Latest on MJJC

The Discussion of MJ's Unreleased Tracks

Going back to the unauthorized 1983 interview, Michael spent 1983 and 1984 with Buz Kohan creating music for Steven Spielbergs scrapped Peter Pan movie. Neverland Landing, Make a Wish, I'm Peter Pan and Happy Song are 4 songs worked on for that project

Has anyone contacted Buz?
 
NetflexKing said:
Apparently there is a "Pajamas" snippet online that kinda sounds legit in terms of production. We should ask Damien if it's the real thing.
Click to expand...
FlyAway0086 said:
Click to expand...
Oh, c'mon! Seriously?

results.png
 
BlackAnon said:
Would’ve been a better interview if he wasn’t in front of that waterfall. Wish they would’ve asked him more about music and his projects at the time
Click to expand...
It's a strange interview. He mentions BJ and Beat It so obviously those two have already been big hits, the album is doing its thing, and yet these people have awesome access to him. The interview is really amateurish (the waterfall nonsense, terrible sound quality). Who are these people?

I like the interview itself. The questions are basic but not shallow, imo. Hearing Michael talking about magic and his inspiration is fabulous.

@mjfanatic777 said:
The interview, right? Did he also sing the chorus for Best Of Joy / The Toy ?
Click to expand...
No, just the lovely Peter Pan thing.
 
zinniabooklover said:
It's a strange interview. He mentions BJ and Beat It so obviously those two have already been big hits, the album is doing its thing, and yet these people have awesome access to him. The interview is really amateurish (the waterfall nonsense, terrible sound quality). Who are these people?

I like the interview itself. The questions are basic but not shallow, imo. Hearing Michael talking about magic and his inspiration is fabulous.


No, just the lovely Peter Pan thing.
Click to expand...
I believe he sued the cameraman for selling the footage without his knowledge. This is one of those interviews where Michael had no plans to release it but was going to keep it for himself
 
BlackAnon said:
I believe he sued the cameraman for selling the footage without his knowledge. This is one of those interviews where Michael had no plans to release it but was going to keep it for himself
Click to expand...
Oh, did not know that. Apologies to Michael but I can't pretend I'm not glad it's out there bc it's brilliant. I usually skip the LaToya bit and the picture and sound quality are crap but the content is actually really good. Especially compared to the usual msm nonsense that's out there.

Thanks for the info. I only found it 2 - 3 years ago so I can watch it with a clear conscience, lol.
 
firmware-god said:
Try this one instead: Why DID the Estate release anything at all after Michaels death?
Click to expand...
There are several reasons, John Branca has indicated that Michael's album was complicated to put together and that there were very few MJ vocals in the later years.
The second reason is that they don't have all the songs, multi-tracks and they need the collaborators but they don't do it.
The 3rd reason is that they reported 83 songs, in different states, to the IRS to pay less taxes.
The 4th reason is that unreleased songs don't make as much money as other projects. However, that doesn't mean that these unreleased songs will never be released.
Can you develop further on your side as well? Thanks in advance.
 
BlackAnon said:
Going back to the unauthorized 1983 interview, Michael spent 1983 and 1984 with Buz Kohan creating music for Steven Spielbergs scrapped Peter Pan movie. Neverland Landing, Make a Wish, I'm Peter Pan and Happy Song are 4 songs worked on for that project

Has anyone contacted Buz?
Click to expand...
I have already tried to contact him. But unfortunately I didn't get any feedback from him. Maybe someone will be luckier than me.
 
FlyAway0086 said:
Alright, alright, I'll admit that it had me, at first. I think it was the percussive elements, over everything else. I'll put on the clown makeup for today.
Click to expand...
Yea, the stranger in Moscow beats make everything sound more endearing, even if not authentic. It's not really that easy to tell anymore.
 
JohnC said:
Let's end the confusion about MJ's unreleased tracks here.
Click to expand...
Well here's one way to help end my confusion: What is the difference between the 2001 Ver. of Xscape on Xscape and the 2002 Ver. that leaked in 2002
 
SmoothMel7 said:
There are several reasons, John Branca has indicated that Michael's album was complicated to put together and that there were very few MJ vocals in the later years.
The second reason is that they don't have all the songs, multi-tracks and they need the collaborators but they don't do it.
The 3rd reason is that they reported 83 songs, in different states, to the IRS to pay less taxes.
The 4th reason is that unreleased songs don't make as much money as other projects. However, that doesn't mean that these unreleased songs will never be released.
Can you develop further on your side as well? Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
So it's simultaneously both the Estate's fault...and not their fault at all.
 
Sisoqqq said:


This song is tribute to MJ. There is a singer from Algeria called soolking who did dance MJ
Click to expand...
Wrong thread, bro. Why do you post almost every unrelated stuff in here? This forum has more threads than just this. And if there isn't one that doesn't fits your topic you can open a new one.
 
Why is it important to stick to the scope or parameters of a forum thread titled, "Let's end the confusion about MJ's (Michael Jackson's) unreleased tracks here"?

Sticking to the scope or parameters of a forum thread, especially one focused on ending confusion about Michael Jackson's unreleased tracks, is important for several reasons:
  1. Clarity and Purpose: The thread is likely created to provide clarity and compile accurate information about a specific topic—in this case, Michael Jackson's unreleased tracks. Staying on topic ensures that the purpose of the thread is fulfilled, and the information remains clear and relevant to those seeking it.
  2. Efficiency: By focusing discussions strictly on the subject at hand, participants can more efficiently share and receive information. This avoids the dilution of valuable data with off-topic posts, making it easier for everyone to find the information they need quickly.
  3. Respect for Participants: People visiting the thread are there for a specific reason. Sticking to the relevant topic shows respect for their time and interest, as they may not wish to sift through unrelated content to find what they are looking for.
  4. Ease of Moderation: It helps moderators to manage the forum more effectively. When discussions remain on-topic, it reduces the workload for moderators who might otherwise need to remove off-topic posts or guide the conversation back to the main focus.
  5. Archival Value: A well-maintained thread that sticks to its intended topic becomes a valuable resource for future reference. This is particularly important for topics with historical or fan interest, such as the unreleased works of a famous artist.
Staying within the scope of the thread not only enhances the user experience but also builds a comprehensive and focused resource that benefits current and future forum visitors interested in the topic.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top