Latest on MJJC

"Michael", a biopic about Michael Jackson, is officially happening.

Billie Jean 78 said:
The report goes on to mention that this came to light after the HBO documentary Leaving Neverland, specifically after a September story in the Financial Times revealed that John Branca, one of Jackson’s executors, paid out $16.5 million to the accusers in the Leaving Neverland documentary, with one deciding to seek an additional $213 million, leading to litigation from Jackson’s estate.

Wait, what? Branca paid out money to the accussers in Leaving Neverland? Robson and that other bugger were paid by the Estate???
Click to expand...
That article is badly written and poorly researched. The settlement was with the Cascio’s - they had to make it public when Frank Cascio (although not named, it was most likely him based on the description) tried to break the agreement by threatening to make public their allegations if he didn’t get more money. So the estate put their side of the story out first via the Financial Times.

It seems the movie producers found out around the same time as the rest of us and six weeks later they delayed the film. It’s beyond ridiculous.
 
StellaJackson said:
That article is badly written and poorly researched. The settlement was with the Cascio’s - they had to make it public when Frank Cascio (although not named, it was most likely him based on the description) tried to break the agreement by threatening to make public their allegations if he didn’t get more money. So the estate put their side of the story out first via the Financial Times.

It seems the movie producers found out around the same time as the rest of us and six weeks later they delayed the film. It’s beyond ridiculous.
Click to expand...

Why would the Cascio "settlement" affect the biopic?
 
StellaJackson said:
That article is badly written and poorly researched. The settlement was with the Cascio’s - they had to make it public when Frank Cascio (although not named, it was most likely him based on the description) tried to break the agreement by threatening to make public their allegations if he didn’t get more money. So the estate put their side of the story out first via the Financial Times.

It seems the movie producers found out around the same time as the rest of us and six weeks later they delayed the film. It’s beyond ridiculous.
Click to expand...
Or maybe all the these articles got some part of the story wrong. Because, as I said, the math ain't mathing. So, let's wait.
 
IhateTheMedia said:
Lionsgate in their official earnings call today said the movie's production is finishing
Click to expand...
Your username is so appropriate lol

Where can I listen to the call?

If that's true the story about the reshoots might be a lie. How can production be finishing if they have reshoots?
 
Billie Jean 78 said:
The report goes on to mention that this came to light after the HBO documentary Leaving Neverland, specifically after a September story in the Financial Times revealed that John Branca, one of Jackson’s executors, paid out $16.5 million to the accusers in the Leaving Neverland documentary, with one deciding to seek an additional $213 million, leading to litigation from Jackson’s estate.

Wait, what? Branca paid out money to the accussers in Leaving Neverland? Robson and that other bugger were paid by the Estate???
Click to expand...
No. And searching is your friend. There's numerous threads about this on here.
 
StellaJackson said:
That article is badly written and poorly researched. The settlement was with the Cascio’s - they had to make it public when Frank Cascio (although not named, it was most likely him based on the description) tried to break the agreement by threatening to make public their allegations if he didn’t get more money. So the estate put their side of the story out first via the Financial Times.

It seems the movie producers found out around the same time as the rest of us and six weeks later they delayed the film. It’s beyond ridiculous.
Click to expand...
There's no evidence they delayed the movie because of the cascios.

Heck there's still no evidence the deal the estate made with the estate had anything to do with allegations either.
 
StellaJackson said:
Is it?
Click to expand...
Yes it is. It's a bold unsubstantiated assumption.

Especially when it's extremely common for movies to be delayed.

You just heard from lions gate themselves that they are on their way to completing production, which contradicts what all these hit piece articles have been saying, but you're still choosing to believe the hit piece articles?

Will the chokehold the media has on people's minds ever losen???
 
Transcript of the Lions gate earnings call


https://www.reddit.com/r/MichaelTheMovie/comments/1ijt8vu/production_is_almost_finished_on_the_biopic

Just to show you guys an example of how common it is for movies to be delayed on the Lions gate call they mentioned the movie John wick ballerina that's coming out in June. That movie was also delayed for a year.

From google

Release. From the World of John Wick: Ballerina is scheduled to be released in the United States on June 6, 2025, after being delayed from its originally announced date of June 7, 2024.

So please stop saying the delay had something to do with the cascios or the settlement. You're just falling for the media's trap. They know people are ignorant about how movie productions go and they're taking advantage of that to spread bad press about the biopic.


They also included the biopic in there "fiscal 26 slate"

For those who don't know what that means, I'll let google explain

What is fiscal year 2026?


Fiscal year 2026 refers to the 12-month period beginning on March 1, 2025, and ending on February 28, 2026. FY2026 Guidance Assumptions: Results include approximately $15-$18 million of equity income from AZZ's minority interest in its unconsolidated
 
Last edited:
kelley said:
There's no evidence they delayed the movie because of the cascios.

Heck there's still no evidence the deal the estate made with the estate had anything to do with allegations either.
Click to expand...
Michael Jackson’s estate has initiated legal proceedings against a former associate of the late pop icon, who threatened to raise fresh allegations of inappropriate conduct before the release of a film the executors hope will quell the child sex abuse claims that shadowed his later years.
The strategy suffered a setback after HBO’s 2019 documentary, Leaving Neverland, which featured the graphic accounts of two men, Wade Robson and James Safechuck, who alleged Jackson abused them as children.

Shortly after, the five unnamed accusers — who were not featured in the Neverland documentary — made their allegations. According to Jackson’s estate, the man had previously denied Jackson ever engaged in inappropriate conduct.

I would have thought that was pretty clear. As I said before, the quotes from John Branca in the FT are real and certain members of the Cascio family did indeed make allegations of sexual abuse. They are known fraudsters so it was never much of a surprise but I understand why people don't want to believe it.
 
StellaJackson said:
Michael Jackson’s estate has initiated legal proceedings against a former associate of the late pop icon, who threatened to raise fresh allegations of inappropriate conduct before the release of a film the executors hope will quell the child sex abuse claims that shadowed his later years.
The strategy suffered a setback after HBO’s 2019 documentary, Leaving Neverland, which featured the graphic accounts of two men, Wade Robson and James Safechuck, who alleged Jackson abused them as children.

Shortly after, the five unnamed accusers — who were not featured in the Neverland documentary — made their allegations. According to Jackson’s estate, the man had previously denied Jackson ever engaged in inappropriate conduct.

I would have thought that was pretty clear. As I said before, the quotes from John Branca in the FT are real and certain members of the Cascio family did indeed make allegations of sexual abuse. They are known fraudsters so it was never much of a surprise but I understand why people don't want to believe it.
Click to expand...
With regard to the biopic, the subject of this thread, there has been no suggestion that any delay is related to the Cascio's.
 
Robbsaber01 said:
I don't know about that story. Just for the record though. In one of his last interviews, he defended MJ during LN and wanted to punch Wade lol. Rip Aaron.

Hopefully these rumors aren't the reason for re-shoots. '93 has to be mentioned in the film. It changed almost everything.
Click to expand...

Yes because he's an attention whore. He wanted fans to praise him at that time and that outweighed the desire for money

But when he was down and needed money he told bullshit stories about Michael.
 
Last edited:
StellaJackson said:
That article is badly written and poorly researched. The settlement was with the Cascio’s - they had to make it public when Frank Cascio (although not named, it was most likely him based on the description) tried to break the agreement by threatening to make public their allegations if he didn’t get more money. So the estate put their side of the story out first via the Financial Times.

It seems the movie producers found out around the same time as the rest of us and six weeks later they delayed the film. It’s beyond ridiculous.
Click to expand...
Are you implying the delay happened because of the Cascios rather than because of the Chandlers??
 
Hot_Street said:
Is there a chance of a trailer at the Super Bowl?
Click to expand...
Personally I don't see that happening as it's only February. If the movie was scheduled for its original April release then sure but in October? I wouldn't expect a trailer until some time mid or after June
 
kelley said:
Yes because he's an attention whore. He wanted to fans to praise him at that time and that outweighed the desire for money

But when he was down and needed money he told bullshit stories about Michael.
Click to expand...
Any sources on the "bs stories" that he allegedly told? Regardless, from what I remember from the interview he seemed genuinely annoyed and surprised at Wade for lying. Even if you're right, I'd argue he did the right thing in the end.
 
Robbsaber01 said:
Any sources on the "bs stories" that he allegedly told? Regardless, from what I remember from the interview he seemed genuinely annoyed and surprised at Wade for lying. Even if you're right, I'd argue he did the right thing in the end.
Click to expand...
I'd rather not post links and bring more attention and views to the videos but you can look it up for yourself. Just search his name and weed. Then you should read the article on vindicate Michael that goes into detail about how Aaron's mother tried to sell that story back in the early 2000s and Aaron denied it at the time.

Fans need to start noticing the patterns in these people who exploit Michael. Because they all work from the same play book.

There is a strong incentive to sell salacious story's about MJ in the media. And yes even MJs "friends" are tempted and often give in for the money.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top