zinniabooklover
Proud Member
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2022
- Messages
- 25,372
- Points
- 113
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looking good to me.
OMG yes….I always hoped he’d do an ACOUSTIC ”unplugged” show!!! Even pre-recorded!!! They could’ve had a contest for fans to win a ticket to the show and then they could have taped it and aired it world wide!!!I think it would have been nice if Michael had given a concert where he performed the entire album. In the style of the canceled HBO special. So that people saw again: oh yes, he is also a musician. I mainly remember that we knew Michael at the time because of all the craziness around him, not as a musician.
This is part of it.The album was promoted. Michael complained to save face.
If it failed it's because they handled it with no adequacy at all.This is part of it.
But more importantly, we're asking the wrong question.
Invincible didn't fail because it wasn't promoted.
It wasn't promoted because it failed.
Basically, success leads to success. 2 singles from an album is reasonable enough, and very common. But a record company will keep releasing singles as long as they keep having hits. And they will stop releasing singles as soon as they don't have a hit. It really is as simple as that.
I agree about liking individual songs but not the album as a whole. That’s mainly my problem with the album. I mean, I could do without Heartbreaker and Invincible (and even Unbreakable) but the rest I actually love listening to!!! I think if you would’ve skipped the three first songs (even though I did once do a parody to the tune of Unbreakable called ”Mike’s Too Fine Tou Know”.A friend and I are working on a few Invincible tracklists, to go with our fictional timeline, right now... I'm not confident enough to share yet! The songs were there, both released and not, for a brilliant album with the right singles, videos and promotion.
But, honestly? Unbreakable as lead single + video, YRMW as second, a couple of the ballads, Whatever Happens & Threatened and that's a great potential group of singles. It's funny because I love individual songs from this record but not really the album as a whole? Not sure how to explain. Getting MJ to agree to a limited tour would help a lot as well - with US shows! I'm really enjoying reading over this thread.
You literally have no idea what you're talking about. Were you actually around then? You seem to be unaware of his relationship with Sony at the time.This is part of it.
But more importantly, we're asking the wrong question.
Invincible didn't fail because it wasn't promoted.
It wasn't promoted because it failed.
Basically, success leads to success. 2 singles from an album is reasonable enough, and very common. But a record company will keep releasing singles as long as they keep having hits. And they will stop releasing singles as soon as they don't have a hit. It really is as simple as that.
This is a decent point. Napster and Rhapsody weren't quite there yet. Windows Media Store either.CDs weren’t really a thing any longer but st the same time LEGIT digital downloads weren’t a thing either yet.
Yeah, that's true. For albums, we'd only seen this a couple of times. Saw it a lot for singles, I guess, but it was quite rare for albums. In a way , this started the American nonsense of Target version, Walmart version and whatever. Ugh. Disgusting.Releasing it in multiple colors was a genius idea. Not something I had seen before.
This really is the truth that people don't want to admit. It just wasn't a great album. That's all there is to it.IThe album wasn't great. Several really crappy slow songs.
I dunno. Too many collaborations and it starts to get a bit formulaic.Change out 6 songs, include a big collaboration and sales would have doubled.
They usually get released as B-sides. Problem is Invincible didn't have enough singles...It boggles my mind why they didn't even include the remixes with Jay-Z or Eve....
I think having an MTV Unplugged would have made people respect MJ more.I think it would have been nice if Michael had given a concert where he performed the entire album. In the style of the canceled HBO special. So that people saw again: oh yes, he is also a musician. I mainly remember that we knew Michael at the time because of all the craziness around him, not as a musician.
As I said before, they only spend money making a video if the album is already successful. Believe it or not, they don't plan everything out in advance - they're playing by ear. If people buy the 2nd single, they release a 3rd one. If people buy that, they release a 4th one. If people buy that, they release a 5th one. If people buy the 8th single, they release a 9th one, etc. but if nobody buys the 2nd single, that's it, no more.And Break of Dawn and Butterflies and Whatever Happens would need short films!!! And I’d make sure snippets of those songs are played everywhere during TV shows and movies and in commercials and in airplanes and at football and baseball and hockey ganes and in stores and just everywhere!!!
Like, you've got some good ideas. But this isn't one of them.And then I’d also make sure to do collabs with different brands. Use the song names or images from the short films to sell anything and everything. Sell an INVINCIBLE energy drink or I don’t know…Invincible wetsuits for surfers,Sell shoes ”Whatever Happens-Nike”… Do a collab with some battery company or something
Honestly, the first time I heard Cry I just yawned and said "not this theme again'YRMW and Cry sound like Sony wanted to play it safe with themes that were familiar to fans.
Just curious, what made you say this? Just because I said something you don't like? That's certainly the new way to try to write somebody off. I was literally talking earlier in this thread about how other musicians had to change their plans after 901.You literally have no idea what you're talking about. Were you actually around then? You seem to be unaware of his relationship with Sony at the time.
Oh and I’d like to add that Invincible sold over 10 million copies world wide WITHOUT any promotion whatsoever and DESPITE the whole album leaking before it was released. So again…HARDLY a ”flop”. Anyone who says it was being promoted is lying or weren’t around during that time. The ONLY promotion it got was the YRMW short film and the Virgin Megastore signing. THAT’S IT. I didn’t see any promotion anywhere, However, 9/11 also happened right after it was released so that too of course had an effect. Michael had many things planned (tour etc.) but nothing came of them after 9/11.![]()
^^Not really aiming to resurrect the convo, just looking for somewhere to place this fabulous photo which I love.
![]()
Interesting, so was I. Were you at the MJNI listening party?Yes, I was there when the album launched. Yes, I saw first hand in London, Manchester and NY what sort of wide-reaching promotion Invincible enjoyed.
Gloria told me it was MJs fault, not Sony's - this was before it even fully kicked off. Always wondered what that was about.Interesting, so was I. Were you at the MJNI listening party?
Interesting, I never really trusted Gloria, she did some shady things. People think she was this major fan, she wasnt, she was the business and finance behind MJNI, Adrian Grant was the major fan, she just saw great potential with his fan knowledge and ideas.Gloria told me it was MJs fault, not Sony's - this was before it even fully kicked off. Always wondered what that was about.
Fans forget KING magazine was going after MJs lack of promotion during HIStory.. it wasn't a new issue, just a lot worse this time around
At the time actually I downloaded You Rock My World before it was released on Napster. But I don't think Napster is the reason Invincible lagged a bit. I mean, you can't always be at your peak? I was in high school at the time, and it really wasn't cool to listen to Michael Jackson. Most saw him as a weirdo. The guys listened to Linkin Park and Jay-Z and stuff. The girls listened more to Christina Aguilera and Britney. If you liked Michael Jackson you had to keep it quiet. The 2000s were not a good era for Michael, especially after 2003. It was only after his death in 2009 that he became hip again.This is a decent point. Napster and Rhapsody weren't quite there yet. Windows Media Store either.
This is exactly how I seen it, I became a fan in the summer of 2001, I was 13 and it was not cool to be an MJ fan due to what you described.At the time actually I downloaded You Rock My World before it was released on Napster. But I don't think Napster is the reason Invincible lagged a bit. I mean, you can't always be at your peak? I was in high school at the time, and it really wasn't cool to listen to Michael Jackson. Most saw him as a weirdo. The guys listened to Linkin Park and Jay-Z and stuff. The girls listened more to Christina Aguilera and Britney. If you liked Michael Jackson you had to keep it quiet. The 2000s were not a good era for Michael, especially after 2003. It was only after his death in 2009 that he became hip again.
The kids aint exactly hyping MJ up like that now either.... It's just kinda circumstantial. It always has been, post Bad really.At the time actually I downloaded You Rock My World before it was released on Napster. But I don't think Napster is the reason Invincible lagged a bit. I mean, you can't always be at your peak? I was in high school at the time, and it really wasn't cool to listen to Michael Jackson. Most saw him as a weirdo. The guys listened to Linkin Park and Jay-Z and stuff. The girls listened more to Christina Aguilera and Britney. If you liked Michael Jackson you had to keep it quiet. The 2000s were not a good era for Michael, especially after 2003. It was only after his death in 2009 that he became hip again.
Gloria was the definition of shady. First time I met her she was the rudest person I had ever encountered up until 2001. Everything I have heard about her chimes with my own experiences.Interesting, I never really trusted Gloria, she did some shady things. People think she was this major fan, she wasnt, she was the business and finance behind MJNI, Adrian Grant was the major fan, she just saw great potential with his fan knowledge and ideas.
But to be honest he looked a lot younger than 43. At least that's how I perceived it.The truth of the matter was that the album wasn’t great by his standards and at 43 years old, he was seen as a bit past it and dated.
43 isn’t even old! But I guess the charts are all about the youth.But to be honest he looked a lot younger than 43. At least that's how I perceived it.