Latest on MJJC

The Discussion of MJ's Unreleased Tracks

JohnC said:
Oh, c'mon! Seriously?

results.png
Click to expand...
Alright, alright, I'll admit that it had me, at first. I think it was the percussive elements, over everything else. I'll put on the clown makeup for today.
 
FlyAway0086 said:
Alright, alright, I'll admit that it had me, at first. I think it was the percussive elements, over everything else. I'll put on the clown makeup for today.
Click to expand...
Yea, the stranger in Moscow beats make everything sound more endearing, even if not authentic. It's not really that easy to tell anymore.
 
JohnC said:
Let's end the confusion about MJ's unreleased tracks here.
Click to expand...
Well here's one way to help end my confusion: What is the difference between the 2001 Ver. of Xscape on Xscape and the 2002 Ver. that leaked in 2002
 
SmoothMel7 said:
There are several reasons, John Branca has indicated that Michael's album was complicated to put together and that there were very few MJ vocals in the later years.
The second reason is that they don't have all the songs, multi-tracks and they need the collaborators but they don't do it.
The 3rd reason is that they reported 83 songs, in different states, to the IRS to pay less taxes.
The 4th reason is that unreleased songs don't make as much money as other projects. However, that doesn't mean that these unreleased songs will never be released.
Can you develop further on your side as well? Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
So it's simultaneously both the Estate's fault...and not their fault at all.
 
Sisoqqq said:


This song is tribute to MJ. There is a singer from Algeria called soolking who did dance MJ
Click to expand...
Wrong thread, bro. Why do you post almost every unrelated stuff in here? This forum has more threads than just this. And if there isn't one that doesn't fits your topic you can open a new one.
 
Why is it important to stick to the scope or parameters of a forum thread titled, "Let's end the confusion about MJ's (Michael Jackson's) unreleased tracks here"?

Sticking to the scope or parameters of a forum thread, especially one focused on ending confusion about Michael Jackson's unreleased tracks, is important for several reasons:
  1. Clarity and Purpose: The thread is likely created to provide clarity and compile accurate information about a specific topic—in this case, Michael Jackson's unreleased tracks. Staying on topic ensures that the purpose of the thread is fulfilled, and the information remains clear and relevant to those seeking it.
  2. Efficiency: By focusing discussions strictly on the subject at hand, participants can more efficiently share and receive information. This avoids the dilution of valuable data with off-topic posts, making it easier for everyone to find the information they need quickly.
  3. Respect for Participants: People visiting the thread are there for a specific reason. Sticking to the relevant topic shows respect for their time and interest, as they may not wish to sift through unrelated content to find what they are looking for.
  4. Ease of Moderation: It helps moderators to manage the forum more effectively. When discussions remain on-topic, it reduces the workload for moderators who might otherwise need to remove off-topic posts or guide the conversation back to the main focus.
  5. Archival Value: A well-maintained thread that sticks to its intended topic becomes a valuable resource for future reference. This is particularly important for topics with historical or fan interest, such as the unreleased works of a famous artist.
Staying within the scope of the thread not only enhances the user experience but also builds a comprehensive and focused resource that benefits current and future forum visitors interested in the topic.
 
Lucy is in Love with Linus is something I'm curious to hear. Lucy is Linus' older sister.

Fanfare 1992, Little Girls and Llama Lola are also on my list. These were written sometime during Dangerous
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top