have to say, if this documentary airs, and enough people watch it, it will ultimately destroy Michael's legacy and the love people have for him.
Based on the reviews, it's a very devastating documentary.

At this point, regardless of whether or not Michael molested boys, to which non of us for sure know, he's dead. That's what pisses me off about the documentary but what is the point of releasing this documentary accusing a dead man who cannot defend himself of the worst accusations one could face. They both had an opportunity in 2005 to testify against Michael and get him put away, yet they didn't.

Regardless, even as a big fan myself, I will not go as to 100% discredit their claims, because I was not there. I just question the timing and motive of their decision.

I absolutely discredit all their claims. They sure have proven that they deserve that. Countless of inconsistencies and contradictions in what he said in 2005 compared to 2015 and now in this doc. Basically completely different stories really, I would say it's no better than what mommy Arvizo claimed and her constant changing story.

The things he said about MJ in the opus, in interviews, to him via postcards or whatever the **** it was where he thanked MJ for sharing his sacred land Neverland. I firmly believe without a doubt that MJ never touched these people. That just wasn't him. As Corey Feldman said it, he just wasn't that kind of guy. I find it extremely telling how all of the accusers always had something off about them, something shady. Look, if there had been at least one kid or family that was NOT off, not trying to go for a easy money grab, not having said drastically different things in the past in defense of MJ and now coming out with a ludicrous new claim.... it wouldn't have been so easy to just say I discredit it all.

These two are no better than the Chandlers and Arvizos and I see zero reason, zero, to even consider the possibility that they could be telling truth here.
 
What I find really sad is that everyone always says - Innocent until proven guilty...

But with MJ it is and has always been - Guilty until proven innocent...

When some greedy F#"¤s claim these stupid things it is almost impossible to prove MJ's innocense... We have sooo many proofs, and so many things that indicates (proves?) that MJ was innocent. Yet, those two are alive and very public and loud with those allegations... - MJ is not around to defend himself, no one really does. - Mostly fans. A great objective doc that goes thru every statement, the phonecall recording, trial transcripts etc. - that will not prove MJ was innocent, but it will show all the lies all the contradictions etc. - and any normal person will hopefully conclude MJ was innocent.
 
ILoveHIStory;4238754 said:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="sk"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">THANK U &#8294;<a href="https://twitter.com/NBCNews?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@NBCNews</a>&#8297; 4 FINALLY ALLOWING ME IN MY OWN VOICE 2 SET THE RECORD STRAIGHT! THIS IS THE ARTICLE EVERY1 SHOULD READ!! 2DAY MAKES HISTORY, &amp; ITS ONLY THE THE CREST OF THE TURNING TIDE CALLED <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Kids2?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Kids2</a> (Children&#8217;s Rights Movement) <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/THETRUTHISCOMING?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#THETRUTHISCOMING</a> <a href="https://t.co/kz6HBfvIiV">https://t.co/kz6HBfvIiV</a></p>&mdash; Corey Feldman (@Corey_Feldman) <a href="https://twitter.com/Corey_Feldman/status/1089973603100110849?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">28. januára 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Good on Corey! I'm definitely going to read that in a minute, but it seems he's finally being heard. Took a good minute.

Has he said anything about Leaving Neverland yet?
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"


According to this panel it's the year of the pedophile... Discussion about pedo's film starts at the 6:05 mark.

Please leave a comment or give the video a thumbs down if you have a youtube account. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

You're right. I was gonna say that we need a way to inform the media of the facts, the stuff they don't report on at all. The facts that would discredit a lot of the stuff in this doc.

Then I remembered how they covered the 2005 trial and constantly tried to make it look like MJ was having a very bad day while in actuality his team was winning all the way. It was either that from them, or they talked shit about his clothing. They've never cared about the facts at all. Same goes for these fake fans that all of a sudden appeared after his death.

Those will be the first to flock towards these lying ass bastards.

In 93 I was this 19 year old with no internetaccess but I was sceptical to the big media circus and that the media just seemed to forget about how it all started, the Chandler tape etc .
In 2005 I was thinking that if we just send facts to the media they will understand and report on that but that was kind of naive. We need to be aware that it is difficult to get someone to understand something if their salery depend on them not understanding it. Some will just be encouraged to write more trash but not all of the media is like that. It is important to understand the difference and send it to what seems to be a serious journalist and like I said before I think a lot of people do see through this to begin with. And why watch the documentary to begin with? Probably because you are a hater or live in a bouble to begin with. These are adult men accusing a dead person after all.
 
Last edited:
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

Have tried replying on this thread a couple of times and its not showing up for some reason. I'll try again now. Do any of you think we need some kind of source with all the facts that doesn't have things like 'MJfan' etc in the title? This is no disrespect to fans but people simply don't want to listen if they think its just fans pushing an agenda. I also worry people won't take Taj seriously either as he's obviously going to defend his family. I feel like it needs to be someone impartial who can just deliver facts. Any ideas? Also do any of you know how to find direct sources of information, official statements, court transcripts etc. I keep trying to tell people stuff and linking them to MJ fan sources just doesn't work.
 
Back
Top