Latest on MJJC

Thriller 40th Anniversary

Mister_Jay_Tee said:
Idk, I compared the 'new' starlight to the mp3 leak I've been having, it's noticably better. That and Trouble.
Click to expand...

Yeah I was talking about Hot Street, which has leaked in great quality, probably being lower quality when it's eventually released. Didn't mention anything about Starlight or Trouble.
 
Last edited:
SmoothGangsta said:
Yeah I was talking about Hot Street, which has leaked in great quality, probably being lower quality when it's eventually released. Didn't mention anything about Starlight or Trouble.
Click to expand...
I see no reason for Hot Street being lower quality. There's precedence for good quality releases, Thriller wise, the bad in this case are really outliers. Carousel I chalk up mostly to going back to the very earliest tape instead of the 2001/2008 stuff. Maybe because they lost it.
 
wonderouzmj said:
He keep the exact same aaahhhhssss from 88 on the 95 version... WOW!! WE'VE BEEN LISTENING TO 88 VOCALS THIS WHOLE TIME
Click to expand...
Do you mean the lead or backing vocals? The lead was most certainly not used on the album version. He re-recorded the song in late 1989 / early 1990, which is why it sounds so similar to the 1988 version, and most of the lead vocals come from that session.

The backing vocals could be the same, but I’m not sure. I think he would have properly re-recorded them in 1989.
 
dethorro said:
Do you mean the lead or backing vocals? The lead was most certainly not used on the album version. He re-recorded the song in late 1989 / early 1990, which is why it sounds so similar to the 1988 version, and most of the lead vocals come from that session.

The backing vocals could be the same, but I’m not sure. I think he would have properly re-recorded them in 1989.
Click to expand...
Trust me...im 10x ahead/aware of all of this & yes I meant background vocals. The baritone aaahhhsss (2-3rd layer). They are the exact same. Listen to the multitrack bgv & then the 88. I'm just mind blown that they have always been some bad era mixed in on that particular song
 
wonderouzmj said:
I have the dolby version downloaded & im no expert but I don't think it's supposed to sound the way it sounds. Alot of elements seem to be missing
Click to expand...
The dolby version is actually one of the best dolby mixed projects ive ever heard. Only aspect of this celebration they actually did right.
 
AlwaysThere said:
Financially, he’s 100% right. No other estate has overseen the level of success MJ’s has. Hence the “Nearly $3 billion in earnings later” comment.

Artistically… lmfao.
Click to expand...
yes because y'all supporting them crappy projects. I'm sorry but that is the true.
 
The main reason to support so hard early on was to help make MJ's kids pockets fatter.

As for their success in the Estate?

It's because Cirque De Soleil and This Is It made a ton of money. It's that simple really.

And the huge outpour of grief/mourning in 2009 helped.

But sure, me streaming Bad 25 on Spotify directly made John Branca rich or whatever. The real fans just stays on this website and birch, birch,birch, and moan.
 
AlwaysThere said:
No, he doesn’t lmfao. That’s ridiculous.
Click to expand...
His point is somewhat valid. If fans did not support the estate for their lack of projects and/or poor projects they would eventually put out something of quality so they do not loose their cash flow. They know that a ton of mj fans will eat up anything they put out regardless of the quality.
 
MJ has consistently been the highest earning deceased celebrity, and in 2016, was the highest earning artist period (thanks to the ATV Sale) but hasn't been for the last couple of years. The fact of the matter is, just "crappy projects" aren't going to keep revenue flowing and continue when the real money is in streaming content and other things with ongoing support. Music albums, music period, does not accrue much.

Although in reflection, much of their early success no doubt was in the long term genius of holding on to the catalogue...
 
MJ did very well on this list despite the LN-desaster, Covid and no album-releases in the last years. In 2016 he is on 6 because the dead people for him did selling their cataloges or estates and elvis has the biopic this year.

Prince, Freddy, Whitney, Lennon..... are not in the Top Ten

www.mjvibe.com

Michael Jackson in the top 10 of The Highest-Paid Dead Celebrities for 2022 - MJVibe

Michael Jackson was #1 for 8 years in the row in the famous Forbes’ Highest-Paid Dead Celebrity. In 2021, Michael went to #3 due to the Estate not securing major deals and COVID. COVID is still a repercussion of this year’s position in the list, but also other artists have secured bigger deals...
www.mjvibe.com www.mjvibe.com
Michael Jackson was #1 for 8 years in the row in the famous Forbes’ Highest-Paid Dead Celebrity.

In 2021, Michael went to #3 due to the Estate not securing major deals and COVID.

COVID is still a repercussion of this year’s position in the list, but also other artists have secured bigger deals. At #1 this year we can see J.R.R. Tolkien who made $500 Million when Swedish video game company Embracer announced its acquisition of Middle Earth Enterprises in August for $788 million. Following close behind is basketball legend Kobe Bryant with $400 million from his estate’s sale of his stake in the BodyArmor sports drink company to Coca-Cola. It marks the largest acquisition in the soft drink firm’s history. At #3, David Bowie Estate made $250 Million with the sale of his publishing catalogue. Elvis is at #4 majorly from his Estate deals for shows, merchandise and of course the biopic. James Brown is at #5 due to the acquisition of his music rights by a New York-based independent music publisher.

And yes, Michael Jackson lost 3 spots to be at #6 for 2022. MJ ONE was closed for so long due to COVID, the lack of Merchandise’s sale and Estate’s deals made in the last 2 years has a repercussion in the profits and therefore the position in this list. However, 2023 might be different as MJ ONE in Las Vegas re-opened, MJ The Musical is doing really well with $80 million growth by November and also it is about to tour the US in August 2023. Not to mention Thriller 40 is about to come out and the sales of this new Estate Project will put back some cash in the bank with albums and merchandise sales.

  1. J.R.R. Tolkien with $500 Million
  2. Kobe Bryant with $400 Million
  3. David Bowie with $250 Million
  4. Elvis Presley with $110 Million
  5. James Brown with $100 Million
  6. Michael Jackson with $75 Million
  7. Leonard Cohen with $55 Million
  8. Dr Seuss with $32 Million
  9. Jeff Porcaro with $25 Million
  10. Charles Schulz with $24 Million
SOURCE: Forbes
 
Last edited:
Mister_Jay_Tee said:
MJ has consistently been the highest earning deceased celebrity, and in 2016, was the highest earning artist period (thanks to the ATV Sale) but hasn't been for the last couple of years. The fact of the matter is, just "crappy projects" aren't going to keep revenue flowing and continue when the real money is in streaming content and other things with ongoing support. Music albums, music period, does not accrue much.

Although in reflection, much of their early success no doubt was in the long term genius of holding on to the catalogue...
Click to expand...
He wasn't this year actually the streak fell off
 
Clay7 said:
His point is somewhat valid. If fans did not support the estate for their lack of projects and/or poor projects they would eventually put out something of quality so they do not loose their cash flow. They know that a ton of mj fans will eat up anything they put out regardless of the quality.
Click to expand...
The estate has released no less than a dozen projects since MJ’s death. Of those, I can name 4 that attained widespread commercial success (This Is It, Michael, XSCAPE, and T40). Everything else performed moderately to poorly. And even the high-selling projects haven’t been immune from extensive fan criticism and outcry.

The estate’s poor-quality projects are their fault and their fault alone. Blaming the fans is a pathetic cop-out.
 
AlwaysThere said:
The estate has released no less than a dozen projects since MJ’s death. Of those, I can name 4 that attained widespread commercial success (This Is It, Michael, XSCAPE, and T40). Everything else performed moderately to poorly. And even the high-selling projects haven’t been immune from extensive fan criticism and outcry.

The estate’s poor-quality projects are their fault and their fault alone. Blaming the fans is a pathetic cop-out.
Click to expand...
No I think you’re misunderstanding what I meant haha. What I meant was, fans are somewhat encouraging their behavior of delivering subpar projects by supporting them. If their lazy projects all had terrible sales and their revenue over all is low they would surely attempt to do something about it.
 
Clay7 said:
No I think you’re misunderstanding what I meant haha. What I meant was, fans are somewhat encouraging their behavior of delivering subpar projects by supporting them. If their lazy projects all had terrible sales and their revenue over all is low they would surely attempt to do something about it.
Click to expand...
Their revenue is quite low, lower than they'd like. They haven't gotten a #1 yet. The products that are actually good deserve it. They made a few good products: This Is It, Cirque De Soleil, and the Musical. It's just the albums that people nitpick so hard.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top